<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAPS Board Member Responds Angrily to Request for Comment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/</link>
	<description>Hatewatch is a blog of the Southern Poverty Law Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Mundt</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-33397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Mundt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-33397</guid>
		<description>Another interesting thing I&#039;ve noticed is this website&#039;s &quot;Hatewatch&quot; graphic image at the top of the page. The editors/ administrators of this site went to great pains to use a photo of an obviously white skinned, blue eyed man. Does ANYONE out there think this smacks of racism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another interesting thing I&#8217;ve noticed is this website&#8217;s &#8220;Hatewatch&#8221; graphic image at the top of the page. The editors/ administrators of this site went to great pains to use a photo of an obviously white skinned, blue eyed man. Does ANYONE out there think this smacks of racism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High John de Conquerer</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-33127</link>
		<dc:creator>High John de Conquerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-33127</guid>
		<description>Hubert is right. The SPLC is a liberal hate group that is like Hizbollah - it does a few good things and a bunch of bad things. 

The recent worst was representing an illegal alien drug smuggler under the guise of &quot;immigrant justice.&quot; They have stolen millions in donations from gullible donors who falsely believe they are a good cause. Now, those poor donors are supporting Mexican drug cartels.

The SPLC is a danger to debate and civil society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hubert is right. The SPLC is a liberal hate group that is like Hizbollah &#8211; it does a few good things and a bunch of bad things. </p>
<p>The recent worst was representing an illegal alien drug smuggler under the guise of &#8220;immigrant justice.&#8221; They have stolen millions in donations from gullible donors who falsely believe they are a good cause. Now, those poor donors are supporting Mexican drug cartels.</p>
<p>The SPLC is a danger to debate and civil society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrannyofWhites</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-32186</link>
		<dc:creator>GrannyofWhites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-32186</guid>
		<description>For some reason, Eddie, several lines of your post are not visible.
Some time ago I looked at the names of the attorneys who are now representing SPLC.  Many were of Hispanic descent.
I think that may be the reason for the change in direction of SPLC&#039;s focus.
They are the new Germans.
They have even threatened (in California, after the Prop 187 mess) that they will learn who their ENEMIES are.  
These were Hispanic American political leaders threatening Americans who try to oppose illegal immigration.
Fortunately, through private communications, Americans can congregate and share this information.
I feel like we are living in Nazi Germany - today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason, Eddie, several lines of your post are not visible.<br />
Some time ago I looked at the names of the attorneys who are now representing SPLC.  Many were of Hispanic descent.<br />
I think that may be the reason for the change in direction of SPLC&#8217;s focus.<br />
They are the new Germans.<br />
They have even threatened (in California, after the Prop 187 mess) that they will learn who their ENEMIES are.<br />
These were Hispanic American political leaders threatening Americans who try to oppose illegal immigration.<br />
Fortunately, through private communications, Americans can congregate and share this information.<br />
I feel like we are living in Nazi Germany &#8211; today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Mundt</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-32184</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Mundt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-32184</guid>
		<description>As a late to wake up reformed 70&#039;s liberal, I can tell you all that the smear tactics of personal destruction employed by the SPLC are the stock in trade of the left. For the left, it has never been about an open discussion of the facts. The primary tactic is to label through mass media any opposing viewpoint as that of a &quot;racist&quot;, &quot;nazi&quot;, &quot;hater&quot;, or &quot;nativist&quot;. The debate is therefore stifled, a true assault on freedom of speech and expression. Legal apparatus such as the ACLU and MALDEF have also been employed to this end, providing additional suppression of individuals and local governments opposed to illegal immigration by threatening or instituting civil suits over so called &quot;hate speech&quot;. These are the same tactics used by the Nazi party in WWII Germany to stifle opposition, and similar to the pressures applied to citizens of the former Soviet Union who needed &quot;re-education&quot; in their gulags for making statements against the power structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a late to wake up reformed 70&#8217;s liberal, I can tell you all that the smear tactics of personal destruction employed by the SPLC are the stock in trade of the left. For the left, it has never been about an open discussion of the facts. The primary tactic is to label through mass media any opposing viewpoint as that of a &#8220;racist&#8221;, &#8220;nazi&#8221;, &#8220;hater&#8221;, or &#8220;nativist&#8221;. The debate is therefore stifled, a true assault on freedom of speech and expression. Legal apparatus such as the ACLU and MALDEF have also been employed to this end, providing additional suppression of individuals and local governments opposed to illegal immigration by threatening or instituting civil suits over so called &#8220;hate speech&#8221;. These are the same tactics used by the Nazi party in WWII Germany to stifle opposition, and similar to the pressures applied to citizens of the former Soviet Union who needed &#8220;re-education&#8221; in their gulags for making statements against the power structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Tabash</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-32103</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Tabash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-32103</guid>
		<description>I am also on the board of directors of CAPS.  My colleague on that board, biology professor, Stu Hurlbert, just alerted me to the fact that his comments have been published on this blog.  I would like to provide my take on this.

  I like to refer to myself as the &quot;token liberal Democrat&quot; in the immigration reduction movement.  There should be more of us involved in this.  For me, as the son of an Auschwitz surviving mother, I had better have a very good reason to now want to curtail the number of immigrants who come to the U.S. each year.  I&#039;m afraid that I do have that justification.  It is overpopulation

   California now has 38 million people.  We sustain a net growth of at least 500,000 per year.  At current levels of immigration, legal, illegal, and their offspring, the U.S. will have one billion people at the turn of the century.

   My heart goes out to the illegal entrants who want to come here seeking a better life.  However, we cannot absorb them, nor the large numbers of legal immigrants who wish to enter the United States, with large numbers of that group settling in California, primarily southern California.
  
   The majority of even illegal aliens are decent people just seeking a better life.  However, no nation can be expected to forfeit its sovereign control of its borders and be deprived of knowing who is coming in at any moment in time.  We would not leave the doors to our homes open, if we were assured that 80% of those who enter without our knowledge will be benevolent, but just 20% will be criminals.

   I will admit that in this century, millions of people, and these are not just people from Mexico and other Central American nations, but from places like Bangladesh, the Sudan, and Somalia, will die, either because of oppressive governments or because of abject poverty, if they cannot move to the United States.  Yet, we still  cannot absorb every human being on this planet who lives in dreadful circumstances in another country.  This is not racism.  It is common sense arithmetic.

    I have alway admired the Southern  Poverty law Center.  SPLC and I just each filed briefs with the California Supreme Court in the effort to legalize same sex marriage.  SPLC has done great service to the nation in exposing true white supremacists.  However, it greatly saddens me to see an otherwise fine organization spew out unfair and unjust accusations of hate against those of us who have the courage to state the obvious: High numbers of legal and illegal immigration will, in totality, result in a severe overpopulation problem for the nation and particularly for California.

   It is grossly unfair of SPLC to charcterize people like me, who only want to curtail runaway population growth, as racists.  Unfortuantely the imputation of racism can be hurled by the far left as irresponsibly and as unjustly as the religious right accuses secular people of having morals that are inferior to religious-based ethics.

   Again, I grieve for every person on the planet who lives in dire circumstances and sees relocation to the United States as the only solution.  However, we cannot absorb every such person, nor can we let large numbers of them continue to unlawfully enter our borders with no idea who each such entrant is.  We must also drastically cut back on legal immigration.  

    The religious right must give in on family planning.  The left and corporate Republicans must give in on immigration.  To stabilize our population we need both birth control and border control.  

     If Sweden were the bordering nation and the same number of blond haired, blue eyed people tried to come across the border, as we now face with our southern border, my views would be the same.  I love and respect the Mexican people.  That does not, however, logically entail that I must accept  millions more of Mexican nationals, or nationals from any other country, who want to enter the U.S,, whether lawfully or unlawfully.

      I implore SPLC to not become the left wing equivalent of the religious right.  Stop hurling the epithet of racism at everybody who advocates ending illegal immigration and reducing legal immigration.  Let&#039;s all engage in an in depth intellectual dialogue on how many  more people the U.S. and California--particularly--can absorb.

      The religious right accuses its opponents of being immoral.  SPLC should not accuse conscientious minded immigration reductionists of racism.  Let&#039;s all rise to a new level of maturity and elevated rational dialogue as we attempt to grapple with how best to deal with the volatile issue of immigration.

Eddie Tabash</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also on the board of directors of CAPS.  My colleague on that board, biology professor, Stu Hurlbert, just alerted me to the fact that his comments have been published on this blog.  I would like to provide my take on this.</p>
<p>  I like to refer to myself as the &#8220;token liberal Democrat&#8221; in the immigration reduction movement.  There should be more of us involved in this.  For me, as the son of an Auschwitz surviving mother, I had better have a very good reason to now want to curtail the number of immigrants who come to the U.S. each year.  I&#8217;m afraid that I do have that justification.  It is overpopulation</p>
<p>   California now has 38 million people.  We sustain a net growth of at least 500,000 per year.  At current levels of immigration, legal, illegal, and their offspring, the U.S. will have one billion people at the turn of the century.</p>
<p>   My heart goes out to the illegal entrants who want to come here seeking a better life.  However, we cannot absorb them, nor the large numbers of legal immigrants who wish to enter the United States, with large numbers of that group settling in California, primarily southern California.</p>
<p>   The majority of even illegal aliens are decent people just seeking a better life.  However, no nation can be expected to forfeit its sovereign control of its borders and be deprived of knowing who is coming in at any moment in time.  We would not leave the doors to our homes open, if we were assured that 80% of those who enter without our knowledge will be benevolent, but just 20% will be criminals.</p>
<p>   I will admit that in this century, millions of people, and these are not just people from Mexico and other Central American nations, but from places like Bangladesh, the Sudan, and Somalia, will die, either because of oppressive governments or because of abject poverty, if they cannot move to the United States.  Yet, we still  cannot absorb every human being on this planet who lives in dreadful circumstances in another country.  This is not racism.  It is common sense arithmetic.</p>
<p>    I have alway admired the Southern  Poverty law Center.  SPLC and I just each filed briefs with the California Supreme Court in the effort to legalize same sex marriage.  SPLC has done great service to the nation in exposing true white supremacists.  However, it greatly saddens me to see an otherwise fine organization spew out unfair and unjust accusations of hate against those of us who have the courage to state the obvious: High numbers of legal and illegal immigration will, in totality, result in a severe overpopulation problem for the nation and particularly for California.</p>
<p>   It is grossly unfair of SPLC to charcterize people like me, who only want to curtail runaway population growth, as racists.  Unfortuantely the imputation of racism can be hurled by the far left as irresponsibly and as unjustly as the religious right accuses secular people of having morals that are inferior to religious-based ethics.</p>
<p>   Again, I grieve for every person on the planet who lives in dire circumstances and sees relocation to the United States as the only solution.  However, we cannot absorb every such person, nor can we let large numbers of them continue to unlawfully enter our borders with no idea who each such entrant is.  We must also drastically cut back on legal immigration.  </p>
<p>    The religious right must give in on family planning.  The left and corporate Republicans must give in on immigration.  To stabilize our population we need both birth control and border control.  </p>
<p>     If Sweden were the bordering nation and the same number of blond haired, blue eyed people tried to come across the border, as we now face with our southern border, my views would be the same.  I love and respect the Mexican people.  That does not, however, logically entail that I must accept  millions more of Mexican nationals, or nationals from any other country, who want to enter the U.S,, whether lawfully or unlawfully.</p>
<p>      I implore SPLC to not become the left wing equivalent of the religious right.  Stop hurling the epithet of racism at everybody who advocates ending illegal immigration and reducing legal immigration.  Let&#8217;s all engage in an in depth intellectual dialogue on how many  more people the U.S. and California&#8211;particularly&#8211;can absorb.</p>
<p>      The religious right accuses its opponents of being immoral.  SPLC should not accuse conscientious minded immigration reductionists of racism.  Let&#8217;s all rise to a new level of maturity and elevated rational dialogue as we attempt to grapple with how best to deal with the volatile issue of immigration.</p>
<p>Eddie Tabash</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-32032</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-32032</guid>
		<description>Theodore Roosevelt a las ideas de los inmigrantes y ser un americano en 1907.
 
&quot;En primer lugar, debemos insistir en que si el inmigrante que viene aquí de buena fe se convierte en un americano y asimila a sí mismo a nosotros, será tratada en una exacta igualdad con todos los demás, porque es un ultraje a discriminar en contra de cualquiera de esos porque el hombre de creencias, o lugar de nacimiento, o de origen. Pero esto se basa en que la persona se convierta en todas las facetas a un americano, y nada más que un americano ... No puede haber una lealtad dividida. Cualquier hombre que dice que él es un americano, pero también otra cosa, no es un americano en absoluto. Tenemos espacio para una sola bandera, pero, la bandera americana ... Tenemos espacio para un idioma pero aquí, y que es el idioma Inglés ... Y tenemos espacio para una sola pero la lealtad y que es una lealtad hacia el pueblo americano &#039;.
Theodore Roosevelt 1907

Cada ciudadano tiene que leer esto!
Mantener esto en marcha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theodore Roosevelt a las ideas de los inmigrantes y ser un americano en 1907.</p>
<p>&#8220;En primer lugar, debemos insistir en que si el inmigrante que viene aquí de buena fe se convierte en un americano y asimila a sí mismo a nosotros, será tratada en una exacta igualdad con todos los demás, porque es un ultraje a discriminar en contra de cualquiera de esos porque el hombre de creencias, o lugar de nacimiento, o de origen. Pero esto se basa en que la persona se convierta en todas las facetas a un americano, y nada más que un americano &#8230; No puede haber una lealtad dividida. Cualquier hombre que dice que él es un americano, pero también otra cosa, no es un americano en absoluto. Tenemos espacio para una sola bandera, pero, la bandera americana &#8230; Tenemos espacio para un idioma pero aquí, y que es el idioma Inglés &#8230; Y tenemos espacio para una sola pero la lealtad y que es una lealtad hacia el pueblo americano &#8216;.<br />
Theodore Roosevelt 1907</p>
<p>Cada ciudadano tiene que leer esto!<br />
Mantener esto en marcha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrannyofWhites</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-32016</link>
		<dc:creator>GrannyofWhites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-32016</guid>
		<description>If you really want equality, you must emphasize responsibility as well as rights.
Illegals display too much irresponsibility.  Some of their behavior is not even considered newsworthy, but the stories abound and are e-mailed privately.

If you want equality, you must stand for equal responsiblity - and that includes respect for law.

LAW - it&#039;s what you pretend to stand up for.  You have forgotten your priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you really want equality, you must emphasize responsibility as well as rights.<br />
Illegals display too much irresponsibility.  Some of their behavior is not even considered newsworthy, but the stories abound and are e-mailed privately.</p>
<p>If you want equality, you must stand for equal responsiblity &#8211; and that includes respect for law.</p>
<p>LAW &#8211; it&#8217;s what you pretend to stand up for.  You have forgotten your priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrannyofWhites</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-32015</link>
		<dc:creator>GrannyofWhites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-32015</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it okay for Mexicans to be nativist?  It is only whites who are condemned for &quot;nativism&quot;.  Other countries are quite protective of their own citizens and fight to keep illegals out. 

But, oh, I forget, they are brown or black and therefore, nativism is quite alright.

Open borders are the breeding place of hate.  There is no law there - and so it is ironic that the Southern Poverty Law Center is even involved.... with the lawlessness of illegal immigration.
As the amount of illegals increase, so does hate.
Humans are not ready for chaos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it okay for Mexicans to be nativist?  It is only whites who are condemned for &#8220;nativism&#8221;.  Other countries are quite protective of their own citizens and fight to keep illegals out. </p>
<p>But, oh, I forget, they are brown or black and therefore, nativism is quite alright.</p>
<p>Open borders are the breeding place of hate.  There is no law there &#8211; and so it is ironic that the Southern Poverty Law Center is even involved&#8230;. with the lawlessness of illegal immigration.<br />
As the amount of illegals increase, so does hate.<br />
Humans are not ready for chaos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrannyofWhites</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-32012</link>
		<dc:creator>GrannyofWhites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-32012</guid>
		<description>Yes, more about drug selling and Mexicans caught at the border with huge shipments of heroin, meth, and every illegal drug you can think of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, more about drug selling and Mexicans caught at the border with huge shipments of heroin, meth, and every illegal drug you can think of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrannyofWhites</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-32011</link>
		<dc:creator>GrannyofWhites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-32011</guid>
		<description>Now, let&#039;s see.  In my Sociology classes we could talk about groups.  It is perfectly &quot;legal&quot;.  In fact, our local Hispanic zealots talk about &quot;groups&quot; of illegals of their own nationality - giving them much, much credit for the positive things they do.  (Always ignoring the negative stories - which the white, Asian and black reporters are assigned to.)
The obvious bias is what is killing your cause.

Your credibility is dying.  And this is why the illegals are leaving and the general public is supporting anti-illegal immigration groups.  

The truth hurts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, let&#8217;s see.  In my Sociology classes we could talk about groups.  It is perfectly &#8220;legal&#8221;.  In fact, our local Hispanic zealots talk about &#8220;groups&#8221; of illegals of their own nationality &#8211; giving them much, much credit for the positive things they do.  (Always ignoring the negative stories &#8211; which the white, Asian and black reporters are assigned to.)<br />
The obvious bias is what is killing your cause.</p>
<p>Your credibility is dying.  And this is why the illegals are leaving and the general public is supporting anti-illegal immigration groups.  </p>
<p>The truth hurts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-31950</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-31950</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this, however horrifying it is.
The truth is always a good thing, it shows us who people really are...like the person above me!
Peace...love &amp; light
SPLC - You&#039;re the best! Long before it was popular to be soo good!
PW
Florida</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this, however horrifying it is.<br />
The truth is always a good thing, it shows us who people really are&#8230;like the person above me!<br />
Peace&#8230;love &amp; light<br />
SPLC &#8211; You&#8217;re the best! Long before it was popular to be soo good!<br />
PW<br />
Florida</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-31678</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 05:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/08/01/caps-board-member-responds-angrily-to-request-for-comment/#comment-31678</guid>
		<description>The SPLC is an anti-White organization.  I&#039;d speculate that one of the reasons that the SPLC smears/attacks anti-immigration organizations is that there would be a perceived benefit for Whites.  &quot;The sooner Whites are a minority the better!&quot;

The SPLC actually has an anti-White section:
/www.splcenter.org/blog/topics/anti-white/
but take a look at the number of articles posted in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SPLC is an anti-White organization.  I&#8217;d speculate that one of the reasons that the SPLC smears/attacks anti-immigration organizations is that there would be a perceived benefit for Whites.  &#8220;The sooner Whites are a minority the better!&#8221;</p>
<p>The SPLC actually has an anti-White section:<br />
/www.splcenter.org/blog/topics/anti-white/<br />
but take a look at the number of articles posted in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
