The Hatewatch blog is managed by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center, an Alabama-based civil rights organization.

David Duke, Huffing About Sexual Mores, Calls the Kettle Black

By David Neiwert on November 18, 2010 - 11:49 am, Posted in Anti-Semitic

Now that he’s gaining in years, former Klan boss and longtime white supremacy advocate David Duke, who in his youth gained a notorious reputation as a womanizing playboy, is apparently now shifting to a more traditional role of moralizing geezer. Witness his most recent video “lecture,” wherein he piously instructs his audience on the historical roots of the “sexual revolution” — which, in Duke’s view, is the product of Sigmund Freud’s theories of psychoanalysis and therefore is yet another civilization-destroying product of conniving Jews:

Duke: Wherever the globalist media reaches on this planet, there is an ongoing sexual revolution. It should be called sexual dehumanization. In traditional Western culture, sex is idealized and embedded with the idea of family and children and the deep and sacred respect for the love between a man and a woman, and marriage as a beautiful, even holy, institution.

A perfect example of the veneration of womanhood, fidelity and purity, as expressed in countless artworks, is the Virgin Mary. The Madonna is also venerated in the Muslim Koran, which defends Mary from the Jewish Talmudic slanders that claim Mary was a whore and Jesus a bastard. I hate to quote those words.

Today the name Madonna fits the Talmudic slander. It’s the image of a degenerate superstar whore, engaging in gang sex and mocking the crucifixion. The latest media-promoted female phenom is Lady Gaga, and this teen idol is also depicted engaging in gang sex, sadism, masochism, and other forms of degeneracy, along with her trendy music. Now this is the hottest new star promoted by the Jewish controlled globalist media, including MTV – Sumner Redstone. Real name: Rothstein.

The media of the Western world, and thus of the whole globe, has become a weapon of mass destruction of the highest in human values. The human cost has been enormous. Hundreds of millions of families have been destroyed. Children now commonly grow up without fathers. Sexually rooted epidemics, including STDs, hepatitis and HPV are now soaring. AIDS, a disease primarily of promiscuity, will cost hundreds of millions of lives. Millions of people have suffered sterility, and will never know the joy of children. Child rape, molestation, and abuse has grown exponentially.

Never mind the hypocrisy of the nation’s foremost practitioner of racial and ethnic dehumanization lecturing us about “sexual dehumanization.” What’s agonizingly hilarious about this diatribe is how starkly Duke’s new moral ethos contrasts with his own personal behavior over the years.

Duke, to put it simply, was widely regarded a “horndog” on the prowl among the white supremacists and other far-right extremists he at one time claimed to lead. Indeed, he essentially abandoned his first family, including his children, in the process.

David Duke

A 2003 article by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) exposed in some depth this aspect of the personal behavior of Duke (seen above with one-time girlfriend Lori Eden, who was then a lingerie model), along with his penchant for spending donor money on his gambling addiction:

Others in the racist movement angrily responded to what would soon become Duke’s notorious womanizing.

“I idolized Duke when I was younger. I looked up to him,” the Rev. Johnny Lee Clary, who served as Duke’s bodyguard in the late 1970s but later became an anti-racist activist, said in an interview. “He would get up and wave the Bible around and talk about Christian values. But when I got to know him on a personal level, I saw what he was really like, and it disgusted me. … I traveled alongside Duke and I watched him at work. I saw him take a Klansman’s wife to his hotel room.”

Duke, then a married man with two children, pursued female sex partners so avidly and so openly that it embarrassed many of his closest colleagues. [Tom] Metzger, then Duke’s state leader in southern California, became livid when Duke showed up for a 1977 Klan anti-immigrant “border watch” stunt and immediately started hitting on women.

“We used to tell people, ‘When Duke comes to town make sure your wife is safely locked up and don’t let him near your daughters,’” Metzger recalled.

As SPLC reported, Duke even later went on to write, under a pseudonym, a sex manual for women — with most of the advice focusing on female submissiveness. No doubt Dr. Freud would have found that interesting.

  • Bill

    That chick with Duke is hot!

  • Jason Smith

    Well, there’s nothing wrong with sex. I’ve read claims about David Duke and how his first marriage failed. Duke is single now and if he can find a younger girlfriend, I say more power to him. Nevertheless, much of what Duke says is true. There is a massive porn industry in America, it’s focused on the degradation of women — especially young White women. Many of the owners of the porn industry are Jews.

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    Here’s a question if you think my “defense” of Muslims is biased. What would you have the world’s Muslims do(of course this assumes that Muslims are one monolithic entity, which they are not, but for the sake of argument assume they are)? Obviously you don’t like many of the practices in Muslim countries(though many of them actually aren’t even mentioned in the Quran or Hadith), but what do you suggest they do about it?

    Second, would you be willing to have Europeans and Westerners engage in the same practices as those you insist Muslims or people in the Third World should adopt?

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    “And yet your constant defense of Islam, the shariah law and the historical Islamic Arab/Turkic invasions and occupations of non-Muslim lands, it all suggests otherwise. And I’m not even taking into account that your name, despite ending with a Russian “-ov” suffix, is still obviously Islamic.”

    1. I defend Islam against unjust claims, as I would Christianity, Judaism, or any other religion.

    2. Occupation of non-Muslim lands? Take a look at Russia some time- most of that land is Turkic and historically Muslim. Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Southern Russia down to Astrakhan, Siberia, etc. Of course not being a nationalist, I don’t play this “who was there first game.”

    3. Yes my name would be an indicator, were it my real name.

    “Your bizarre comparison of the modern-day aid given to the Third World countries with the natural resources taken by the European colonial powers from their overseas possessions centuries ago simply doesn’t even add up. Care to explain how did the latex extract sapped from the Brazilian hevea rubber trees save the Portuguese infants from cholera and dysentery, unlike the antibiotics and oral re-hydration medicines given to Central American and the sub-Saharan African nations by the West? Can you tell me how did all the gold of Montezuma and Atahualpa save the Spaniards from the smallpox epidemics that ravaged Spain during that same period, unlike the vaccines distributed by the WHO to the Third World and finally resulting in its eradication? Or did any of the tea that the Great Britain took from India helped cure the British children of polio or typhoid fever in the 1800s, which today has the British government and NGOs spending tens of millions of pounds in a struggle to eradicate those same diseases in the Indian sub-Continent?”

    You are obviously confused here. These countries extracted resources from their colonies, usually at a pittance if that. They used this position of power to become the rich nations we know today. Since then, they have recently pushed policies on the Third World which are destructive- Free Trade policies mostly, policies which rich countries did not engage in until they were rich and powerful themselves. Aid is a broad term, and often it was used to prop up dictatorships and ensure healthy markets of resources and labor, as is the case today.

  • KuffarFalcon

    “I am not Muslim, nor have I ever been.”

    And yet your constant defense of Islam, the shariah law and the historical Islamic Arab/Turkic invasions and occupations of non-Muslim lands, it all suggests otherwise. And I’m not even taking into account that your name, despite ending with a Russian “-ov” suffix, is still obviously Islamic.

    “Well instead of “aid” they had raw materials extracted from colonies they dominated.”

    Your bizarre comparison of the modern-day aid given to the Third World countries with the natural resources taken by the European colonial powers from their overseas possessions centuries ago simply doesn’t even add up. Care to explain how did the latex extract sapped from the Brazilian hevea rubber trees save the Portuguese infants from cholera and dysentery, unlike the antibiotics and oral re-hydration medicines given to Central American and the sub-Saharan African nations by the West? Can you tell me how did all the gold of Montezuma and Atahualpa save the Spaniards from the smallpox epidemics that ravaged Spain during that same period, unlike the vaccines distributed by the WHO to the Third World and finally resulting in its eradication? Or did any of the tea that the Great Britain took from India helped cure the British children of polio or typhoid fever in the 1800s, which today has the British government and NGOs spending tens of millions of pounds in a struggle to eradicate those same diseases in the Indian sub-Continent?

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    When you say “in the past” are you referring to his time in prison? That would seem logical.

  • Bob cooper

    David duke published a sex guide book under a female fake name a long while back- he’s got no room to talk about sexual depravity when he’s encouraged anal sex in the past.

    Period.

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    Ha Joon Chang easily destroys the culturalist myth(the idea that poor nations have the wrong cultures) in Bad Samaritans. He shows that in the 18th and part of the 19th century, Germans were viewed by the more advanced British as lazy, dishonest, individualistic, and over-emotional. In the late 19th century and early 20th, up to the 1920s, the Japanese were also seen as lazy, individualistic, with a live-for-today attitude. Koreans had an even worse reputation. Ever since the meteoric rise of these nations later on, suddenly the impression of these peoples changed. Now we claim that they are successful because of their culture- discipline, frugality, long-term planning, creativity, and punctuality are among the traits supposedly inherent in German, Japanese, or Korean culture.

    East Asia provides a good example of this shift because when these countries were backward, the cultural culprit was Confucianism, which supposedly preserved traditional practices and stifled creativity and innovation. When Japan succeeded, culturalists claimed that Japan’s unique take on Confucianism was the reason. When other East Asian societies rose in economic power, it was declared that Confucianism actually was conducive to economic development, as opposed to counter-productive. What was allegedly the same culture went from an obstacle to a boost for economic development.

    It is likely that the same will be said of Hindu culture, with the continuing success of India, whereas in the past Hinduism’s features made it a scapegoat for India’s woes. This is also true about Islam. Malaysia is a very developed country where over half of the board of the Central Bank is female. Afghanistan on the other hand is a basket-case, where feudal/clan relationships still dominate.

    Culture has a bearing on economic development, but the truth is largely the opposite. Economics have far more to do with determining the culture. In a stagnant economy with little to no change over many decades, there is little reason to plan, and there is little capital to save in order to invest or develop. People in industrialized countries have far lower birth rates because the advantages of living in such countries is that one can do far more than just produce a family and pop out kids. When you have choices, you have dreams, you have things you want to do before you settle down. In agricultural societies and underdeveloped nations, having dreams like this is looked down upon, and can be considered fanciful. In Eastern Europe, people are still within living age of a time when the state subsidized all kinds of cultural/sport programs to occupy peoples’ time, as opposed to just sitting around popping out babies and maintaining a plot of land, as had been the tradition in the Russian empire.

    You’d probably like to believe that you are somehow culturally superior to Africans or Muslims in the Middle East, and that this superior culture is why you are better off than them economically. But the fact is that at one time your ancestors were popping out kids they couldn’t feed(which would usually die before their first year), and living a “lazy” existence on some patch of dirt. But it might help give your ego a rest to understand that the accomplishments of “your culture”, whatever that is, are not your accomplishments, and that it is ridiculous to try to live off of the glory of other individuals.

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    “Of course not. As a Muslim yourself, why would you want to say anything about your own religion? You’re supposed to glorify it and promote it, as per Islamic jurisprudence.”

    How many times do I need to tell you I am not Muslim, nor have I ever been.

    “You mean having them professionally begging for money on the streets and stealing from the strangers on behalf of their parents and tribal elders? Or the fact that gypsies prostitute out their own daughters, with their own mothers often acting as madams and overseeing the brothels? ”

    This may be the case in Gypsy communities but for most of the world it means sending them to work in factories or on farms so they will have money to take care of you.

    “What you fail to explain is, if your theory on poverty alone causing high birthrates is correct, then why the hell aren’t we seeing a baby boom among the Slavs, Balts or the Finno-Ugrians? Those peoples’ countries are most certainly poor, with Latvia being the poorest EU member. To disprove your “more industry = less chilren”, I’ll even point out that since the fall of Berlin wall, many ex-Eastern Block countries have became de-industrialized and even returned to agricultural based economy, with Ukraine being a prominent example. And yet even in the most simplest, rustic villages in Ukraine’s Carpathian region, where the living conditions can be comparable with those of the Mayan Indian settlements in the Guatemalan highlands; houses often lack electricity, TVs or phones, schools are broken, health care is almost non existent, and agricultural farming and animal husbandry are the main sources of income.”

    Ok I had to cut your massive run-on sentence short, but the reason for low birth rates in Eastern Europe is because these places used to be industrialized and then went through a rapid change. Many people prefer migration to changing the situation in the country. The social welfare system is bad but these people haven’t been living in a traditional peasant lifestyle for the last 70 years(longer really). It is unlikely that they will begin to do so either.

    “Again, it’s the psyche of the people themselves that determine the birthrate, not the economy.”

    Nope, incorrect.

    “If people simply believe in having large families, they would do so regardless of whether they are rich or poor.”

    Nonsense, people in Russia today believe in having kids, but they simply don’t.

    “Since the 1960s in the West, with the poisonous change in mass popular culture and media, the people’s attitudes, or specifically the whites’ attitudes, have changed in regards to having kids. It became cool and hip to casually use abortion like a contraceptive, and being a parent was so overrated. Especially when you can waste your prime child bearing years partying and having a good time. ”

    Wow, what a great alternative you offer- living simply to breed. You attack people in the Third World for what Europeans used to do, and for what you want them to do now.

    “As a teenager, when I myself was at a concert of a heavy metal band called Pantera, over 10 years ago, I remember the band frontman Phillip Anselmo’s on-stage banter to the audience which concluded with “Oh and yeah; DON’T F****NG REPRODUCE!!!””

    Anybody who takes family planning advice from a rocker at a concert probably shouldn’t be reproducing, would you not agree?

  • KuffarFalcon

    Yama said,

    “Duke would hate the Romans for being Italian ”

    Nah, I think he’d be more likely to hate them for the Julius Caesar’s brutal conquest of Gaul, which resulted in a slaughter of over 1 million Celts (Gauls, Aquatinians, Helvetians, Belgae and etc) and the enslavement of many more.

  • KuffarFalcon

    “Nope, no I don’t.”

    Of course not. As a Muslim yourself, why would you want to say anything about your own religion? You’re supposed to glorify it and promote it, as per Islamic jurisprudence.

    “When you’re extremely poor what else can you do but have children to take care of you?”

    You mean having them professionally begging for money on the streets and stealing from the strangers on behalf of their parents and tribal elders? Or the fact that gypsies prostitute out their own daughters, with their own mothers often acting as madams and overseeing the brothels?

    What you fail to explain is, if your theory on poverty alone causing high birthrates is correct, then why the hell aren’t we seeing a baby boom among the Slavs, Balts or the Finno-Ugrians? Those peoples’ countries are most certainly poor, with Latvia being the poorest EU member. To disprove your “more industry = less chilren”, I’ll even point out that since the fall of Berlin wall, many ex-Eastern Block countries have became de-industrialized and even returned to agricultural based economy, with Ukraine being a prominent example. And yet even in the most simplest, rustic villages in Ukraine’s Carpathian region, where the living conditions can be comparable with those of the Mayan Indian settlements in the Guatemalan highlands; houses often lack electricity, TVs or phones, schools are broken, health care is almost non existent, and agricultural farming and animal husbandry are the main sources of income. Yet the Mayan Indians (who are also make up a large growing block of illegal alien population in US) have on average between 9 or 11 kids, while Ukrainians at the most have 1 or 2, if at all. Guatemala, whose population just like Bolivia’s and Paraguay’s is overwhelmingly ethnically indigenous (not even mestizo, like Mexico or Colombia), has a median age of 15. On the other, Ukraine’s population, on the other hand, has a median age of about 40.

    Again, it’s the psyche of the people themselves that determine the birthrate, not the economy. If people simply believe in having large families, they would do so regardless of whether they are rich or poor.
    Since the 1960s in the West, with the poisonous change in mass popular culture and media, the people’s attitudes, or specifically the whites’ attitudes, have changed in regards to having kids. It became cool and hip to casually use abortion like a contraceptive, and being a parent was so overrated. Especially when you can waste your prime child bearing years partying and having a good time.

    http://takimag.com/article/coo.....th_culture

    As a teenager, when I myself was at a concert of a heavy metal band called Pantera, over 10 years ago, I remember the band frontman Phillip Anselmo’s on-stage banter to the audience which concluded with “Oh and yeah; DON’T F****NG REPRODUCE!!!”

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    “So now you actually DO admit that Islam is indeed a violent religion (and far more so than any other faith), and that Muslims are more likely to react violently to their faith being mocked than the non-Muslims would of theirs, and that wherever Islam goes and takes root, the freedom of speech and thought disappears.”

    Nope, no I don’t. Happy?

    “And even in the most staunchly Catholic countries in Europe, like Poland, Austria or Malta, if I called myself something like “Anti-Christ” wouldn’t really raise many eyebrows either. Or at least it wouldn’t result in a prosecution. ”

    You would most likely get beaten up for a number of other reasons though. Probably something like suggesting that Polish skinheads unite with their “white brothers” in Russia or some other such nonsense.

    “Except unlike the developing world, the Victorian Britain (and the whole Europe for that matter) was never showered with the aid money and the doctors without borders. ”

    Well instead of “aid” they had raw materials extracted from colonies they dominated. Also, most aid to Africa has actually done more harm than help. It continues to do this because it is an industry, like any other industry, and there is profit to be made. Of course this has nothing to do with the fact that people in developing countries, including the US and Britain at one point, tend to have larger families.

    “The economy and material wealth (or lack thereof) mean practically nothing, as the peoples attitudes themselves is what really matters in the end when it comes too birth rates. It’s all in the culture.”

    Nope, incorrect. Economic matters determine culture, not the other way around.

    ” Like the Mennonites or the ultra-Orthodox Jews, who tend to be entrepreneurial and have higher than average incomes, but who staunchly believe in having large families.”

    Yet Jews around the world tend to have negative birthrates.

    “And yet despite all the poverty, can you guess which is the only population segment of all Eastern/Central European countries is growing, and rapidly? That’s right, the gypsies. Because, they believe that a woman must marry at a very young age, as in 12 or 11, and for the rest of her child bearing days, she must keep giving birth up to the utmost physical limit of her body, and no matter what. (See the paragraph above). And unlike the native Eastern Europeans, they most certainly don’t believe in the “can’t feed them? don’t breed them” concept.”

    When you’re extremely poor what else can you do but have children to take care of you? I’m sorry but your claims here are ignorant and fly in the face of sociology and history.

  • KuffarFalcon

    “the name Kuffar really doesn’t raise many eyebrows in the States. Try running around Iran or something”

    So now you actually DO admit that Islam is indeed a violent religion (and far more so than any other faith), and that Muslims are more likely to react violently to their faith being mocked than the non-Muslims would of theirs, and that wherever Islam goes and takes root, the freedom of speech and thought disappears. And even in the most staunchly Catholic countries in Europe, like Poland, Austria or Malta, if I called myself something like “Anti-Christ” wouldn’t really raise many eyebrows either. Or at least it wouldn’t result in a prosecution.

    “in Victorian Britain, families were often much larger though many children died in infancy. The developing world is merely still doing the same thing that Europe used to do before it became extremely industrialized.”

    Except unlike the developing world, the Victorian Britain (and the whole Europe for that matter) was never showered with the aid money and the doctors without borders.

    “But take a look around the world and you will notice that the fertility in many third world countries…”
    “So basically we see the following rule, proven again and again throughout history..”

    The economy and material wealth (or lack thereof) mean practically nothing, as the peoples attitudes themselves is what really matters in the end when it comes too birth rates. It’s all in the culture. Like the Mennonites or the ultra-Orthodox Jews, who tend to be entrepreneurial and have higher than average incomes, but who staunchly believe in having large families. Or the Duggar family who are also of high income, and have 19 children. And for that matter, how about that case of Gypsy women who were forcibly sterilized in Czech republic. I remember from Czech press reports, how one of those women went on to say that her fellow Gypsy tribesmen and elders view her as being “worthless as a woman” due to her not being able to bring anymore babies into this world.

    “Of course there are exceptions to this rule, such as in Eastern Europe where the economy and social welfare is so poor that birthrates are plunging”

    And yet despite all the poverty, can you guess which is the only population segment of all Eastern/Central European countries is growing, and rapidly? That’s right, the gypsies. Because, they believe that a woman must marry at a very young age, as in 12 or 11, and for the rest of her child bearing days, she must keep giving birth up to the utmost physical limit of her body, and no matter what. (See the paragraph above). And unlike the native Eastern Europeans, they most certainly don’t believe in the “can’t feed them? don’t breed them” concept.

  • Yama

    Duke would hate the Romans for being Italian.

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    He is both “wrong”, and a hypocrite.

  • anynoymous

    that doesn’t make him wrong

    It just makes him a hypocrite

  • Difluoroethane

    Which “traditional Western” culture is Duke talking about? Is he talking about the Greeks and the Romans, from which most of what is “Western” is derived? Their sexual mores, perhaps more so than those of any other culture, would probably make his hair stand on end. From the Roman emperor who kept young boys in his palace, to the myth of Pasiphae and the Bull, to Alexander the Great and his _very_ close friend, to the poetess Sappho (who was was from the Greek island of Lesbos; thus, one could say she was both a Lesbian and a lesbian). We could also say that the men of Sparta didn’t have a “don’t ask don’t tell” policy.

    David Duke would no doubt have HATED ancient Greece and Rome, despite their being quintessentially Western. Those civilizations would have made even the modern-day USA look prudish.

  • KuffarFalcon

    Thanks Mr. Potok, I appreciate your response.

  • Jonathan Justice

    It might be more to the point to suggest that Mr. Duke’s rants are rather directly connected to his sexual history. Contradictions of this sort are hardly new, but so much of what Freud and his colleagues pointed to is exactly that when folks go fishing in their own unconsciousness the narratives they come back with are more than likely to reflect their own problems. When the pretense that they are talking about somebody else is maintained, the results are usually exactly the sort of deranged projection presented above.

    The idea that leadership includes the privilege of impregnating as many women as possible is so old that it appears unquestioned in some biblical narratives, but it is hardly the exclusive property of Jews, Christians, and Moslems. The competing idea that marital fidelity, however one might define that, and consent, have serious value, has also been around for a while. There is a certain tension between these ideas that has led to an evolving set of standards. The difficulty that so called traditionalists encounter is that admitting to the presence of evolving mores tends to undercut their claims to authority.

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    Kuffar Falcon, I assume the name change was supposed to make you sound more defiant- but the name Kuffar really doesn’t raise many eyebrows in the States. Try running around Iran or something if you want to score cool points. Anyway, as always, I’m here to correct your mistakes, absolutely free of charge.

    “So, bedhopping adventurously from one woman to the next? I guess the ol’ Dave has figured out the secret behind the explosive population growth of the 3rd world countries. I say, good for him.”

    Actually this “secret” was figured out a long time ago. Agricultural societies, and societies without adequate social welfare, have large families. Children take care of their parents when they can no longer work. In addition to this, higher infant mortality means that many children die. These societies often follow religions which restrict birth control as well. Even when capitalism had already taken hold in Victorian Britain, families were often much larger though many children died in infancy. The developing world is merely still doing the same thing that Europe used to do before it became extremely industrialized.

    But take a look around the world and you will notice that the fertility in many third world countries has been going down lately. In North African countries like Morocco, it is not much higher than the Muslims in France, which in fact is itself not much higher than native French(contrary to the idiotic claims of some infamous Youtube videos).

    So basically we see the following rule, proven again and again throughout history- 1. More development and industrialization + social welfare programs + women’s rights/access to birth control = lower birth rates. Of course there are exceptions to this rule, such as in Eastern Europe where the economy and social welfare is so poor that birthrates are plunging- but then again many of these nations are no longer mostly agricultural. Farmers can produce their means of subsistence, urban workers cannot.

    So do you see- the problems of the world are caused mostly by material conditions and not certain “bad people.”

    “While most WN and Klansmen types do nothing but stay in their parents’ basement and waste their lives, angrily writing on forums and chat rooms, at least this guy is doing his natural male duty and having a good time.”

    Since when was this our natural male duty, and how is he contributing to the birth rate when he’s obviously not doing this for the sake of children?

    ” If all the WNs who are in their prime years were emulating him instead of denouncing him, then the much bemoaned below-replacement birth rates of the white folks would be reversed before long!! ”

    What is the inherent value of more “white” people? If the whole world were “white”, you’d suddenly see a struggle emerging over which “white” group, and eventually nationality, is truly “superior”. WNs are largely morons so more of them would not be advantageous to European descended people.

  • Mark Potok

    KuffarFalcon, our purpose isn’t to push out tabloid material about Duke. It’s to show the screaming hypocrisy of a man who claims he’s out to save the white race and defend it against evil, pornographer Jews — people he says are trying to undermine Western civilization’s sexual mores — when everything about his own conduct contradicts his pious lecturing.

  • KuffarFalcon

    So, bedhopping adventurously from one woman to the next? I guess the ol’ Dave has figured out the secret behind the explosive population growth of the 3rd world countries. I say, good for him.
    While most WN and Klansmen types do nothing but stay in their parents’ basement and waste their lives, angrily writing on forums and chat rooms, at least this guy is doing his natural male duty and having a good time. If all the WNs who are in their prime years were emulating him instead of denouncing him, then the much bemoaned below-replacement birth rates of the white folks would be reversed before long!! :)

    But still, all the humor aside, why is SPLC acting like a tabloid and reporting on a man’s sex life? I mean, does a public need to know THAT?

  • Mitch Beales

    Tell me about the great western tradition of respect for marriage etc. etc. From the pagan (Greek and Norse) gods whose escapades required the constant vigilance of their spouses to the Christian God who didn’t deign to get married but conceived a child out of wedlock. I guess that would make him a bastard wouldn’t it. Can you be a virgin and still give birth to a bastard? I always thought it was the other Mary, Mary Magdalene, who some folks thought was a whore.

    In sexuality as in all things, “white” supremacists are lying hypocrites.