Hatewatch Tweets
Hatewatch is managed by the staff of the Intelligence Report, an investigative magazine published by the Alabama-based civil rights group Southern Poverty Law Center.
Sympathy from the Far Right for Limbaugh on His NFL Rebuff
Reading news accounts of the past week, you may have thought conservative radio commentator Rush Limbaugh was merely rebuked for his history of controversial racial comments when he joined a group making a bid to buy the St. Louis Rams. Actually it was something far more serious, according to right-wing writer and commentator Selwyn Duke. Limbaugh was the victim of a “lynching,” Duke wrote in an article posted on the John Birch Society website.
It’s hard to imagine an angry mob storming the gates of Limbaugh’s Palm Beach compound (market value, $48 million) and stringing him up from a palm tree. But twice Duke wrote that Limbaugh was lynched. And in a third reference, he conjured up the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings of 18 years ago, writing that Limbaugh was subjected to a “high-tech lynching.”
An estimated 4,743 people – nearly 73 percent of them black – were lynched between 1882 and 1968, according to the Archives at Tuskegee Institute. Still, Selwyn equates a grotesque and terrifying death at the end of a rope with robust debate over Limbaugh’s views, which Selwyn claims “are in fact very mainstream.”
“It’s quite a bit over the top,” says Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP’s Washington bureau and vice president of advocacy and policy. [The organization took no position on Limbaugh’s Rams ownership ambitions]. “Lynching was one of the earliest forms of domestic terrorism. Not only was it used to wreak havoc and fear, but to kill. It was used to send a chill to other African-Americans. Whatever is happening to Rush Limbaugh, it certainly is overly inflammatory to call this a lynching.”
Considering Duke’s other conclusions about the Limbaugh brouhaha, his lynching hyperbole isn’t surprising. A frequent guest on hate-radio host Michael Savage’s show and other far-right venues, Duke wrote in the same article that Sen. Joseph McCarthy was “one of the most maligned men in American history.” Limbaugh, he contends, is a victim of a new McCarthyism in which “closet communists” are quick to call their foes racists.
These are dark days for conservatives, Duke adds. “The reality is that conservatism is becoming the new communism, with those proclaiming the creed suffering increasing persecution for their beliefs,” he writes. “While in the ’50s you could be blackballed for being a communist, it’s now conservatives who must express their beliefs in whispers. [Limbaugh, Savage, Glenn Beck, Lou Dobbs, et al are hardly whispering]. Limbaugh’s views are in fact very mainstream, yet he still was branded a heretic by today’s powers-that-be. So if such a lynching could be visited upon him, what about me? What about you?”
on October 22nd, 2009 at 9:21 am
“It’s hard to imagine an angry mob storming the gates of Limbaugh’s Palm Beach compound (market value, $48 million) and stringing him up from a palm tree.”
We can try. We can only hope. 8^)
I find it absolutely disgusting that the Reich Wing would use the word “lynching” to describe Junkie Rush getting beaten up for being a racist. Reich Wingnuts WERE the lynch mob in Jim Crow days.
The Reich Wing has fallen off the American airplane and is fluttering to its demise. We can only hope.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 9:25 am
Funny how an ULTRA Reich Wingnut (John Birch Society is as far off the deep end as you can get) would complain that the Righties are being treated like suspected Communist supporters were treated by the HUAC in the 50′s.
It was Reich Wingnuts like Sen. Joe McCarthy who set that precedent. Once again, the Reich Wingnuts are hoisted on their own petard.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 9:33 am
Rush Limbaugh is nothing more than a far right wing extremist espousing hate and inciting fear in the religious right who he wants to believe the bogeyman’s gonna get them if they don’t believe the Bible’s literalist. Certainly a rotten nut not worth eating.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 9:51 am
The reality is that traditional conservativism is DEAD in the US. Idiots like Junkie Rush, Chimpy Bush and Karl Rove killed it.
Nowadays, knuckle-dragging neocons rule the Repukes.
I wish we actually HAD some real conservatives in the GOP, the George Will – Bill Buckley kind. I disagreed with them, but I never found fault in how they said it.
Nowadays we have idiots like Glenn Beck trying to pin slavery on liberals. Absolute idiocy.
We need a return to intelligent discourse. Obama should pull all of FOX News’ press passes, that would be a start.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 10:09 am
You see this sort of “false equivalency” fallacy all the time nowadays. Like when the uber-conservatives equate the racist violent discourse agains Pres. Obama to the liberal criticism of Bush. Or when the AWMs (Angry White Males) on TV and AM cry about how the white male today is a victim of “reverse racism,” as if though what they’re experiencing is even in the same galaxy as what minority victims of racism have experienced.
False equivalency cheapens and diminishes the underlying concept, which of course, is largely what it’s intended to do.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 10:18 am
First of all, Snortax, it is HCUA not HUAC.
The attack on Mr. Rush Limbaugh is just a diversionary tactic for all the crap we have to put up with from ACORN and SEIU around here and coming from the Marxist/Maoists in Washington, DC.
Check out the hate and attack on FREEDOM – oops PROFIT – coming from the CZARs surrounding our President and he selected them for advice.
You tell me that a few thousand JBSers are upsetting your life ? Boy get a life or you have too much time on your hands and looking for snakes under every rock.
You make no mention of the Senate Internal Security subcommittee meetings which supported the HCUA hearing and findings. What’s up with this.
I guess anyone who does not believe in evolution, the sun and sunspots have no effect on the climate, abortion, homos; is a right wing extremist. Oh, I forgot I have to believe everything here literally. I think NOT.
As an impartial outsider what do you think of the human race or the rectum as a hole.
Have a nice day.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 11:06 am
What’s a “high-tech lynching?” Does it imply a titanium rope? Aside from being to the right of Attilla the Hun, these guys have a poor grasp of the English language.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 11:13 am
Did anyone see the recent interview of Limbaugh on NBC? When asked what his motive was for his extremest “views” expressed on his show, he said, “Ratings, of course!”
When the interviewer asked why ratings were so important to him he replied, “So I can make more money!”
Limbaugh doesen’t believe in ANYTHING. He said so himself. He only says things on his show that he thinks will rile up the ignorant and racist people who listen to him, and he’s been very successful doing that.
There’s no point in arguing against someone with no idieology, it’s just a waste of time. Limbaugh is just a whore to money, like all the other greedy people who have put our country into this economic toilet. The difference with him is that he profits from wreaking havoc between Americans who think he’s their “guru.” He’s only a guru of self-indulgence and greed.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 11:59 am
I agree with Observer’s comments above. Unfortunately, there are too many people in this country, and around the world really, that find comfort in issues being a simple “us” versus “them” when in reality the lines between each of us are really fine, almost non-existent at times. There is so much more that is alike about people from different groups than there are differences. But it is so much more comfortable to tuck it in and “defend the fort” vehemently while ignoring the shallow, unethical reasons leaders in radical groups (like Rush Limbaugh) do what they do. It is so difficult for some folks to find the courage and bravery to reach out to someone who appears to be different.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 12:00 pm
First of all, moron, it IS HUAC. House Un-American Activities Committee. Actually, both abbreviations are used.
Mr. Rush Limbaugh? MISTER??
He’s a JUNKIE who went DEAF from doing too much Hillbilly Heroin.
He got away with felony drug possession. Got off scot free.
Douglas, you ARE the rectum that is a hole.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Douglas thinks Maoists and Marxists are running Washington DC.
Douglas obviously has been sharing some of Junkie Rush Limbaugh’s Hillbilly Heroin.
The only Maoists in DC are in the Chinese Embassy.
Douglas, you’re delusional. Get help.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 12:04 pm
I thought it was very funny when I heard Mr. Limbaugh was
trying to buy an NFL football team, especially after all of
the nice things he said about black football players. He was
rejected, as I knew he would be. I think Mr. Limbaugh should stick to sportscasting.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 12:25 pm
I wonder what Mr. Limbaugh thinks of Donovan McNabb
Now?
on October 22nd, 2009 at 12:36 pm
Hi Snorlax, fellow News Hound :)
Douglas invalidated himself–aside from the whole “Maoist/Marxist/ACORN” whining–with the first line of his ‘argument’: it just happens to ALSO be HCUA, but it is indeed known as HUAC.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 12:53 pm
I think Rush Limbaugh is one of the most disgusting people of this day. He is making huge amounts of money to spout out his far right wing views. I wonder how many body guards he has in his employ, I am sure several.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 1:11 pm
Rush Limbaugh is nothing but an egomaniac who loves nothing better than stirring up trouble while he sits back laughing while he rolls around in his money. He must have a very sad life.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 1:42 pm
I guess I’ll begin to hoard today’s drinkable tap water for the days after the liberals lose power in Washington again. Then, in the future, I can drink the water in secret hiding in the “communist” closet. By this time the tap water will probably be poison and drinking it will be considered an act of patriotic self sacrifice. The palatable tap water will be privatized and reserved for upscale gated communities where each home is worth at least a million bucks.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 1:44 pm
I got a question:
What’s “reverse racism”? That seems to imply that there’s a culturally accepted form/direction of racism. If there is, what is it?
Assuming that reverse racism is occuring against Rush, and that Rush is white, acceptable racism is when it’s against specific non-white races.
Summary: Be careful when you mention reverse-racism. It’s like saing “They’re being racist in the wrong direction.” A better word, but still far, far from applying to Rush’s situation, is just racism.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 2:07 pm
Lynching? Who did the lynching? In 1868 the first black man to be lynched in the State of Georgia. was accused of assualt upon a white woman. The woman’s family got after him. He flew to the nearest camp of Union troops asking for protection. Yep he was protected. They hung him on the Courthouse square without trial or legal order. They just did it. So lets hate the South some more.. Who lynched the guy [Matt McConnell] ? Ohio troops camping at Lawrenceville, Georgia. Go on hate some more. Just look in a mirrow….. As entered on the Congressional record. Go on hate some more. Rush is your next victum …. who is hating who??
on October 22nd, 2009 at 5:07 pm
I miss Bill Buckley, while I disagreed with most of what he had to say I would defend to the death Mr. Buckley’s right to say it. Rush is a blowhard hillbilly heroin junkie who lies and tells half truths to a bunch of dittoheaded morons. He will lie about anything to get a response from ignorant people. Barry Goldwater, I miss you and your thoughtful ideas. Let’s hope Rush, Glenn Beck and Lou Dobbs stop getting so much airtime!
on October 22nd, 2009 at 6:44 pm
Most you above are responding like 6th. graders. Cannot grown people be more civil. Shame on all of you. Now, please reply accordingly. Civil is the word. Thank You.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 8:43 pm
Rush Limbaugh is nothing but an anti-American blowhard who has campaigned fervently to take away most of our rights and freedoms. We lost our right to make up our minds for ourselves when the Fairness Doctrine was abolished. The right to freedom of religion has been threatened because some of his ilk supported making Islam illegal in the United States. And those like Limbaugh are staunch opponents of disability rights, worker rights and even freedom of speech. He has no right to claim to be a Christian; most right wingers are truly atheists, anyway.
on October 22nd, 2009 at 9:19 pm
It is deplorable to use the word lynching to describe a simple business rejection, but it is not surprising. The business rejection is not baseless. It is based on former actions and public speech by Rush. We all have to take responsibility for what we do or say.
I think that he knew he would be rejected and used this as another form of white, male victimization. The neo-Cons of today are perpetual victims (in their minds), by minorities, gays, atheist, and liberals.
White fundamentalist churches/church members complain that hate crime legislation violates THEIR rights. They also think themselves persecuted if comedians make fun of them. They believe atheists are persecuting them by wanting to limit religion in govt. institutions.
They believe that illegal immigrants are dangerous people who are disease filled criminals who have the audacity to speak their native language in front of them.
There are so many more examples, but readers will get the gist. Anyway, I think that Limbaugh used this as a way to become “victimized” by the vast liberal conspirators.
on October 23rd, 2009 at 12:03 am
Now, doggone it, don’t put ol’ Douglas down…. He just gave me my laugh for the day…show some respect, you people. Now excuse while I laugh at ol’ Dougie..LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL……burp!
on October 23rd, 2009 at 3:06 am
All you guys should stop picking on poor Douglas. You’re going to confuse him with anything that’s properly punctuated. :D
on October 23rd, 2009 at 3:54 am
The real issue with Rush Limbagh and his hate radio is this. He has a true following of radical hate mongers. One of them will one day believing everything that Mr. Limbagh says is gospel will go out and either attempt or succeed in taking the life of a politician. My question then, is does Mr. Limbagh face any criminal liability for the acts of someone who is a true believer of Mr. Limbagh and his words. Does the 1st amendment protect him? I think not! people like Rush Limbagh who preach hate should face prosecution for what his followers do. One day his money will not save him. Somewhere, I think there should be a jail cell with his name already on it. Be careful Mr. Limbagh you could end up doing your radio show from jail.
on October 23rd, 2009 at 5:59 pm
I had NO idea how wealthy Rush is!
Money can really make a difference in the amount of cosmetic surgery an individual can have – what a transformation!
I remember little Rusty blathering about Sports on a station his Daddy bought for him and he was the quintessential essence of a rolly-poly tyke – silver spoon-fed easy money sort of fellow…..now look at him!
A cigar smoking country clubbing Conservative policy maker like few others!
I suppose narcotics takes years off the old waistline. I’m glad he didn’t go for the old “comb-over” and let his hair thin out…..Looks like an over paid CEO, bilking the serfs under him – a chance to brown-up their noses!
Follow that lead to the article; Rusty is looking pretty suave!
on October 23rd, 2009 at 7:04 pm
Yeah…suave like a hedgehog!!!
on October 24th, 2009 at 7:48 am
I tried to point out on a thread about immigration that being against illegal immigration was not hate and did not belong on a site called hatewatch , that it did not preclude being anti immigration , just anti illegal immigration.
After reading the responses on this Limbaugh thread , I will no longer bother posting here , as this sites biased agenda becomes clear.
These responses are pathetic and political oriented , and themselves are hate based.
Limbaugh is not a racist or a hater , and most here I’d bet have no more than a second hand knowledge of him and have not thoroughly listened to his broadcasts.
I do not agree with everything he says , but the idea that he is a racist , the idea that the Rev. Al Sharpton who incited violence against whites (“we have to get these WHITE usurpers out of our neighborhood” ) leading to deaths , or the Rev. Jackson (“hymies from hymietown” , and ” I would spit in white customers food” ) should lead a protest against Limbaugh for what your vicious responses dont understand was jokes , (black football players are friends of Limbaugh , and guests on his show) , is pathetic .
How ironic that Sharpton and Jackson once again get a pass as they extort money using their stock in trade , racial threats , and Limbaugh is instead the target.
The term lynching has been euphemistically used in countless scenarios to represent way less incidents – yet suddenly its literal interpretation becomes the norm?
Let me exit this hatesite and allow you to continue your hatefest of responses , devoid of realistic critical analysis .
on October 24th, 2009 at 10:04 am
Right-wingers always have mocked people fighting their oppression, and NOW the righties play at being an oppressed minority group!
on October 24th, 2009 at 9:32 pm
Claims of racism, reverse racism or whatever you want to call it is just another way of saying I don’t like you or you don’t like me. Well, boo hoo, get over it. Stand up and take responsibility for your own actions. The race card simply doesn’t work anymore and shame on those who still use it against those who don’t agree with their views. The worst racists in this country today are the Barak Obama Administration and Jimmy Carter. Thank God for great patriots like Rush and Hannity who still speak the truth. If Martin Luther King were alive today he would rebuke the Obama Administration for destroying what he and I fought for.
on October 25th, 2009 at 11:28 am
“Right-wingers always have mocked people fighting their oppression, and NOW the righties play at being an oppressed minority group!”
You couldn’t have exemplified my point any better if you tried to , John.
Read all the above responses , and then tell me who “mocks” who.
And , as I said and you verify , these responses are political , not based on reason and fairness -
Nobody is “playing” or claiming to be “oppressed” -
The claim is that the accusers are hypocrites , and the charges baseless.
But you go ahead and make yourself feel good by viewing yourself a “fighter of oppression” , ignoring the actions of those making the charges I’ve detailed above as acceptable ,
And villifying instead someone with no racial agenda because it fits your political agenda.
on October 25th, 2009 at 1:36 pm
Dave Varez…sorry to see you leave. You will be missed… NOT!!!
Jim, you are 1) a poster boy for pro-abortion; 2) not very intelligent; and 3) still not aware that it is people like you that were responsible for losing the Civil War. You can thank the African-Americans for their part in setting YOU free. MLK, Jr. would pray for/with you… and then kick you in the pants for being so ignorant!
Boo hoo, indeed! Hmph!!!
on October 25th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
What irony.
A site called hatewatch where , if you have an opinion expressed politely and as honestly and factually as possible , but in disagreement with others thoughts ,the responses are hateful and insulting .
Keep up the good work here making this a better world .
on October 25th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Dave, are you one of those people that keep saying you’re leaving a party and then never actually leaves? Are we going to find you sleeping on the floor in the morning?? Sheesh! Anyone who has listened to Limbaugh for half a minute can tell how fanatic his loathing is for pretty much anyone not Rush. And just so we’re clear here, I’m not a big fan of either Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson, but I’d take them over Rush.
And Jim… poor deluded Jim. How, exactly is President Obama a racist? I remember years and years ago, Jimmy Carter made at least one rather tasteless comment but he apologised for it, explained his meaning and has done massive amounts of good works since then.
You cannot damn a person for one comment. Since that one comment may have been made in haste or on a bad day. You condemn a person for their repeated actions in a specific direction. Surely even you can see that?
on October 25th, 2009 at 6:13 pm
mrsjack , I’m the kind of person who leaves when I decide to , not when you decide , unless you own this site ,
And I cant sleep on the floor because I wouldn’t want to take your only spot to stay out of the cold.
“Anyone who has listened to Limbaugh for half a minute can tell how fanatic his loathing is for pretty much anyone not Rush.”
Rush kids around a lot , and you dont get that. You wouldn’t in the half a minute you listen.
I dont agree with everything he says , but he makes a lot of sense and even if one does not agree , he makes you think.
But let me take a wild guess -
You dont agree , and you think Keith Oberman is just wonderful?
on October 25th, 2009 at 9:05 pm
No, MrsCaptJack:
I don’t think Jim or those people who think like him know enough what integrity is because they would not have the brass gonads to apologize when they realized they had made a major gaff. These mannerisms are what separate the reasonable and responsible from those who live inside a vacuum and can’t think for themselves. Jimmy Carter, silly as he may have appeared, has done more than any other Presidents combined to make this a better world, and not used it as a photo op for self-image purposes.
And then there’s Dave…………if you think the SPLC is a hate organization I suggest you crawl out from the rock you were born under and study a little history. You have GOT to be joking!?!?? Yiyiyiyi.
on October 26th, 2009 at 9:29 am
” I suggest you crawl out from the rock you were born under”
In the 15 minutes I’ve taken to politely point out that I dont equate some villifications here with “hate” , I and others have been responded to with venomous vitriol , similar to the comments made towards the subjects of the articles.
Here you give another example of this being the case.
What an example of the pot calling the kettle black (not a hate statement!)
The bunch here is all for a better world – as long as you agree with the bunch.
And if not – look out! Hypocrit city.
on October 26th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
“Let me exit this hatesite and allow you to continue your hatefest of responses , devoid of realistic critical analysis .”
Your words, Dave, not mine. Your bad punctuation, too.
Interesting how you resort to such childish comments and insults and can’t tell when someone else is merely verbally sparring.
I used to listen to Limbaugh on a regular basis ~ that’s where my opinion comes from. When someone repeatedly “jokes” about things I find offensive, I change my opinion of them. There is not one political commentator that I think is “wonderful”; sorry to disappoint. I’ve seen a few commentaries done by Keith Olbermann (perhaps that’s who you meant?) and for those particular commentaries, I agreed with what was said.
I don’t live in a vacuum, so I don’t feel I have to subscribe to everything said by some particular public figure. You might try that, it’s called freedom of thought.
Thanks, Dakotahgeo. I’m totally with you on Jimmy Carter. He started as a peanut farmer and really did become a president, even though much of his development was after he left office.
:
on October 26th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Let me exit this hatesite and allow you to continue your hatefest of responses , devoid of realistic critical analysis .
—————————————————————————————–
mrsjack , I’m the kind of person who leaves when I decide to , not when you decide , unless you own this site , (sic)
—————————————————————————————–
David. David, David…We’re merely trying to honor your request to exit this hatesite (not!) and you left out the last and most important part of my statement…”… and study a little history.” This is not possible for you? Mea culpa x 3.
To mrscaptjack, I think, after looking at the Presidents we’ve had in the last 20 years, sans the last 9 months, I’d rather wear the Badge of Honor, “Peanut Farmer,” then USA President. Ugh…gives me the shivers, lolol.
on October 26th, 2009 at 4:00 pm
Dakotahgeo, I totally agree with you on the “Peanut Farmer” badge of honour! Lol I do think Clinton is also doing some very good things with his foundation as well. Perhaps being mocked a bit is a good thing for some of our presidents, then? :D
As for our DLF (Dear Little Friend) Dave, just imagine Dakotahgeo and I at the door holding your coat and wishing you Godspeed on your journey to whatever fantasy you’re currently living in. Since you’ve denied his suggestion to study a little history and my suggestion to find some freedom of thought that’s not piped into your head by the rush of Rush, we thought you’d like to be on your way. You know, like you said a couple days ago..
on October 26th, 2009 at 7:37 pm
O.k., Dakotahgeo, stop cying! let’s take a look at a few points. First of all MLK, being an christian pastor, stood for morality above all else. Something liberals have abandon along the way. Abortion? Abandonment of traditional family values? Who should pray for who? I know which side the great pastor would stand on. I don’t care what label a person hangs on themselves, as long as they stand on moral foundational principles. The fall of every great civilization came on the heals of immorallity. I just hope we can make it through the Obama leadership and get back to a moral foundation before the country is too far gone to recover.
on October 27th, 2009 at 9:06 am
Jim , I dont post on many sites , but I’ve learned to quickly identify when posters are self absorbed know it alls , and attempt at discussion is a waste of time , degenerating into
personal insults unless you agree with the brood.
The only two options is to waste your time /return insults to idiots -
or just stop wasting your time and walk away.
on October 27th, 2009 at 9:10 am
Jim, Jim, Jim…lololol… Yes, that was some moral foundation we had during the Bush/Cheney Crime Wave. Being a minister/pastor/whatever today does not mean forsaking every principle one stands for, nor does it mean backing the wrong principle or person just because we “like” them. I have a great respect for Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. also, but if you would read a little deeper and wider than “I Have A Dream,” you would find that the good Dr. wasn’t exactly the icon of a moral life either, and his family accepted that, ALONG with his greatness.
You don’t read very well, do you? Who is crying? As far as I can tell, this country has been going down the slippery slope of immorality for a long time, alongside of most other great world nations, so what is your point?! The USA still has a majority of moral, values-led people with positive standards and mores. So what is your point?! Because they don’t agree with you or your philosophies? Jim, you wouldn’t do well in any society or nation that didn’t agree with your theories or ideals so quit with the “crying” accusations. I find most of these posts on here by the right wing complainers laughable… they are my emotional “toast and cereal” in the morning. Things could be a whole lot worse. You say things are going downhill. We are in a minority of nations in the world that have to have laws to protect minorities in this country. We are a nation that has to FORCE people to care for each other by way of a Health Care Bill. We have starving, homeless people in this country because our money is going to bigwig fat cat CEOS and military ammunition against a country that had nothing to do with our well-being or destruction via 9-11!!! If we are NOT crying, we SHOULD be!!! And do not fool yourself that some nations are not just “keeping score” for the time being… there will be retribution! And all the Border Patrols, and soldiers, and homegrown Patriots will never be able to hold back the onslaught. Now you can start crying, oh wise one! You are waaaay out of your league.
on October 27th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
You see what I mean Jim?
You are “way out of your league” with such highly intellectual types , who describe the country as worse than Zimbabwe and point out that we need “laws to protect minorities” , it being so terrible here that said minorities , as had been per immigration thread here pointed out when it fit the agenda , “risk their lives in the desert” to get into this terrible place -
And few leave once they discover how “terrible” it is here ,
though some do return home , quite wealthy from their accomplishments in this miserable place where laws are needed to protect them.
Meanwhile , the lib on a higher intellectual plane than the average Joe is amused at your “silly comments” because , as we all know is the case ,
” all the Border Patrols, and soldiers, and homegrown Patriots will never be able to hold back the onslaught”
of people trying to enter this country where
“We have starving, homeless people”.
How can you possibly argue against that flawless logic?
Like I said – A waste of time.
on October 27th, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Thank you, Dave. I’m glad you see my point…finally.
on October 31st, 2009 at 5:46 am
I wish that idiot varez would just shut up and leave already.
Junkie Rush Limbaugh IS a racist.
That has been conclusively proven, with his own words.
don’t go away mad, varez.
just go away.
on December 8th, 2009 at 12:47 am
Well Dakotahgeo,
Like most libs you’ve once again managed to avoid the discussion at hand. Instead of addressing the issues the best you can do is “well MLK wasn’t an icon of morality either”? Are you for real? And for the rest of your comments, you should really think about applying for the job of Obama’s telepromt writer for his next apology tour. And MrsCaptJack, try to keep up with the latest stupid comments made by your lib friends before joining in the conversation. If this is the best you can do then I think I need to move on to a more responsive forum, so this will be my last enrty.
But I do agree with one thing – the country has been on a downward moral spiral for quite some time. When will a real statesman, patriot, steadfast moral giant arise and take on the challenge? I don’t see anyone out there, dem or rep, worthy to pick up the mantel…unless Rush or Hannity want the job (just thought I would throw that one in as a going away gift). See ya!
on December 8th, 2009 at 9:43 am
Godspeed, Best wishes, Jim!
Don’t let the door hitcha….!!!
Dak!
on December 8th, 2009 at 1:10 pm
Wow Jim. You must read pretty slow if it took you forty days to come up with that drivel. I’d offer to type slower but by the time you managed to get to the end of the sentence, the joke would be lost on you.
on December 8th, 2009 at 3:15 pm
Hey Jim , why bother?
Cant you tell when a bunch of morons want to only “inbreed” among themselves in a discussion?
Can you imagine having this bunch as neighbors?
on December 8th, 2009 at 10:13 pm
MrsCaptJack,
Jim isn’t slow; he just had to find someone to read to him. Stories without pictures are a bummer, eh Jim? Oh well.
Maybe Dave can help you once he graduates from the Elementary level. Based on your smart remark regarding inbreeding, I can’t help but think you and Jim are half brothers. You certainly deserve each other. Limbuagh a distant cousin?
on December 8th, 2009 at 10:19 pm
Sorry…mistyped Limbaugh but does it really matter?!
on December 9th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
Hey Dakota, I think you’re right on several counts there; particularly when it comes to mistyping Limbaugh. We could spell it limburger but then that’s an insult to the cheese. Stinky though it may be ~ it has an actual function, unlike Limbaugh. Although, if we use Not Just Watching’s ideas above, we could possible make a bellows out of Rush to blow some of that how air out of here.