http://miracismwatch.wordpress.....tea-party/

The leader of the Warren Tea Party here in Michigan is a racist who has a long history of involvement with racist organizing in Michigan. In the past he’s organized talks for Paul Fromm and has started a variety of racist groups including the European American Association and Vox Nationale.

Everything the TEA Parties say is true is actually unfounded and unsupported by any facts.

They are simply looking for a great sounding excuse to get rid of a black president.

“He’s black” sounds uncomfortably bigoted, so “taxes are too high” even when taxes are at their lowest under Obama and were higher for every white President, well, any slogan will do, even if it makes no sense.

Sure, the US can elect a black president, “See? We are not racists.”

But let him succeed, even help him succeed?

NEVER!

They can’t wait to put this “experiment” in the dust bin and move on.

The “Take Back America” slogan of the TEA Party is John Tanton’s doing — they want to take America back from the minorities who have become all too present, all too majority.

John Tanton is trying to put is “attrition” ideals into law — see the second line of Arizona’s SB1070.

“Attrition” is where they plan to peal off one layer of non-white, non-European American culture at a time until America is a white European majority again.

That is what “Take Back America” is about — it’s about not living “under” any black President!

And it’s not The “Tea” Party — the “TEA” stands for Taxed Enough Already”, but the original “Tea” stands for the original Tea Party that wanted representation, not less taxes.

When the TEA Party clamors for more representation, for federal voting rights and representation for the District of Columbia, for instance, then I’ll know they take their moniker seriously.

The TEA Party is a shameful, racist, lying, ignorant, stupid sham. *

Sadly, I can’t imagine this fear dissipating until a few more generations … but we said that 50 years ago, and 100 years ago, and 150 years ago, and 200 years ago …

Click!
Love and hugs,
Peter Blaise

* Ignorance is whe you don’t know any better, stupidity is when you do.

I also look at the fact that the corporations have been sitting on a pile of cash. Some of this cash is being used to endorse republican candidates. I scratch my head and think, ‘how many employees could these corporations have hired with this type of money.’

I was disgusted with Carly Fiorina ridiculing Barbara Boxer’s hairstyle, while overlooking Meg Whitman’s hairstyle. As for me, if I had to choose between these two hairstyles, it’s Barbara’s all the way!

As someone who can care less what they are offering, because I am voting straight Democrat, the teas/republicans forget, or at least they think we have forgotten the Anti-immigrant marches with the slogan, “2012 is coming for you.” After Hurricane Katrina, “pull yourself up by your bootstraps.” Gas prices went as high as $5.00 a gallon (meanwhile they are inching back up, I’ll bet they are expecting a republican landslide at the elections to raise it to their “$10.00 a gallon.”) They want to bust up all unions. They said Americans were lazy and didn’t want to work – they are using Juan Williams as a posterboy for employment firings-yet, I don’t know any American that have lost one out of 2-3 jobs (and I say literally, ’cause I don’t know anyone that have 2-3 well-paying jobs at the same time) and able to get a better one. Most Americans, if they lose a job, sometimes they are unemployed for at least 6 mos. – to 1 year. And taxes, how does that affect the little guy? If the little guy has no job, how can he pay taxes? For me, with the foreign money coming in to back republicans, to me, this is saying that foreigners are able to install the government they want – yet, foreigners hate when we install their government officials.

The best unknown candidate that I have seen so far is Jimmy McMillan (NY) the “rent is too damn high party.”

I think people from big cities will give you the November surprise you’re not expecting. We don’t like the ‘cut and run’ tactics, we don’t like the fact that, and I’m speculating here, the female candidates picked up a term from Michael-still-don’t-get-it “Man Up” and running with it.

What’s puzzling about this, the females are acting as if they are taking advantage of being a female but using reverse sexual harassment and daring their male opponents to fight back so that they can cry and expect the female voters to back them. Again, coming from a neighborhood where the phrase, “MAN UP,” is used, and the way it is used, and the situations it is used in – it is normally men with each other – and if these female candidates knew exactly what it is, if they had any self-respect, they’d be embarassed. For one, they are not, I repeat, they are not ‘Old School,’ they are not OG or LG. And the news should be ashamed of themselves for showing this – because this is actually slang for some words that would never be allowed on any broadcast – again these candidates dissed the media, the media so quick to get a story they really don’t know what they are reporting!

I’m not a follower, nor am I a fan of Farrakhan, however, I think he is more educated, or at the very least consider him well-spoken compared to what I’m seeing today.

Hmmm, you are criticizing something that was held in doors, but not something out in public for everyone to see? You don’t think holding signs of the prez as a joker, muslim, hitler as being racially insensitive and disrespectful? You don’t think it’s disrespectful and unprofessional for the candidates using slang from the hood, “man up?” Would the male opponents receive the same respect if they told the females, “who’s your daddy?”

I find it odd that the female candidates are using slang from the hood when they have made it obvious they no nothing of the hood. Is this the future of politics using slang when these people would not dare go anywhere near these type of hoods out of fear?

Our nation’s President sat in a pew in the Reverend Wright’s church for over 20 years listening to this disgusting racist drivel. To boot, the church’s newsletter once featured Louis Farakhan on its cover.

Where was the SPLC on this when it counted?

Why such selective indignation?

Another question, it’s obvious what some supporters are running from, but, do they know what they are running to? Example, they claim to want to reduce government taxes and less government regulation also to remove minimum wage laws. I don’t think some of the supporters realize that, for example, cruise ships are registered in Bahamas, Liberia, and Panama and some of the cooks are making $150 per week for a 98-hour-work-week. Security firm Triple Canopy hires mercenaries from Peru and other emerging countries for about $30-a-day (see the site Corpwatch).

I was hoping one would respond to me, because I’ve heard rumors that the teas as well as Freedom Works are encouraging as well as using these books for training sessions, Saul D. Alisnky’s “Rules for Radicals” and the “Communist Manifesto.” This is what was alleged at one of the get-togethers I was at – the guys look at sports, while the women discuss issues. Further, it was alleged that these books were used to help them gain traction in running for office, and to use it against their opponents.

To Joseph S.: The Southern Poverty Law Center has never identified the Tea Party as a “hate group.” What we have done is make note when Tea Party units have developed associations with individuals and groups whose public comments or organizational connections we have documented as promoting hate. The NAACP-sponsored report does essentially the same thing: Saying that while most Tea Party officials and members have not engaged in hate speech, people who have promoted hate have been drawn to and included in, Tea Party activities.

To Amira: The SPLC has never “attacked” the Tea Party as a whole, but has identified elements within the movement that have, at times, manifested views we monitor. As we wrote in the Spring 2010 issue of Intelligence Report: “The ‘tea parties’ and similar groups that have sprung up in recent months cannot fairly be considered extremist groups, but they are shot through with rich veins of radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism.” We consider it our mission to track the activities of known propagators of hate, wherever they turn up. If they turn up at Tea Party rallies, we make the effort to inform the public of the known facts about them.

Skinnyminny I hadn’t heard of “Idiocracy” before. Is it a documentary? :-)

How come you tea party supporters object to the SPLC being political? Isn’t the tea party a political movement? josephS says the tea party began getting national attention in April 2009, about 3 months after Mr. Obama was elected president. Government spending way beyond our means had been rampant for about 8 years (2 invasions, tax cuts, “homeland security”) by then but I’m sure it was just a coincidence that the tea party didn’t really get going until an African American was elected president. It may not be cause and effect but there’s definitely a correlation there!

I just noticed that my browser wont let me spell correlation wrong. Here’s a tip to you tea partiers. When your typing is underlined in red you’ve spelled it wrong. Ha, ha, ha.

Q:”Maybe someone from this party can explain to me, why do the teas like to pass out “Communist Manifesto,” written by Karl Marx and F. Engels then tell people that 10 planks is what is causing the fall of the U.S. and the Dems are to blame?”

A: Because they are morons. First off I doubt they are passing out the whole manifesto, because they couldn’t understand it(“What the HELL is a BOR-GEE-O-SEYE?!”)

They are most likely trying to claim that the “Ten planks” are ten planks of the Communist party when in fact Marx and Engels did not write that they were. The Manifesto was supposed to define Communist political ideals, to introduce them. They wrote that in most situations, Communists would generally approve of the following policies….”

Look at it this way- many Tea Partiers would generally approve of anti-abortion policies(or use the States’ rights cop out on this issue). Of course this does not mean that the Tea Partiers approve of some Islamic theocracy where abortion is also banned. A progressive income tax, for example, is not a goal of Communists- it is a policy they would be favorable toward but Communists fight for revolution, not reform(too bad many Communists forget about this fact).

Many of those planks were taken up by various political leaders who were opposed to Communism, so as to stave off a workers’ revolution. The threat of revolution has led to many positive effects in countries where there never was a Communist revolution.

I would like to ask one of the teas, why do the teas hand out copies of the book, “The Communist Manifesto” and tell them the Dems are responsible for the “10 Planks to seize power and destroy freedoms” listed in the book?

I would also like to ask, if the teas are strongly for the 2nd Amendment, then where were they when LE held gun buy-back programs in the minority communities?