Comments on: Pat Buchanan Says Oslo Shooter’s Views “May Be Right”

By: Baba Ram Ding Dong

Baba Ram Ding Dong — Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:45:16 +0000

Criticisizing The disproportionate influence in American foreign policy wielded by Israel does not, by any means, make one an anti Semite. The influence is there. Confront it.
Answer it. Deal with it. Do not call it names and attempt to label it anti Semitism. That is simply avoiding the issue and hiding behind name calling. Would you deny that there is a heavy Cuban lobby in Florida? Would you deny that there was ever a China Lobby in American Politics? See Ross Y. Koen’s book for the answer to the last question. Join the political debate but grow up when you do it.

By: Shadow Wolf

Shadow Wolf — Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:44:05 +0000

Patty boy wasn’t the only one on MSNBC to spew vitriolic innuendos. Chris Mathews is also spat some nonsense previousl on several instances. Albiet, not directed at Jews(nor blathering anti-Setimitism). But with rabid fallacies regarding Native Americans and possibly Latinos.

By: skinnyminny

skinnyminny — Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:19:56 +0000

No matter how much people complain about Patsy, MSNBC won’t cancel his contract. During the 2008/9 presidential campaign, I saw Patsy, live on MSNBC, tell a black female political analyst to, “shut up.” When I had cable, I had to stop watching Rachel Maddow when she would invite him as a guest, calling him her ‘fake uncle.’

For some reason, guys like Patsy thinks it is okay to always have this fight mentality – being rude, argumentative, hostile…never mind the fact that these guys love glorifying the past, WHERE’s THE CHILVARY?

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:38:13 +0000

“Genocide? You mean Haiti? That was black on white genocide at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Columbus had nothing to do with it. He discovered the New World at the end of the fifteenth century. Do read some history books, will you? Not the PC “Cultural Marxist” kind, either…”

Idiocy. Pure, unadulterated, idiocy, 20 kilos of it. Yes, those black folks in Haiti had such a wonderful life under their masters until they just up and “genocided” the “whites.” That’s incredibly relevant today, isn’t it? Oh wait, it actually is, because it was precisely this revolution which denied Napoleon a crucial staging area for an invasion of the continent. The loss of this colony convinced him that the territory of Louisiana was indefensible. Hence it was sold to Thomas Jefferson.

Yes, reading history books IS a good idea.

Now here comes the hard part. Someone explain to me what “Cultural Marxism” is. Show your work.

By: Shawn

Shawn — Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:00:42 +0000

Because someone commits acts of violence in the name of specific beliefs does not necessary make those beliefs wrong. Every ideology has had people that have not hesitated to use violence to supposedly push their cause. Al Gore would agree with a lot of the Unibomber’s writings, for example.

By: Liberal Eunuch

Liberal Eunuch — Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:26:51 +0000

Genocide? You mean Haiti? That was black on white genocide at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Columbus had nothing to do with it. He discovered the New World at the end of the fifteenth century. Do read some history books, will you? Not the PC “Cultural Marxist” kind, either…

By: chopin.voltaire.mencken.adams

chopin.voltaire.mencken.adams — Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:44:11 +0000

No may be about it. His actions were wrong, but–like John Brown–his ideas are right.

By: Kochise

Kochise — Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:43:17 +0000

Buchanan’s egregious assertions on the protests waged by Indigenous Native Americans on Columbus Day, has nothing to do with “Cultural Marxism”, but rather it’s an expression of dissent and protestation of a gold hungry tyrannical mass murderer who supposedly discovered the Americas in circa 1492. I don’t see how a group of people’s blockade of a festive holiday, whose iconic name is synonymous with genocide, is somehow associated with “Cultural Marxism”. When the protestations itself quite contradicts “Cultural Marxism”.

By: Shadow Wolf

Shadow Wolf — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:50:08 +0000

I meant by ending up with the same fate: Getting the boot.

By: Argaman

Argaman — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:15:01 +0000

You mean, with his own show on CNN or MSNBC?

By: Shadow Wolf

Shadow Wolf — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:08:11 +0000

Could it be possible that Pat Buchanan will end up as the next Lou Dobbs?