<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ideologues Call for Post-Election Militia Revival</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/</link>
	<description>Hatewatch is a blog of the Southern Poverty Law Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hallman</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-66789</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 05:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-66789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doctor Jeep

    I hate to tell you this, but the Constitution is dead
as a doornail. It&#039;s either the lefts tyranny or the rights,
one or the other. But then again, there is that something
else that defies either side. It&#039;s called the National Socialist
idea as promoted by the National Alliance. It&#039;s obvious
how you feel about Hitler, but we let&#039;s deal with the facts.
Hitler was an enemy of Jewish Bolshevism, and if the west
had stayed out of Hitlers program , he would have destroyed the Soviet Union and no doubt would have
prevented the Chinese communist party from gaining power or at least them being able to hold on to it. He would have 
prevented the subsequent Korean War, the Vietnam War,
not to mention the Cold War and the U.S. almost realizing
WWIII in 63 because of the Cuban crisis. In fact , Cuba
wouldn&#039;t have survived without Soviet support. Hitler wanted
three main things.1 to remove the Jews and their marxism
from Germany.2. Destroy Jewish Bolshevism and the
Soviet Union which was the real threat to the world as we
now know, and 3. To provide sufficient living space for the
German people, somewhat along the lines of our own
founding fathers and early patriots through Manifest
Distiny and the removal of the Indians. Our winning WWII
is a direct result of the cultural marxism. open border
policies and the Internationalism we see today known as
the&#039; New World Order&#039;. So say what you will about Adolf
Hitler and National Socialism, but it is an Americanized
version of the same thing thing we could use today.
Pacifism, fixations on civil rights, humanitarism, all are
designed to keep us from realizing what is really necessary in order to restore our national identity, that 
being, of European stock, and true political, economic,
and social progress.. Our early patriots messed-up
not sending the Blacks back to Africa when they could
have easily and allowing the Jews to come here with
their politically correct marxist ideas of equality and
so forth. We need a reality based worldview and the
mentality to do whatever is necessary to restore the
whites back to at least their pre-1965 immigration
status where we at least made-up 90% of the population
and where not looking at becoming minorites in our\own nation. Our founding fathers would be rolling over in
their graves at the prospect of our nation becoming
an eventual third world nation populated by mostly non-
whites, think about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctor Jeep</p>
<p>    I hate to tell you this, but the Constitution is dead<br />
as a doornail. It&#8217;s either the lefts tyranny or the rights,<br />
one or the other. But then again, there is that something<br />
else that defies either side. It&#8217;s called the National Socialist<br />
idea as promoted by the National Alliance. It&#8217;s obvious<br />
how you feel about Hitler, but we let&#8217;s deal with the facts.<br />
Hitler was an enemy of Jewish Bolshevism, and if the west<br />
had stayed out of Hitlers program , he would have destroyed the Soviet Union and no doubt would have<br />
prevented the Chinese communist party from gaining power or at least them being able to hold on to it. He would have<br />
prevented the subsequent Korean War, the Vietnam War,<br />
not to mention the Cold War and the U.S. almost realizing<br />
WWIII in 63 because of the Cuban crisis. In fact , Cuba<br />
wouldn&#8217;t have survived without Soviet support. Hitler wanted<br />
three main things.1 to remove the Jews and their marxism<br />
from Germany.2. Destroy Jewish Bolshevism and the<br />
Soviet Union which was the real threat to the world as we<br />
now know, and 3. To provide sufficient living space for the<br />
German people, somewhat along the lines of our own<br />
founding fathers and early patriots through Manifest<br />
Distiny and the removal of the Indians. Our winning WWII<br />
is a direct result of the cultural marxism. open border<br />
policies and the Internationalism we see today known as<br />
the&#8217; New World Order&#8217;. So say what you will about Adolf<br />
Hitler and National Socialism, but it is an Americanized<br />
version of the same thing thing we could use today.<br />
Pacifism, fixations on civil rights, humanitarism, all are<br />
designed to keep us from realizing what is really necessary in order to restore our national identity, that<br />
being, of European stock, and true political, economic,<br />
and social progress.. Our early patriots messed-up<br />
not sending the Blacks back to Africa when they could<br />
have easily and allowing the Jews to come here with<br />
their politically correct marxist ideas of equality and<br />
so forth. We need a reality based worldview and the<br />
mentality to do whatever is necessary to restore the<br />
whites back to at least their pre-1965 immigration<br />
status where we at least made-up 90% of the population<br />
and where not looking at becoming minorites in our\own nation. Our founding fathers would be rolling over in<br />
their graves at the prospect of our nation becoming<br />
an eventual third world nation populated by mostly non-<br />
whites, think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doktor Jeep</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-65196</link>
		<dc:creator>Doktor Jeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-65196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is long believed the Hitler banned gun ownership outright. The truth of the matter is that he simply made it difficult for common folk to have them. 

There are some parts of Germany where Hitler is quite despised still. The Mosel Region, for example. Hitler wanted to take that country and industrialize it, and move the people there to Western Russia (after invading it, of course). Lots of common people in the Mosel and Eifel regions - some of them might not have liked the idea of being moved. I lived near Trier for 3 years and heard this from the old timers. 

I am glad the Hitler issue showed up, because it gives me a chance to address the one thing that I do fear going wrong with &quot;the militia&quot; and that is, it becoming a Freikorps. Google the term and you will see what I mean. The militia, as intended by the Founders, could never be true to the ideal and become something along the lines of a Freikorps in America. 
Yet this &quot;tool&quot; is desired by both sides. Obama wants a 1.5 million man security force, likely fueled by ideals of progressive socialism as every organization takes concepts from those who found (or fund) it. However such a disgraceful treatment of civil liberties and the concepts against standing armies could not be countered rightly on Constitutional grounds.... so instead there could be a &quot;other side of the coin&quot; response where people will claim to be &quot;conservative&quot; and try their own large force. Likely trying to call themselves a militia. Such a force would no more be a real militia than Obama&#039;s security force. Yet if the counter is founded or run suddenly by &quot;disgruntled conservative veterans&quot;, then it could become something of a freikorp, leaving America with the choice of living under tyranny of social progressive thus or under the tyranny of social conservative thugs. It&#039;s still tyranny, and the end results will not account to anything good. The difference between the left and right in America today is much like the difference between Stalin and Hitler. Both tyrants, both murderous, and both wanted to win at all costs. Hitler murdered 10 million at the least, Stalin killed somewhere from 60 to 100 million.. The Nazis kept records during their systematic murdering while the Soviets simply forced people off their land and onto the highways to starve, so the numbers to compare with the two murder machines are not exact.

But it all comes down to murder, and it&#039;s roughly 100 million murdered by their own governments in the 20th century. The worst part is that you cannot get good people to do this, unless you make them think it&#039;s for the good, or necessary. This is why we see human rights violated in the name of human rights, discrimination in the name of tolerance, and theft from the state that claims to protect us from thieves. 


I know many good patriots who, never having a friend in such people who drink the Koolaid of progressive idealogy, find no home in the fake conservatism either. Be rest assured that the most capable people I know have no interest in attacking anybody on behalf of some ideal or stated purpose of a movement. Liberty is their goal, but are not on a level of ignorance to be led to violence against others by simple claims of a change agent or provoker. Nobody can tell me &quot;Them blacks are out to take away your freedom! Kill them!&quot;. However if I am to be imprisoned for protesting against the unconstitutional policies of a black president and therefore my ideas labeled a &quot;hate crime&quot; for political expedience of silencing me, then things will not go well. There is nothing new going on here: labels of hate crime, racist, bigot, etc, will be used for political measures. People will claim to &quot;feel threatened&quot; by those who simply disagree with them - all with the intent of bringing SWAT teams down on dissenters. Just like old times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is long believed the Hitler banned gun ownership outright. The truth of the matter is that he simply made it difficult for common folk to have them. </p>
<p>There are some parts of Germany where Hitler is quite despised still. The Mosel Region, for example. Hitler wanted to take that country and industrialize it, and move the people there to Western Russia (after invading it, of course). Lots of common people in the Mosel and Eifel regions &#8211; some of them might not have liked the idea of being moved. I lived near Trier for 3 years and heard this from the old timers. </p>
<p>I am glad the Hitler issue showed up, because it gives me a chance to address the one thing that I do fear going wrong with &#8220;the militia&#8221; and that is, it becoming a Freikorps. Google the term and you will see what I mean. The militia, as intended by the Founders, could never be true to the ideal and become something along the lines of a Freikorps in America.<br />
Yet this &#8220;tool&#8221; is desired by both sides. Obama wants a 1.5 million man security force, likely fueled by ideals of progressive socialism as every organization takes concepts from those who found (or fund) it. However such a disgraceful treatment of civil liberties and the concepts against standing armies could not be countered rightly on Constitutional grounds&#8230;. so instead there could be a &#8220;other side of the coin&#8221; response where people will claim to be &#8220;conservative&#8221; and try their own large force. Likely trying to call themselves a militia. Such a force would no more be a real militia than Obama&#8217;s security force. Yet if the counter is founded or run suddenly by &#8220;disgruntled conservative veterans&#8221;, then it could become something of a freikorp, leaving America with the choice of living under tyranny of social progressive thus or under the tyranny of social conservative thugs. It&#8217;s still tyranny, and the end results will not account to anything good. The difference between the left and right in America today is much like the difference between Stalin and Hitler. Both tyrants, both murderous, and both wanted to win at all costs. Hitler murdered 10 million at the least, Stalin killed somewhere from 60 to 100 million.. The Nazis kept records during their systematic murdering while the Soviets simply forced people off their land and onto the highways to starve, so the numbers to compare with the two murder machines are not exact.</p>
<p>But it all comes down to murder, and it&#8217;s roughly 100 million murdered by their own governments in the 20th century. The worst part is that you cannot get good people to do this, unless you make them think it&#8217;s for the good, or necessary. This is why we see human rights violated in the name of human rights, discrimination in the name of tolerance, and theft from the state that claims to protect us from thieves. </p>
<p>I know many good patriots who, never having a friend in such people who drink the Koolaid of progressive idealogy, find no home in the fake conservatism either. Be rest assured that the most capable people I know have no interest in attacking anybody on behalf of some ideal or stated purpose of a movement. Liberty is their goal, but are not on a level of ignorance to be led to violence against others by simple claims of a change agent or provoker. Nobody can tell me &#8220;Them blacks are out to take away your freedom! Kill them!&#8221;. However if I am to be imprisoned for protesting against the unconstitutional policies of a black president and therefore my ideas labeled a &#8220;hate crime&#8221; for political expedience of silencing me, then things will not go well. There is nothing new going on here: labels of hate crime, racist, bigot, etc, will be used for political measures. People will claim to &#8220;feel threatened&#8221; by those who simply disagree with them &#8211; all with the intent of bringing SWAT teams down on dissenters. Just like old times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountaingirl08</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-64833</link>
		<dc:creator>mountaingirl08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-64833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Hitler &quot;liberalized&quot; the ownership of guns. That was done so that &quot;good&quot; and &quot;pure&quot; German citizens would be armed, likely to murder Jews and political dissidents and the handicapped. I don&#039;t think that gun training for the citizenry by Hitler&#039;s minions is much of a recommendation for rampant and liberalized gun ownership.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Hitler &#8220;liberalized&#8221; the ownership of guns. That was done so that &#8220;good&#8221; and &#8220;pure&#8221; German citizens would be armed, likely to murder Jews and political dissidents and the handicapped. I don&#8217;t think that gun training for the citizenry by Hitler&#8217;s minions is much of a recommendation for rampant and liberalized gun ownership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountaingirl08</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-64826</link>
		<dc:creator>mountaingirl08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-64826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No; I don&#039;t think Hitler really put his &quot;people&quot; before himself. He played to people who wanted simple answers to complex issues. Apparently thinking for themselves gave his followers a headache. 
In a somewhat authoritarian society, one whose citizens were economically decimated by the Depression and who were incensed by the terms of the Versailles Treaty ending WW One, and so on, Hitler seemed to offer a solution and also to be a leader who would allow the citizenry to hold their heads up again.
He hired (a Jewish man of all people) a coach who taught him how to perfect his &quot;delivery&quot; so he would be impressive and domineering in his speeches. He also was a chronic user (abuser maybe) of  methamphetamine. That aided him in being so angry and forceful when he made his rants, er, speeches.
However, without the support of so many of his nation, Hitler would have remained a failed artist of murky background. It has even been suggested that Hitler&#039;s grandfather could have been of Jewish descent. Ironic, ain&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No; I don&#8217;t think Hitler really put his &#8220;people&#8221; before himself. He played to people who wanted simple answers to complex issues. Apparently thinking for themselves gave his followers a headache.<br />
In a somewhat authoritarian society, one whose citizens were economically decimated by the Depression and who were incensed by the terms of the Versailles Treaty ending WW One, and so on, Hitler seemed to offer a solution and also to be a leader who would allow the citizenry to hold their heads up again.<br />
He hired (a Jewish man of all people) a coach who taught him how to perfect his &#8220;delivery&#8221; so he would be impressive and domineering in his speeches. He also was a chronic user (abuser maybe) of  methamphetamine. That aided him in being so angry and forceful when he made his rants, er, speeches.<br />
However, without the support of so many of his nation, Hitler would have remained a failed artist of murky background. It has even been suggested that Hitler&#8217;s grandfather could have been of Jewish descent. Ironic, ain&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JewBet</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-64700</link>
		<dc:creator>JewBet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-64700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States owners of self defense weapons are as capable of operations with them as were al Qaeda. Since you anti-war types have been cheering on the terrorists since day one, you should be aware that such a rag-tag force can be quite a thorn in the side of an organized military. Many U.S. citizens have been trained by and served in the U.S. military. Since few of your panty-waist writers and readers can claim that same experience, it&#039;s easy to see why they can sell gun owners short.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States owners of self defense weapons are as capable of operations with them as were al Qaeda. Since you anti-war types have been cheering on the terrorists since day one, you should be aware that such a rag-tag force can be quite a thorn in the side of an organized military. Many U.S. citizens have been trained by and served in the U.S. military. Since few of your panty-waist writers and readers can claim that same experience, it&#8217;s easy to see why they can sell gun owners short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hallman</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-64269</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-64269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hitler was a true leader and put his people before
himself, which is a lot more than one can say for these
crooks we have in Washington today. I would say Hitler
would be a very good role model for those who would
lead us in the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitler was a true leader and put his people before<br />
himself, which is a lot more than one can say for these<br />
crooks we have in Washington today. I would say Hitler<br />
would be a very good role model for those who would<br />
lead us in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountaingirl08</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-63844</link>
		<dc:creator>mountaingirl08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-63844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a role model--Hitler.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a role model&#8211;Hitler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hallman</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-63618</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-63618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ATTEN: CAJ

  It&#039;s because there are few White Nationalist within
these wanni-be GI Joe militia groups that they&#039;ll fail,
for the lack of a cohesive ideology. Simply having a gun
will not insure one knows how to use one, or when it&#039;s
necessary to use it. One needs organization and 
ideological training. Contrary to what the powers that
be would have our people think, Adolf Hitler actually
liberalized gun ownership and actually militarized the
German population so that most could carry weapons
and know how to use them. It was a very much part of
the Hitler Youth Organization to teach every young man
how to shoot and defend themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ATTEN: CAJ</p>
<p>  It&#8217;s because there are few White Nationalist within<br />
these wanni-be GI Joe militia groups that they&#8217;ll fail,<br />
for the lack of a cohesive ideology. Simply having a gun<br />
will not insure one knows how to use one, or when it&#8217;s<br />
necessary to use it. One needs organization and<br />
ideological training. Contrary to what the powers that<br />
be would have our people think, Adolf Hitler actually<br />
liberalized gun ownership and actually militarized the<br />
German population so that most could carry weapons<br />
and know how to use them. It was a very much part of<br />
the Hitler Youth Organization to teach every young man<br />
how to shoot and defend themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doktor Jeep</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-62175</link>
		<dc:creator>Doktor Jeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-62175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the founders actually meant that we are indeed to train with military weapons, and not be hindered in that process. 

You forget US vs Miller. (1939). That case never finished out.

Back in the day, townshipt maintained their own cannons too. That was way before the Dick Act. 

Please check the history of the Second Amendment before you make assertions. 

In the meantime, &quot;trained by whome?&quot; You ask.

Well there was the Civilian Marksmanship Program, and it still exists. You can actually order large surplus battle rifles and the US Government will mail them to your door. Even under Clinton they did that. 

You can also look up the National Militia Standards - assembled by experienced veterans and operators. It also has a code of ethics that you will find interesting. You will also note there are no sections that mention anything about assassinations or blowing up buildings. (So don&#039;t assume).

Now to answer your question regarding why there is only resistance when democrats are in power, it&#039;s simple: you are seeing the false left-right paradyne in effect. George Bush was anti-gun and anti-freedom too. John McCain was no better. But the great game is to keep a two party duopoly in effect that only looks different on the surface to keep the sheep thinking their votes matter. You get a democrat in office, pisses everybody off, so they vote a republican in thinking now everything will be fixed. That as 2000. Now Bush spent 8 years driving the office like a stolen car, yet while Obama brings back Clinton retreads who the neocons love, everybody thinks they will get &quot;change&quot;. 

Yes, people foolishly think that republicans are not out to disarm them or take away civil liberties. But people still think we have freedom just because the Constitution has not been officially burned (in ceremony no less) yet I know one man who was threatened with contempt of court for bringing up the Constitution in it, and two ladies who, on handing out pamphlets about jurist rights, were threatened with &quot;jury tampering&quot;. This was under the same regime that supposedly protects rights yet expanded the police state (Bush). 

Now it&#039;s the turn of all those young hopeful liberals and progressives to become just as disenchanted in their party as conservatives are in the republicans. But in 4 or 8 years, they will have a republican come forth to make everybody think they are getting change again, but will not. 

Conservatives don&#039;t conserve, liberals don&#039;t liberate. 

Eventually all those disenchanted, disenfranchised, and then wide awake people will be Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich supporters.

There is already a growing transpartisan movement towards freedom and it&#039;s pro-gun too. Surely people of differing classes and colors uniting under a common banner that is NOT pro government would be enough to keep certain people from getting a good nights sleep.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the founders actually meant that we are indeed to train with military weapons, and not be hindered in that process. </p>
<p>You forget US vs Miller. (1939). That case never finished out.</p>
<p>Back in the day, townshipt maintained their own cannons too. That was way before the Dick Act. </p>
<p>Please check the history of the Second Amendment before you make assertions. </p>
<p>In the meantime, &#8220;trained by whome?&#8221; You ask.</p>
<p>Well there was the Civilian Marksmanship Program, and it still exists. You can actually order large surplus battle rifles and the US Government will mail them to your door. Even under Clinton they did that. </p>
<p>You can also look up the National Militia Standards &#8211; assembled by experienced veterans and operators. It also has a code of ethics that you will find interesting. You will also note there are no sections that mention anything about assassinations or blowing up buildings. (So don&#8217;t assume).</p>
<p>Now to answer your question regarding why there is only resistance when democrats are in power, it&#8217;s simple: you are seeing the false left-right paradyne in effect. George Bush was anti-gun and anti-freedom too. John McCain was no better. But the great game is to keep a two party duopoly in effect that only looks different on the surface to keep the sheep thinking their votes matter. You get a democrat in office, pisses everybody off, so they vote a republican in thinking now everything will be fixed. That as 2000. Now Bush spent 8 years driving the office like a stolen car, yet while Obama brings back Clinton retreads who the neocons love, everybody thinks they will get &#8220;change&#8221;. </p>
<p>Yes, people foolishly think that republicans are not out to disarm them or take away civil liberties. But people still think we have freedom just because the Constitution has not been officially burned (in ceremony no less) yet I know one man who was threatened with contempt of court for bringing up the Constitution in it, and two ladies who, on handing out pamphlets about jurist rights, were threatened with &#8220;jury tampering&#8221;. This was under the same regime that supposedly protects rights yet expanded the police state (Bush). </p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s the turn of all those young hopeful liberals and progressives to become just as disenchanted in their party as conservatives are in the republicans. But in 4 or 8 years, they will have a republican come forth to make everybody think they are getting change again, but will not. </p>
<p>Conservatives don&#8217;t conserve, liberals don&#8217;t liberate. </p>
<p>Eventually all those disenchanted, disenfranchised, and then wide awake people will be Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich supporters.</p>
<p>There is already a growing transpartisan movement towards freedom and it&#8217;s pro-gun too. Surely people of differing classes and colors uniting under a common banner that is NOT pro government would be enough to keep certain people from getting a good nights sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAJ</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-62146</link>
		<dc:creator>CAJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-62146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All males aged 18 to 44 are part of the &quot;Unorganized Militia.&quot; The Militia Act of 1792 required all able bodied adult males to have firearms and ammunition, and to train with said weapons. The National Guard is not the militia, the militia is the people. 

&quot;I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.&quot;
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788 

Those who worship governments as gods may not like this fact but the purpose of the Second Amendment was to enable the government to be overthrown should it become tyrannical. Governments have murdered more people than anything else over history so the people must have a way to prevent such crimes.

&quot;Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive.&quot;
--Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (Philadelphia 1787). 

And the SPLC is foolish in saying all militias and survivalists are racist white nationalists. Utterly false, they are a minority in militias and survivalist circles, though they, the dumbest people who call themselves militias, do provide plenty of material because of their foolishness. Taking these minorities and painting all militia and survivalist types as such is as much bigotry as the racists have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All males aged 18 to 44 are part of the &#8220;Unorganized Militia.&#8221; The Militia Act of 1792 required all able bodied adult males to have firearms and ammunition, and to train with said weapons. The National Guard is not the militia, the militia is the people. </p>
<p>&#8220;I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.&#8221;<br />
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788 </p>
<p>Those who worship governments as gods may not like this fact but the purpose of the Second Amendment was to enable the government to be overthrown should it become tyrannical. Governments have murdered more people than anything else over history so the people must have a way to prevent such crimes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (Philadelphia 1787). </p>
<p>And the SPLC is foolish in saying all militias and survivalists are racist white nationalists. Utterly false, they are a minority in militias and survivalist circles, though they, the dumbest people who call themselves militias, do provide plenty of material because of their foolishness. Taking these minorities and painting all militia and survivalist types as such is as much bigotry as the racists have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GENO</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60968</link>
		<dc:creator>GENO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Im previous law enforcement until I got injured in Iraq.&quot;

Was it &quot;funny&quot; to be lied to and duped into an exaggerated warfare where Saddam Hussien had no WMDs??? Let alone, no ties to Al-Qaida terrorists??? Then that must`ve been a hilarious experience for you. The War on Terror and Bin Laden was in Afaghnistan, not Iraq.

&quot;I am not white.&quot;

You embrace an ideology that is embraced by White Supremacists, yet you claimed that you&#039;re not &quot;white&quot; but perhaps you&#039;re now ashamed to be &quot;white&quot;? You said on
2009-11-21;
&quot;The spic and you pukes should not belong in this country&quot;(not sure who you&#039;re directing that comment to)
Since you spewed a racist epithet aimed at an unknown Hispanic/Latino and from what I can tell on this post thus far, there are no Hispanics placing any comments in this forum, because if there was, surely a Hispanic would place a comment on here to admonish your remarks etcetera. And there has been none. So if you are &quot;not white&quot; and I know you&#039;re not Hispanic/Latino based on your racist remark, then I must assume you to be Black/African-American? If so, then what justifies you as a Black man that I as a Native American &quot;should not be in this country&quot;? This *is* my country, it was my land before your &quot;Founding Fathers&quot; and its &quot;Constitution&quot; have arrived. You were merely brought here by the slave trade. Another thing I like to point out is that your fellow White Supremacists friends claimed that 98 to 99% of the Black popular vote was in favor of Obama. I guess that makes you an outcast amongst your own people? But because of your racist views directed at the Hispanic/Latino population. You must have angered your fellow ex-comrades in the Law Enforcement and those in your neighborhood. Since non-Whites make up some *X* number of workers in the LEA  on every level, all the way up to the White House including our President.
I hope you won&#039;t face police brutality coming from the Hispanic Americans because of your racist views.

You claimed that you were in the militia. What militia were you a member of again? I&#039;m trying to research one that recruits Black folks but did not find one, I did, however came across Whiite Extremists/Extreme Chistian Right groups were its members were comprised of White Supremacists, but did not find any Black militia groups other than Black Separatists such the New Black Panther Party, Nation of Islam(you claimed to be Christian	so this one is out of the question, that also exempts Yaweh-Yaweh). The rest were street gangs unless you meant to be a gangbanger? Do you mind telling me which militia that was? If not, then you&#039;re the greatest hoax since &quot;the Piltdown Man&quot;.....

Also in case you didn&#039;t know this. The LEA(law enforcement agencies) does not recruit high school dropouts and individuals suffering from retardation and learning disabilities. You lacked basic reading comprehension, grammar, spelling, improper use of words by incorrect terms. I figured you dropped out in the 6th grade or less. You also harbor no historical knowledge regarding our American History. 

&quot;Hates the kkk their freedom of speech is protected like yours is&quot;

Glad to hear that you hate your fellow White Supremacist friends but again, need I remind you that hatespeech isn&#039;t exactly protected. I suggest you read the exact policies on the Freedom of Speech and how it is applied. Promoting violence and terror is not &quot;protected&quot; speech under current federal laws and guidelines.

Since you were purported to be a LEO, didn&#039;t you know that the feds and the judge has the right to warrant a search and siezure if you are suspected to have ties to domestic terrorists groups or if your planning a &quot;lone wolf&quot; terror mission? Or even the dangerous WN elements? The Feds have that power but you as a former LEO did not fully understood this issue which is why I doubt your falsified claims as a LEO. Did you not remember that anti-Government militias are also anti-LEOs? LEOs have engaged in shootouts with militias and WNs over the years throughout the last century. Many LEOs have died as a result in those gunbattles with the militia.

FEMA is a federal agency working under the Homeland Security Secretary Micheal Chertoff. Come 2009, he will be replaced by Gov. Janet Napolitano(D-AZ) who is a Democrat working under Obama. But since you stated that you are anti-Obama, boy I sure hope you can find another job. Good luck with that &quot;dawg&quot;!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Im previous law enforcement until I got injured in Iraq.&#8221;</p>
<p>Was it &#8220;funny&#8221; to be lied to and duped into an exaggerated warfare where Saddam Hussien had no WMDs??? Let alone, no ties to Al-Qaida terrorists??? Then that must`ve been a hilarious experience for you. The War on Terror and Bin Laden was in Afaghnistan, not Iraq.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am not white.&#8221;</p>
<p>You embrace an ideology that is embraced by White Supremacists, yet you claimed that you&#8217;re not &#8220;white&#8221; but perhaps you&#8217;re now ashamed to be &#8220;white&#8221;? You said on<br />
2009-11-21;<br />
&#8220;The spic and you pukes should not belong in this country&#8221;(not sure who you&#8217;re directing that comment to)<br />
Since you spewed a racist epithet aimed at an unknown Hispanic/Latino and from what I can tell on this post thus far, there are no Hispanics placing any comments in this forum, because if there was, surely a Hispanic would place a comment on here to admonish your remarks etcetera. And there has been none. So if you are &#8220;not white&#8221; and I know you&#8217;re not Hispanic/Latino based on your racist remark, then I must assume you to be Black/African-American? If so, then what justifies you as a Black man that I as a Native American &#8220;should not be in this country&#8221;? This *is* my country, it was my land before your &#8220;Founding Fathers&#8221; and its &#8220;Constitution&#8221; have arrived. You were merely brought here by the slave trade. Another thing I like to point out is that your fellow White Supremacists friends claimed that 98 to 99% of the Black popular vote was in favor of Obama. I guess that makes you an outcast amongst your own people? But because of your racist views directed at the Hispanic/Latino population. You must have angered your fellow ex-comrades in the Law Enforcement and those in your neighborhood. Since non-Whites make up some *X* number of workers in the LEA  on every level, all the way up to the White House including our President.<br />
I hope you won&#8217;t face police brutality coming from the Hispanic Americans because of your racist views.</p>
<p>You claimed that you were in the militia. What militia were you a member of again? I&#8217;m trying to research one that recruits Black folks but did not find one, I did, however came across Whiite Extremists/Extreme Chistian Right groups were its members were comprised of White Supremacists, but did not find any Black militia groups other than Black Separatists such the New Black Panther Party, Nation of Islam(you claimed to be Christian	so this one is out of the question, that also exempts Yaweh-Yaweh). The rest were street gangs unless you meant to be a gangbanger? Do you mind telling me which militia that was? If not, then you&#8217;re the greatest hoax since &#8220;the Piltdown Man&#8221;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Also in case you didn&#8217;t know this. The LEA(law enforcement agencies) does not recruit high school dropouts and individuals suffering from retardation and learning disabilities. You lacked basic reading comprehension, grammar, spelling, improper use of words by incorrect terms. I figured you dropped out in the 6th grade or less. You also harbor no historical knowledge regarding our American History. </p>
<p>&#8220;Hates the kkk their freedom of speech is protected like yours is&#8221;</p>
<p>Glad to hear that you hate your fellow White Supremacist friends but again, need I remind you that hatespeech isn&#8217;t exactly protected. I suggest you read the exact policies on the Freedom of Speech and how it is applied. Promoting violence and terror is not &#8220;protected&#8221; speech under current federal laws and guidelines.</p>
<p>Since you were purported to be a LEO, didn&#8217;t you know that the feds and the judge has the right to warrant a search and siezure if you are suspected to have ties to domestic terrorists groups or if your planning a &#8220;lone wolf&#8221; terror mission? Or even the dangerous WN elements? The Feds have that power but you as a former LEO did not fully understood this issue which is why I doubt your falsified claims as a LEO. Did you not remember that anti-Government militias are also anti-LEOs? LEOs have engaged in shootouts with militias and WNs over the years throughout the last century. Many LEOs have died as a result in those gunbattles with the militia.</p>
<p>FEMA is a federal agency working under the Homeland Security Secretary Micheal Chertoff. Come 2009, he will be replaced by Gov. Janet Napolitano(D-AZ) who is a Democrat working under Obama. But since you stated that you are anti-Obama, boy I sure hope you can find another job. Good luck with that &#8220;dawg&#8221;!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aslan Maskhadov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60940</link>
		<dc:creator>Aslan Maskhadov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Patrick....have you seen any bills in Congress to start quartering troops in the US?  Do you realize that quartering troops in private houses made a LOT more sense in the 18th and 19th centuries than it would now?  Are we losing our freedom of speech in the US?  Sure there are various limits and such but as time changes, so must laws.  


&quot;Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the ark of the Covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human, and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment... laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind... as that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, institutions must advance also, to keep pace with the times.... We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain forever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.&quot;  THOMAS JEFFERSON]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick Patrick&#8230;.have you seen any bills in Congress to start quartering troops in the US?  Do you realize that quartering troops in private houses made a LOT more sense in the 18th and 19th centuries than it would now?  Are we losing our freedom of speech in the US?  Sure there are various limits and such but as time changes, so must laws.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the ark of the Covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human, and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment&#8230; laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind&#8230; as that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, institutions must advance also, to keep pace with the times&#8230;. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain forever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.&#8221;  THOMAS JEFFERSON</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aslan Maskhadov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60931</link>
		<dc:creator>Aslan Maskhadov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your militias are not subject to regulation, not trained to any measurable standard.  There is nothing to guarantee oversight, and we can only assume that you would &quot;enforce&quot; or &quot;defend&quot; the Constitution according to your layman beliefs, and what is there to guarantee that citizens would be able to redress grievances against your militia.  

Furthermore, you having an armed group not regulated by the government implies that you see the government as hostile, and thus constitute a treasonous domestic terrorist group.  Not that I am always opposed to such groups- but you should at least be honest. 

There is no reason to think that militias like yours would be significantly better at doing anything than government agencies, and the idea of the UN invading America is laughable.  America, on the UNSC, uses the UN to influence and oppress other nations, it is not a victim of the UN in any way shape or form.  Plus, if they did invade for some reason, your militias would get plastered by several armies, instead of just one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your militias are not subject to regulation, not trained to any measurable standard.  There is nothing to guarantee oversight, and we can only assume that you would &#8220;enforce&#8221; or &#8220;defend&#8221; the Constitution according to your layman beliefs, and what is there to guarantee that citizens would be able to redress grievances against your militia.  </p>
<p>Furthermore, you having an armed group not regulated by the government implies that you see the government as hostile, and thus constitute a treasonous domestic terrorist group.  Not that I am always opposed to such groups- but you should at least be honest. </p>
<p>There is no reason to think that militias like yours would be significantly better at doing anything than government agencies, and the idea of the UN invading America is laughable.  America, on the UNSC, uses the UN to influence and oppress other nations, it is not a victim of the UN in any way shape or form.  Plus, if they did invade for some reason, your militias would get plastered by several armies, instead of just one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60827</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reasons why I think this comment is funny.
 1. I am not white
 2. I am previous law enforcement untill I got injured in Iraq
3. Has been in militia since getting injured in iraq
4. hates the KKK but their freedom of speech is protected just like yours is
5.  And yes every ones rights of search and seziure is protected they cant just think your a criminal and search your car, im sure you all are the type of people who just hands a LEO your Id and lets him search you , your house or car, without a warrant or probable reasonable cause.
6. I got the idea of providing quater etc because it used to be that way and because of a little war we all enjoyed from 1776 untill 1814 it is no longer. However if the UN has their way I am sure you will enjoy the blue hats being in your house be nice to them feed them well! 
7. I am not even from europe and the europeans are a bunch of whack jobs in my opinion however I have met some decent SAS guys and a few british soldiers in my travels
8. How am I a whack job, radical, red neck, uneducated racist etc, because I am tired of watching this country go to hell and I enjoy freedoms that would make this country a better place if people stopped attacking them. 
9. I am not happy that the oh mighty leader obama got elected, however I have no plans of assination, war etc, I am however prepared to let it be known that I wills tand up for whatever I believe in. Voilence when there is other options is weak and cowardace, being prepared for violence when there is no other option is survival.  I am more into training and being ready and speaking and resisting peacefully against our nantion being flushed. 
10. Other reasons I am in the militia and things my unit trains for: Natural disasters ie. Make disaster response more efficient. Local citizens know what resources they do and don’t have on hand at their disposal. We can’t expect some guy in a suit in Washington D.C. to know every detail of our situation. In the Katrina aftermath, FEMA turned away a Wal-Mart truck full of bottled water, despite there being thousands of people desperately needing fresh drinking water. The militia would have escorted that truck exactly where it needed to be.
 Assist local law enforcement, we have taken part in helping with search and rescue, especially with our mounted team. We also assist in man hunts including helping find criminals who have broken free etc. We also have assited in a small brush fire, accident response etc. So if we are such horrible domestic terrorists etc why do LEO&#039;s enjoy our help and we time and time again provide it. 
I also find it funny because we also are ready and have trained to be ready to stand and help repel a terroist invasion and provide aid to wounded etc. Our group has over 15 medics, 2 doctors, and a fully functioning aid station and ambulance. All rapidly deployable to any where within our AO at a moments notice. 

So there you have it. I really am done with this convo, for If you dont get it you dont get it simple as that. For any one else who does seem to get it I have a flyer which is our public information flyer we hand out at our fundraisers, bake sales, any where we go etc. If you want to take a look at it or are interested in taking part in our upcoming FTX where we are teaching family first aid skills, disaster prepardness etc, shoot me a email and I will get info out to you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reasons why I think this comment is funny.<br />
 1. I am not white<br />
 2. I am previous law enforcement untill I got injured in Iraq<br />
3. Has been in militia since getting injured in iraq<br />
4. hates the KKK but their freedom of speech is protected just like yours is<br />
5.  And yes every ones rights of search and seziure is protected they cant just think your a criminal and search your car, im sure you all are the type of people who just hands a LEO your Id and lets him search you , your house or car, without a warrant or probable reasonable cause.<br />
6. I got the idea of providing quater etc because it used to be that way and because of a little war we all enjoyed from 1776 untill 1814 it is no longer. However if the UN has their way I am sure you will enjoy the blue hats being in your house be nice to them feed them well!<br />
7. I am not even from europe and the europeans are a bunch of whack jobs in my opinion however I have met some decent SAS guys and a few british soldiers in my travels<br />
8. How am I a whack job, radical, red neck, uneducated racist etc, because I am tired of watching this country go to hell and I enjoy freedoms that would make this country a better place if people stopped attacking them.<br />
9. I am not happy that the oh mighty leader obama got elected, however I have no plans of assination, war etc, I am however prepared to let it be known that I wills tand up for whatever I believe in. Voilence when there is other options is weak and cowardace, being prepared for violence when there is no other option is survival.  I am more into training and being ready and speaking and resisting peacefully against our nantion being flushed.<br />
10. Other reasons I am in the militia and things my unit trains for: Natural disasters ie. Make disaster response more efficient. Local citizens know what resources they do and don’t have on hand at their disposal. We can’t expect some guy in a suit in Washington D.C. to know every detail of our situation. In the Katrina aftermath, FEMA turned away a Wal-Mart truck full of bottled water, despite there being thousands of people desperately needing fresh drinking water. The militia would have escorted that truck exactly where it needed to be.<br />
 Assist local law enforcement, we have taken part in helping with search and rescue, especially with our mounted team. We also assist in man hunts including helping find criminals who have broken free etc. We also have assited in a small brush fire, accident response etc. So if we are such horrible domestic terrorists etc why do LEO&#8217;s enjoy our help and we time and time again provide it.<br />
I also find it funny because we also are ready and have trained to be ready to stand and help repel a terroist invasion and provide aid to wounded etc. Our group has over 15 medics, 2 doctors, and a fully functioning aid station and ambulance. All rapidly deployable to any where within our AO at a moments notice. </p>
<p>So there you have it. I really am done with this convo, for If you dont get it you dont get it simple as that. For any one else who does seem to get it I have a flyer which is our public information flyer we hand out at our fundraisers, bake sales, any where we go etc. If you want to take a look at it or are interested in taking part in our upcoming FTX where we are teaching family first aid skills, disaster prepardness etc, shoot me a email and I will get info out to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GENO</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60815</link>
		<dc:creator>GENO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;would you like to give up your  right to free speech,&#039;

Hate speeches are not &quot;protected&quot;	nor is it tolerated in free speech events. Which is why your KKK/WN cohorts tends to get the boot almost daily.

&quot;your right to protection from searches and seizures,&quot;

Once again, you  imprudently think you are &quot;protected&quot; from unlawful &quot;searched and seizures&quot; if the U.S. Governemt deems you to be a dangerous psychotic WN. By the rule of law, they can warrant a search to rid your rights to keep arms if you posed harm to the U.S. Government and to the American citizens alike. And in your case, you shouldn&#039;t be in possession of arms based on your low functioning understandings of the &quot;Rights&quot; granted therein. 

&quot;or maybe you want us troops living in your house because you have to provide them quater?&quot;

When I meant &quot;retarded&quot; in my previous posts, I think that&#039;s exactly what I meant in terms of your lowly concept. Or did you just come up with that concept?

&quot;Or perhaps we all want to be the chuch of england?&quot;

Speaking for myself, I personally want you and hacknuts like the WNs to go back to England or wherever they came. Because you&#039;re a part of this Nation`s problem and not the solution.
And that would be--
&quot;one less person to contend to repair our great nation.&quot;
But in hindsight, I don&#039;t think you have any idea what you&#039;re talking about in terms of &quot;repairing our Nation&quot; when its folks like you who wish to wage war on the Federal Government and the American people. But if you want to &quot;repair our nation&quot; you simply need to respect all aspects of the laws in the books and respect the man who will be our President come 2009. I&#039;m not implying that you ought to like the guy, I am merely saying what Morris Dees has said--
&quot;You have the right to hate. I support that right. But you do not have to cross that line and hurt somebody&quot;
Simply because that American does not agree to your low IQ`d fallacies and it also does not justify you taking up arms against the President-Elect and the United States Government.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;would you like to give up your  right to free speech,&#8217;</p>
<p>Hate speeches are not &#8220;protected&#8221;	nor is it tolerated in free speech events. Which is why your KKK/WN cohorts tends to get the boot almost daily.</p>
<p>&#8220;your right to protection from searches and seizures,&#8221;</p>
<p>Once again, you  imprudently think you are &#8220;protected&#8221; from unlawful &#8220;searched and seizures&#8221; if the U.S. Governemt deems you to be a dangerous psychotic WN. By the rule of law, they can warrant a search to rid your rights to keep arms if you posed harm to the U.S. Government and to the American citizens alike. And in your case, you shouldn&#8217;t be in possession of arms based on your low functioning understandings of the &#8220;Rights&#8221; granted therein. </p>
<p>&#8220;or maybe you want us troops living in your house because you have to provide them quater?&#8221;</p>
<p>When I meant &#8220;retarded&#8221; in my previous posts, I think that&#8217;s exactly what I meant in terms of your lowly concept. Or did you just come up with that concept?</p>
<p>&#8220;Or perhaps we all want to be the chuch of england?&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking for myself, I personally want you and hacknuts like the WNs to go back to England or wherever they came. Because you&#8217;re a part of this Nation`s problem and not the solution.<br />
And that would be&#8211;<br />
&#8220;one less person to contend to repair our great nation.&#8221;<br />
But in hindsight, I don&#8217;t think you have any idea what you&#8217;re talking about in terms of &#8220;repairing our Nation&#8221; when its folks like you who wish to wage war on the Federal Government and the American people. But if you want to &#8220;repair our nation&#8221; you simply need to respect all aspects of the laws in the books and respect the man who will be our President come 2009. I&#8217;m not implying that you ought to like the guy, I am merely saying what Morris Dees has said&#8211;<br />
&#8220;You have the right to hate. I support that right. But you do not have to cross that line and hurt somebody&#8221;<br />
Simply because that American does not agree to your low IQ`d fallacies and it also does not justify you taking up arms against the President-Elect and the United States Government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60807</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me guess you think the civil war was about slaves also? And what they meant back than does matter, because it is how you have freedoms today. If that is the case would you like to give up your right to free speach, your right to protection of searches and seziures, maybe you want us troops living in your house because you have to provide them quater?  Or perhaps we all want to be the church of england? If you think it doesnt matter and you dont want these freedoms leave this great country so its one less person helping it slide downhill and one less person to contend with to repair our great nation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me guess you think the civil war was about slaves also? And what they meant back than does matter, because it is how you have freedoms today. If that is the case would you like to give up your right to free speach, your right to protection of searches and seziures, maybe you want us troops living in your house because you have to provide them quater?  Or perhaps we all want to be the church of england? If you think it doesnt matter and you dont want these freedoms leave this great country so its one less person helping it slide downhill and one less person to contend with to repair our great nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aslan Maskhadov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60793</link>
		<dc:creator>Aslan Maskhadov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t matter what the Founding Fathers meant back then, because what they DID mean was for the Constitution to be a living document, and after the Civil War it was pretty apparent that it would be a bad idea for the government to relinquish a monopoly on force.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter what the Founding Fathers meant back then, because what they DID mean was for the Constitution to be a living document, and after the Civil War it was pretty apparent that it would be a bad idea for the government to relinquish a monopoly on force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60725</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh and one more thing citizens surpriseingly enough can buy at4s stingers, tanks wtf ever just get taxed out the ass and have to pay for a stamp and permit for them. &lt; goes outside to play with friends m203]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and one more thing citizens surpriseingly enough can buy at4s stingers, tanks wtf ever just get taxed out the ass and have to pay for a stamp and permit for them. &lt; goes outside to play with friends m203</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60721</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find that funny, first off I am not white so that makes your comments about me that much entertaining, second off I was in a militia when bush was in office, third yes our founding fathers did mean for citizens to train and equip them selves, it happened time and time again hence why this country has its rights of being idiots today. Do not make it personal if personal attacks is all you can come at us with than it shows what you reallya re about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that funny, first off I am not white so that makes your comments about me that much entertaining, second off I was in a militia when bush was in office, third yes our founding fathers did mean for citizens to train and equip them selves, it happened time and time again hence why this country has its rights of being idiots today. Do not make it personal if personal attacks is all you can come at us with than it shows what you reallya re about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aslan Maskhadov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60677</link>
		<dc:creator>Aslan Maskhadov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since when does &quot;regulated&quot; mean trained? And if trained? TRAINED by whom?  The National Guard is trained by the US government, in US military facilities.  Do you actually believe that the Founding Fathers just expected US citizens to randomly organize on their own, with no government oversight, with military weapons?  Sure, they ought to let you guys buy AT4s, Stingers, and other major weapons and leave you alone on private land to play with them.

And I&#039;d like an answer to Geno&#039;s point that for some reason, militia types find the need for resistance against the government when there is a democrat in power.  You talk about this like it would be some kind of popular uprising, but in case you didn&#039;t notice, a vast majority of Americans don&#039;t seem to find their freedom so threatened. In fact, they voted for Obama.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when does &#8220;regulated&#8221; mean trained? And if trained? TRAINED by whom?  The National Guard is trained by the US government, in US military facilities.  Do you actually believe that the Founding Fathers just expected US citizens to randomly organize on their own, with no government oversight, with military weapons?  Sure, they ought to let you guys buy AT4s, Stingers, and other major weapons and leave you alone on private land to play with them.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;d like an answer to Geno&#8217;s point that for some reason, militia types find the need for resistance against the government when there is a democrat in power.  You talk about this like it would be some kind of popular uprising, but in case you didn&#8217;t notice, a vast majority of Americans don&#8217;t seem to find their freedom so threatened. In fact, they voted for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flick</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60656</link>
		<dc:creator>Flick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Carroll Quigley, globalist insider, from his book, &quot;Tragedy and Hope&quot;:
&quot;The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.&quot;

Samuel Adams:
&quot;If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace.  We ask not your counsel or your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hands of those who feed you.  May your chains set lightly upon you.  May posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Carroll Quigley, globalist insider, from his book, &#8220;Tragedy and Hope&#8221;:<br />
&#8220;The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Samuel Adams:<br />
&#8220;If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace.  We ask not your counsel or your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hands of those who feed you.  May your chains set lightly upon you.  May posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doktor Jeep</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60627</link>
		<dc:creator>Doktor Jeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Well Regulated&quot; meant &quot;well trained&quot;.  

It&#039;s common for people lacking study in these matters to assume the meaning of &quot;regulated&quot; to mean &quot;regulations&quot; as in &quot;rules&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well Regulated&#8221; meant &#8220;well trained&#8221;.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s common for people lacking study in these matters to assume the meaning of &#8220;regulated&#8221; to mean &#8220;regulations&#8221; as in &#8220;rules&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60558</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.&quot;

  --  Thomas Jefferson]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.&#8221;</p>
<p>  &#8212;  Thomas Jefferson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GENO</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60528</link>
		<dc:creator>GENO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Asian Maskhadov. 
Patrick`s retarded and often degenerated nonsense regarding his fallacious opinion on militias exemplify the notion why our National Homeland Security is threatened from within. His backward unsound arguments merely shows off his ignorance many of them are best known for. Which is why they are a part of this country`s growing problem.
One question pops into my head on why is that these White Extremist Wing-Nuts always feel the need to take up arms and rage against the U.S. Government whenever a Democrat becomes the president? It only tells me one thing, and that is they can&#039;t seem to possessed the abilities to cope under a different party surely to last 4 years or more. So they retort to their &quot;Gods&quot; and &quot;Guns&quot; when a Republican is not in the White House.  I say that the Independents(like myself) and Democrats voters have more balls to live under Republitard tyrannical rule than that of a Neo-Con under a &quot;Liberal&quot;......

&quot;When you need help pray that I&#039;m christian and man enough to reach out and help you.&quot;

Seriously, you&#039;re the last person I would ever ask for any help in this country, you have nothing that I want. But even if one were to seek help from someone, it surely won&#039;t be coming from you nor that person would accept it. Certainly I won&#039;t.

&quot;keep believing what CNN tells you.&quot;

The Dobsy Award winning Lou Dobbs is so full of that brown stuff, that anybody with a rationale mind knows it. Only xenophobes and other paranoid crackers would lap up anything he spat out, no matter how bogus and exaggerated his reports are. I&#039;d wondered about the nuts who actually believe him than wonder about Lou Dobbs himself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Asian Maskhadov.<br />
Patrick`s retarded and often degenerated nonsense regarding his fallacious opinion on militias exemplify the notion why our National Homeland Security is threatened from within. His backward unsound arguments merely shows off his ignorance many of them are best known for. Which is why they are a part of this country`s growing problem.<br />
One question pops into my head on why is that these White Extremist Wing-Nuts always feel the need to take up arms and rage against the U.S. Government whenever a Democrat becomes the president? It only tells me one thing, and that is they can&#8217;t seem to possessed the abilities to cope under a different party surely to last 4 years or more. So they retort to their &#8220;Gods&#8221; and &#8220;Guns&#8221; when a Republican is not in the White House.  I say that the Independents(like myself) and Democrats voters have more balls to live under Republitard tyrannical rule than that of a Neo-Con under a &#8220;Liberal&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;When you need help pray that I&#8217;m christian and man enough to reach out and help you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seriously, you&#8217;re the last person I would ever ask for any help in this country, you have nothing that I want. But even if one were to seek help from someone, it surely won&#8217;t be coming from you nor that person would accept it. Certainly I won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>&#8220;keep believing what CNN tells you.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Dobsy Award winning Lou Dobbs is so full of that brown stuff, that anybody with a rationale mind knows it. Only xenophobes and other paranoid crackers would lap up anything he spat out, no matter how bogus and exaggerated his reports are. I&#8217;d wondered about the nuts who actually believe him than wonder about Lou Dobbs himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aslan Maskhadov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60515</link>
		<dc:creator>Aslan Maskhadov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the prayers but Allah can hear me just fine!  I hate to tell you but your &quot;we are all the militia&quot; argument does not jive with the American legal system.  You&#039;re back in the 18th century.  Not to mention the fact that even in the 2nd Amendment there are the words &quot;WELL REGULATED MILITIA&quot;.  Hmmm...regulated by whom I wonder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the prayers but Allah can hear me just fine!  I hate to tell you but your &#8220;we are all the militia&#8221; argument does not jive with the American legal system.  You&#8217;re back in the 18th century.  Not to mention the fact that even in the 2nd Amendment there are the words &#8220;WELL REGULATED MILITIA&#8221;.  Hmmm&#8230;regulated by whom I wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60460</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You POS sheep just will never get it will you? Like I said earlier When you need help pray that I am christian and man enough to reach out and help you. Reminds me of the ant who did not prepare story as a kid. 
 Also why do you all keep thinkign the goal of a militia is to be some armed insane bandits who violently overthrow the govt? Even though that is a right people have is to overthrow their govt. A militia is simply you we all are the miltia. If you have ever even gone on a camping or hiking trip you in fact have taken part in militia training. I give up you all will just never get it, keep believing what CNN tells you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You POS sheep just will never get it will you? Like I said earlier When you need help pray that I am christian and man enough to reach out and help you. Reminds me of the ant who did not prepare story as a kid.<br />
 Also why do you all keep thinkign the goal of a militia is to be some armed insane bandits who violently overthrow the govt? Even though that is a right people have is to overthrow their govt. A militia is simply you we all are the miltia. If you have ever even gone on a camping or hiking trip you in fact have taken part in militia training. I give up you all will just never get it, keep believing what CNN tells you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aslan Maskhadov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60443</link>
		<dc:creator>Aslan Maskhadov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kev&#039;s reply actually came before mine, so now I have to give it props. Let&#039;s face it, if a Communist group like the RCP were conducting paramilitary training in camps, openly stating their intention to rebel against the US government, they would be taken out in a week.  If Muslim organizations, worried about Islamophobic hate crimes, started teaching self-defense courses on private land including shooting skills, Homeland Security would be all over them within days.  

The Federal government has every right to ban and lock up all actively training militias as domestic terrorists.  Aside from previous acts of violence that had ties to these groups and their conspiratorial ideology, these groups are conducting paramilitary training and could be logically viewed as potential domestic terrorists.  Few countries in the world allow their citizens to conduct such training with the stated aim of using it against the establishment.  The 2nd amendment ensures right to bear arms, but it says nothing about things like registration, and more importantly it does not grant the right to form anti-government paramilitary organizations.  What part of &quot;well-regulated militia&quot; don&#039;t you folks understand.

In the end, your half-baked interpretations of &quot;original intent&quot; will fall flat in court like so many arguments common to tax protesters and &quot;sovereign citizens&quot;.  In the mean time, I predict a new wave of con men will arise in the militia movement, just like those that used to make fortunes selling bogus tax advice and snake oil like &quot;pure trust&quot; accounts.  Due to militia types&#039; lack of any real legal knowledge, and their distrust of any establishment advice or sources(like the IRS), many people lost thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars to con-men who knew how to take advantage of the paranoid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kev&#8217;s reply actually came before mine, so now I have to give it props. Let&#8217;s face it, if a Communist group like the RCP were conducting paramilitary training in camps, openly stating their intention to rebel against the US government, they would be taken out in a week.  If Muslim organizations, worried about Islamophobic hate crimes, started teaching self-defense courses on private land including shooting skills, Homeland Security would be all over them within days.  </p>
<p>The Federal government has every right to ban and lock up all actively training militias as domestic terrorists.  Aside from previous acts of violence that had ties to these groups and their conspiratorial ideology, these groups are conducting paramilitary training and could be logically viewed as potential domestic terrorists.  Few countries in the world allow their citizens to conduct such training with the stated aim of using it against the establishment.  The 2nd amendment ensures right to bear arms, but it says nothing about things like registration, and more importantly it does not grant the right to form anti-government paramilitary organizations.  What part of &#8220;well-regulated militia&#8221; don&#8217;t you folks understand.</p>
<p>In the end, your half-baked interpretations of &#8220;original intent&#8221; will fall flat in court like so many arguments common to tax protesters and &#8220;sovereign citizens&#8221;.  In the mean time, I predict a new wave of con men will arise in the militia movement, just like those that used to make fortunes selling bogus tax advice and snake oil like &#8220;pure trust&#8221; accounts.  Due to militia types&#8217; lack of any real legal knowledge, and their distrust of any establishment advice or sources(like the IRS), many people lost thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars to con-men who knew how to take advantage of the paranoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aslan Maskhadov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60338</link>
		<dc:creator>Aslan Maskhadov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may surprise you to know that the Constitution is a living document, and our &quot;militia&quot; has been known as the National Guard for quite some time now.  It would be foolish to suggest that the Constitution, a document drafted in the 18th century and its conditions, should never be changed. After all, had they not changed it, we would still have slavery today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may surprise you to know that the Constitution is a living document, and our &#8220;militia&#8221; has been known as the National Guard for quite some time now.  It would be foolish to suggest that the Constitution, a document drafted in the 18th century and its conditions, should never be changed. After all, had they not changed it, we would still have slavery today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60337</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, before you guys think that these idiots have so many rights and ways to go through with them know this:  It is an act of Treason to revolt against the United States of America which can be punishable by death. If President Andrew Johnson would not have been a nasty racist and did his job there would have been so many people executed and imprisoned after the Civil war to teach that lesson.   It is also an act of sedition, not to mention plotting against the Presdient of the US!!   WTF???!! Do you really think that they can plot against the President without being arrested? They will be arrested. They will be killed or do hard time.   No where in the constitution does it say you can plot against the President.  Nothing in any &quot;right&quot; or &quot;amendments&quot;  They are going to go down. If need be the national guard will become involved and I will be among the ones bringing the treasonist traitors to justice.    
 
 They are now committing federal crimes, they will lose everything.  I do not think that most people;the overwhelming majority of people, are willing to lose everything.   (Do they really want to leave their comfortable lifestyles to live up in the hills drinking water and eating squirrels?)  So they need to relax and maybe they will enjoy maybe the best President the US ever had.   They may come to love him and be glad he is our President.   Just give it a chance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, before you guys think that these idiots have so many rights and ways to go through with them know this:  It is an act of Treason to revolt against the United States of America which can be punishable by death. If President Andrew Johnson would not have been a nasty racist and did his job there would have been so many people executed and imprisoned after the Civil war to teach that lesson.   It is also an act of sedition, not to mention plotting against the Presdient of the US!!   WTF???!! Do you really think that they can plot against the President without being arrested? They will be arrested. They will be killed or do hard time.   No where in the constitution does it say you can plot against the President.  Nothing in any &#8220;right&#8221; or &#8220;amendments&#8221;  They are going to go down. If need be the national guard will become involved and I will be among the ones bringing the treasonist traitors to justice.    </p>
<p> They are now committing federal crimes, they will lose everything.  I do not think that most people;the overwhelming majority of people, are willing to lose everything.   (Do they really want to leave their comfortable lifestyles to live up in the hills drinking water and eating squirrels?)  So they need to relax and maybe they will enjoy maybe the best President the US ever had.   They may come to love him and be glad he is our President.   Just give it a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-60271</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/11/19/ideologues-call-for-post-election-militia-revival/#comment-60271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtually EVERY WN organization has at minimum two or more Federal Agents or paid C.I.&#039;s working. Most everyone knows that. Militias, may or may not have directed agents in the ranks depending upon the level of their rhetoric, but likely there is some oversight to their activities. It doesn&#039;t take an insider to know this is a reality.

The MISTAKE that is often made is to consider Militias as a separate entity from the body of the People. I am very weary of the &quot;organized militia&quot; concept. Primarily because THEY get penetrated by White Nationalists (WN) who eventually ruin every damn thing they touch! Not only do I find their thinking inappropriate for the present century (&amp; just plain ridiculous) but they are very often extremely disloyal to their own pathology.

Anyone who has ever worked in a correctional environment knows that the &quot;Aryans&quot; are extremely quick to exploit their own - to such an extent that they are better called the &quot;Heroin Brotherhood&quot;, than the &quot;Aryan Brotherhood&quot;. No one who has ever sampled real life would EVER trust a &quot;white nationalist&quot;...It&#039;s as simple as that.

That being said, the concept that a Militia is a white nationalist playground is only true in-so-far as they are allowed to exploit that venue. ANYONE with an once of sense would distance themselves from any WN in the ranks. They are there to exploit, to inform, to corrupt, &amp; to aggrandize (themselves).
Many, many people make it a habit to walk the other way once the talk turns to &quot;race issues&quot;.... NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE SHEEP; BUT BECAUSE THEY ARE FREE THINKING INDIVIDUALS. THE MAJORITY IN THIS COUNTRY SIMPLY DON&#039;T BELIEVE THE WN RHETORIC - AS IT DOESN&#039;T MAKE SENSE &amp; IT&#039;S ESPOUSED BY THE LOWEST MESSENGERS!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtually EVERY WN organization has at minimum two or more Federal Agents or paid C.I.&#8217;s working. Most everyone knows that. Militias, may or may not have directed agents in the ranks depending upon the level of their rhetoric, but likely there is some oversight to their activities. It doesn&#8217;t take an insider to know this is a reality.</p>
<p>The MISTAKE that is often made is to consider Militias as a separate entity from the body of the People. I am very weary of the &#8220;organized militia&#8221; concept. Primarily because THEY get penetrated by White Nationalists (WN) who eventually ruin every damn thing they touch! Not only do I find their thinking inappropriate for the present century (&amp; just plain ridiculous) but they are very often extremely disloyal to their own pathology.</p>
<p>Anyone who has ever worked in a correctional environment knows that the &#8220;Aryans&#8221; are extremely quick to exploit their own &#8211; to such an extent that they are better called the &#8220;Heroin Brotherhood&#8221;, than the &#8220;Aryan Brotherhood&#8221;. No one who has ever sampled real life would EVER trust a &#8220;white nationalist&#8221;&#8230;It&#8217;s as simple as that.</p>
<p>That being said, the concept that a Militia is a white nationalist playground is only true in-so-far as they are allowed to exploit that venue. ANYONE with an once of sense would distance themselves from any WN in the ranks. They are there to exploit, to inform, to corrupt, &amp; to aggrandize (themselves).<br />
Many, many people make it a habit to walk the other way once the talk turns to &#8220;race issues&#8221;&#8230;. NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE SHEEP; BUT BECAUSE THEY ARE FREE THINKING INDIVIDUALS. THE MAJORITY IN THIS COUNTRY SIMPLY DON&#8217;T BELIEVE THE WN RHETORIC &#8211; AS IT DOESN&#8217;T MAKE SENSE &amp; IT&#8217;S ESPOUSED BY THE LOWEST MESSENGERS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>