“Although recently *debunked* by … Newsweek (which called it “too silly to discuss”) …”

Declaring something “too silly to discuss” is *not* the same as debunking.

Therefore I have to question who exactly you are trying to defend when you denigrate people who bring up inconvenient facts as ‘conspiracy theorists.’ Popular Mechanics, whose chief editor is the cousin of former DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff cannot be considered a reputable authority on these matters; their nepotistic political affiliations are obvious. DHS would not exist were it not for the official narrative on 9/11. Do you really think there was no windfall for the Chertoff family – one whose gravy train just might have to be protected by the cousin running Popular Mechanics? Cui Bono?

You guys are lawyers, you figure it out…

Like its niggardly sister word “Anti-Semitism”, it is is replete with semantics from both law and political science, as well as popular urban lore and the ubiquitous hate crime Bills in the West, or more appropriately, the thought crime Bills.

All of those semantics were carefully separated and each deconstructed in the article ‘Anatomy of Conspiracy Theory’:

print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2010/03/anatomy-of-conspiracy-theory.html

I urge SPLC scholars to actually study the aforementioned article. You would need to figure out how to address the next spin now that the word “conspiracy” has been acutely anatomized into its separate components. I believe the semantic qualifier you wished to apply for this article was ‘kookish’ – because the legal definition of ‘conspiracy’ may cause you to be indicted for being some part of the real conspiracy to mask the unraveling of the most monumental crimes against humanity.

Get a lawyer to read that article.

Thank you.

Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org

The Jersey Girls support Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, the organization founded by Richard Gage whose purpose it is to promote a criminal investigation of the Ground Zero murder scene, and whose efforts in presenting empirical evidence are smeared by parties not interested in an investigation.

It was predicted years ago that: ‘War on Terror’ and its assorted accoutrements like the Patriot Act was not about ‘Islamofascism’ but about squelching dissent to “imperial mobilization”.

Here is an old excerpt, circa 2003:

print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2009/03/war-on-terror-not-about-islamofascism.html

Stifling activist dissent is the real reason

Okay, what is the answer? Muslims of America make a very convenient fifth column to be vigilant against, to be investigated and dug out of their mosques, requiring new laws for surveillance and new powers for security agencies. To successfully deploy this, any and all confluence of interests are being employed, including the hatred and arrogance of the ultra right-wing Christian fanatics who seek Armageddon to get closer to Jesus.

How convenient! Muzzling the dissent of the very vocal minority of brave activists, and the likes of Daniel Ellsberg that might rise up to challenge the oppression and destruction of innocent people around the world in the process of executing this American global conquest, would require some draconian measures. Why? In order to curb their civil rights and create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation so that they would not be vocal in their protests, lest they are able to successfully mobilize and dethrone the emperor! Well the persecution of the “fictitious fifth columnist” is conveniently giving the perpetuators of world conquest the much needed despotic laws to control and contain any sort of public outrage.

These oppressive laws via the USA Patriot Act 1 passed by Congress in the wake of 9/11 without any debate, and now its even more oppressive successor Patriot Act 2 waiting in the wings for an opportune time, and the concomitant erosion of civil liberties, is really intended for the rest of the US population, and not so much for any “fictitious danger” from the “fictitious fifth columnists”.

It is a preemptive strike at domestic dissent, consistent with the doctrine of preemptive strike at imperial targets abroad. Both are part of the same foreign policy agenda, as per ZB’s “Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”*7

Test this hypothesis yourself. How much danger are the Muslims to the state in the prosecution of their global hegemonic plans, and how much danger are the activists? In fact, any terrorism done by any Muslim in the US would play right into the hands of the state, now wouldn’t it? But a Daniel Ellsberg or two leaking out privileged information from the “inside” like the infamous “Pentagon Papers”, that can provide concrete evidence of lying and deceit of the kind impeachments are made of, difficult to wriggle out from, can put a quick stop to the grandiose expansion plans of the state, now couldn’t it? Or a mass mobilizations against the war as witnessed during Vietnam might awaken the real sleeping giant, the good hearted but dormant public, mightn’t it? Richard Nixon, October 15, 1969, inside the White House, talking to Henry Kissinger, while a million people protesting outside the White House, briefly contemplates dropping an atomic bomb on Vietnam, but allows sanity to prevail because of his fear of what the million marchers might do to him.*8

Well – fastforward 2010: we have, as expected, Dissenters To Be Detained As “Enemy Belligerents” ACT.

I’d say SPLC is merely doing its appointed job as the bulldog of masters pulling the strings of police-statehood enroute to world government because, as even Bertrand Russel had logically derived it ab initio from the basic premise of the reality of an oligarchy in a scientific modernity:

“World government could only be kept in being by force”.

See his Impact of Science on Society.

So, SPLC is on the mark. Don’t fret about the bulldog if you don’t like its snarl. Go for its oligarchic masters who are not ony feeding it, but orchestrating world events designed to piece-meal, one fait accompli at a time, culminate in world government.

Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
United States of America

“The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. Its easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.”
— Herman Goehring, Nazi Party – Nuremberg Trials

The price of her exercise of free speech and expression was her career.

It seems very clear the SPLC has joined up with the propagandists and gay bashers…

http://abs.sagepub.com/content/vol53/issue6/

Haven’t people studied history? Don’t they realize that the German people were also incapable of facing the fact their own government was building concentrations camps? That their own government had staged false-flag attacks? Even after WWII had ended there were Germans who had no idea that just one mile away people were being put into ovens.

People in Germany were also called “conspiracy-theorist” and “unpatriotic” when contradicting what the mainstream media fed to the people.

When will people drop their inflated American ego…

Can we get past the American Exceptionalism and face the facts?

My thoughts about camps being built for US citizens is that I have no opinion as of yet. Not enough data at this point.

My thoughts on 9/11 are simple. 2 planes + 2 strikes = 3 buildings…. I’m not buying that one. 2 bats + 2 balls has NEVER equaled 3 home runs. That’s all the evidence I need. K.I.S.S.

How “America: Freedom to Fascism” is “right wing” or “hate” is beyond me, but splc really has no credibility as ahuman rights organization. It attacks people who take normal political stands in public fora, apparently afraid to contest those concepts which it opposes in the free market of ideas.

Ditto for 9-11 truth documentaries. It is number one, non-partisan to question the what happened on that day. Number two, over 60 percent of americans polled question the official story. Number three thousands of engineers and architects have signed a petition claiming th epancake collape theory of NIST is impossible.

So what does splc gain by calling this hate or right wing? The only possible gain can be to marginalize or silence a school of thought; in which case one must ask WHY?

Oh yeah, as others have noted the official story of 9eleven is a “conspiracy theory.”

Conspiracy to commit a crime esp. a felony is in fact a separate crime in our legal system, so surely “So.Po.LEGALCENTER” (yah, LEGAL) is not claiming that conspiracies don’t exist?

Its a buy in. You buy the official conspiracy theory, or you don’t. That seems predetermined by sociological bent , or by reading and becoming aware of a nasty History of secrets involving ‘false flag’ events.
Of which 911 is one.

Michael Parenti – Terrorism, Globalization and Conspiracy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZleYnq3nYw

If only there were more humans like you, we’d not find America in the current mess it’s in.

The internet is fertilized by people posting words they think are true, yet they’ve never checked any of their ‘facts’ out. If you spend a bit of open-minded time searching the various websites devoted to finding the truth about 9/11 and also an equal amount of time on the 9/11 truthers are crazy websites I think you’ll begin to see why so many rational humans question the government’s propaganda about that fateful day.

And in the process you may also discover a host of other horrible actions done by the American government against its own people all in the name of peace and freedom. Once you realize the government doesn’t give a rat’s ass about you individually, it kinda can’t help but open your eyes.

If the SPLC was/is concerned about hate, then maybe they’d devote more time helping the world’s muslims who are at the receiving end of more institutionalized hate than about any group I can think of. Well them and anyone with the audacity to question the government.

DaveS