That’s also true for rape trials. Most rape cases are he says she says cases where the woman says that the man forced her or threatened her with force to have sex while the man says that the woman agreed-that they did the acts she agreed to & what she & or he said no to, they didn’t do. With rape, it’s possible for a woman or man to 1st consent but change mind & say no. It’s also possible for a woman or man to 1st say not but then voluntarily change mind & decide to have sex. It’s also possible for a woman or man to say no to 1 sex act but agree to another. Rape/sex abuse cases must be judged individually by juries. So the same is true for ‘gay bashing’ cases-they must be judged individually.

You’re right. That was a PAINFULLY weak answer. ‘I don’t believe them because they’re EVIL!’

Good luck in life with that kind of attitude, buddy.

We’re done here.

And you answered the same thing. I asked for statistics. You have given me speculation. The American Justice System puts the burden of proof on the accuser. As such, there must be evidence that all of these men had been sexually assaulted by gay men prior to their beating.

You’re the one making the accusations. You’re the one who needs to produce the evidence.

Until then, you have no more credibility than Paul Cameron.

First, I never made a comment regarding Gandhi’s faith, so I don’t know why you brought that up.

Second, since you seem to be so enamored with Paul Cameron, I’m sure you would be willing to provide evidence to support his claims. Every story you’ve ever told is simply specious. Give me numbers that prove gay-bashing doesn’t exist. Give me numbers that prove there are almost no bias-crimes against homosexuals by heterosexuals.

Please. I can’t wait to hear what you say.

A very good point. I had always wondered why Greece had subsided as a major center of civilization. Now I know it was their acceptance of buggery.

But it seems that SPLC, Huffington Post, etc. score people like Dr. Paul Drummond Cameron, etc. because they give facts on the harms of gay/lesbian activities which gay/lesbian groups hate by labelling people such as the FRC as hate groups. The SPLC, Huffington Post, etc. talk about anecdotal gay bashing cases by straight men, when the fact is that almost all the violence against gays & lesbians-assault&battery & murder are domestic violence cases. Eg. if a gay were to bash his gay lover during a domestic fight, this assault&battery is usu. not going to be in the media unless it’s a strange case such as involving a famous gay couple. If a gay or lesbian were to kill their lover during a domestic fight, then it’s usu. in the local press but probably won’t be in the national press.

On the other hand, if a gay or few cases lesbian is bashed or killed by a straight man, then it makes national news incl. here on SPLC, because these cases are strange & odd-the news is about strange, odd & interesting. In December 2011, there was national news incl. in Huffington Post about a vandalism @ a gay nativity scene in Claremont Calif. So far, nobody has been arrested. Gay/lesbian groups say that the vandalism was done by ‘homophobes’ who vandalised the nativity. But as nobody has been arrested & if no suspects are found, it’s possible that the vandalism could’ve been staged by gays & lesbians who vandalized the nativity scene of 2 lesbians for sympathy purposes by using the media to lecture on how ‘homophobic’ society is & possibly get insurance money. Again, the Claremont police haven’t arrested any1 for vandalizing the gay nativity scene. If it was done by people who are against gay/lesbian activities, then it’s a dumb thing to do as it hurts our cause. But if it was done by a gay or lesbian to try to get sympathy for gays/lesbians in the media, then don’t be surprised. Gays & lesbian groups know that the national press will cover these cases as they’re strange & unusual so gays & lesbians would have a motive to stage the vandalism of the gay/lesbian nativity scene in Claremont church for sympathy & insurance money. Hope SPLC approves.

Also, not a single study shows any other risks from marijuana smoking than smoke inhalation.

You seriously need to get your head out of your posterior.

Oh, wait. No I didn’t. You have honestly uttered the most despicable comment on this entire article, and I seem to think you don’t even realize how disgusting it was. Abort babies because that may eventually become LGBT? Maybe you just have a thing for Indira Gandhi and her policies of ‘volunteered’ sterilization.

You are just as bad, and even arguably worse than these people. ‘As bad as smoking crack?’ Now that’s just silly and I won’t even dignify it with a proper response.

Haven’t commented here for sometimes, but let me say that I’m proud to be homophobic. Gay/lesbian activities by willing adults is comparable to pot smoking by willing adults. Yes, the law allows this in the U.S., but we must try to find a cure for gay/lesbian activities. Sex changes to repeat are mutilations & they must abolish this. You can call me a bigot but it’s good to be a bigot against gay/lesbian activities & viewing it the same way as marijuana smoking as it’s bad for health.

Care to name a society that collapsed from acceptance of homosexual behavior?

And you can’t use Sodom and Gomorrah. The Bible is not a valid historical text.

I am in no way affiliated with the SPLC other than as a commenter on the blog.

The burden of proof is on you guys. The SPLC has provided oodles and oodles of evidence (oodles being the technical term), but your side? Well you’ve just produced a lot of hot air. Boo hoo.

The tides are turning against bigotry. Whether you like it or not.

Really? Based on what? Care to provide “hard evidence?” Are we become your enemies because we tell you the truth…sexual behavior is just that – a conduct and behavior. Christian opposition is the only thing that stands in the way of this BEHAVIOR corrupting the entire society. BEHAVIOR get it? Do what you do in the privacy of your own home but don’t CRAM IT DOWN society’s collective throat. Those who want to do it, go for it and reap the health “benefits” from it. But stop trying to justify it as an acceptable NORMAL lifestyle. Up until 1973 homosexuality was rightfully classified as a mental disorder. Do some research from non-Christian sources and see the mental health stats for those involved in this BEHAVIOR. Better yet check out the society’s that collapsed from such unrestrained abnormal behavior.

Tell you what, if you provide hard evidence that AFA, Americans for Truth, ATM, FRC, and Scott Lively who believes the Bible and speak its words are haters, then I will provide proof to refute the vicious lies of SPLC. Other than that SPLC naming Christian organizations as haters is all the proof you need, check your own source – SPLC – those who hate the truth call truth hate.

BTW, most of the supporters and donors are most likely all SPLC staffers trying to make it seem as if there is support for this God-hating organization. Laughable.

As has become the norm with you trolls, your comment makes absolutely no sense.

Care to learn the English language before you post again?

I like how when we ask wannabe trolls like you how we are “the real haters”, the best you can manage for proof is “read your own comments.”

And to the fellow who thought that this article is anti-Christian…First, it was not a Muslim group in question here. Second, you’ll note that the SPLC not only does not attack Christians who tolerate gays and lesbians, but also does not attack the millions who still teach homosexuality is a sin. What they are attacking here is a group which goes out of its way to slander people and influence legislation that would curtail other people’s civil rights based on their faith. Do you honestly believe that if a Muslim group were standing on those steps, they would just ignore it?

And by the way, why is it so many conservatives suddenly become pro-feminist and pro-gay ONLY when it concerns Muslims? Just once it would be nice to see Pamela Gellar come out strongly in favor of abortion and gay marriage right on Fox. With her self-proclaimed objectivist ideology, there shouldn’t be a problem for her.

As has been said innumerable times before: freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism.

All I did was laugh at them. As far as I know, that’s not exactly hate speech…

But what do I know?

However, the Pat Robertsons of the world want to use Christianity as a tool of rule to tell people what kind of person they should have sex with, how to have sex, and to ban birth control. Whether it’s Sharia Law or Christianity, they both sound like totalitarianism.