<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Washington Times Again Cites Dubious Anti-Immigrant Sources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2007/09/04/the-washington-times-again-cites-dubious-anti-immigrant-sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2007/09/04/the-washington-times-again-cites-dubious-anti-immigrant-sources/</link>
	<description>Hatewatch is a blog of the Southern Poverty Law Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the daily phosdex</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2007/09/04/the-washington-times-again-cites-dubious-anti-immigrant-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>the daily phosdex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2007/09/04/the-washington-times-again-cites-dubious-anti-immigrant-sources/#comment-858</guid>
		<description>Which should also be enough to raise &quot;red flags&quot; as to whether these same anti-immigrant groups also include among their articles of faith (howbeit in secret) appeals for &quot;right-thinking White Christian families&quot; to &quot;serve their racial and national duty&quot; by increasing their birth rates.

Even if it means deliberately banning abortion, contraception and family planning as much as pornography.

The which is in much the same camp as the Nicolae Ceaucescu regime in Romania (1966-89), which saw increased birth rates (couples being advised to have no less than five children) as one with hastening the Final Onset of Pure Socialism, never mind the clear and present risk of a labour surplus ensuing--anathema to Communist regimes and the planned socioeconomic paradigms they practiced.

Likewise with aparthid South Africa&#039;s P.W. Botha regime urging white families to &quot;Make Babies for Botha,&quot; claiming that national and racial honour required this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which should also be enough to raise &#8220;red flags&#8221; as to whether these same anti-immigrant groups also include among their articles of faith (howbeit in secret) appeals for &#8220;right-thinking White Christian families&#8221; to &#8220;serve their racial and national duty&#8221; by increasing their birth rates.</p>
<p>Even if it means deliberately banning abortion, contraception and family planning as much as pornography.</p>
<p>The which is in much the same camp as the Nicolae Ceaucescu regime in Romania (1966-89), which saw increased birth rates (couples being advised to have no less than five children) as one with hastening the Final Onset of Pure Socialism, never mind the clear and present risk of a labour surplus ensuing&#8211;anathema to Communist regimes and the planned socioeconomic paradigms they practiced.</p>
<p>Likewise with aparthid South Africa&#8217;s P.W. Botha regime urging white families to &#8220;Make Babies for Botha,&#8221; claiming that national and racial honour required this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2007/09/04/the-washington-times-again-cites-dubious-anti-immigrant-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2007/09/04/the-washington-times-again-cites-dubious-anti-immigrant-sources/#comment-688</guid>
		<description>I see two major problems with the ad campaign.
 
1.  The person in the video who was fictionally turned away from a job because the employer: (a) hired all foreign workers, and (b) did not want to even talk to any U.S. workers.  The video blames this on the labor certification process (required labor market test to sponsor a foreign worker) and its totally wrong on the law.  
 
If a potentially qualified U.S. worker submits a resume for a labor certification ad, that person must be screened to see if they meet the minimum qualifications for the position.  If a qualified, able and willing U.S. worker results from the labor certification recruitment, then the employer cannot proceed with the labor certification process and select a foreign worker to fill the position on a permanent basis.
 
2.  If an employer indicates it only wants to talk with foreign workers, it commits citizenship discrimination and is subject to prosecution by the Dept. of Justice, Office of Special Counsel.  The OSC pursued employers whose ads indicated they only wanted to hire foreign workers earlier this year (or late last year) and those employers had to cease their activities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see two major problems with the ad campaign.</p>
<p>1.  The person in the video who was fictionally turned away from a job because the employer: (a) hired all foreign workers, and (b) did not want to even talk to any U.S. workers.  The video blames this on the labor certification process (required labor market test to sponsor a foreign worker) and its totally wrong on the law.  </p>
<p>If a potentially qualified U.S. worker submits a resume for a labor certification ad, that person must be screened to see if they meet the minimum qualifications for the position.  If a qualified, able and willing U.S. worker results from the labor certification recruitment, then the employer cannot proceed with the labor certification process and select a foreign worker to fill the position on a permanent basis.</p>
<p>2.  If an employer indicates it only wants to talk with foreign workers, it commits citizenship discrimination and is subject to prosecution by the Dept. of Justice, Office of Special Counsel.  The OSC pursued employers whose ads indicated they only wanted to hire foreign workers earlier this year (or late last year) and those employers had to cease their activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eh</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2007/09/04/the-washington-times-again-cites-dubious-anti-immigrant-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>eh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2007/09/04/the-washington-times-again-cites-dubious-anti-immigrant-sources/#comment-674</guid>
		<description>You should concentrate on any data and its accuracy, rather than the supposed &#039;dubiousness&#039; of a source. Intelligent people will find you a lot easier to take seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should concentrate on any data and its accuracy, rather than the supposed &#8216;dubiousness&#8217; of a source. Intelligent people will find you a lot easier to take seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
