“I don’t think too kindly of you nor the “racists” you’re frequently defending. Your “feelings” are of no importance to me.”
- My feelings are hurt even worse!

“Just the truth, of the matter, common sense and rationale logic(see Asian [Aslan] Maskadov`s post).”
- Rational logic? Must you depend on Aslan for that?

This is true. However the ARA are pathetic children (check their web-site, it’s a howl). Their “story” is about as entertaining as how David Duke got his “PhD”.

There is enough foolishness to go around in discussions of this sort.
Much to my chagrin, I find that many on the far Left have a [not so] hidden anti-Semitic agenda when attacking Israel’s Geo-political policies. “Zionist” morphs into Jew after a short time & with enough vigor to warm the heart of any Klansman.
Frankly, I did not think Obama had enough foreign policy experience to warrant his presidency.
I do NOT vote for a candidate on the basis of race. Such a thing is tantamount to obvious racist thinking. But foreign policy alone does not a president make.
I felt a level of political maturity had been reached when the SPLC began to look clearly at all levels of racist ideology on both the Left & Right, White & Black.
And THAT is a tough road to travel! Try being Black & being critical of Antisemitism…. Or being Methodist & being Pro-choice….

My answer to you is, “Maybe.” After all, grammar is spelled with an “a”, not an “e” and you should write, “isn’t it amazing THAT, not “isn’t that amazing HOW”.

Also, you should have written “should this fact prevent me from trying TO express my opinion” not “prevent me trying express my opinion” .

I guess that IS my point. People who are “good at grammar and writing” have also (usually) learned to appreciate other cultures. You, on the other hand, my unlearned friend, have proven to all of us that you are an ignorant, “unlettered” bigot who should crack open a book occasionally. You might even learn something.

“My feelings are hurt”

I don’t think too kindly of you nor the “racists” you’re frequently defending. Your “feelings” are of no importance to me. Just the truth, of the matter, common sense and rationale logic(see Asian Maskadov`s post).

http://img404.imageshack.us/im.....eupko0.jpg

The man is turning into a vampire!!

Sort of feel sorry for him, he looks completely battered and beaten, and even has hints of plastic surgery. Meanwhile Don Black looks gushing with vigor, i mean why not, his Stormfront website keeps raking in the donations that he uses to renovate his home and buy yachts =]

For instance:
1. One doesn’t “discriminate other races” one “discriminates AGAINST other races.”

2. Hotels aren’t “privately run business’s” they are “privately-run businesses”.

3. “Mis-categorized” isn’t even a word.

4. “are few are actually smart…”
I guess that doesn’t apply to you…

5. It is not “admit yourselves as racist” it is “admit to yourselves that you are racists”.

6. You should write “really an affront” rather than “really afront” because affront is spelled with two “f”s, and is usually preceded by “an”.

7. “Wherever” is one word, CAL, and “ever-breeding” needs a hyphen between the words…

I think you all need to calm down, take a deep breath, and spell-check your ill-considered posts. I don’t want to suggest anything that might be uncomfortable for you, but maybe if you were smarter you wouldn’t feel so threatened by other people…

I guess it’s true – racists and hatemongers really are pathetic morons.

My feelings are hurt that you think of me in those terms!

Asian Maskadov,

I agree. But seeing how this conversation is going with Jonathan. I figured you’re wasting your time. You’re simply gonna have to accept the fact that there are some really lame, idiotic, trivial people on here who would rather play head games rather than come to reasonable terms both sides can agree on something. But with Jonathan, there is none. No matter how much you make sense in your arguments, to which you’ve made some valid points. Nevermind debating him because his obvious patterns of jewish style distortions will only follow.

Most of the posters here are weak-minded fools who are brainwashed with anti-White propaganda. But are few are actually smart and have intelligent things to say.

You’re right about EURO, but I’d call them a “love” group.

“I already stated it: Africans did not have the choice of assimilating into some kind of “black” classification, at the expense of their individual traditions and cultures. In other words, they will always some what be stuck with the term “black” Americans because they have no other choice.”
- They have choices: they now call themselves “African Americans”.

“It has zippo to do with it. Have you been keeping up with the news lately?”
- I keep up with the news. Ethnicity is influential. Sorry.

“A second generation Pakistani and a full-blooded Englishman have more in common culturally(in other words practically) than the Englishman has with a Czech or Serb.”
- I thought Trevor Phillips said that Britain was sleepwalking into segregation?

“You can’t just classify people as “Asians” and leave it at that.”
- Why not? I hereby now declare Asian people as “Asians”. See, it’s not so hard! You should give it a try!

“Mis-catagorized? It was made up to begin with, around the time of the Virginia Slave Laws.”
- OK, if you don’t like the term “White”, use “European-derived” instead or maybe even “Euro-Peeps”.

“OK, Aslan, so what was you point about Africans not coming here voluntarily?”

I already stated it: Africans did not have the choice of assimilating into some kind of “black” classification, at the expense of their individual traditions and cultures. In other words, they will always some what be stuck with the term “black” Americans because they have no other choice.

“Really? Of course not completely, but it has a big influence.”

It has zippo to do with it. Have you been keeping up with the news lately?

“Oh? I presume those to whom you refer are focusing more on their ethnic group than their race.”

No, often times simply nationality, as in citizenship. A second generation Pakistani and a full-blooded Englishman have more in common culturally(in other words practically) than the Englishman has with a Czech or Serb.

“Just because they “hate” it doesn’t invalidate it.”

It was never valid to begin with. You can’t just classify people as “Asians” and leave it at that.

“Just because they were mis-categorized doesn’t invalidate the concept. Sounds like “Abolish The White Race” Noel Ignatiev drivel.”

Mis-catagorized? It was made up to begin with, around the time of the Virginia Slave Laws. Before the Irish and Italians earned such hatred from the ruling class, it was poor English people who received all the scorn. Then they realized that if they didn’t find a way to divide the poor whites and black slaves, they would discover their common interests and eventually achieve a victorious revolution(there were plenty of slave revolts at that time involving both “races”).

If something is truly so important, so rooted in biological fact, such a crucial part of our society and is in fact timeless, WHY oh WHY did it change so much over time?

“Then there is the idea that I implied the world revolves around ethnicity- it does not.”
Really? Of course not completely, but it has a big influence.

“Do you not realize that ‘white’ and ‘black’ are almost totally invalid outside of the US?”
Oh? I presume those to whom you refer are focusing more on their ethnic group than their race.

“In the US it makes sense for practicality’s sake, but Japanese or Koreans in Asia would hate being lumped into one large group, …”
Just because they “hate” it doesn’t invalidate it. Since they would “hate”, are you saying the Japanese and Koreans are giant “hate” groups?

“What was a ‘white American’ was not a constant definition. Being ‘white’ wasn’t good enough for the Irish…”
Just because they were mis-categorized doesn’t invalidate the concept. Sounds like “Abolish The White Race” Noel Ignatiev drivel.

Then there is the idea that I implied the world revolves around ethnicity- it does not. But for practical purposes, ethnicity or better said nationality still determines a hell of a lot more in this world than phony concepts of race. Do you not realize that “white” and “black” are almost totally invalid outside of the US? Or even more hilarious is this concept of “Asian”. In the US it makes sense for practicality’s sake, but Japanese or Koreans in Asia would hate being lumped into one large group, not to mention with Vietnamese, Thais, and Cambodians.

What was a “white American” was not a constant definition. Being “white” wasn’t good enough for the Irish and other European Catholics when they began arriving in huge numbers in the 19th century. They were described in the same terms used for Mexican undocumented immigrants and blacks by racists today. But instead of recognizing their lot was the same as the blacks, they played up to the “white” man, and earned their way into “white” society, sacrificing what they deserved for some crumbs from the masters’ table.

“And yes, to a degree, the designation ‘black’ is just as artificial as ‘white’.”
-At least you are consistent!

“But unfortunately blacks didn’t come to the US willingly, ”
-Some did.

“Lucky for you ‘white’ folks, you can still probably trace your ethnic roots. Of course if you actually DID, you would see how stupid and pointless this ‘white’ identity is.”
-Stupid!!! I’m insulted!

“I’m dividing ‘white people’ into different groups?”
-You seem to with White Americans.

“Words cannot describe such ignorance: ”
-Try improving your writing skills.

“Europeans already are, and ALWAYS have been dividing into different, competing groups.”
-I’m well aware of that.

“Even the modern nation state is a relatively new entity in human history.”
-So is the internet. What is your point?

“Moreover, the world does not revolve around race, it revolves around capitalism, and the rule of capitalism is profit above all else- not race.”
-Just before you seemed to imply that it revolved around ethnicity.

“I suggest you save your money for a tour of Europe, and prepare to have some illusions shattered.”
-I’m in Europe now.

And yes, to a degree, the designation “black” is just as artificial as “white”. But unfortunately blacks didn’t come to the US willingly, and they had their traditions and identities destroyed. Lucky for you “white” folks, you can still probably trace your ethnic roots. Of course if you actually DID, you would see how stupid and pointless this “white” identity is.

I’m dividing “white people” into different groups? Words cannot describe such ignorance: Europeans already are, and ALWAYS have been dividing into different, competing groups. Even the modern nation state is a relatively new entity in human history. The fact is that this artificial, American concept of “white” is not going to end the hatred between Serbs and Croats, Slavs and northern Albanians, Georgians and Russians, Chechens and Russians, and so on. Moreover, the world does not revolve around race, it revolves around capitalism, and the rule of capitalism is profit above all else- not race.

I suggest you save your money for a tour of Europe, and prepare to have some illusions shattered.

“Yes, ‘whites’ are fake. Irish, Hungarians, Poles, Ukrainians, Germans, etc. are REAL.”

What about:

Yes “Jews” are fake. Moderately Religious Jews, Orthodox Jews, Ashkenazi Jews, Sephardic Jews, Atheist Jews, Homosexual Jews, Zionist Jews, Jews for Jesus, etc. are REAL.

You are nothing but an anti-White bigot Maskhadov.

Shame on you and your organization for inciting people to make anonymous and threatening calls, mails, etc.

“Yes, ‘whites’ are fake. Irish, Hungarians, Poles, Ukrainians, Germans, etc. are REAL. There is NO prohibition or negativity in the US against celebrations related to these groups.”

So you’d agree that “Blacks” are also fake? Going further, our “Black” president must also be fake along with the “Black Congressional Caucus”.

Break up White people into different groups and deny that Whites as a whole have any interests or even exist. It sounds like a bit of a divide and conquer strategy.

I’m not blaming you, but certain elements in society love to blame “White” people for slavery. So if White people are to “blame” for bringing African to America, then they have group interests and thus exist. No?

“1. “Political correctness” is nonsense. …”
I agree, it is.

“2. There is nothing wrong with celebrating REAL heritage in the United States. …”
Oh, so White people are “fake”? “They don’t really exist and thus don’t and shouldn’t organize.” Yea, right. What about NAACP, MEChA, etc?

“3. There is a reason why there are many groups for specific minorities- namely because whites to this day have ruled the US almost exclusively”
So they should give up power, let themselves be overrun my “minorities”, become an insignificant minority and just fade away? Are you insane?

“4. Creating a Caucasian Club was a bad idea probably because the school in question did not have any Georgians, Chechens, Ingushes, Ossetians, Avars, Lezgins, Circassians, etc.”
Here is the US Caucasian is synonymous for White.

“5. David Duke is a liar, …”
I still haven’t heard any specific examples.

“The ‘threats’ you are referring to regarding the emails sent to the manager who was coincendentally ‘fired’. to the manager who was coincendentally ‘fired’.”

My post to which you referring was mostly a copy and pasting from a newspaper artcle. I agree with you, the threats were probably from ARA scumbags. The manager allegedly resigned due to being threatened.

Were not coming from the Mid-Peace and Justice. In fact, such “threats” are usually the work of Anarchists, ARAs and Lone Wolves”

“Put the blame where the blame belongs. Instead of trying to defame.”
I didn’t blame, I just copied what the newspaper said.

“Is it so much of a hypocritical act to denounce ‘White Racists’ when 90% of my comrades are White themselves?”
Comrades? You sound like a Communist! There are a lot of self-hating Whites.