<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family Research Council Reposts Discredited Anti-Gay ‘Science’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/06/14/family-research-council-quietly-reposts-discredited-anti-gay-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/06/14/family-research-council-quietly-reposts-discredited-anti-gay-science/</link>
	<description>Hatewatch is a blog of the Southern Poverty Law Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/06/14/family-research-council-quietly-reposts-discredited-anti-gay-science/comment-page-1/#comment-301032</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=6836#comment-301032</guid>
		<description>Sounds similar to some of the &#039;research&#039; done by the idiot homophobe Warren Throckmorton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds similar to some of the &#8216;research&#8217; done by the idiot homophobe Warren Throckmorton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Molloy</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/06/14/family-research-council-quietly-reposts-discredited-anti-gay-science/comment-page-1/#comment-300360</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Molloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=6836#comment-300360</guid>
		<description>Todd, the Anti Gay Science clearly has quotation marks and, according to the Scientific Method, quotation mark science cannot be duplicated in a controlled environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, the Anti Gay Science clearly has quotation marks and, according to the Scientific Method, quotation mark science cannot be duplicated in a controlled environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLavigueur</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/06/14/family-research-council-quietly-reposts-discredited-anti-gay-science/comment-page-1/#comment-300314</link>
		<dc:creator>RLavigueur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=6836#comment-300314</guid>
		<description>Todd, 

The anti-gay &quot;science&quot; was discredited by not by &quot;pro-gay&quot; science, but by the normal operation of science when the anti-gay positions continue to prove baseless and without any evidence in their favour. That&#039;s how science works, ideas and theories are tested and subjected to experiment and scrutiny, and if they don&#039;t stand up, they&#039;re abandoned.  
 
It’s amusing that you infer that the American Medical Association, American Psychiatric Association, and the American Sociological Association, together consisting of tens of thousands of social scientists and doctors, are all biased in favour of homosexuality. Even more so that you make the claim without a shred of evidence that these organizations are biased in favour of homosexuals and bisexuals. 
 
I presume you assume bias because these organizations position themselves against your own beliefs, but rest assured, they have a good reason to do so. There was a time not so long ago when the organizations in question either said nothing about or were against homosexuality, but these positions were changed because increasing scrutiny showed that they had never had scientific merit in the first place. 
 
Cameron, of course, is quite easy to discredit, and I challenge you to pick any one of his studies that connect homosexuality to paedophilia/incest/rape/disease/the decline of civilization that is not riddled with methodological errors and conclusions that have nothing to do with what evidence his flawed methodologies present. There&#039;s a reason his work is discredited by all major scientific organizations who do work in the same areas, and it isn&#039;t that they&#039;re all in the thrall of the nefarious homosexual agenda. Or if not Cameron, any anti-gay science of your choosing. 
 
Of course, if my challenge to find legitimate work by Cameron is too difficult for you, you could also point to some of these studies that are biased in favour of homosexuality and have swayed countless tens of thousands of intellectuals to take their side. 

I&#039;ll wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, </p>
<p>The anti-gay &#8220;science&#8221; was discredited by not by &#8220;pro-gay&#8221; science, but by the normal operation of science when the anti-gay positions continue to prove baseless and without any evidence in their favour. That&#8217;s how science works, ideas and theories are tested and subjected to experiment and scrutiny, and if they don&#8217;t stand up, they&#8217;re abandoned.  </p>
<p>It’s amusing that you infer that the American Medical Association, American Psychiatric Association, and the American Sociological Association, together consisting of tens of thousands of social scientists and doctors, are all biased in favour of homosexuality. Even more so that you make the claim without a shred of evidence that these organizations are biased in favour of homosexuals and bisexuals. </p>
<p>I presume you assume bias because these organizations position themselves against your own beliefs, but rest assured, they have a good reason to do so. There was a time not so long ago when the organizations in question either said nothing about or were against homosexuality, but these positions were changed because increasing scrutiny showed that they had never had scientific merit in the first place. </p>
<p>Cameron, of course, is quite easy to discredit, and I challenge you to pick any one of his studies that connect homosexuality to paedophilia/incest/rape/disease/the decline of civilization that is not riddled with methodological errors and conclusions that have nothing to do with what evidence his flawed methodologies present. There&#8217;s a reason his work is discredited by all major scientific organizations who do work in the same areas, and it isn&#8217;t that they&#8217;re all in the thrall of the nefarious homosexual agenda. Or if not Cameron, any anti-gay science of your choosing. </p>
<p>Of course, if my challenge to find legitimate work by Cameron is too difficult for you, you could also point to some of these studies that are biased in favour of homosexuality and have swayed countless tens of thousands of intellectuals to take their side. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/06/14/family-research-council-quietly-reposts-discredited-anti-gay-science/comment-page-1/#comment-300262</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=6836#comment-300262</guid>
		<description>So, was anti-gay science discredited by pro-gay science?

Absolutely no bias here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, was anti-gay science discredited by pro-gay science?</p>
<p>Absolutely no bias here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RockyMissouri</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/06/14/family-research-council-quietly-reposts-discredited-anti-gay-science/comment-page-1/#comment-300037</link>
		<dc:creator>RockyMissouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=6836#comment-300037</guid>
		<description>One thing is certain: the Family Research Council is hazardous to children, and families....and goodwill, to people in general...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing is certain: the Family Research Council is hazardous to children, and families&#8230;.and goodwill, to people in general&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/06/14/family-research-council-quietly-reposts-discredited-anti-gay-science/comment-page-1/#comment-299960</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=6836#comment-299960</guid>
		<description>Thank you, and Alvin McEwen, for continuing to be vigilant in monitoring these groups.

FRC (and many other similar groups that have been spared the hate group label) has earned its designation in the hall of shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, and Alvin McEwen, for continuing to be vigilant in monitoring these groups.</p>
<p>FRC (and many other similar groups that have been spared the hate group label) has earned its designation in the hall of shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reynardine</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/06/14/family-research-council-quietly-reposts-discredited-anti-gay-science/comment-page-1/#comment-299185</link>
		<dc:creator>Reynardine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=6836#comment-299185</guid>
		<description>I rather wish Mr. Perkins would go back to running the Bates Motel and loving his mummy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather wish Mr. Perkins would go back to running the Bates Motel and loving his mummy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
