Comments on: A Slick DVD Defends Racism

By: John D. Fiat

John D. Fiat — Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:40:45 +0000

I’m not surprised that the SPLC calls this great documentary and the man who made it, racist. For without (perceived) racism, they’d be out of business. And what a profitable business it is! Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton make millions of dollars every year from it, as does the SPLC (and that’s just a few of the thousands of professional race pimps). Someday, the word racism will carry less weight than “The Boy Who Cried Wolf.” I can’t wait, because it is a complete joke. Move on and get a real job, you race-baiting cowards!

By: justin

justin — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:37:29 +0000

Rac-ism is a word created by cultural Marxist to subvert society. It’s a FACT, thanks to those that have exposed the Frankfurt School and their shenanigans..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WB6p5QPVhPI

By: Danny

Danny — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:41:33 +0000

Sheridan:

The point is that Craig Bodeker is against “reverse racism” and double standards, yet displays himself as an extreme racist.

That’s a conflict of interest and an untenable position that he continues to try to pretend and intellectualize despite his failures.

By: Kitty

Kitty — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:14:55 +0000

Interesting reply, if one is ignorant to the fact that the SPLC is involved in exposing racist groups of ALL races.
SPLC has sent notification about black racist groups as well as white, Dearies.
But don’t let the facts stop your loud chest thumping.

By: Sheridan

Sheridan — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:56:15 +0000

This is the sort of drivel we have come to expect from the SPLC. I have viewed Craigs video and have (as well as virtually ALL others who viewed it with me) found it to hit the proverbial nail on the head. Why is it you – sonia and splc have relentlessly defended this so called “overwhelming evidence of racism” argument? You are nothing more than pea brained morons whose sole purpose in life is to drive a wedge between the races and create the illusion that the evil white devil is out there and waiting to pounce. That the evil white man is trying to opress all others. If you can’t back it up with facts, you fall back to call the evil white man a racist. That word has lost its meaning – we have heard it too many times. You and your media play up alleged white on black crimes (Duke LaCrosse), yet do not cover black on white such as the rape and murder of Channon Christaian and Christopher Newsome. You are a joke. One day YOUR chickens will come home to roost and your glass house will shatter around you.

By: Don Quixote

Don Quixote — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:52:21 +0000

Mike writes: “… every scientific findings I’ve seen about the two show that race and intelligence is highly linked, and only fall slightly short of being conclusive.”

Really? In science, if you “fall short of being conclusive,” that means you’re hypothesis has to be rejected out of hand, even if you only slightly fell short. So you admit there is no proof of your white supremacy hypothesis. Thank you! Finally, an honest racist!

Then Mike contradicts himself and writes: “Intelligence is determined by genetics, and races vary genetically. Logically we can thus assume that races will have different intelligence levels.”

Really? Decades ago, geneticists, biologists and anthropologists dispelled the myth of biological race. Know what the final nail in it coffin was? As it turns out, much to the disappointment of unscientific people like you and white supremacists who practice pseudo science, THERE IS MORE GENETIC VARIATION WITHIN SO-CALLED “RACES” THEN THERE IS BETWEEN SO-CALLED “RACES”.

So Mike, this irrefutably means that people like you are clinging to an anachronist myth. If there is no such thing as a discernible biological race, yet all your arguments about white supremacy are based on this singular false premise. False premises mean false arguments. False arguments implode.

Your entire worldview collapsed and you are crawling around in the wreckage desparately trying to find something that validates your false identity and delusions of supremacy. I can only imagine you didn’t accomplish what you wanted in life and need to find someone to vent your anger upon. You and the other pseudo-scientific racists who post here are pathetic sorry individuals.

By: Danny

Danny — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:07:43 +0000

And by the way Craig:

I read your own press release: http://www.amren.com/mtnews/ar.....eker_r.php

It’s funny that you say that statements are “…even made up!” yet cannot point to a single specific statement that is made up!!

So tell us – what was the specific, alleged “misquote?” We’ll be glad to listen. The reason why you point to none is because no misquotes exist!!

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:19:08 +0000

I don’t really take anything the SPLC says seriously these days (your paycheck depends on finding racism in anything, so your claims of it anywhere are suspect), but after watching the video, reading your review and then Bodeker’s reply, I must say… shame on the SPLC.

This is about the most pathetic excuse of a journalistic critique I’ve ever seen in my life.

“He makes no effort to examine the scientific findings on intelligence and race, which have yet to produce convincing evidence that IQ differences are caused by genetics.”

Really? Because every scientific findings I’ve seen about the two show that race and intelligence is highly linked, and only fall slightly short of being conclusive. Intelligence is determined by genetics, and races vary genetically. Logically we can thus assume that races will have different intelligence levels. Modern testing and the general state of affairs throughout history prove this.

By: Danny

Danny — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:23:18 +0000

Craig:

Read the update to this post: http://www.splcenter.org/blog/.....filmmaker/

Look familiar?

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:10:02 +0000

Glad you could make it Mr. Bodeker. Now you can answer a couple questions:

1. At what time in American history do you think racism was a problem, and how.

2. What academic studies did you rely on to construct your theories about racism and its effects?

3. If you do not hate people of other races, how do you reconcile that position with your comments on Youtube videos.

Thanks in advance.

By: Craig Bodeker

Craig Bodeker — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:39:24 +0000

It’s interesting that the SPLC didn’t notify me of their “review,” of my film; “A Conversation about Race,” when it was done, even though I sent a personal note along with the DVD they ordered. I had to hear of this critique from a third-party. (Evidently the same way the SPLC collects it’s “evidence of hate.”) Maybe they figured I wouldn’t notice when a wealthy group of powerful, Governmedia-funded shakedown-artists call me a racist….?
The readers can see the film for free on Google Video, and judge for themselves. Is it hate or debate?
You can read the positive reviews from such hate-filled publications as American Thinker, Issues and Views, and The Mike Rosen Show. You can feel the racism, spewing from such reviewers as Human Events’ Warner Todd Huston and the Denver Post’s Ross Kaminski.
People can ignore this documentary. That is what the SPLC hopes you’ll do. Just take their word for it. Craig Bodeker is a hater!
But a lot of us are done taking the word of the “racism” industry.

Craig Bodeker
A Conversation About Race.

By: texasgomer

texasgomer — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:31:50 +0000

Johnny Winters rocks and Kinky is God’s gift to Texas.

A quarter inch beneath the skin we are all the same color.

By: Mike Magruder

Mike Magruder — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:19:08 +0000

I agree. We’re like albino creatures in caves. Why did Johnny Winter sing so black? Long live Kinky!

By: texasgomer

texasgomer — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:42:07 +0000

My favorite song by Kinky is “They don’t make Jews like Jesus anymore.” Totally funny.

ok, sub-equatorial Africa, my contention of dark skin still holds.

By: Mike Magruder

Mike Magruder — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:58:06 +0000

That’s Homo Erectus.

By: Mike Magruder

Mike Magruder — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:56:58 +0000

Best song by Kinky Friedman, next governor of Texas, with the Texas Jewboys is titled Home Erectus.

By: harlem

harlem — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:39:02 +0000

the first humans came form ethiopia, not equatorial africa.

By: harlem

harlem — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:24:47 +0000

I know racial types are mostly culturally arbitrary distinctions.

The first humans did not come from equatorial africa. the earliest fossils originate from the ethiopian zone, I think.- and not Ghana or the congo, et al

By: Nordmacht

Nordmacht — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:36:08 +0000

Amazing. You managed to squeeze four claims of racism and three claims of anti-Semitism into one chapter. Congratulations.

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:39:40 +0000

But molly even the three distinct racial groups are pretty much arbitrary. Look at the Turks for example, Turkish ethicities vary in looks from east Asian to white European, and that includes Tatars and Chuvashes who for the most part still occupy their native lands.

By: Tezuka fan

Tezuka fan — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:01:45 +0000

To expand on what molly is saying, race is a cultural constuct (physical scientist shouldn’t focus on it), which most modern anthropologists agree on (I majored in anthropology).
So outside of social commentary and studies, race doesn’t exist. But, the KKK and the NSM follow Hitler’s/etc. idea of a physical/mental difference between the races, ignoring any kind of environmental pressures and adaptations.
I’m too tired to come up with a closing/summary.

By: texasgomer

texasgomer — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:45:56 +0000

@molly
I did not say they would not be exactly the same as today’s Africans. Our ancestors were from equatorial Africa. Since they were near the equator they were probably dark skinned, hence “black Africans.”

By: molly

molly — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:38:34 +0000

Uh, our ancestors from Africa were not “black”.in the modern sense of the word. …Anthropologists say that the “races” didn’t differentiate until about 40,000 years ago, after most (?) of the planet had been colonized by humans…humans from one million or 500,000 years ago were not really divided into three distinct “racial” groups….

By: texasgomer

texasgomer — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:46:16 +0000

Horace, I agree, trace any human’s ancestry far enough back and you will find black Africans.

By: Tezuka fan

Tezuka fan — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:25:05 +0000

@Tony
BURNED!! You are the insult master!!

Also, I think Bodeker would probably say that the Jews are responsible for everything bad in civilization. Even the things that predate Judaism and things that were negative to a lot of Jews.
I bet $50 that that’s what he’d say, and I’m not even a gambling man. Any takers?

By: Mike Magruder

Mike Magruder — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:46:35 +0000

Mary Ellen. You’ve got to admit I’m imaginative. And I DO like “nice long liedowns”. I actually enjoy a six pack beforehand. I’m going to vote Kinky Friedman for Governor of :Texas. ps I really get a kick out of astronomy for a hobby.

By: Danny

Danny — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:39:30 +0000

Read the followup to this article:

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/.....filmmaker/

By: Warren E. Boisselle

Warren E. Boisselle — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:20:09 +0000

One has only to pay attention to the Nobel prizes to learn the truth. Among the races of the world, there is one group disproportionately represented in these awards. And there is the proof of the pudding.

By: Tony

Tony — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:01:21 +0000

If everything that’s good about civilization is to the credit of white people, is everything that’s bad about it the fault of white people as well?

By: Snorlax

Snorlax — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:33:06 +0000

More revisionist propaganda from the Reich Wingnuts.

Just make their racism go away by pretending it doesn’t exist.

Like making the Holocaust go away by pretending it didn’t exist.

Delusional.

Dangerously delusional.