Firstly @ Mr Black…. Saying there is genetic markers that link 2 races of people together does not denote an indigenous right or qualify you for sovereignty. IE: Just because African Blacks share genetic similarity to American Natives does not make them the same or prove birthright. Studies have shown that there are also genetic distinctions between the two races as well, this information just isn’t published (or most likely simply ignored) by groups that want to use incomplete science to create a “Legal” argument that supports their cause.

Secondly, creating the argument that he had legal right to seize property he had no rights to (Other than apparently his self justified theft of said property AFTER He sent paperwork to the original owner, claiming he was a banker and asking her to sign the quitclaim deed, then forged documents and falsely identified himself as the homeowners husband in an attempt to modify the loan), while interesting, has no foothold in legality. It’s simply a justification for a theft backed up by poorly informed people who really don’t know any more about law than what they learned on Youtube…..

While Sovereignty is a real and tangible thing, it’s also a widely abused goal by groups and individuals in order to escape the requirements of Citizenship. Obey Laws, be taxed, be productive in your own right. It’s clear that it’s much easier to seize a property and claim right to it than work and pay for it. Most of these groups don’t feel the need to prove their birthright, and instead use bunk science and propaganda to validate their point of view.

Personally, if I were you, Mr Black, I would not decry White Supremacists and then Espouse Black Supremacist teachings. Frankly, that just calls into question everything you say. This Country may be run as a corporation, but it’s kept that way by Bigoted Racists, the Ignorant, and the Apathetic. The color of your skin does not entitle you to anything in this society, color is just used by the politically strong to keep us weak and fighting against one another. It’s clear that this tactic is quite effective by some of the posts here. Nonetheless, your personal racist beliefs do not make a legal argument, nor have you linked them to anything about this case.

To all of you who say Akeem Kwame should be kicked out of this country or incarcerated for his OPINIONS: You should be ashamed of yourselves. I couldn’t think of anything less American than jailing people for their beliefs. That’s the true slippery slope we all sit on. How long after that might any of you be considered a “Dangerous Radical” and jailed without cause? If you think it’s an impossibility you might want to rethink your “Love it or leave it” agenda. Alot of positive changes have been made since this country began by people who did love this country and didn’t leave it.

Should he be tried in the court? Yes. He has not established “Sovereignty” in any way, and is therefore a United States Citizen and under jurisdiction of the laws of this country. The judge asking he go through psychological testing is just his way of covering his bases and ensuring his judgement is not quickly overturned. It’s clear from his comments he doesn’t think he is dealing with someone who has psychological problems, but with someone he thinks of as possibly an idiot. Spend enough time in the courtroom and you’ll learn.

In this case, throwing him in jail had the desired effect. Upon returning to the court after 2 weeks in jail Akeem Kwame apologized for wasting the courts time and agreed to hire a lawyer. I have no doubt, in time, he will be found guilty of the crimes he’s accused of (charges he doesn’t deny himself, he just feels he is immune to the law) and sent to jail for legitimate reasons.

The Caveat: Who is a person? Until the 20th Century it was White Men who were Persons. If you were not a person you were somone who is consented to rule by benefits granted by the State, who dictated your legal status.

The Colonies in and of themselves were granted ability to govern and do commerce by extended corporate royal charters, which derived their authority form Kings and the Pope.

In separation “Self Evident” natural rights under direct authority of a non denominational supreme God, the United States cut out the middle man and legally separated from Europe, and then bought up the other corporate bodies in North America. Anyone can create a Bill and if a period of time passes the bill is accpeted unless it is disputed. I can give you a bill for 10k as a business and attempt to collect if you do nothing, and then sell it to a debt collector. The Bill of Rights , and “Declaration” of Independance uses the Roman/British/Vatican system of that recognizes God as supreme authority.

The British Army could make the United States withdraw their declarations and so they became Sovereign States that had to be recognized under the existing British Empire which at the time pretty much controlled the world.

The rest of the European concessions added the land of their colonies to the independent ones from Great Britain. The question now is that if you benefit from implied consent of U.S. Citizenship to be governed you gain Nationality and have consequences from your status. Most people know that their were Native American nations that had legitimate title to govern themselves and these Nationhood was recognized with official treatise as foreign nations, although these treatise were broken and conceded with the status that comes with living on a reservation.

One nation that the U.S declared a protective treaty that still stands is from the Treaty of Morocco. It is downplayed that Muslim and African nations (especially North African) had contributed to the early U.S and had protected Diplomatic status on American soil Being “negro” or “black” and a “slave” in was as much a regulation of legal personhood rather than the only fact that one was of Black African Descent.

The Moorish Temple in America was a recognition that those of african/muslim descent are given rights of “person: and also that of a protected sovereign foreign national. Some do this by declaration, many do this by research into their own family history. This is why many names that are considered “black” in the united states, malik, hakeem, kareem etc are actually Arabic because of the large intermixed population from Muslim African nations.

The loss of any protected status largely happend as a result of reconstruction, where african americans were recognized persons and even held political positions, until virtually all were once regulated to the status of “negroe”. Race in america soley by color has always been a legal distinction, because their is no other reference to claim of status by national origin alone for most people. Titles of nobility became replaced by race, class and gender.

Legal personhood was granted to “negroes” in the 1960’s, but Noble Drew Ali asserted himself as a Moorish national under the Treaty of Morocco. Whether others declare themselves Moorish, or use claim of right by ancestry, what they are attempting to do has historical precedent. Others that attempt to become sovereign of their own accord, must know exactly what they are doing or they are incurring debt and use of services of the government on whose land they reside and do commerce in, and subject to punishment if debt and crimes are committed.

Whether one agrees or disagrees with the idea of becoming “stateless”, it is not that outlandish when the entire legal history of the western world takes authority that consent to be governed is implied by the granting of “personhood’ (rather than being chattel, or moveable property) with the state taking its authority from God Almighty. All Grammar and Spelling errors are mine. Go read a book.

Somehow in America we have forgotten this. We seem to believe that govt is the master and not the people. Yet juries are supreme in decisions not govt by use of courts. The people set the morality both for their states. cities. towns and the federal govt as well.

The people in California recently decided that gay marriage is illegal in California. They can also inform the federal govt that it is illegal under the sovereign authority of the people.
Govt cant use a Constitution given them by that same sovereign authority to not abide by the will of the sovereigns of the state. The people simply didn’t delegate that authority to any govt .and they surely didn’t put it into their Consitution!
Who or what is sovereign in America? Is it the people who created the Constitution and a govt or is it govt and Constitution created by those same people? IN creating a Constitution the people delegated authority to the govt but they never relinquished their right to remove that authority, abolish the Constitution and decide who shall and shall marry in America@

You are correct in your teaching, but you must realize that you are in a society that is controlled by white supremacists. They know if Blacks ever found out the truth that they will be even more powerful than before. They have spend their entire life brainwashing Blacks and never intend to repay what they have stolen. We all know that the truth will come forth and it is just a matter of time. This entire system the whites have created is fallen and believe me and you this Babylon system will be destroyed. I like to remind them of Revelations 2:9. I would urge anyone to visit http://www.youtube.com and insert: white woman tell the truth; then after watching type: white man tell the truth. The time will come where Blacks will regain their power and rightful authority. This is not about race, its about Truth. Its a shame that whites are still trying to protect what they did not own from the beginning. May I remind them that the old KKK clans and their ancestors are being permanently removed and their children do not buy in the evil they have brought upon the land. Despite all that has happened, I can honestly say many were affected by the economy downfall but look around you…the ones that were and still is affected the most and hit the hardest are the whites. They have built a system that even now they can not control anymore. They are the epitome of John 8:43-44. They are like their father because he was a liar from the beginning, he is the father of lies…For anyone who is claiming sovereignty, the only thing you have to do is wait and exercise patience…In time everything that belongs to you will eventually find it way back to its rightful owners…The Truth Is Here and all you have to do people is open your eyes and keep an open mind. If anyone has stolen anything, its the judge who is trying to steal the freedom of this man by placing him in a holding cell as an animal. Jails are the new age slavery. What made the judge so upset because the judge knows this man is being truthful. The judge knows he did not sign the correct oath and there is no such as legalese, that is a bunch of hogwash gibberish and the judge knows this.All this man had to do is say, before he answers anything from the judge is that, Before I answer that, grant me immunity from state and federal prosecution. Then he could say I do not have an attorney for sentencing, nobody would sign my contract. Now this would have really heated the hatred in the judge if Kwame would have told him, I do not accept you as my judge. or Judge, do you hold the full judicial power of the state? or is it the military power? or perhaps he could have said, The judge’s office was not created by law. Now this is the question no judge ever want to hear….Your Honor, are you a Mason? Mr. Prosecutor, are you a Mason? (these are ways to shut down a court case)

And for Kwame, I recommend the next time you appear in any court which I doubt you will ever after the psychological testing. They are going to classify you as psychological disturbed because you are a challenge to them and they want to discredit you before the people…They know if it is ever proven in the eyes of the public you are right then you will gain much power…But if you ever have to go before any of them again…This should simply be your answer: “I decline to swear the oath. If I swear the oath, I will be waiving the right to challenge the authority of the person who is administering the oath. I do not waive this right.” The statue says the clerk shall record ALL (notice cap letters) orders. I order this case dismissed. Supposedly I am presumed to know the law, however, it is physically impossible for me to read the over 60 million statues plus everything ever published in the Federal Register. Take judicial notice that I do not know the entire law and nor do you judge! No state has the right to own any citizen. Every citizen is a free agent and the ones who call themselves Americanas and Americans knows this to be The Truth!

The idea that the UNITED STATES, (Notice the caps), acts as a corporation is supported by quite a bit of evidence. Also there is evidence that you have a straw man and it may be possible to declare sovereignty.

Now, there is a process to go through and it seems the defendant in the original story only verbally declared sovereignty and did not file the appropriate paperwork. In addition, you can NOT infringe on another’s constitutional rights and expect to avoid punishment because you are sovereign.

There is enough to learn about this to create a four year college program out of it. Absolutely more than I can cover in a post, and I’ve only just begun to discover these things, myself.

If you are really interested, Google is your friend. I started with gaining an understanding the Federal Reserve and fractional reserve banking. That in itself is enough to get your blood boiling! From there begin researching the United States as a corporation. You’ll have to filter through the sites that can’t back up the claims with law or cite their sources, but there are some that do. I was surprised to find YouTube to be a good source of info, too.

As for people that believe they are being patriotic by telling dissenters to gtfo of the country, you are being counterproductive. As stated by someone dead and famous that I can’t remember, “Dissention is the highest form of patriotism.” Question everything before discarding it as falsehood.

That is an astounding story; it makes David Icke’s claims look balanced and well-researched by comparison. I can’t tell if you’ve really been severely brainwashed or forgot to take your meds…or if you’re just trolling. :(

That makes as much sense as anything the idiot “Moorish” national had to say.

http://www.ethnologue.com/family_index.asp

Ethnologue language family index

I think you are mistaking the group to which this person belonged with another one. This nut almost surely belonged to the Moorish Science Temple of America, a very old Black supremacist cult (possibly the first in the USA?) predating the NOI. They are racist and quasi-Muslim, calling their holy book the Koran, their holy places mosques, etc. Their leader, Prophet Noble Drew Ali, is dead and was never convicted, to my knowledge of any such thing.

The Moorish Science Temple has members who are part of the sovereign citizens’ movement, a broader group of loosely affiliated individuals who follow certain “gurus” that speak at seminars. Sovereign citizens have no particular “leader”, and adherents to the ideology are dedicated to the movement in varying degrees. They are not racist per se and are not mostly Black supremacists.

You are probably referring to the Nuwaubians, a different Black supremacist cult whose leader was convicted of rape, child sexual abuse, and sexual assault. They believed in aliens, Bible codes, Blacks as the pillars of world civilization (including that Jesus and the Prophet Muhammad were Black), and most strongly, they believed in their leader, Dr. Malachi Z. York (the child rapist). There are still existing adherents to Nuwaubianism, who are pushing for their leader’s release from prison.

The three groups/movements are not the same.