Comments on: NYC Probes Anti-Semitic Attacks as Firebombing Hits NJ Rabbi’s Home

By: Kiwiwriter

Kiwiwriter — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:38:16 +0000

A suspect in this case has been arrested. He is identified as an unemployed loner with few friends and a great hatred for Jews.

By: Kiwiwriter

Kiwiwriter — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:42:16 +0000

Woland,

Someone who chortles over a vicious firebombing of a rabbi and his family is only worthy of ridicule, condescension, and pity.

So trundle back to VNN, where your anti-Semitic “witticisms” are more welcome, I’m sure.

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:27:36 +0000

“P.S., the forced conversions of the northern european peoples by their ruling elites occured from 600-1400 AD (more or less), therefore the correct timeline is 1400-600 years ago.”

Gee Woland, I didn’t know Europeans(or “whites” as you like to call them) include only ‘Northern Europeans.’ See I had this wacky idea that Greeks and Romans were Europeans, thus pushing that timeline to the reign of Theodosius who made it the official religion of the Roman empire.

Also those ruling elites you speak of…were they Jewish? I’m pretty sure they weren’t. In any case I have to find it funny when WNs complain about non-white crime and behavior while simultaneously idolizing Germanic barbarians who were infamous for their rape and pillaging. Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Turks, Moors, Mayans and Chinese built far greater civilizations than the Germanic and Scandinavian pagans. You’re basically putting a small sub-group of Europeans on a pedestal when in fact they didn’t even show much promise at all until long after their adoption of Christianity.

By: Woland

Woland — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:48:22 +0000

Ruslan,

You have such a beautiful command of the English langauge.

P.S., the forced conversions of the northern european peoples by their ruling elites occured from 600-1400 AD (more or less), therefore the correct timeline is 1400-600 years ago.

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:14:26 +0000

Woland, virtually every neo-Nazi claims he’s not a Sieg Heiling idiot. But with your nonsensical views about the “semitic spirit”(whatever the hell that is), you might as well be. And about that “slave religion”, you do realize WHO “foisted” that religion on you right?

It’s rather amusing finding someone who is still butthurt about something that happened around 1700 years ago.

By: Woland

Woland — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:53:38 +0000

Kiwiwriter,

What is the reason for your obsession with VNN?

Is it that your favored method of argument is to slander anyone who disagrees with your worldview as a “neo-nazi”?

And before you fire off an appropriately condescending, facile comment, note that I am not an arm-band wearing, stiff arm saluting Hilterite cartoon stereotype.

I am simply opposed to the semitic spirit and the docile cattle mentality that results in us “goyim” when its various slave religions are foisted upon us – which incidentally, is an more accurate description of what Marr railed against in 1879.

By: Kiwiwriter

Kiwiwriter — Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:13:11 +0000

Aron, as I said earlier, be careful how you feed trolls. They just want to be able to rush back to VNN and show their pals how they stood tall in the glorious fight against the Jewish-Communist conspiracy to put a kosher delicatessen flying the hammer and sickle on every street corner, and actually got a reaction.

By: Aron

Aron — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:35:49 +0000

Matt,

Were there enough non-sensical questions in your last post? Does anyone really care? Why am I even bothering to respond to you?

THE PEOPLE, INCLUDING US LEFTY JEWS, WANT TO KNOW?

By: Matt

Matt — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:13:43 +0000

You see most people don’t burn their own houses and cars? Didn’t any of you lefty Jews look at the story of how it is all insurance fraud? That paper must be run by a war criminal?

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:59:12 +0000

So now a rabbi’s home gets firebombed. Okay, I wonder how the perpetrators of this vicious act would feel about their own homes being torched?! Wow! You mean that’s not nice? Imagine that.

By: Beachcomber

Beachcomber — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 04:33:16 +0000

Wow! This subject sure brought out the anti-Semitism in many of you, not to mention blaming the victims, pointing fingers at one another, and arguing over the definition of anti-Semitism. For shame! For shame! How childish. How backward.

By: Reynardine

Reynardine — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:13:11 +0000

Ian, that is true: the majority of Muslims speak either Indo-Iranian languages or one of the languages of Indonesia. At this point, increasing numbers speak English with increasing fluency, or other more or less Western languages of countries where their families have settled. A sizeable number are Turanian, also. Just so, outside of Israel, Hebrew is solely a liturgical language, and most Jews don’t speak it. Nonetheless, these religions, like Christianity, are desert-born and come from common cultural roots. That is exactly why the Children of Ibrahim are at each others’ throats: it is sibling rivalry. Where one becomes dominant, the other two are persecuted. Christianity, though, has so long called itself European that it considers the remaining religions to be nomadic “others” and often (as in Spain) the same Other. The kind of mindset that will persecute one will persecute both.

By: Kiwiwriter

Kiwiwriter — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:10:46 +0000

I think the saddest thing about Woland’s childish extrusion is the thought that he probably regards it as having struck a great blow for his beloved yet nonexistent Aryan race. If spouting drivel like that on SPLC’s blog — and presumably bragging about it to his pals on VNN — is the greatest accomplishment of his life, I feel sorry for him.

Ruslan, Mitch, Aron: good answers to the troll. Be careful how you feed him.

By: Matt

Matt — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:27:07 +0000

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....olice.html

seems it not hte National Socialists?

By: Ian

Ian — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:11:42 +0000

Wilhelm Marr, the inventer of the term “anti-Semitism” used it to describe the movement against Jews. The book where he first used the term was called “”The Victory of Germandom over Jewry”, not “The Victory of Germandom over Rival (Non-Christian) Abrahamic Religions and Cultures”.

A large majority of Muslims do not speak Semitic languages, other than religious use of Arabic.

By: Reynardine

Reynardine — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:15:24 +0000

Ian, I never said it means prejudice against Semitic languages. It means prejudice against rival (non-Christian) Abrahamic religions and cultures. All “Christian” Inquisitions have persecuted them both, and where it is acceptable to persecute one, the other will soon follow.

By: Ian

Ian — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:04:40 +0000

Claiming “antisemitism” means prejudice againt Semitic languages is like claiming “homophobia” means fear of same.

By: Starr

Starr — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:28:02 +0000

This sounds a whole lot like the recent “anti semitic attacks” that turned out to be a case of i”nsurance fraud.

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:09:26 +0000

Molly, you must be new here. If you make claims, you need to bring the evidence.

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:31:42 +0000

Let’s not point fingers yet, many of these cases lead right back to the homeowners themselves. NYC is not a hotbed of National Socialists.

By: Mitch Beales

Mitch Beales — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:26:14 +0000

Molly your post is hate speech since you are repeating lies that have been called out repeatedly.

By: Aron

Aron — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:25:59 +0000

Molly,

Care to enlighten us with some evidence? Because, I don’t you’ll be able…

Oh, and Woland: your armband is showing.

By: Molly

Molly — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:37:10 +0000

Where were the occupy wall streeters when this happened. They are stirring up a lot of anti- semitism. Hate speech is alive and well there.

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:19:56 +0000

Yes, Woland, I’m sure that Rabbi was responsible for terrible oppression of the “Goyim.” That would be typical VNN logic.

By: Woland

Woland — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:46:54 +0000

Once the Goyim start to be “uppity”, who knows what they will do next?!!!

By: Woland

Woland — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:42:17 +0000

Oy Vey!

By: Reynardine

Reynardine — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:14:50 +0000

Anti-Semites are anti-Semites. “Semites”, culturally and linguisticly, is a term that includes Muslim and Christian Arabs, as well as Jews (I don’t think too many Americans even think about the Maltese). Anti-Muslim/Arab bigotry is going to have a resonance with anti-Jewish bigotry, and often serves as a more socially acceptable surrogate for it, so whoever stirs up one will sooner or later stir up the other.