<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revealed! David Irving Can Be a Jerk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/</link>
	<description>Hatewatch is a blog of the Southern Poverty Law Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-132589</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-132589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great, Carter, and we&#039;ll put you in charge of determining who is and who isn&#039;t distorting the truth, ok?  I say YOU distort the truth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, Carter, and we&#8217;ll put you in charge of determining who is and who isn&#8217;t distorting the truth, ok?  I say YOU distort the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Peanut</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-131717</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Peanut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-131717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking of Stormfront, has Stormfront´s ties with wealthy figures in Miami´s right-wing Cuban exile community ever been fully investigated?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Stormfront, has Stormfront´s ties with wealthy figures in Miami´s right-wing Cuban exile community ever been fully investigated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-131558</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-131558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holding dishonorable viewpoints is certainly a subjective agenda. But publicly attempting to convince others of a lie and publicly disgorging falsehoods to the instigating of lies, misdeeds, &amp; the re-writing of history is generally accepted as the &quot;Fighting Words&quot; concept within First Amendment case rulings. 

[If you don&#039;t understand the legal definition of &quot;fighting words&quot;, please do a quick Google and conceptualize it in this context.]

If someone were to take a public forum and blather on about a total distortion of truth to the extent that it insights the same social discordance as &quot;Laughing at a Funeral&quot;; that is NOT protected speech.

It is NOT only shouting &quot;fire&quot; in a crowed movie theater that is not protected by the 1st Amendment but the illustration set above that is NOT protected. It is also NOT Privacy as set by the 4th Amendment as the statements (by Irving) were designed to be public &amp; continued to be thus disseminated at the public for a specific purpose of swaying one group against another.

The &quot;Baptist Church&quot; in Kansas (I use the term Church loosely) who publicly pickets the funerals of Servicemen and individuals who died from AIDS, had been ruled non-protected speech when taken to court. If a loved one died in military service and a group of INTOLERANT JERKS PICKETED THE MOST PRECIOUS &amp; LAST TIME YOU HAD WITH THEM....
THAT WOULD NOT BE PROTECTED SPEECH.

The same is true with victims of the Nazis. Catholics (Laymen &amp; Priests alike) Jews, Slavic peoples - just about anyone who did not fit the Nazi ideal, were murdered. And this little pontificating &quot;scholar&quot; would make an issue out of whether the number was 5.8 or 6 million....To what end? To stir further Hate, To revel in the pain of those whom he happens to hate, &amp; to repaint history. So WHO is the INTOLERANT JERK?

The Bill of Rights does NOT give individuals or organizations the right to manipulate truth or lies so the end result is &quot;Fighting Words&quot;. This is both substantiated in both State &amp; Federal case law.

Holding a &quot;dishonorable viewpoint&quot; &amp; attempting to convince a group of it&#039;s validity to the ultimate outcome of swaying a group that they are victimized by falsehoods - when NO evidence exists for such views, has no defense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holding dishonorable viewpoints is certainly a subjective agenda. But publicly attempting to convince others of a lie and publicly disgorging falsehoods to the instigating of lies, misdeeds, &amp; the re-writing of history is generally accepted as the &#8220;Fighting Words&#8221; concept within First Amendment case rulings. </p>
<p>[If you don't understand the legal definition of "fighting words", please do a quick Google and conceptualize it in this context.]</p>
<p>If someone were to take a public forum and blather on about a total distortion of truth to the extent that it insights the same social discordance as &#8220;Laughing at a Funeral&#8221;; that is NOT protected speech.</p>
<p>It is NOT only shouting &#8220;fire&#8221; in a crowed movie theater that is not protected by the 1st Amendment but the illustration set above that is NOT protected. It is also NOT Privacy as set by the 4th Amendment as the statements (by Irving) were designed to be public &amp; continued to be thus disseminated at the public for a specific purpose of swaying one group against another.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Baptist Church&#8221; in Kansas (I use the term Church loosely) who publicly pickets the funerals of Servicemen and individuals who died from AIDS, had been ruled non-protected speech when taken to court. If a loved one died in military service and a group of INTOLERANT JERKS PICKETED THE MOST PRECIOUS &amp; LAST TIME YOU HAD WITH THEM&#8230;.<br />
THAT WOULD NOT BE PROTECTED SPEECH.</p>
<p>The same is true with victims of the Nazis. Catholics (Laymen &amp; Priests alike) Jews, Slavic peoples &#8211; just about anyone who did not fit the Nazi ideal, were murdered. And this little pontificating &#8220;scholar&#8221; would make an issue out of whether the number was 5.8 or 6 million&#8230;.To what end? To stir further Hate, To revel in the pain of those whom he happens to hate, &amp; to repaint history. So WHO is the INTOLERANT JERK?</p>
<p>The Bill of Rights does NOT give individuals or organizations the right to manipulate truth or lies so the end result is &#8220;Fighting Words&#8221;. This is both substantiated in both State &amp; Federal case law.</p>
<p>Holding a &#8220;dishonorable viewpoint&#8221; &amp; attempting to convince a group of it&#8217;s validity to the ultimate outcome of swaying a group that they are victimized by falsehoods &#8211; when NO evidence exists for such views, has no defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-130973</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-130973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People have a right to privacy, and they also have a right to hold dishonorable viewpoints.  The real intolerant jerks are those who would violate these principles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have a right to privacy, and they also have a right to hold dishonorable viewpoints.  The real intolerant jerks are those who would violate these principles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-130700</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-130700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interweaving the David Irving Article and the story about the Canadian youth into one comment provides for a unique example about how Adolf Hitler had treated the MOST loyal of his followers. If any of you know the history of that period you also know how National Socialism (read - White Nationalism) lashes out at it&#039;s own...

During the War on the Eastern Front when Hitler&#039;s prize Waffen SS Divisions would not fight to the death Hitler became lived with rage. These were Hitler&#039;s most prized and victorious troops, yet they were torn to ribbons facing the Red Army. 
When SS Divisions Leibstandarte, Das Reich &amp; Totenfopf (who were responsible for the operation of the Death Camp system) broke and run (retreated, some historians would say) Hitler became so enraged - that  they would not sacrifice their lives on his magnificent military planning, that he ordered them to be stripped of their prized Divisional insignia &amp; publicly shamed &amp; repudiated them as cowards.
To continue to follow Hitler would mean certain death at the hands of the Red Army. - Obviously they were not THAT loyal.
National Socialism has had a history of turning on it&#039;s own members; not matter HOW committed they seemed to be. This is actually the HISTORY of that Pathology &amp; it&#039;s interaction with it&#039;s followers. (&quot;You can NEVER be good enough to satisfy the &#039;Leader&#039;&quot;)
Because in the end, the sacrifices are always too much as to be wasteful, meaningless, &amp; planned by an idiot.) Typically, Concentration Camp Guards found no problem in killing the helpless &amp; sick, but when it came to standing and fighting those which would destroy them; they ran away.

According to Nazi  legend, Joachim Peiper a highly decorated veteran of Leibstandarte who had fought with profound victory at Kursk &amp; Battle of the Bulge suggested his men gather all their combat decorations together in a chamber pot &amp; send them to Hitler.
Here was Hitler&#039;s Body Guard Division saying &quot;Fuck You, madman!&quot; And there was Hitler saying, &quot;If you won&#039;t die needlessly for me in my ridiculously foolish military planning, I throw you out like rubbish - no matter WHO you are&quot;.
That was very very essence of National Socialistic thought:... They always have turned on their own. They have always been informers. The very nature of their system demands these disgusting character traits.

Source: Story of the Second World War, Schuser,
German Battle Tactics, Newton. Rise and Fall of Third Reich, Simon Shuster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interweaving the David Irving Article and the story about the Canadian youth into one comment provides for a unique example about how Adolf Hitler had treated the MOST loyal of his followers. If any of you know the history of that period you also know how National Socialism (read &#8211; White Nationalism) lashes out at it&#8217;s own&#8230;</p>
<p>During the War on the Eastern Front when Hitler&#8217;s prize Waffen SS Divisions would not fight to the death Hitler became lived with rage. These were Hitler&#8217;s most prized and victorious troops, yet they were torn to ribbons facing the Red Army.<br />
When SS Divisions Leibstandarte, Das Reich &amp; Totenfopf (who were responsible for the operation of the Death Camp system) broke and run (retreated, some historians would say) Hitler became so enraged &#8211; that  they would not sacrifice their lives on his magnificent military planning, that he ordered them to be stripped of their prized Divisional insignia &amp; publicly shamed &amp; repudiated them as cowards.<br />
To continue to follow Hitler would mean certain death at the hands of the Red Army. &#8211; Obviously they were not THAT loyal.<br />
National Socialism has had a history of turning on it&#8217;s own members; not matter HOW committed they seemed to be. This is actually the HISTORY of that Pathology &amp; it&#8217;s interaction with it&#8217;s followers. (&#8220;You can NEVER be good enough to satisfy the &#8216;Leader&#8217;&#8221;)<br />
Because in the end, the sacrifices are always too much as to be wasteful, meaningless, &amp; planned by an idiot.) Typically, Concentration Camp Guards found no problem in killing the helpless &amp; sick, but when it came to standing and fighting those which would destroy them; they ran away.</p>
<p>According to Nazi  legend, Joachim Peiper a highly decorated veteran of Leibstandarte who had fought with profound victory at Kursk &amp; Battle of the Bulge suggested his men gather all their combat decorations together in a chamber pot &amp; send them to Hitler.<br />
Here was Hitler&#8217;s Body Guard Division saying &#8220;Fuck You, madman!&#8221; And there was Hitler saying, &#8220;If you won&#8217;t die needlessly for me in my ridiculously foolish military planning, I throw you out like rubbish &#8211; no matter WHO you are&#8221;.<br />
That was very very essence of National Socialistic thought:&#8230; They always have turned on their own. They have always been informers. The very nature of their system demands these disgusting character traits.</p>
<p>Source: Story of the Second World War, Schuser,<br />
German Battle Tactics, Newton. Rise and Fall of Third Reich, Simon Shuster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nativefaith</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-130213</link>
		<dc:creator>nativefaith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-130213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question about this Saturday in NYC
From: Allen Rouse 
To: focalp@aol.com
Date: Thu, Nov 12, 2009 12:37 pm
Hello Mr.Irving,
My name is Allen Rouse and my wife and I will be attending your talk this Saturday in NYC. I am part of the media group at Stormfront, I do a weekly program on Stormfront Radio called &quot;The Staropramen Show&quot;, Staropramen is my username there. I would like to know if it would be possible for me to videotape the talk on Saturday for Stormfront. Don Black, SF&#039;s proprietor has informed us that a major overhaul is being done to the site in the coming weeks which will include our own video hosting capabilities and it would be nice to have this
talk for this new feature. I look forward to meeting you and enjoying your always brilliant and informative talks.
 
Yours truly,
 
Allen Rouse/Staropramen   


The stormwatch website that Rouse refers to harbors more of the same and an interesting line of communication is exposed:

Don Black, proprietor of Stormfront website

&quot;Stormfront is an online community of White activists. It&#039;s not a business, no one receives a salary, and our work is supported by voluntary contributions. These are used entirely for upgrading hardware and software, monthly Internet bandwidth charges, expanding Stormfront radio and other multi-media projects, publishing our printed newspaper and, when necessary, legal bills.&quot;

Charles A Lindbergh 

&quot;Stormfront&#039;s creator and Administrator, Don Black, has financed much of Stormfront&#039;s growth out of pocket, personally. The bigger we grow, the more we Stormfronters (and Guests) need to pay ourselves for what Don created.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question about this Saturday in NYC<br />
From: Allen Rouse<br />
To: <a href="mailto:focalp@aol.com">focalp@aol.com</a><br />
Date: Thu, Nov 12, 2009 12:37 pm<br />
Hello Mr.Irving,<br />
My name is Allen Rouse and my wife and I will be attending your talk this Saturday in NYC. I am part of the media group at Stormfront, I do a weekly program on Stormfront Radio called &#8220;The Staropramen Show&#8221;, Staropramen is my username there. I would like to know if it would be possible for me to videotape the talk on Saturday for Stormfront. Don Black, SF&#8217;s proprietor has informed us that a major overhaul is being done to the site in the coming weeks which will include our own video hosting capabilities and it would be nice to have this<br />
talk for this new feature. I look forward to meeting you and enjoying your always brilliant and informative talks.</p>
<p>Yours truly,</p>
<p>Allen Rouse/Staropramen   </p>
<p>The stormwatch website that Rouse refers to harbors more of the same and an interesting line of communication is exposed:</p>
<p>Don Black, proprietor of Stormfront website</p>
<p>&#8220;Stormfront is an online community of White activists. It&#8217;s not a business, no one receives a salary, and our work is supported by voluntary contributions. These are used entirely for upgrading hardware and software, monthly Internet bandwidth charges, expanding Stormfront radio and other multi-media projects, publishing our printed newspaper and, when necessary, legal bills.&#8221;</p>
<p>Charles A Lindbergh </p>
<p>&#8220;Stormfront&#8217;s creator and Administrator, Don Black, has financed much of Stormfront&#8217;s growth out of pocket, personally. The bigger we grow, the more we Stormfronters (and Guests) need to pay ourselves for what Don created.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beholder</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-130064</link>
		<dc:creator>beholder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-130064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is astounding. So much so that I am speechless. Truth is indeed stranger than fiction. So, finding myself without meaningful comment on this issue, I will limit myself to state that in my mind&#039;s eye I can clearly see Snorlax&#039;s forebears sweeping the trenches of Huns and liberating Europe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is astounding. So much so that I am speechless. Truth is indeed stranger than fiction. So, finding myself without meaningful comment on this issue, I will limit myself to state that in my mind&#8217;s eye I can clearly see Snorlax&#8217;s forebears sweeping the trenches of Huns and liberating Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Peanut</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-129786</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Peanut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-129786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There may be a suspicious South African hand behind this self-described &quot;anti-fascist&quot; hack. Please note the animosity between Irving and a certain BNP &quot;historian&quot; due to Irvings suggestion, published on-line in his diary, that the said &quot;historian&quot; may be some sort of intelligence operative. A racist South African blogger close to this &quot;historian&quot; was recently raided by the police and closed down his blog. All very fishy...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be a suspicious South African hand behind this self-described &#8220;anti-fascist&#8221; hack. Please note the animosity between Irving and a certain BNP &#8220;historian&#8221; due to Irvings suggestion, published on-line in his diary, that the said &#8220;historian&#8221; may be some sort of intelligence operative. A racist South African blogger close to this &#8220;historian&#8221; was recently raided by the police and closed down his blog. All very fishy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorlax</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-129691</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorlax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-129691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some states in the US still have criminal libel laws.

These Holohoaxer nut cases have been successfully prosecuted under civil libel laws.

Maybe its time to get a criminal prosecutor involved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some states in the US still have criminal libel laws.</p>
<p>These Holohoaxer nut cases have been successfully prosecuted under civil libel laws.</p>
<p>Maybe its time to get a criminal prosecutor involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorlax</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-129689</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorlax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-129689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Over 60 years ago the World told the Nazis to go to Hell &amp; the world will continue to do so.&quot;

Damn right.

My dad, both my uncles and both my grandpas wore our uniform against the Hun and then against Hitler.

Their generations were willing to put their lives on the line for freedom.  Is ours?

The reich wingnut rhetoric in blogspace is turning ugly.  They&#039;re openly talking revolt.

Is today a repeat of 1931 or 1861...or maybe both?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Over 60 years ago the World told the Nazis to go to Hell &amp; the world will continue to do so.&#8221;</p>
<p>Damn right.</p>
<p>My dad, both my uncles and both my grandpas wore our uniform against the Hun and then against Hitler.</p>
<p>Their generations were willing to put their lives on the line for freedom.  Is ours?</p>
<p>The reich wingnut rhetoric in blogspace is turning ugly.  They&#8217;re openly talking revolt.</p>
<p>Is today a repeat of 1931 or 1861&#8230;or maybe both?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moldings suffolk county new york</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-129478</link>
		<dc:creator>moldings suffolk county new york</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-129478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What comes around goes around. He&#039;ll get his share of karma just wait.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What comes around goes around. He&#8217;ll get his share of karma just wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/11/19/revealed-david-irving-can-be-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-129159</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=3514#comment-129159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Ms. Antas is experiencing some Aryan angst.....too bad. She is a grown up woman &amp; should known that - YOU CAN&#039;T BE DISILLUSIONED IF YOU DON&#039;T HAVE ILLUSIONS TO BEGIN WITH.
Recently I had been watching the History Channel with a color film(s) documentary of WWII. 
ANYONE who can doubt the existence of the Holocaust is either a sheltered fool, someone experiencing &quot;wishful thinking&quot;, or a certain defilement of humanity called Sin by many.
National Socialism not only destroyed a generation or more, but it left such an ugly scar that one would think that anyone tempted to play on that Playground should think twice or three times before proceeding. 

WN rat-out their own members, &amp; seem to scar themselves at the point when they wake from their nightmarish ideals with nothing but embarrassing tattoos to show for it.
And wake, they do! I would not be surprised that here are MORE &quot;ex-white nationalists&quot; than there ever are committed members. They are a group whose reflection in the mirror of self examination is treachery, disappointment, &amp; sadness.
Carrying their ideals to the end they would exterminate little children. Children who have never harmed a soul.
Knowing this, or seeing it makes anyone with an ounce of decency  - silently weep for all the hurt they have delivered over the course of their &quot;career&quot;.
They eventually remember the children they screamed at during their &quot;Rallies&quot; or public appearances. The elderly people they frightened or made to cry.....what a legacy!

Over 60 years ago the World told the Nazis to go to Hell &amp; the world will continue to do so. 
Those who harm the innocent will NEVER be supermen (or women). They will always be the cowards, bullies, &amp; a low functioning blight on the pages of history or human interaction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Ms. Antas is experiencing some Aryan angst&#8230;..too bad. She is a grown up woman &amp; should known that &#8211; YOU CAN&#8217;T BE DISILLUSIONED IF YOU DON&#8217;T HAVE ILLUSIONS TO BEGIN WITH.<br />
Recently I had been watching the History Channel with a color film(s) documentary of WWII.<br />
ANYONE who can doubt the existence of the Holocaust is either a sheltered fool, someone experiencing &#8220;wishful thinking&#8221;, or a certain defilement of humanity called Sin by many.<br />
National Socialism not only destroyed a generation or more, but it left such an ugly scar that one would think that anyone tempted to play on that Playground should think twice or three times before proceeding. </p>
<p>WN rat-out their own members, &amp; seem to scar themselves at the point when they wake from their nightmarish ideals with nothing but embarrassing tattoos to show for it.<br />
And wake, they do! I would not be surprised that here are MORE &#8220;ex-white nationalists&#8221; than there ever are committed members. They are a group whose reflection in the mirror of self examination is treachery, disappointment, &amp; sadness.<br />
Carrying their ideals to the end they would exterminate little children. Children who have never harmed a soul.<br />
Knowing this, or seeing it makes anyone with an ounce of decency  &#8211; silently weep for all the hurt they have delivered over the course of their &#8220;career&#8221;.<br />
They eventually remember the children they screamed at during their &#8220;Rallies&#8221; or public appearances. The elderly people they frightened or made to cry&#8230;..what a legacy!</p>
<p>Over 60 years ago the World told the Nazis to go to Hell &amp; the world will continue to do so.<br />
Those who harm the innocent will NEVER be supermen (or women). They will always be the cowards, bullies, &amp; a low functioning blight on the pages of history or human interaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>