<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veterans Against Jihad Takes on ‘Threat’ of Shariah Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/</link>
	<description>Hatewatch is a blog of the Southern Poverty Law Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:03:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan Amirkhanov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-202268</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan Amirkhanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-202268</guid>
		<description>...And actually most Europeans are more concerned with immigration from other European nations, particularly European Union nations of Eastern Europe.  It&#039;s not only the immigration- they are angry(though they have themselves to blame) that so much of their tax Euros have gone into propping up states like Poland, Slovakia, the Baltic states, and so on- yet these states for the most part continue to be hell-holes and people flock out of them and into England, Germany, and the west in general.  

But I look at it this way, Western Europe worked so hard to break down &quot;evil totalitarian&quot; Communism- so let them clean up the mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;And actually most Europeans are more concerned with immigration from other European nations, particularly European Union nations of Eastern Europe.  It&#8217;s not only the immigration- they are angry(though they have themselves to blame) that so much of their tax Euros have gone into propping up states like Poland, Slovakia, the Baltic states, and so on- yet these states for the most part continue to be hell-holes and people flock out of them and into England, Germany, and the west in general.  </p>
<p>But I look at it this way, Western Europe worked so hard to break down &#8220;evil totalitarian&#8221; Communism- so let them clean up the mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch Beales</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-202229</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch Beales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-202229</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we could add liars to the list of apt titles for the repeated claims of the &quot;Muslim threat in Europe&quot; which they continue to make in spite of the fact the these claims have been debunked repeatedly.  What&#039;s really happening in Europe today is the biggest wave of xenophobia and religious hatred since the defeat of Nazi Germany 65 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we could add liars to the list of apt titles for the repeated claims of the &#8220;Muslim threat in Europe&#8221; which they continue to make in spite of the fact the these claims have been debunked repeatedly.  What&#8217;s really happening in Europe today is the biggest wave of xenophobia and religious hatred since the defeat of Nazi Germany 65 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan Amirkhanov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201759</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan Amirkhanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 03:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201759</guid>
		<description>&quot;We’ve been called traitors, morons, idiots; cowards, paranoids&quot;

Yup, that pretty much covers your group.  Apt titles them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We’ve been called traitors, morons, idiots; cowards, paranoids&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup, that pretty much covers your group.  Apt titles them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domenick, Anotheroneofthem</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201649</link>
		<dc:creator>Domenick, Anotheroneofthem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201649</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been called traitors, morons, idiots; cowards, paranoids and thanks to MR. buddha, we were provided with an acronomic nexus to  female genitalia.

This is not the SPLC I once knew.

What Class!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been called traitors, morons, idiots; cowards, paranoids and thanks to MR. buddha, we were provided with an acronomic nexus to  female genitalia.</p>
<p>This is not the SPLC I once knew.</p>
<p>What Class!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch Beales</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201641</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch Beales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201641</guid>
		<description>At least those awful jooz have had the good sense not to try to impose their Kosher laws on the rest of us.  They&#039;ll have to pry my BBQ from my cold dead hands!  You paranoid ninnies and idiots are a laugh a minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least those awful jooz have had the good sense not to try to impose their Kosher laws on the rest of us.  They&#8217;ll have to pry my BBQ from my cold dead hands!  You paranoid ninnies and idiots are a laugh a minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CitizenSpork</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201437</link>
		<dc:creator>CitizenSpork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201437</guid>
		<description>Lou, your comments on Shariah law courts in the UK are as alarmist as the reactionary newspapers over here. The simple fact of the matter is that a Muslim in the UK is entitled to have a _civil_ matter dealt with by a religious leader in accordance with his/her religious beliefs, this is in no way different from two atheists attending an arbitration meeting to resolve a _civil_ matter. The findings are only acceptable when both parties agree to the outcome and in no way can they supercede the law of the land. A Muslim (or any other person for that matter) cannot choose to be tried in any court other than a crown/magistrate court in the case of any _criminal_ proceedings brought against them. The slippery slope does not in any way shape or form apply.

As to your alarmist BS about banning piggy banks and the like, I hate to break this to you, but it&#039;s simply not true. While I have no doubt you could bore me to tears with links to stories in the Mail about christmas being banned or toilets made for Muslims only in shopping centres, but that wouldn&#039;t change the fact that the stories are generally wilful misreporting of incidents to further the &quot;OMG those dirty foreigners want to ruin it for us lovely middle class white people&quot; rhetoric of the right wing press in the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou, your comments on Shariah law courts in the UK are as alarmist as the reactionary newspapers over here. The simple fact of the matter is that a Muslim in the UK is entitled to have a _civil_ matter dealt with by a religious leader in accordance with his/her religious beliefs, this is in no way different from two atheists attending an arbitration meeting to resolve a _civil_ matter. The findings are only acceptable when both parties agree to the outcome and in no way can they supercede the law of the land. A Muslim (or any other person for that matter) cannot choose to be tried in any court other than a crown/magistrate court in the case of any _criminal_ proceedings brought against them. The slippery slope does not in any way shape or form apply.</p>
<p>As to your alarmist BS about banning piggy banks and the like, I hate to break this to you, but it&#8217;s simply not true. While I have no doubt you could bore me to tears with links to stories in the Mail about christmas being banned or toilets made for Muslims only in shopping centres, but that wouldn&#8217;t change the fact that the stories are generally wilful misreporting of incidents to further the &#8220;OMG those dirty foreigners want to ruin it for us lovely middle class white people&#8221; rhetoric of the right wing press in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan Amirkhanov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201401</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan Amirkhanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201401</guid>
		<description>&quot;From me: The simple fact is Ruslan, you lied – flat out lied – when you said there were no sharia courts in Europe. This from someone telling Whitehurst to do “some research……&quot;

Where you do your research makes a BIG difference.  Your &quot;research&quot; consists of alarmist sites, judging by the words and concepts you regurgitate.  

Nonetheless, what bearing on actual law do the Sharia courts you refer to have?  None.   


&quot;Cowardly? I am right in the fight bro. &quot;

No, you are a coward in real life and your &quot;fight&quot; is little more than an internet fantasy.  That is why your paranoid mind NEEDS me to be a Muslim so badly. 

&quot;Why no comment on your lie about no sharia courts in Europe, Ruslan? Hoping we’d just overlook that?&quot;

Please show us your sources, and show what bearing these courts have on UK law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From me: The simple fact is Ruslan, you lied – flat out lied – when you said there were no sharia courts in Europe. This from someone telling Whitehurst to do “some research……&#8221;</p>
<p>Where you do your research makes a BIG difference.  Your &#8220;research&#8221; consists of alarmist sites, judging by the words and concepts you regurgitate.  </p>
<p>Nonetheless, what bearing on actual law do the Sharia courts you refer to have?  None.   </p>
<p>&#8220;Cowardly? I am right in the fight bro. &#8221;</p>
<p>No, you are a coward in real life and your &#8220;fight&#8221; is little more than an internet fantasy.  That is why your paranoid mind NEEDS me to be a Muslim so badly. </p>
<p>&#8220;Why no comment on your lie about no sharia courts in Europe, Ruslan? Hoping we’d just overlook that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Please show us your sources, and show what bearing these courts have on UK law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan Amirkhanov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201387</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan Amirkhanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 07:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201387</guid>
		<description>Sorry Domenick, but most of us just aren&#039;t as easily terrified as you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Domenick, but most of us just aren&#8217;t as easily terrified as you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Stouch</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201370</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Stouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201370</guid>
		<description>From me:  The simple fact is Ruslan, you lied – flat out lied – when you said there were no sharia courts in Europe. This from someone telling Whitehurst to do “some research......

From Ruslan:  Well thanks for confirming my assertion that conservatives are cowardly, paranoid people afraid of their own shadow. Cry and moan all you want but I am an atheist....

Cowardly?  I am right in the fight bro.  Why no comment on your lie about no sharia courts in Europe, Ruslan?  Hoping we&#039;d just overlook that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From me:  The simple fact is Ruslan, you lied – flat out lied – when you said there were no sharia courts in Europe. This from someone telling Whitehurst to do “some research&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>From Ruslan:  Well thanks for confirming my assertion that conservatives are cowardly, paranoid people afraid of their own shadow. Cry and moan all you want but I am an atheist&#8230;.</p>
<p>Cowardly?  I am right in the fight bro.  Why no comment on your lie about no sharia courts in Europe, Ruslan?  Hoping we&#8217;d just overlook that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domenick, Anotheroneofthem</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201360</link>
		<dc:creator>Domenick, Anotheroneofthem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201360</guid>
		<description>Based on Blog comments, knowledge surrounding Shari&#039;ah and the threat it poses on our Constitutional Republic, is at best marginal.

Shari&#039; ah is a social, political, economic and unfortunately a religious ideology, which by virtue of it&#039;s tenets, seeks to dominate all who are non Muslim by subverting ALL other political as well as  economic systems. Shari&#039;ah IS Islam. 

Are we at risk? we seem to think so. Putting ones politcal leanings aside, I invite you to read all you can and make your own assessment. The Geert Wilders trial, being conducted as we speak may be a good start. Key in Sharia Compliant Financing, Joy Brighton, Frank Gaffney and learn how these seemingly mundane financial transactions are supporting Al-Qaida and others violent groups.

What we hate is the oppression of Shari&#039; ah and the violence of Jihad against  Americans and all peoples of all  nations subject to and under it&#039;s dictates.

It is not about religious redemption. It&#039;s about the explotation of fear, benefitting those perpetuating it, with power, wealth and control.

Thank You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on Blog comments, knowledge surrounding Shari&#8217;ah and the threat it poses on our Constitutional Republic, is at best marginal.</p>
<p>Shari&#8217; ah is a social, political, economic and unfortunately a religious ideology, which by virtue of it&#8217;s tenets, seeks to dominate all who are non Muslim by subverting ALL other political as well as  economic systems. Shari&#8217;ah IS Islam. </p>
<p>Are we at risk? we seem to think so. Putting ones politcal leanings aside, I invite you to read all you can and make your own assessment. The Geert Wilders trial, being conducted as we speak may be a good start. Key in Sharia Compliant Financing, Joy Brighton, Frank Gaffney and learn how these seemingly mundane financial transactions are supporting Al-Qaida and others violent groups.</p>
<p>What we hate is the oppression of Shari&#8217; ah and the violence of Jihad against  Americans and all peoples of all  nations subject to and under it&#8217;s dictates.</p>
<p>It is not about religious redemption. It&#8217;s about the explotation of fear, benefitting those perpetuating it, with power, wealth and control.</p>
<p>Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAS</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201331</link>
		<dc:creator>SAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 03:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201331</guid>
		<description>........well-known politicians like Newt Gingrich — are now warning with straight faces that mullahs could soon be caning American schoolchildren if they get caught chewing gum.......


Actually, there is only one country that actually bans chewing gum, and that is Singapore, and no, Sharia laws do not exist there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;..well-known politicians like Newt Gingrich — are now warning with straight faces that mullahs could soon be caning American schoolchildren if they get caught chewing gum&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Actually, there is only one country that actually bans chewing gum, and that is Singapore, and no, Sharia laws do not exist there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unbelievable occult stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201319</link>
		<dc:creator>Unbelievable occult stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 23:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201319</guid>
		<description>Is *every* Christian Republican a frothingly insane loon?

Good grief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is *every* Christian Republican a frothingly insane loon?</p>
<p>Good grief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan Amirkhanov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201308</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan Amirkhanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201308</guid>
		<description>&quot;sharia law is nothing to fear in comparison to what the jews are doing and have done to this country. &quot;

I see what you did there Dana.  If you wish, please explain to us what Jews have done to America. Then prepare to reap a whirlwind of sarcasm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;sharia law is nothing to fear in comparison to what the jews are doing and have done to this country. &#8221;</p>
<p>I see what you did there Dana.  If you wish, please explain to us what Jews have done to America. Then prepare to reap a whirlwind of sarcasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan Amirkhanov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201306</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan Amirkhanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201306</guid>
		<description>&quot;Upon further consideration Ruslan, I believe you are also telling a lie in your assertion that you are an atheist.

Your arguments run much to similar to those I found at Loon-watch, a UK based islamist site. And I notice that Loonwatch is actually linked to SPLC on its website, so that fits perfectly well.

No, you are a professional Ruslan, simply employing taqqiya and spreading misinformation.&quot;

Well thanks for confirming my assertion that conservatives are cowardly, paranoid people afraid of their own shadow.  Cry and moan all you want but I am an atheist, after freeing myself the insanity of evangelical Christianity(America&#039;s answer to the Taliban).   How sad that the best you can come up with is &quot;you&#039;re lying&quot;, and then the hilariously paranoid &quot;you&#039;re a professional.&quot;  

Hell, I WISH I could get paid for this.  Exposing right-wing nutcases and torpedoing your pathetic arguments is one of the easiest things I do.  If only someone would pay me.  

Now it is ironic that given all this you are oblivious to claim that Mitch doesn&#039;t have a &quot;cogent argument&quot;.  Funny that all your &quot;arguments&quot; revolve around stories you &quot;recall&quot;.  Gee, recall from where exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Upon further consideration Ruslan, I believe you are also telling a lie in your assertion that you are an atheist.</p>
<p>Your arguments run much to similar to those I found at Loon-watch, a UK based islamist site. And I notice that Loonwatch is actually linked to SPLC on its website, so that fits perfectly well.</p>
<p>No, you are a professional Ruslan, simply employing taqqiya and spreading misinformation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well thanks for confirming my assertion that conservatives are cowardly, paranoid people afraid of their own shadow.  Cry and moan all you want but I am an atheist, after freeing myself the insanity of evangelical Christianity(America&#8217;s answer to the Taliban).   How sad that the best you can come up with is &#8220;you&#8217;re lying&#8221;, and then the hilariously paranoid &#8220;you&#8217;re a professional.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Hell, I WISH I could get paid for this.  Exposing right-wing nutcases and torpedoing your pathetic arguments is one of the easiest things I do.  If only someone would pay me.  </p>
<p>Now it is ironic that given all this you are oblivious to claim that Mitch doesn&#8217;t have a &#8220;cogent argument&#8221;.  Funny that all your &#8220;arguments&#8221; revolve around stories you &#8220;recall&#8221;.  Gee, recall from where exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Stouch</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-2/#comment-201305</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Stouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201305</guid>
		<description>Mitch Mitch Mitch, where to begin.  I&#039;ll keep it simple.  I recall a recent story about a British bank &quot;recalling&quot; piggy banks - for children, of course - because certain muslims found them offensive.  So much for your commentary on pigs.

As regards sharia, you obviously miss the point.  Being, that the muslims are forming a parallel society in which they will follow their own laws.  Does the term &quot;no go areas&quot; mean ring a bell?  Naturally this takes time, but they push a little here and a little there, and before you know it, presto, separate swimming hours for men and women (Germany).  I also recall a recent incident in which a politician visited a muslim neighborhood, only to be told by the local imam something to the effect that, &quot;you dont come to a muslim area and do whatever&quot;.

Must you resort to name calling Mitch?  Ninnies and idiots?  Usually such exclamations are a reflection of frustration born from the lack of a cogent argument.  Such being the case here, if you still miss my points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch Mitch Mitch, where to begin.  I&#8217;ll keep it simple.  I recall a recent story about a British bank &#8220;recalling&#8221; piggy banks &#8211; for children, of course &#8211; because certain muslims found them offensive.  So much for your commentary on pigs.</p>
<p>As regards sharia, you obviously miss the point.  Being, that the muslims are forming a parallel society in which they will follow their own laws.  Does the term &#8220;no go areas&#8221; mean ring a bell?  Naturally this takes time, but they push a little here and a little there, and before you know it, presto, separate swimming hours for men and women (Germany).  I also recall a recent incident in which a politician visited a muslim neighborhood, only to be told by the local imam something to the effect that, &#8220;you dont come to a muslim area and do whatever&#8221;.</p>
<p>Must you resort to name calling Mitch?  Ninnies and idiots?  Usually such exclamations are a reflection of frustration born from the lack of a cogent argument.  Such being the case here, if you still miss my points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dana pallessen</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201296</link>
		<dc:creator>dana pallessen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201296</guid>
		<description>sharia law is nothing to fear in comparison to what the jews are doing and have done to this country.  pity ben franklin, thomas jefferson and others at the time did not prevail.  we would not be currently be burdened with either their presence nor the fact that the muslims have brought their fight with the jews to our country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sharia law is nothing to fear in comparison to what the jews are doing and have done to this country.  pity ben franklin, thomas jefferson and others at the time did not prevail.  we would not be currently be burdened with either their presence nor the fact that the muslims have brought their fight with the jews to our country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch Beales</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201293</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch Beales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201293</guid>
		<description>chris dowling What got you so teed off?  Fore!  If you&#039;ll check out http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-442555/Church-school-renames-Three-Little-Pigs-avoid-offending-Muslims.html you&#039;ll see that Muslim leaders condemned as misguided changing the 3 pigs to 3 puppies.  For one thing they have no objection to pigs as storybook characters, only as dinner.  It is also true, as far as I know, that devout Muslims consider dogs just as unclean as hogs.

In general I am done searching for documentation of the nonsensical claims of &quot;conservatives&quot; who seem incapable of writing in the English language much less including URLs in their post to back up their ridiculous claims.  I will, however, point out (as I did when Lou Stouch or one of his co-ninnies posted these claims about Sharia courts in the UK in another thread here) that the controversy has arisen because parliament has recently passed a law that, when someone willingly submits to binding arbitration by an Islamic court, the ruling of that court will indeed be considered binding.  I don&#039;t quite see how this provides any support for Sharia law.  It seems to me that a rational person would be less likely to subject themselves to an Islamic court if the ruling of that court was considered binding.  With any luck this act of parliament will eventually put such courts out of business.  Unfortunately, as some of the idiots who post here make abundantly clear, there seems to be an endless supply of people who are not at all rational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chris dowling What got you so teed off?  Fore!  If you&#8217;ll check out <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-442555/Church-school-renames-Three-Little-Pigs-avoid-offending-Muslims.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....slims.html</a> you&#8217;ll see that Muslim leaders condemned as misguided changing the 3 pigs to 3 puppies.  For one thing they have no objection to pigs as storybook characters, only as dinner.  It is also true, as far as I know, that devout Muslims consider dogs just as unclean as hogs.</p>
<p>In general I am done searching for documentation of the nonsensical claims of &#8220;conservatives&#8221; who seem incapable of writing in the English language much less including URLs in their post to back up their ridiculous claims.  I will, however, point out (as I did when Lou Stouch or one of his co-ninnies posted these claims about Sharia courts in the UK in another thread here) that the controversy has arisen because parliament has recently passed a law that, when someone willingly submits to binding arbitration by an Islamic court, the ruling of that court will indeed be considered binding.  I don&#8217;t quite see how this provides any support for Sharia law.  It seems to me that a rational person would be less likely to subject themselves to an Islamic court if the ruling of that court was considered binding.  With any luck this act of parliament will eventually put such courts out of business.  Unfortunately, as some of the idiots who post here make abundantly clear, there seems to be an endless supply of people who are not at all rational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allah</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201292</link>
		<dc:creator>Allah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201292</guid>
		<description>Scaring people into follwing soemone is an old ploy.fear is a great motivator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scaring people into follwing soemone is an old ploy.fear is a great motivator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201291</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201291</guid>
		<description>Just more scare tactics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just more scare tactics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Stouch</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201287</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Stouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201287</guid>
		<description>Upon further consideration Ruslan, I believe you are also telling a lie in your assertion that you are an atheist.

Your arguments run much to similar to those I found at Loon-watch, a UK based islamist site.  And I notice that Loonwatch is actually linked to SPLC on its website, so that fits perfectly well.

No, you are a professional Ruslan, simply employing taqqiya and spreading misinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon further consideration Ruslan, I believe you are also telling a lie in your assertion that you are an atheist.</p>
<p>Your arguments run much to similar to those I found at Loon-watch, a UK based islamist site.  And I notice that Loonwatch is actually linked to SPLC on its website, so that fits perfectly well.</p>
<p>No, you are a professional Ruslan, simply employing taqqiya and spreading misinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan Amirkhanov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201285</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan Amirkhanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201285</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oneofthem&quot;, in case you weren&#039;t aware, people who want to impose Sharia law, like all religious fundamentalists- ARE right wing.  The right wing is defined by those who want to preserve tradition and fight against change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oneofthem&#8221;, in case you weren&#8217;t aware, people who want to impose Sharia law, like all religious fundamentalists- ARE right wing.  The right wing is defined by those who want to preserve tradition and fight against change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Stouch</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201282</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Stouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201282</guid>
		<description>Ruslan.  So, its &quot;Stouch&quot; now, huh?  Little burr under that saddle?

The simple fact is Ruslan, you lied - flat out lied - when you said there were no sharia courts in Europe.  This from someone telling Whitehurst to do &quot;some research&quot;.

You&#039;ve now lost all credibility here Ruslan.  And personally I dont care if your an atheist or any other -thist - you toe the muslim party line in all things, so your religion, or lack thereof, is irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruslan.  So, its &#8220;Stouch&#8221; now, huh?  Little burr under that saddle?</p>
<p>The simple fact is Ruslan, you lied &#8211; flat out lied &#8211; when you said there were no sharia courts in Europe.  This from someone telling Whitehurst to do &#8220;some research&#8221;.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve now lost all credibility here Ruslan.  And personally I dont care if your an atheist or any other -thist &#8211; you toe the muslim party line in all things, so your religion, or lack thereof, is irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legalhound</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201280</link>
		<dc:creator>legalhound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201280</guid>
		<description>Sharia Law isn&#039;t coming to America. We have far more to fear from Evangelical Law because we have way too many people in this country who falsely believe that 1) America was a Christian Nation (Read ALL of Jefferson&#039;s writing on the subject and check out Madison while you&#039;re at it) 2. That the Constitution doesn&#039;t really require the separation of church and state and 3. That religion actually has a place in a court room.
See the similarities. We have a justice system that is 1. based on retribution, 2. Is biased against minorities 3. That puts the victim on trial (especially rape cases) and now we have groups that are certain that their religion would save us all. The difference is that the Evangelicals are running for office so they can actually cause trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharia Law isn&#8217;t coming to America. We have far more to fear from Evangelical Law because we have way too many people in this country who falsely believe that 1) America was a Christian Nation (Read ALL of Jefferson&#8217;s writing on the subject and check out Madison while you&#8217;re at it) 2. That the Constitution doesn&#8217;t really require the separation of church and state and 3. That religion actually has a place in a court room.<br />
See the similarities. We have a justice system that is 1. based on retribution, 2. Is biased against minorities 3. That puts the victim on trial (especially rape cases) and now we have groups that are certain that their religion would save us all. The difference is that the Evangelicals are running for office so they can actually cause trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan Amirkhanov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201269</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan Amirkhanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201269</guid>
		<description>Oh one more thing Whitehurst. It looks like you need some help making proper analogies.  If we want to compare a monument to Hitler at Treblinka properly we would have to believe that the owners of Park 51 are building a monument to Bin Laden, or Mohammed Atta et al. In other words, someone involved in the planning or execution of 9-11 and subscribing to their extremist ideology.  Park 51 is akin to a YMCA(in fact its design is based on one) and it is not at Ground Zero, which incidentally already has had a real Mosque even closer to it.  

Research. Do some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh one more thing Whitehurst. It looks like you need some help making proper analogies.  If we want to compare a monument to Hitler at Treblinka properly we would have to believe that the owners of Park 51 are building a monument to Bin Laden, or Mohammed Atta et al. In other words, someone involved in the planning or execution of 9-11 and subscribing to their extremist ideology.  Park 51 is akin to a YMCA(in fact its design is based on one) and it is not at Ground Zero, which incidentally already has had a real Mosque even closer to it.  </p>
<p>Research. Do some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan Amirkhanov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201268</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan Amirkhanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 05:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201268</guid>
		<description>&quot; We are seeing go down into the depths of deepravities each and every day. Christians are being bashed by the left, while liberals are hunky dorky with anyone who happens to be anything but Christian.&quot;

Nonsense, absolute nonsense.  Christians have been taking flak for their increasing demand to be involved in politics and dominate the laws of the land.   This is why it is hypocritical for such people to complain about Sharia law taking over America while every Supreme Court Justice confirmation hearing revolves around issues like abortion.


&quot;Unfortunately too many Christians have hide under the cloak of cowardice.&quot;

Uh yeah, sure.  Last time I checked they were extremely vocal for decades.  I grew up in the evangelical movement and I am familiar with their persecution fantasy.  Basically when people resist their preaching or oppose their attempts to push their agenda in the schools or government, they cry persecution.

&quot;The thought of Muslins and thir liberal consortiums say it is okay to build a Muslin community center or Park 51, but at the same the liberals would be in an uproad if someone decides to build a shrine in honoring of Adolph Hitler in Triblanca nazi concentration camp or any other concontration camps in Poland.&quot;

So you are comparing all Muslims to Hitler, interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; We are seeing go down into the depths of deepravities each and every day. Christians are being bashed by the left, while liberals are hunky dorky with anyone who happens to be anything but Christian.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nonsense, absolute nonsense.  Christians have been taking flak for their increasing demand to be involved in politics and dominate the laws of the land.   This is why it is hypocritical for such people to complain about Sharia law taking over America while every Supreme Court Justice confirmation hearing revolves around issues like abortion.</p>
<p>&#8220;Unfortunately too many Christians have hide under the cloak of cowardice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh yeah, sure.  Last time I checked they were extremely vocal for decades.  I grew up in the evangelical movement and I am familiar with their persecution fantasy.  Basically when people resist their preaching or oppose their attempts to push their agenda in the schools or government, they cry persecution.</p>
<p>&#8220;The thought of Muslins and thir liberal consortiums say it is okay to build a Muslin community center or Park 51, but at the same the liberals would be in an uproad if someone decides to build a shrine in honoring of Adolph Hitler in Triblanca nazi concentration camp or any other concontration camps in Poland.&#8221;</p>
<p>So you are comparing all Muslims to Hitler, interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan Amirkhanov</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201267</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan Amirkhanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 05:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201267</guid>
		<description>Well Stouch, the fact that these courts(which likely have no bearing on UK law) exist only for marriage and divorce, as well as contracts, does not automatically mean that Sharia law is going to take over the UK.  You are committing a slippery slope fallacy here.  In fact for Orthodox Jews there are similar bodies which regulate marriage and divorce.  I don&#039;t see anyone suggesting that Jews are going to take over....oh wait, ok I DO see a lot of people suggesting that but the point is far fewer people believe that nonsense.  

You might also be disturbed to find out that I am an atheist, not a Muslim, and on principle I would be just as opposed to Sharia law as I would any other religious involvement in public affairs.  So you&#039;ll have to live out your Crusade fantasy on some other site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Stouch, the fact that these courts(which likely have no bearing on UK law) exist only for marriage and divorce, as well as contracts, does not automatically mean that Sharia law is going to take over the UK.  You are committing a slippery slope fallacy here.  In fact for Orthodox Jews there are similar bodies which regulate marriage and divorce.  I don&#8217;t see anyone suggesting that Jews are going to take over&#8230;.oh wait, ok I DO see a lot of people suggesting that but the point is far fewer people believe that nonsense.  </p>
<p>You might also be disturbed to find out that I am an atheist, not a Muslim, and on principle I would be just as opposed to Sharia law as I would any other religious involvement in public affairs.  So you&#8217;ll have to live out your Crusade fantasy on some other site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarleyDaysYet</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201265</link>
		<dc:creator>EarleyDaysYet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 04:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201265</guid>
		<description>@ oneofthem &quot;Wow! Let me see If I have this right, A group called VAJ takes a stand on Sharia law, and you respondents to the article want to aver to the vagina, the Crimean War, Trotsky and other Alinsky style diversions?&quot;

Taking a stand on something that isn&#039;t an issue is meaningless. 

Sharia law courts exist in the UK, to what should be the shame of that government. Tribal customs should not replace law of the land, &amp; establishing this precedent in the UK means that the rights of Muslim women have again been undermined. 

HOWEVER: Sharia law, as someone else pointed out, cannot in toto replace the existing systems in the UK or the US, or Australia, without completely abolishing the rule of law. That is EXTREMELY unlikely.  

Just don&#039;t give up that first toehold - don&#039;t allow domestic abuse, female circumcision, &quot;honour&quot; killings, forced marriages, etc on the basis of &quot;cultural norms&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ oneofthem &#8220;Wow! Let me see If I have this right, A group called VAJ takes a stand on Sharia law, and you respondents to the article want to aver to the vagina, the Crimean War, Trotsky and other Alinsky style diversions?&#8221;</p>
<p>Taking a stand on something that isn&#8217;t an issue is meaningless. </p>
<p>Sharia law courts exist in the UK, to what should be the shame of that government. Tribal customs should not replace law of the land, &amp; establishing this precedent in the UK means that the rights of Muslim women have again been undermined. </p>
<p>HOWEVER: Sharia law, as someone else pointed out, cannot in toto replace the existing systems in the UK or the US, or Australia, without completely abolishing the rule of law. That is EXTREMELY unlikely.  </p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t give up that first toehold &#8211; don&#8217;t allow domestic abuse, female circumcision, &#8220;honour&#8221; killings, forced marriages, etc on the basis of &#8220;cultural norms&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domenick, Anotheroneofthem</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201261</link>
		<dc:creator>Domenick, Anotheroneofthem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201261</guid>
		<description>Some may not agree with who or how the message is conveyed. However the issue is not how or who conveys the message, but the message itself. 

Does the message have merit? does it warrent further research? I submit that it does. However, make your own assessment 

Make no mistake, the threat is real and the proof is unfolding in Europe. Lets do the research instead of wasting valuable talent trying to exchange ego inspired comments. 

Please. read &quot;Shari&#039; ah The Threat To America&quot; It&#039;s on line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some may not agree with who or how the message is conveyed. However the issue is not how or who conveys the message, but the message itself. </p>
<p>Does the message have merit? does it warrent further research? I submit that it does. However, make your own assessment </p>
<p>Make no mistake, the threat is real and the proof is unfolding in Europe. Lets do the research instead of wasting valuable talent trying to exchange ego inspired comments. </p>
<p>Please. read &#8220;Shari&#8217; ah The Threat To America&#8221; It&#8217;s on line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Stouch</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201254</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Stouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201254</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the SPLC will think about this:

85 sharia courts in UK, says report  (30) 
Press Association, Monday June 29 2009 There are as many as 85 sharia courts operating in Britain, according to a new report.

Academic Denis MacEoin, the report&#039;s author, said the existence of the courts practising Islamic law could lead to different legal standards being applied to Muslim and non-Muslim citizens.

He said many of the courts operate out of mosques and their rulings are closed off to non-Muslims.

In previous reports it was claimed there were only five sharia courts in the UK, working in London, Manchester, Bradford, Birmingham and Nuneaton.

He said: &quot;This is not a matter of eating halal meat or seeking God&#039;s blessing on one&#039;s marriage. It is a challenge to what we believe to be the rights and freedoms of the individual, to our concept of a legal system based on what parliament enacts, and to the right of all of us to live in a society as free as possible from ethnic-religious division or communal claims to superiority and a special status that puts them in some respects above the law to which we are all bound.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the SPLC will think about this:</p>
<p>85 sharia courts in UK, says report  (30)<br />
Press Association, Monday June 29 2009 There are as many as 85 sharia courts operating in Britain, according to a new report.</p>
<p>Academic Denis MacEoin, the report&#8217;s author, said the existence of the courts practising Islamic law could lead to different legal standards being applied to Muslim and non-Muslim citizens.</p>
<p>He said many of the courts operate out of mosques and their rulings are closed off to non-Muslims.</p>
<p>In previous reports it was claimed there were only five sharia courts in the UK, working in London, Manchester, Bradford, Birmingham and Nuneaton.</p>
<p>He said: &#8220;This is not a matter of eating halal meat or seeking God&#8217;s blessing on one&#8217;s marriage. It is a challenge to what we believe to be the rights and freedoms of the individual, to our concept of a legal system based on what parliament enacts, and to the right of all of us to live in a society as free as possible from ethnic-religious division or communal claims to superiority and a special status that puts them in some respects above the law to which we are all bound.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oneofthem</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/10/01/veterans-against-jihad-takes-on-threat-of-shariah-law/comment-page-1/#comment-201249</link>
		<dc:creator>oneofthem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=4902#comment-201249</guid>
		<description>You can get more information on the VAJ at VAJonline.org

As for those of you that are still talking about old world theories and how you fear the right wing is taking over the universe, it&#039;s not the right you should be alarmed about.  It&#039;s the creeping invasion of sharia law on our constitution as Dearborn MI has encountered and communities throughout the country are encountering.  Take a moment away from your other thinking and find out more about the menace sharia poses to our republic.  It&#039;s not about politics anymore, it&#039;s about our nations future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get more information on the VAJ at VAJonline.org</p>
<p>As for those of you that are still talking about old world theories and how you fear the right wing is taking over the universe, it&#8217;s not the right you should be alarmed about.  It&#8217;s the creeping invasion of sharia law on our constitution as Dearborn MI has encountered and communities throughout the country are encountering.  Take a moment away from your other thinking and find out more about the menace sharia poses to our republic.  It&#8217;s not about politics anymore, it&#8217;s about our nations future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
