A couple things:

Claiming radical right wingers, skinheads and the like are anything but insignificant is plain out and out bias.

If they’re insignificant, please explain why Ron Paul is getting about 10% of the vote so far? (And don’t anyone blame it on mainstream Republicans or conservatives, or you’ll destroy your own argument.) Ever look at who’s supporting that guy? Now they get their own candidate!

Re: the lop-sided reportage here–I agree. I’m a mainstream conservative, but I keep my eye on the extremist right because I loathe sharing the words “right” or “conservative” with them. But it’s obvious to me that anyone right-of-center, even marginally so, is considered an extremist, a racist, or a bigot here. Wouldn’t it be more productive to welcome conservatives to the cause of anti-bigotry? I look at the blogroll and see nothing but bigotry, in the way said bloggers paint “all conservatives” with a broad brush, as though we’re all Pat Buchanan, Gary North, or David Duke. I am very dedicated to anti-racist causes, but even I have a hard time wading through the very left-wing, prejudiced (!) vibe toward people like me that exists here. I still do come here to read, but I have to turn a blind eye to more than I’d like and chalk it up to strong bias (one might call that “bias” prejudice, too).

I’m sure the extremists on the far right love seeing SPLC and some commenters (I’m lookin’ at you, Atheist, with your nonsensical comment) going after mainstream conservatives, because it can/does have the effect of discrediting SPLC with a large swath of potential supporters.

Not a very smart way of doing business, if you ask me. (And it’s not that the SPLC is the only one guilty of alienating potential allies–it seems to be the modus operandi among many on the Left, and then they think conservatives don’t care about racism?)

Funny, that.

Anybody that reads the above in its entirety will know that you have been more than effectively responded to in advance. Nothing you write will change that. Any nonsense you add only lessens your credibility.

No more in depth comments here. It’s a waste of time. The intelligence factor is almost zero. But, more importantly, there’s almost zero traffic to this thread and the site in general doesn’t have but a handful of contributors.

You’ve served our purpose in helping us get our message out and revealing your true believer mindset, now you can rave on. We don’t mind at all.

OMG! What a freakin` moron who watches loony tunes or nickelodeon kiddie shows all day. (Calpso Louie`s? Whatever the f*** that is.)
Howdy, do you have anything better to do like, fix one of them broken down cars in your front yard? Yet, your calling people idiots when you don’t have anything to say intelliegently yourself. And if you claimed that “Westernman`s” statements are wrong, lets see if you can prove him otherwise, or shut-up.

And speaking of your “drooling” remarks, I rather spit in the face of a Nazi. Just keep watching your Sylvester and Daffy Duck toons.

You should see if you can hitch a ride on one of Calypso Louie’s space ships that he claims he uses to fly to the moon on many occassions.

I despise George Bush and the entire family, but you’re more of an idiot than they are.

Talk about hare-brained conspiracy theorists! Do you drool and slobber when you write, or just when you rave?

Glad you admit that you are wrong.

Crossbow again impedimentally spat out: “incidentally, I was right wasn’t I?
I mean about you(r) being to cowardly to write me.”

Yeah, sure buddy so you can uh….
get all violently ugly behing the scenes. Are you afraid to post your credits here???

Mr. Crossbow does not, however, possessed the rational understanding of how serious White Supremacists hategroups really are, here for those who have forgotten history:

COINTELPRO
Was a covert governmental program imbedded with FBI informats and undercover agents to infilitrate and usurp the ranks of Anti-Government & Hate groups such as KKK, American Nazi Party and the Weathermen et al etc. Their goal was to discredit, distort, dismantle and disperse the pliable and often times dysfunctional hategroups. Some of the head neo-nazis are FBI informats if not, outright FBI agents. This is evident by recent activities such as the Florida Klan rally which was runned by an FBI informer. The Bill White smear of Ron Paul, and of course Hal Turner who is the most obvious FBI agent provocatuer on the planet.
Hence their “dirty tricks” paid off.
Jewish infilitration into the White Supremacists groups are not uncommon.

BUT WHAT THE CROSSBOW DOESN’T KNOW!!!! Was that George W. Bush`s grandfather was a Nazi himself. Prescott Bush`s assets in the Banking Union were siezed in 1942 soley because of his finacial interests of claiming to have funded the Hitler`s Third Reich before the war was over.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story
And yet still to this day the system continues to erode, thanks to the right winged politicians who voted in favor of George W. Bush with the current war in Iraq/Afahnistan costing American tax payers a whopping $1 trillion and counting…..

Crossbow: I don’t have to. You prove my point with every paragraph you write.

Incidentally, I was right, wasn’t I?

I mean about your being too cowardly to write me.

I mispelled a word in my sentences which should be spelled out “misunderstood” in the end of the first paragraph. And once again, if C-bow thinks “Bad Blood” was “proven wrong”,
Why don’t he tell that the to Intelligence reproter who wrote it…..

Crossbow says: “I do” in response to my first question. F.Y.I. He talks about me trying to produce a “case with them”. His misunderstanding was that I based facts and because of his own incomprehensions, he thinks I’m playing lawyer. His stance is nonsense.
CB: “when the opposition resorts to name calling”.

Yeah huh….who am I opposing again?
F.Y.I. KKK, Neo-Nazis, Nativists Extremists, La Raza and Mecha,et al etc. Duh…..

“Then its proof positive that they know they lost the arguement”

Huh???? Where, and how is that so, Charlie???

“But more importantly, that they’re only alternative to using logic and fact which was proven wrong.”

Oh my Gosh!!!! Tell me Walt Hilderman is he blind??? I posted absolute factual truths, look again C-bow!!!
Bad Blood posted by the Intelligence Reports right in here!!! I dare you look that up. The other source I posted was an independent source not relavant to SPLC straight from the University of Colorado!!! This tells me you suffer from severe reading incomprehension. Face it, you’re a dimwit.

“Is to hurl insults”
Why, of course skeletor. I have a personality. If you assumed everybody`s gotta think, talk, write like you. Then you’re a loon. Again, unlike you I do not attack other people. Not only you attacked me. You also attacked CobraWays(see above). Yoo attacked the Atheist, Mark Antony and perhaps Walt Hilderman just to name a few.
Enough with your trivial blathers, I will no longer address you after this. Its ridiculous. Obvisiously, you have some kind of personal agenda going on. You’re critical of everybody. Your extreme state of denial in viewing evidence before you is trite and slim. Unlike you, I do not entertain the thought of playing with words in order to galvanize confusion. And lastly, quit putting words into my mouth….

Crossbow response: I do, and if your comprehension were better you would understand that.

“You are typing in the same blog within the “source” that can provide LINKS to whites on non-whites violence, idiot. You need to shake your numbskull and wake up into realization.”

Crossbow: Heh, heh, heh. Well, when the opposition resorts to name calling, then it’s proof positive they know they’ve lost the argument, but, more importantly, they realize that their only alternative to using logic and facts, which were proven wrong, is to hurl insults.

I would ask you to contact me direct at bwcrossbow@yahoo.com.sg and I would be more than happy to discuss the matter further. You won’t, of course, because you lack courage.

Westernman: “Holy cripes! Did you just come up with that concept? Dimwit, that all depends on the circumstances surrounding non-white on white crime.

Crossbow: And the crimes I gave links to all prove that these attacks ARE obviously hate crimes if you had the intelligence to understand the reporting and the facts.

W.M. “If you see a black man punch a white man in a bar(heck we see this all the time in movies and somtimes in reality) is not a “hatecrime regarded as such”.

Crossbow: And you go on to say I’m not making sense? LOL. There were no claims that such an incident was a hate crime. Can’t understand that can you?

W.M. :”…..neglected considering the increased violence on native women by whites is no exception but a great sample of your quote. Reading your 2nd paragraph is indecipherable and incoherent but making out what you’re trying to say is that you haven’t read a single white supremacist`s website from what I understand with your lack of knowledge in that area.”

Crossbow: And, again, you have the gall to say somnething I wrote is indecipherable?

You accuse me of being unclear, then follow up with an incoherent rant like that? LOL

Heh, heh, heh. You come across as one of those types who arrive at an event where you don’t want the opposition to speak, scream, rave, and display hysterical grief, then chain yourself to others, with tears streaming down your face, ready to die to prevent rhetoric you delusionally believe will corrupt the world.

And, if somebody would ask you why you do that, you would say that you do so, because you hate fanaticism.

LOL You’re quite entertaining.

“I heard that they went as far as to take the head of a raccoon and put it in the mailbox of a Latino family. No one reported on this at all. Between the raccoon incident, physically attacked students of color, chasing students of non-traditional sexual orientation around with sticks, and screaming profanities at pedestrians during their infantile protests, I wonder why the university has not taken more serious action against the YAF.”

Crossbow wrote: When I read what you had to say above, I ran a Google on the group, Young Americans for Freedom,” and checked some other reliable sources.

The Young Americans for Freedom is a conservative group that has formed on some university campuses, under university guidelines for conduct, rhetoric and the like. They’re pro-Republican, and sometimes sponser speaking events from conservative speakers like Ann Couleter, Tom Tancredo, etc.

When Tom Tancredo arrived to speak, there was an unruly mob that screamed, shouted and just general behaved like neanderthals.

I located a clip reporting it on Fox’s Hannity and Colmes.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HOXSXL1auNk

Too, there were reports that after that affair the miscreants attacked a few YAF members with sticks and tried to assault them, chasing them down the street, screaming profanities.

Obviously, what you have done is turned the situation around, intending to give the impression it was the YAF group that was the unruly mob.

The YAF would have had their group accreditation annulled by the university if they did anything like that, and you full well know it. You should be ashamed of yourself for telling such lies. You probably are doing so just because you fanatically despise conservatives, because they disagree with your radical agenda. I suspect that one of those people could have been you in that mob on the Fox clip with the bandanna over his face, because he knew if he were recognized he could be prosecuted.

I’m not sure, but I think that this is the same group who sponsored Ann Coulter to speak and the neanderthals threw a pie in her face.

The only reason anybody could be afraid of listening to another point of view is because the person is so emotionally wrought into a fanatical mindset for a cause that can’t be logically supported, he cannot allow anybody else to speak what he knows is the truth for fear of having his entire base of beliefs assigned to the outer fringes by listeners, and he often displays a frothing mouth in his pursuit to prevent that from happening any way he can.

Like Nazism. Or communism. Or Fascism.

And, as was the policy of the above, he believes the end justify the means.

I forgot to add the letter “s” in” Who say”s” I’m trying to docotor up a case for them?”

Sorry, I’m in a hurry.

“Yes their rehtoric can be hostile, but there is no way you can make a case for them committing more hatecrimes,”

Who say I’m trying to doctor up a case for them?

“With a link that reports only white on non-white violence”

You are typing in the same blog within the “source” that can provide LINKS to whites on non-whites violence, idiot. You need to shake your numbskull and wake up into realization.

“Because every non-white on white assualt and murders are purely and simply hate crimes but are never regarded as such.”

Holy cripes! Did you just come up with that concept? Dimwit, that all depends on the circumstances surrounding non-white on white crime. If you see a black man punch a white man in a bar(heck we see this all the time in movies and somtimes in reality) is not a “hatecrime regarded as such”.

“Because the authorities that give the press would probably cause a large scale civic upheavel”

The media(mainstream or therwise) have the right to Freedom of the Press to report such crimes. Maybe not in your area but we did see one recently where a non-white family`s residence was vandalized with hate words & swastika graffiti just a couple months back. I can do an archive search for that article if needed.

“And they think they’re being civic-minded by keeping a lid on things”

Yes, and why don’t you ask the local tribes people who are the only race that goes un-reported and neglected considering the increased violence on native women by whites is no exception but a great sample of your quote. Reading your 2nd paragraph is indecipherable and incoherent but making out what you’re trying to say is that you haven’t read a single white supremacist`s website from what I understand with your lack of knowledge in that area. But if you want another example of how dangerous skinheads are then read the SPLC`s recent intelligence reports titled “BAD BLOOD”. This one took place in my state(not my hometown) of Arizona in Maricopa County. Amanda Crow is a good example of White on White hatecrime. And this is the latest incident reported. Now that I have to go to work, be back at it later…..

I heard that they went as far as to take the head of a raccoon and put it in the mailbox of a Latino family. No one reported on this at all. Between the raccoon incident, physically attacked students of color, chasing students of non-traditional sexual orientation around with sticks, and screaming profanities at pedestrians during their infantile protests, I wonder why the university has not taken more serious action against the YAF.

The SPLC is doing a service to democracy by monitoring the Michigan State University Young Americans for Freedom. Keep up the great work!

Crossbow response: Yes, their rhetoric can be hostile, but there’s no way you can make a case for them committing more hate crimes with a link that reports only white on non-white violence, because every non-white on white assault and many of the murders are purely and simply hate crimes, but are never regarded as such. Why? Because the authorities know that to give the same press to non-white on white violence would probably cause large scale civil upheaval, and they think they’re being civic-minded by keeping a lid on things.

And another thing is that you’re still condoning the suppression of anti-white attacks. Why? Surely you must be like the rest of us and are concerned for the safety of your family and friends, are you not? The silence these so-called hate watch groups offer ENCOURAGES these kinds of hostilities, tacitly encouraging these criminals to go at it non-stop. Since condemning the attacks would undoubtedly help curtail them, and it isn’t done, I can reach no conclusion other than they’re o.k. with them. Why? Are they trying to start a war, or get more of us killed? I don’t know, but I’m in the process of learning why. Something is wrong with this picture. Concentrating on a few right wing lunatics who don’t have two nickles to rub together and zero power and clout, while ignoring unprovoked non-white racial attacks against innocent people is criminal and starkly indicates that an underlying agenda is at play here.

So far as the media playing down non-white on white attacks, because they fear civil upheaval is concerned, the fact of the matter is that they’re right! If they gave the same press to non-white on white attacks as they do to the reverse, it would indeed cause armed conflict, I have no doubt, because racial animosity and hatred against whites expressed by inter-racial attacks are a 100 plus times more common. They occur almost every day., but nowadays they’re not able to keep a lid on things as effective as before, and we’re seeing a white backlash.

Forget white racist groups, Westernman. The big problem now is coming within the mainstream white community who are getting fed up. Read the newspaper forums about the latest anti-white beating on a bus against a white lady by 9 blacks, and you’ll find an unusually large amount of radical, outraged posts are coming from middleclass America. Read some of the conservative blogs like World Net Daily that has readers in the millions everyday. They didn’t used to report on anti-white violence, but they are now. And don’t respond by claiming WND is a right wing hate group, because that’s nonsense. Conservative? Yes. But hateful? Not hardly.

And so far as your claim that skinhead groups are citing the possibility of civil war doesn’t prove anything other than they’ve reached the same conclusion as many others have, including Martin Van Crevald, The Transformation of War, William Lind, Military.com, Pat Buchanan, Dr. Sam Huntington, Harvard, The Clash of Civilizations, etc., and so far as Civil War II is concerned, the book, you’d better damn well believe I’ve read it myself and what the author says makes a lot of sense to me and many others.

Even SPLC in one of its intelligence reports had this to say about the situation today:

The Rift
Evidence of a divide between blacks and Hispanics mounting
By Susy Buchanan

“One after another, the reports have rolled in. From Florida to California, Nevada to New Jersey, even as far away as the state of Washington, the news is getting harder to ignore: There’s trouble brewing between blacks and browns.”

So, while the SPLC isn’t reporting about the numerous non-white in white hate attacks, even they found it hard to ignore that there is much racial problems between the masses that do not involve the white population, indicating that it isn’t just the skinheads who see this.

Your making a mistake by not taking authentic information into consideration, because it comes from people you loathe. An old military intelligence strategy that has won many battles, which involves keeping an ear out for voices everywhere in order to make an accurate analysis of current situations, has taught many tacticians that listening to the opposition could well mean the difference between victory and defeat.

We’re edging closer to all out upheaval every day, and not many are bright enought to see it.
Condemning one side but ignoring the other which is worse by numerous multiples is asking for violent radicalism to thrive.

Crossbow response: That’s absolutely false, and it is just that kind of disinformation that has prompted those of us here who have vividly pointed out the depth and scope of anti-white violence to call for a halt to it by groups who claim to be against hate.

Did you look at the above links regarding anti-white black violence? I could give you a hundred more, and the reason they occur is because they’re never criticized for their hateful racist attacks, and it’s people like you that condone them by pretending they don’t exist. You’re trying to convince us the right wingers are doing more? Preposterous!

The big problem today, my friend, is anti-white hatred and violence, which so grossly overshadows these insignificant right wing groups you want us to believe are powerful it isn’t even a close call. Right wing fanatics are a miniscule bunch in this country, and every last one of them are poorly funded or not funded at all. The real problem with racism and hate come from anti-white blacks and HIspanics in this country. Asians and others are o.k. and are glad to be here in order to improve their lot.

The only reason anyone or any group would pretend otherwise is because they’re not pursuing an agenda of anti-hate, but are pursuing a policy of hatred themselves against the radical right, but, most importantly, they’re condoning black/Hispanic on white attacks, because it would take away from their agenda if they did so. To say the SPLC doesn’t give much attention to non-white on white violence and hatred, because they’re concentrating so much on the radical right fringe is ludicrous. Hate is hate, and concentration on the lesser of two factions is ludicrous.

Claiming radical right wingers, skinheads and the like are anything but insignificant is plain out and out bias.

But times are changing. The comment forums after the mainline newspapers on the net today are chocked full of white rage from Joe Sixpack and Sally Soccermom. They’re finally beginning to notice the disparity between reports of a scant few white racist attacks and those by non-whites, and they’re sounding outraged and radical. Blogs from people who are mainline conservatives are also now inclusive of anti-white violence and hatred, where they weren’t before.

Joe Horn in Texas shot two black burglars in his front yard, and it looks as if The Texas castle law will protect him from prosecution, and the killing was quite blatant.

Literally dozens of relatively RECENT black on white attacks and murders, are finally beginning to draw white backlashes. , but what is so significant is that the voices rising in protest are getting more numerous and far more strident. .

The groundswell I believe really began with the Fat Tuesday, black on white beatings in New Orleans and Seattle a while back, where innocent whites were assaulted by blacks. One white male was killed by having his head beat in with a club by blacks as he was trying to help a white girl who was being mobbed and beaten by them. With each atrocity that has occurred since then we’re seeing more and more whites speaking out more and getting progressively more militant. Thanks to the internet black on white attacks are known instantly and the MSM has a problem with trying to cover them up, because they’re forced to report them locally, and in this day and age of the internet nothing is now known only locally. The growing anger by whites has accrelerated since then, with most of it becoming very noticable the last 3 or 4 years.

And what is especially significant about this trend is that several states have now passed some form of the “Stand your ground law,” or the “Castle Doctrine,” which gives a victim the right to use deadly force against an attacker to protect himself or his property against the threat of death or serious injury. The first, of course was Florida, then Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Idaho, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi and South Dakota. Similar bills are pending in 16 other states. The NRA is undertaking a big push right now to encourage passage of the law in states that don’t yet have it.

In addition to this law, if I’m remembering correctly, there are now 30 states that allow concealed carry permits, with more to follow.

What all this means, of course, is that we have a growing segment of the white population that is getting angry enough to start shooting in self defense, and laws are being passed to give them a right to carry a concealed weapon and the legal right to use it without question.

So there could be many more Joe Horn incidents in the foreseeable future, and whether he’s indicted or not doesn’t matter. People will just be more determined to shoot within the limits of the law.

With the economy now teetering on the brink of a severe economic downturn, it is within reason to give serious consideration to an armed white backlash, because there’s no question that anti-white hatred and violence will accelerate, although I will concede that provocation for such a happening will have to be quite severe in itself, but the way things are going there might be just that. My voice is raising the alarm, because I don’t want to see that happen.

“USA right wingers love violence”

It is so totally true and the history shows it. Nonetheless, they do possessed some adequate degree of violent tendencies. Not only that but they also commit the MOST hatecrimes responsible, past and present. Look here:

http:///www.findarticles.com/p/articles/hatecrimes

“In 1996, the state of Colorado reported 133 hatecrimes with 10 incidents at the University. And only 4 of which were comitted by non-whites.”

4 out of 133 incidents committed by no-whites??? Wow!!! One good example.
That certainly says it all. Keep the focus on White Supremacists, SPLC.
After reading boths sides Whites and Browns. I will have to say that the White Supremacists says the most vile crap ever spewed forth, again not because of their most violent rehtorics but the MOST speeches ever recorded. There are numerous postings that I will not place here because I don’t have to, its no secret that the Extreme Radical Right promotes what they call “the coming race war in the Americas” or “Civil War 2″. …..some really pathetic crap there.

So who’s sorry now???

“You are correct. I just started reading into the websites of La Raza and Mecha trying to get an insight of what they’re about. And what troubles me for instance is how “Mecha”(a non-profit organization consist of students) claims that they are the true “indigneous peoples of this “Aztlan”.

“But as far as these groups(La Raza or Mecha) is concerned, I haven’t yet read anywhere for them committing any hatecrimes, ”

Crossbow response: “Well, I have to agree with your there, Westernman, I haven’t read anything about them committing hate crimes…………..or should I say “yet,” because their rhetoric, though covered by free speech, is more vile than anything I’ve read from any other group in the country. They even advocate killing white people.

Takle a look at this guy, Professor Guiterrez, still working at the Univ. of Texas after the below quote:

“We have an aging white America.They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population… I love it. They are shitting in their pants with fear. I love it.”, “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”– Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas.Reference is MSE HTML source doc: URL

Or how about this guy. Another professor. He doesn’t specifically say they should kill the Gringo, but he wants to take over the US Southwest by any means necessary which is the same thing.

“Republica del Norte,” the Republic of the North, which would include the present U.S. states of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, plus southern Colorado, along with several current Mexican states, is “an inevitability.” The new “Hispanic homeland” should be brought into being “by any means necessary.” — Charles Truxillo, professor, University of New Mexico

And then there’s this guy, another high profile elitist, loudly proclaiming racist intent to take over California.

“California is going to be a Hispanic state, and anyone who doesn’t like it should leave. They should go back to Europe.” — Mario Obledo, co-founder and President of MALDEF, 1968 to 1973; President of the League of United Latin American Citizens 1983-85, California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare 1975-82, awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bill Clinton Obledo

“The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot.” — Excelsior – The national newspaper of Mexico

“We are practicing La Reconquista in California.” — Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General

“We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos…non-Latinos aren’t watching, they aren’t raising questions”–Fernando Guerra, professor, Loyola Marymount

Crossbow: Here’s my big complaint about all of this. None of it is reported and condemned by any mainstream source, including the SPLC. Though, so far as I know, they aren’t in the process of doing anything violent, is there any question that they’re advocating hate and a violent takeover of the US Southwest, if “worse comes to worst?”

If it’s hate we want to control, how about starting here?

Dude, it’s simple. USA Right wingers love violence. USA Left wingers do not. There have been violent leftist groups in the past, the Weathermen, the SLA, etc., but they have had nothing even remotely close to the range or staying power of the dedicated Right Wing hate groups, like the KKK or anti-Gay groups. That is why the SPLC focuses on right-wing hate groups- there are so many more and they are so much more powerful.

http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/20…

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13422602

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRPHhF-Np6k

The KlanWatch has indeed intensified, but, As you have seen in 2007, there is now a Klan watching the Klan. No negative junk out there just a group that saw the problem and had the ballz enough to stand up to even the worst and most notorious Foul mouthed individuals.

If our society does not have the initiative to stand up and listen to those sitting down, then we all shall perish.
So, everyone make an entry here on this blog and focus on what you see with your own eyes.

50 % of all you read on the net is 100 % Crappola .

SPLC you have some house cleaning to do also.
NO OFFENSE JUST FACT

Ken Mier Investigator ACK

You are correct. I just started reading into the websites of La Raza and Mecha trying to get an insight of what they’re about. And what troubles me for instance is how “Mecha”(a non-profit organization consist of students) claims that they are the true “indigneous peoples of this “Aztlan”. And their motives is questionalble. So I asked some of my Native American buddies what their opinion is on this group. They could not relate to Mecha and do not support or associate with them in any way. Most Natives are primarliy English speakers and their opinions vary, they believed that this Latino/Chicano movement is a theft of their identity their cultural significance and heritage. I guess the same can be said for some Black Americans too. Look up Ted Hayes @chooseblackamerica.com and the Crispus Attack Brigade. However, I can’t blame them for that. It is still a perplexing issue on where most Native Americans stand on immigration. But as far as these groups(La Raza or Mecha) is concerned, I haven’t yet read anywhere for them committing any hatecrimes, there is none that I am able to look up other than the fact that they are just excersizing their Freedom of Speech just what the National Socialist Movement(MSN) or Stormfront.org is doing. SPLC does indeed report hate crimes comitted by Mexican Mafia and other Latino street gangs in L.A. Look into SPLC`s “ethnic cleansing in L.A.” 2006 intelligence reports states that Mexicans gangsters are committing hate crimes.

It is 2008 and we are ready for his challenge of the New Civil Rights ERA.

Seems like everyone is waiting on the politicians, HUH ?
It’s up to the Citizens to create change.

Into action, Let’s do something great in 2008.

on December 26th, 2007 at 11:15 pm

“Crossbow says:
“In fact, I am a news junkie and can say with some authority and definite knowledge that there are far more left wing hate groups and non-white hate groups than there are of the radical white supremacist groups. Far more. Yet no mentioned on this site.” LOL!!!!”

Crossbow: I listed several three differenbt times now, but the moderator refused to post my comments, even though they were links to mainstream new sites, so I won’t try to post them again.

It’s deplorable that the SPLC will not post legitimate items, because they’re not in line with what they want us to believe. Nobody should submerge the truth. It’s only through debate and discussion solutions to problems are can be achieved.

My email address is: bwcrossbow@yahoo.com.sg

Please write to me, and I will be more than happy to provide you with whatever back up info you need.