Comments on: Georgia Court to Hear Arguments on Obama’s Eligibility for Primary Ballot

By: Horus

Horus — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:42:11 +0000

“If and when you guys get shellackled in the November election for selecting Mittens or Newt the Toad Gingrich as a presidential candidate, at least you have nobody to blame but yourselves…”

They will claim he won by Voter Fraud, they are already hyping that fallacy.

By: JPotter

JPotter — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:23:43 +0000

Gosh, Patrick, the board of directors page at SLRC is suddenly 404!!!

Busted they are.

http://slrc-csa.org/site/directors.php

By: JPotter

JPotter — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:21:41 +0000

A caveman wearing a hardhat a’birfin’ away on the interwebs! What an image! :-D

By: caveman

caveman — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:23:22 +0000

Hardhat,
I wonder how Obama manages to poses them the way he does, perhaps they are all on some kind of entitlement program and would hate to lose their income.

By: Aron

Aron — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:51:23 +0000

Hardhat,

I seem to recall we once had a semi-civil discussion regarding ‘Southern Heritage.’ I wonder what you did with that person?

And I’m not taking your bait regarding my ‘comeback.’ In the grown-up world, we call those kinds of remarks ‘retorts.’ Good luck in middle school.

By: hardhat

hardhat — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:42:17 +0000

caveman,
These are obama zombies…no amount of info will help them. It is fun though to get them slobbering mad.
The first person to question obo’s questionable past was Hillary! She was the first so called ‘birther”.The second was obo himself to question John McCain. It is an amazing thing that Hillary got the 4th most important position in the United States from a dude she ran against. I am sure there were some deals made there.
Your points can not be argued.They will just spin them here.
Aron, Your comeback was weak. Dumb. Go away.
Ruslan, where are you? Doing abit of investigation? Finally. You may learn something.Take off your blinders.
Kiwiwriter..smackdown? Whose?

By: caveman

caveman — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:38:05 +0000

Thanks,
Comrad Amerika-nov you just made my point. Why don’t you review the pictures of the documents you just sent and tell me, where are the raised seals, that are present on all the other certificates I’ve seen? Furthermore when you go looking for the proof you will find articles on this very subject. The more lies one tells the more elaborate the lies he must tell to cover up the original lie.

By: Aron

Aron — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:31:15 +0000

Hardhat,

I’m listening to it right now. Unlike my watches, YOU are simply full of hot air.

By: hardhat

hardhat — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:43:26 +0000

Aron,
Go get out one of your old watches, wind it up and listen to it tick.

By: hardhat

hardhat — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:37:58 +0000

R.A.
Is that where you got your proof? Pitiful, simply pitiful. Have you ever heard of Neil Abercrombie? Probably not. Have you even bothered to read about the twin daughters born to the Nordykes at the Kapi’olani Hospital one day after the purported day of obama’s birth? Their COLB has much more information. You probably skipped over that one. Did you even bother to listen to a former senior elections clerk for Honolulu, Tim Adams that signed a notorized affidavit swearing that there was no long form hospital generated birth certificate on file at/with the Hawaii Dept. of Health and that also neither hospitals had any record of him being born at either of their facilities.Why hasn’t a doctor or nurse come forward? Seems that a President born in either of the hospitals would be a big deal, at least just to satisify the crazy proofers. Who is the missing doctor?
Now we have the previous Director of Health Dr. C. Fukino issuing a statement June 27, 2009. verifying that she had seen the “original” records that were on file. Strangly, obama’s friend, Abercrombie who wanted to put the birther issue to rest is claiming he can not find the original records.Ooops!!!!
Do you know what a Certificate of Live Birth is? If not, let me enlighten you. It means that a child was born alive. This could mean that the grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn were both living in Hawaii at the time, and they were indeed, gave testimony to the birth which would have been all that was needed for the production of the COLB. This would trigger the 2 newspaper announcements from the ‘Honolulu Advertiser” and the” Honolulu Star- Bulletin” that would come from the Dept. of Health. Both birth announcements are identical in both papers. The address of the birth announcements belong to the grandparents. The Nordyke twins announcement was identical except it listed twin daughters on Aug 5th, whereas obama’s listed a son, Aug 4th. 1961. Was this your smoking gun? Which of the 2 hospitals was he born in. There are claims to being born in Kapi’olani and also Queen’s Medical Center. How can this possibly be? More discrepencies. BTW, I saw a COLB issued August 7, 1969 that listed a doctor from the state of Hawaii. Seems obama can not determine where he was born at. Poor dude only has a COLB with no hospital or doctor. This should restrict him from getting a passport.
Did you see June 27, 2004 “Sunday Standard” published in Kenya? Probably missed that one as well. I will help you out.” Kenyan-born Obama all set for U.S. Senate”. Hummmm??? Oops. Darn those blabber-mouths!
I took you advice and googled obama birth certificate and bout fell out of my chair laughing. Appears it is mostly about a forged document with many layers. Did you catch that? Probably not. I think you should do the same and google it as well.I think it is you who is actively ignoring the facts because it would shatter your little obama-bot world.

By: Kiwiwriter

Kiwiwriter — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:36:51 +0000

Nice smackdowns, Ruslan.

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:29:40 +0000

I find it curious that you’ve never seen this: http://www.snopes.com/politics.....ficate.asp

Looks like there’s a seal of the state of Hawaii on that there document!

Burden of proof is on you to explain this whole conspiracy; how the governor and secretary of health of Hawaii are lying, how all these judges are violating the law, how they managed to insert announcements of Obama’s birth into newspapers from 1961, and so on.

By: caveman

caveman — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:36:19 +0000

I find it very curious in all the photos of Obama’s birth certificate one or two small details are missing. (1) the seal of the state of Hawaii and (2) if not the original which would have the seal, a certified copy seal. Not sure if anyone has pondered these missing pieces or not but the certified copies I have of my birth certificate has both and copies of my fathers Florida birth certificate from 1936 has them. I guess Hawaii just doesn’t bother with things like certifications and non sense like that.

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:00:04 +0000

Hardhat, a few years ago they invented this thing called Google. There you can find the short form birth certificate which was provided, you can see the governor of Hawaii and the secretary of public health attesting to its authenticity. You can see the newspaper clippings announcing his birth in 1961. You can see when he released his long form certificate. You have access to all this information and yet you ignore it because it would upset your little conspiracy theory. Deep down you know that you have to actively ignore a lot of evidence otherwise the whole thing falls apart.

And for the record, this is not my real name and I’m not from another country so let’s can the xenophobia. Judging from your fear of vaccines and fluoride, it would seem like you never met a conspiracy theory you didn’t like. You have to admit though, this conspiracy about Obama is simply idiotic.

By: Aron

Aron — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:09:02 +0000

Oh, this is going to be fun!

I can’t wait to see Ruslan DESTROY ‘hardhat.’

By: hardhat

hardhat — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:49:48 +0000

Amirk,
If there are conspirators, they have a flouride drinking, vaccine taking, medication generation to laugh at for gobbling up the junk that the press-ta-tutes feed them. Do u disagree?

I am not a nutcase if you please.Sounds as if your name is from another country. Do you care about this country and do you want to see it radically changed?

By: hardhat

hardhat — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:32:08 +0000

Amirk,
Oh really? Barry, Barak, whatever/whoever has released all records. Where can I find them? This is amazing.

By: Gregory

Gregory — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:46:59 +0000

My comment was truncated for some reason.

Anyway, unless you are willing to cover sedition under the blanket label of High Crimes and Misdemeanors then you are running in circles.

By: Gregory

Gregory — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:34:36 +0000

combatvet adivses:
” Read the founding documents, your miserable excuses for human beings.”

If you did the same you might notice that sedition is not mentioned in the US Constitution or the Declaration of Independence. Presumably those are the founding documents you referenced. Therefore, your argument that sedition is an impeachable offense should be uniquely amusing.

As for treason, mentioned seven times in the Constitution, I would direct you to Article 3 Section 3. Please tell us how that is applicable in this particular case. Take your time, it is an open book exam.

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:45:19 +0000

“Let the case go forward!!! Barry has too many names. Different names could mean different alias. Barry lived in too many countries. We all know that! No records. We all know that also. ‘Man Up Barry”. Show yourself. Come clean if you have nothing to hide.”

BS. He doesn’t have “too many names”, and he has released all records, many of which have been attested to by third parties. If Obama is part of some great conspiracy, and he’s not eligible to be president, don’t you think the conspirators could have found a puppet who’s obviously 100% all-American? Are these conspirators super-geniuses or morons?

I can’t stand it when nutcases like you force me to defend Obama.

By: Ruslan Amirkhanov

Ruslan Amirkhanov — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:53:15 +0000

Alright “combatvet”, first of all, I hardly think hours spent playing Call of Duty: Black Ops qualifies one as a combat veteran. Second, where have you seen evidence that the SPLC promotes Communism? Third, what, according to you, is Communism? Fourth, the Arizona immigration law does not “mirror federal law” and only the federal government can regulate immigration. Fifth, illegal immigration does not constitute an “invasion” nor an “act of war.” Sixth, the claim that states rights trump that of the federal government was put to the test before, and decided in favor of the federal government, in the case of CSA v. United States of America in 1861-65, the decision favoring the USA. Seventh, why do you call liberals cowards while simultaneously accusing them of being bloodthirsty Communists who are persecuting you poor conservatives. Are you struggling under the iron heel of a bunch of cowards and hippies? What does that make you then? And finally- USE PARAGRAPH BREAKS, like they taught you in elementary school.

By: hardhat

hardhat — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:15:53 +0000

combatvet …i hope you will be protecting my behind in the near future.This bunch here will be looking for gov’mint help.

By: hardhat

hardhat — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:06:12 +0000

Let the case go forward!!! Barry has too many names. Different names could mean different alias. Barry lived in too many countries. We all know that! No records. We all know that also. ‘Man Up Barry”. Show yourself. Come clean if you have nothing to hide.

By: combatvet

combatvet — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:20:33 +0000

SPLC- Sellout Pathetic Liar Center home of the OBOT mutant training facility. The basis for your radical existence is spreading Communism and in doing so shredding the Constitution to fit your vile agenda. As for the numb nut on here who thinks the states can’t trump the federal government, think again. Try reading the tenth amendment. Arizona passed an anti-illegal immigration law that, word for word, mirrors the federal law. The feds and your boy the usurper refuse to put an end to the act of war occurring on our Southern border. Inaction by the feds demands action by the states and is wholly constitutional. Treason and sedition are impeachable offenses and ignoring a massive infiltration of our sovereign border (an act of war) and gun running. Operation Fast and Furious by the federal government, an unconstitutional act under orders from the DOJ and White House, are capital offenses. States rights trump that of the fed. Read the founding documents, your miserable excuses for human beings. Better we send you sell outs over to Afghanistan and bring our brothers back, who are putting all on the line for a nation and founding you mutant liberals hate. The Afghani’s are looking for coward pushovers for target practice!

By: Ithink

Ithink — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:35:04 +0000

I really don’t understand all of the one sided talk about frivolous lawsuits. The majority of you voted in a President that you didn’t have a clue about. His background and upbringing is in question. The people he associates with and even the amount of money he spends to hide his past. The Democratic committee should have done the homework prior to appointing him. Nobody in their right mind would spend so much money unless there was something to hide. Look at Arizona why is the Federal Government suing Arizona? Federal Governments usually don’t sue states. “frivolous” Our money at work~Taxpayer~

Maybe the reason the post would appear as ‘doublespeak’ to yourself is that all the questions and suspicions of his birth and lineage have already been answered, and in certifiable empirical evidence. You reich-wing nutter butters keep changing the goal posts and dress up your knee-deep racist and nativist sentiments in ‘legitimate questioning’ or political debate when it manifestly is nothing of the sort. If and when you guys get shellackled in the November election for selecting Mittens or Newt the Toad Gingrich as a presidential candidate, at least you have nobody to blame but yourselves…

By: hardhat

hardhat — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:15:01 +0000

looks like the case for B.H.O. in Georgia is going forward.

By: wally barrett

wally barrett — Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:15:05 +0000

I must have too much time on my hands as I read all the comments and was left breathless laughing myself to the floor by some of you folks comments. Does anyone read or study anymore? 5 hours (or more) of T.V. a day is mandatory, especially in the south?Then a few more hours listening to talk radio. The Constitution is a fairly brief, very concise, well written document that most everyone should be able to grasp. Southern white folks (white folks are “my” people) have difficulty getting ahold of the human decency parts, still believing that slavery is a “States Right” and that Black folk should stay in “their” place and for sure not have the right to vote. The laws on frivolous lawsuits are pretty clear, even in places like Miss, Texass, Georgia, Florida and the like. The procedure to qualify as a Presidential candidate is another pretty “simple” read, while the investigation is long and deep. They have yet to make a mistake with one of those investigations. Thank you SPLC, we need you more and more, which is proven beyond a doubt by the postings.

By: Aron

Aron — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:53:19 +0000

Hey Doug,

Where were you conservatives when the USA-Patriot Act was passed though? You sure did a GREAT job protecting the Constitution on that one…

Blowhard.

By: Doug

Doug — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 03:08:22 +0000

An amalgamation of radical leftists who sue at the drop of a hat are critical of conservatives who sue to protect rather than destroy the Constitution and the rights of the American people. Sounds just about right for a Morris Dees operation.

By: ModerateMike

ModerateMike — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:21:01 +0000

“Look at Arizona why is the Federal Government suing Arizona? Federal Governments usually don’t sue states.”

Well, just imagine if the federal government were not empowered to challenge the constitutionality of state laws. In that case, the states could virtually nullify constitutional rights with complete impunity. If a state government were to pass a law making criticism of its governor a punishable offense, and the federal government challenged it, I would call that money well-spent.