Decades ago, pornography was isolated to those sleazy grey buildings, with bars on the windows and ID checks at the door. Today you can find hundreds of new porn books on Amazon, absolutely free, each and every day, and easily available to children. No credit card is required, no parental locks, and no tracking. Kids are becoming addicted to sexually explicit material, and Amazon is making access to pornography easier than ever.

But what is even more disturbing is the activity on the Amazon website, where children are being lured into adults only groups, populated by members who read and review erotica. For example, this reporter found the following conversation on the Amazon Customer Discussions:

Adult#1 says: “10. through me, you can get to Adult #4 and others you know here, and Adult #4 can get you into the “cool places” ;-)”

Female child-14yo says: “The only objection I have to goodreads is that I’m not old enough to be in the BBA group. :P Would I be able to find most of you at the Dead Writers’ Society?”

Adult#2 says: “Oh, Pet, I’ve been wanting you to join us over there. … If it won’t let you join, PM Adult #4 (she is easier to find than I am because my name over there is really common) and we’ll figure out a way to let you in.”

Adult#1 says: “Lie about your DOB year. (I will disavow any knowledge of this suggestion).”

Adult#3 says: “You do know that what you just did is a criminal offense?”

And further research leads us to discussion threads started by Adult #4, like “For the Quirky and Racy Among Us”, and “Spanking in erotica: How much is too much?” where she states “I thought spanking should be something of a sexual turn on…” And what is most shocking of all, Adult #4 claims to be a first-grade school teacher.

Amazon has been notified repeatedly about this group of adults, and has refused to stop the obvious criminal corruption of a minor. The question is why? Is Amazon so desperate to destroy Barnes & Noble with the dumping of free eBooks, that they will sacrifice the mental health of children? Do the lawyers at Amazon even know what the Sherman Act says, or what criminal negligence means in this country.

Parents around the world need to demand an explanation from Amazon, and an immediate investigation by the US Justice Department. Our children are not pawns in Amazons perverted games and craving for power. It is time to put an end to this criminal behavior against children, and against Barnes & Noble.

And that is the opinion of this reporter.

Sources:

http://www.amazon.com/forum/ro.....H0RIVM8ZDP

If ever kudos were deserved for carrying a book, which may be “offensive” to some, but which discusses needed ideas and challenges, it is today! I’m not saying that I necessarily agree with White racial nationalism, but their right to sell their books, publish their newsletters, and even broadcast on radio and Television must be sacrosanct. If their rights to free speech, assembly, and press are restricted today, SPLC and ADL will be on the Government’s verboten list tomorrow!

Their right of expression and advocacy MUST be protected, or nobody’s is!

PEACE AND FREEDOM!
David K. Meller

Oh poor historically challenged WN, you amuse me. First of all, yes, various European populations have been victims of slavery hundreds of years ago(of course people like you love talking about how slavery practiced by whites wasn’t so bad). But here are a few points you need to consider:

1. In many cases, Europeans sold other Europeans into slavery, especially in early Russia. Incidentally, Moscow actually came to power thanks to the Golden Horde. The Ottoman Empire was just as European as it was non-European, as the peculiarities of their system meant that they tended to use local populations in Anatolia and the Balkans rather than displacing them or replacing them. Many famous “Ottomans” were not Turkish at all, but rather Greek, Armenian, Serbian, Bosnian, Albanian, and so on.

2. Apparently you miss the hypocrisy of WN authors constantly complaining about rape and mistreatment of white women while fantasizing about doing it themselves.

“I’m willing to believe this whole “all humans are same”

Who said “all humans are same”? Oh right, nobody.

” B.S about as much as I do Ted Kennedy’s claims about the 1965 immigration reform that he helped shove through the senate floor not changing America’s ethnic balance, unleashing Third Worlders upon U.S nor will it making entire parts of U.S resemble Third World.”

You need to stop getting your information on immigration from Stormfront. History lesson time again!

1. The 1924 immigration act which the 1965 act effectively ended excluded mainly Europeans from Southern and Eastern Europe. Latin Americans were not covered, nor were Africans(who usually didn’t have resources to immigrate anyway).

2. The reason why the 1965 immigration act seems to have shifted immigration habits is simple. Prior to 1924, major waves of immigrants came from Europe. Now what happened between WWII and 1965? Let’s see, Ireland’s standard of living improves, Poland, USSR, and other Eastern European countries are behind the Iron Curtain. Money is being dumped into countries like West Germany and Italy.

In other words, there were good reasons why the trends changed against European immigration. Of course with the exception of the Irish, the 1924 act excluded most Eastern and Southern Europeans anyway.

Also your claim that America has areas that resemble the Third World today is rather hilarious. Try looking at what life was like in the 1920s or 30s before you start complaining about today.

“And yet, here we are, with America poised to resemble Guyana or Brazil by 2040.”

Unlikely.

“Lies and agitprop that are meant to soothe the worries and reassure the whites into embracing their own annihilation, and especially so since 1960s, are as much part of Left’s and Marxists’ agenda and strategy as eggs are to omelettes. ”

Blargh MARXIST!! BLARGH!! LEFT!!! 1960S!! ARGH!!!

“The “scientists” like Lewontin, Montagu and others have been well known for their leftist politics and their “one world” and “pro-multiculti” activities. ”

You believe in a “white race”. You’re a multi-culturalist.

“That was the most obtuse comment I’ve read in this thread. Recent research shows how Caucasians are in fact a relatively homogenous group, with only some if any variations. Even the non-European Caucasoids such as relatively unmixed Berbers of North Africa are much closer to Europeans, especially Basques and Andalusians, than they are to Bedouin Arabs, Sephardi Jews and especially moreso the sub-Saharan Africans both in terms of physical appearance and genes. ”

Name a society that was organized based on genetic data like that. Never mind, you can’t. Better question: Can you explain the benefits of organizing a society based on the genetic data you just mentioned.

So, kidnapping white women for the purposes of breeding and multiplying? Why, this basically might as well been a tale of Moors, Tatars or Ottoman Turks who just happened to be trapped in white European men’s bodies!

“The nucleotide diversity between humans is about 0.1%” So, everyone is very, very similar, and the only “indiginous population” that anyone resembles is the human polulation. “In general, however, an average of 85% [of that 0.1% variation that is] of genetic variation exists within local populations, ~7%….”

I’m willing to believe this whole “all humans are same” B.S about as much as I do Ted Kennedy’s claims about the 1965 immigration reform that he helped shove through the senate floor not changing America’s ethnic balance, unleashing Third Worlders upon U.S nor will it making entire parts of U.S resemble Third World. And yet, here we are, with America poised to resemble Guyana or Brazil by 2040. Lies and agitprop that are meant to soothe the worries and reassure the whites into embracing their own annihilation, and especially so since 1960s, are as much part of Left’s and Marxists’ agenda and strategy as eggs are to omelettes. The “scientists” like Lewontin, Montagu and others have been well known for their leftist politics and their “one world” and “pro-multiculti” activities.

“People you would likely consider ‘white’ are more genetically different from one another than all Europeans are from all Africans”

That was the most obtuse comment I’ve read in this thread. Recent research shows how Caucasians are in fact a relatively homogenous group, with only some if any variations. Even the non-European Caucasoids such as relatively unmixed Berbers of North Africa are much closer to Europeans, especially Basques and Andalusians, than they are to Bedouin Arabs, Sephardi Jews and especially moreso the sub-Saharan Africans both in terms of physical appearance and genes.

In the end, let me just say that it’s quite bewildering how you Jordan and others in the left manage to contradict yourselves, with defending and fighting for racial diversity, while simultaneously claiming that there’s no racial diffrences between humans whatsoever. But then again, double standards, one sidedness and hypocrysy are the best friends for the likes of you.

The more you and other supporters of the idea of a white race attempt to bring up thousands of years of history, the more laughable the argument seems in light of anthropological, sociological and historical fact.

“That there are mixed races around the edges of the white world, whether it be Europe, the Near East, North Africa, or North America, does not mean that it does not have a very real, extant core.”

What it means is that you have chosen to define a core based around a specific and arbitrary set of criteria. Many in the United States consider “Hispanic” to be a racial category; while if you went to Europe, you would be hard pressed (in this period of history) to find people who would agree with you that those from the Southern part of the continent are not European. Go back in time and the definitions get blurrier. 40,000 years ago, there was no conception of Europe, and no evidence of a conception of whiteness, because the cultural traditions and history associated with these concepts did not yet exist.

If you insist on using genetics, the entire nation of America would count as one of your mixed areas, with studies suggesting that at least 1/3rd of “white” Americans have physical and genetic markers which are not associated with European populations. Are these people actually not “white”, even though they believe that they are and even though they are culturally identical to those “whites” around them? If race is genetic, how could these people fail to realize their background?
.
Herein lies the problem with race. These people “know” that they are white, even though their DNA demonstrates unambiguously that they are not of pure European ancestry. They characterize themselves as white, instead, because in our culture having a European sounding name, a roughly European family tree, at least down the male branches of the family, and more or less pale skin is sufficient to mark an individual as belonging to the white “race”.

In practice, it resembles the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy, with those positing a racial identity listing off a number of traits, physical or genetic, and then drawing a line around them, declaring that those are the traits that mark white people. Today, we aren’t nearly as ridiculous about this as in the era of craniometry and phrenology, but as has been mentioned above, genetic similarity between groups is large enough to make attempts at dividing lines pointless.

“The reality of the existence of white people is so easily understood that children can perceive it instantly.”

The existence of variation in skin colour, hair colour, hair length, hair texture, eye colour, gender, height, and weight are all readily apparent to children. It is socialization that teaches them that difference in some of these areas is insignificant, while difference in others matters a great deal. This is why children in different areas of the world conceive of these ideas very differently.

It takes very little effort to convince children in classrooms that people’s eye colour determines personal worth. It does not follow that this reveals how simple and obvious a system of discrimination and distinction on eye colour should be to adult society.

@Pointdexter. Yes we are all aware of DNA connections between populations. That being said, how many societies in history have been based on the percentage of such-and-such DNA one has? HINT: ZERO. Moreover, European culture is not tied to European DNA; plenty of European cultures have taken much from non-European traditions wherever they meet.

And just as the best things in life are free, so are the worst sometimes- I am of course referring to KD Rebel(which I reviewed above), the Viking Kidnapping-Rape-Polygamy-Exposition-loaded adventure by David Lane.

As much as you seem to be highly informed and intelligent, and I respect your writing style, let me with all due respect, correct you.

It appears you may be of Turkish or Caucasian ancestry (as in from the Caucasus) given your name and the knowledge that you display of that region in the world.

However, as a Mexican American, please do not speak for my history or my culture, especially when you do not know what you are speaking of. It merely demonstrates ignorance on your part.

If you want to speak about radical ideology, I suggest you being with another racists supremacist ideology similar to white supremacy, it’s called Turanism.

The noun Mexican is NOT a European identifier. It is a word that originates from the Nauhtl (Aztec) word Mexihca. Always has been. It’s similar to the noun Coptic as used by Eygptian Arabs, the word Coptic meaning Egyptian, which is commonly used by Christian Arabs whose ancestory is historically tied to the ancient Eygpitans before Arab invasions, but who speak Arabic culturally and linguistically. Similarly, we Mexicans linguistically speak the Spanish language and adopt certain Spanish cultural customs, and we also identify ourselves as Mexican means Mexihca or Aztec, which is an extension of our historical ancestry.

Ruslan said:

“Well that depends on the motives of said African-American, Latino, etc. The motives of people who want to preserve “whiteness” are domination of society. I have in fact been in debates condemning the radical ideology of some Latino groups, reminding them that identifiers like Mexican are inherently European and not necessarily indigenous.”

I have never belonged or posted to Stormfront. No interest. Further, I do not know the works of Don Black or Tom Bombadil.

I have always held my views, expressed my opinions. Gradually, quite imperceptibly at first, things changed. Despite never uttering a racial slur, despite never believing one race superior over another, despite keeping to myself, I suddenly found myself labeled.

Amused at first, then, when the attacks – that is the way they felt – expanded I tried to fight back. But, like all straw man contests, one cannot win. In a very real sense, I became involved because of the attacks. That was some 18 years ago. Prior to that – say, ’83 or ’84 – I worked or participated in a variety of left/liberal causes including the Jesse Jackson campaign believing, at the time (though certainly not anymore), in the legitimacy of the man and his message.

And while I have certainly heard of some of the larger WN sites (like Stormfront) I have never taken an active part. Too many Americans become the caricature drawn up for them by minority groups. I have zero interest in the ego-based competitions mascarading as many American (i.e., WN) programs.

By the way, supremacy is a fallacy, an erroneous twisitng of intentions. My way, my life, my values and ideals are better for me and my family, my culture. Period. I’ve never understood if the slur “white supremacist” is intentional or just the result of lazy thinking. As someone else noted above, there is no “white race.” White is a convenient term, something many understand, but like the word “black” it paints over the true issues.

As long as my racial brothers and sisters hang onto ideas like supremacy, our cause will always be lost. Our goal is to focus our unique talents, skills and ideas on maintaining our past history and expanding our future plans. We have only to take care of ourselves and the rest will take care of itself.

But here’s another wildcard, if some of you say you are proud of YOUR history, then why the outcry when we had the day without an immigrant protests? Why the outcry of, “if they love their country so much to fly their flags, they should go back.”

This is something that needs to be discussed, because immigrants from non-European countries are told to declare their loyalty to this country, meanwhile, people that trace their ancestors to European countries tend to declare their loyalty to European countries instead of the U.S. Wassup?

Hahaha, you wouldn’t know that if you were to walk though much of London or Birmingham.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gR3FwTtBVjk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1b9J8D3tOg

Likewise, I must point out that even during the height of British rule of India, there wasn’t a single part of that place where the white British or other European residents were a majority, or even slightly outnumbered the Indians. That is all in a jarring contrast to entire boroughs of English cities where the native English people have been thoroughly driven out and ethnically cleansed by the unlimited flood of colonists from Indian subcontinent.

“Norman, Saxon, Celtic?”

Being white Europeans they were, they are certainly considered to be founding stock of the British nation.

As far as the article that spawned this thread, I too am a firm believer in free speech, and believe that to combat bad speech one must use more speech, not less. But, I am also free in where to spend my money, and I stopped using Amazon during the Michael Vick debacle when they refused to stop promoting books that defended and showed people how to fight dogs. I wrote them, to which they answered with the standard free speech form email, and I now buy my books and other media elsewhere.

Real freedom rocks.

That is sadly the case. And I truly wish it wasn’t.

Aron

That's true. But the hysterics that Dr. Laura (of the on-air n-word tirade) and others of such ilk would have you believe otherwise. In their world, they can rant and rave as is their right under the 1st Amendment, but you are to be silent if you don't agree with them.

http://tinyurl.com/26zymuu

As Ruslan has put so eloquently on so many occasions, freedom of speech does not mean freedom from critique.

Aron

This is why the “we’re just being proud of our heritage” line doesn’t fly with anyone who has had enough contact and experience with WN communities. For one thing, most WNs, especially the American variety, have never set foot in Europe and thus know nothing about “European culture.” But more important than this, check out any given WN forum and you will find not a celebration of heritage and history but mostly a non-stop whine fest about everything from the undocumented construction workers to subtle “anti-white messages” in the latest Snickers commercial.