As for this site, you really don’t know the point. It’s to highlight folks that perpetuate hatred against a group of people because of who they are, where they come from, or what they look like. It’s disingenious for you to act like these folks are not influential when they really are. It’s not fringe, it’s mainstream. I also live in a neighborhood that has blacks, Mexicans, whites, etc. There are no problems here. But go ahead and believe what you want to believe. You already exposed yourself as a racist anyway. And if race is real, which it isn’t, please show proof. Your attitude makes you look foolish.

However your disingenuous concentration on the fringe of the fringe misses something that is undeniably the case:

If you want a good idea of any area’s crime rate the percentage of black people is (at minimum) a very good correlating factor. I propose that is determines higher crime stats. Your site ignores a wave of urban crime and decay that cannot be explained away by socioeconomic conditions. Conditions of poverty that exist in the UK, Ireland where no comparable murder or rape rates exist.

At a certain point people make the reality that they live in (or wallow in, if you prefer.) grown ups make their own beds, they allow their kids to run wild or they actively encourage it. You choose to ignore it completely, salivating over a handful of antisocial losers on the right.

Even if white people make a stochastic (you would call it racism, which it is!) judgement that they wish to live as far away from black people as possible they are reducing the likelihood of their own victimization from violent crime 55 fold. It’s a perfectly rational decision to make. Income levels cannot explain this increased threat, as income inequality exists in other societies without a similar disproportionate rate of crime to suffer.

Where would you live? University City, St Louis or South County? If you were picking public schools, a quiet place to raise children and a safe working commute, what choice would you make?

your PC attitude just makes you look foolish.

Make sure you cite your sources. You’ve got to be able to back up your claims!

If ‘race’ is indeed a ‘real thing,’ would you mind defining ‘white’ for me?

But that would never stop a smug, credulous person like yourself from putting words in my mouth. Would it?

If that’s all you have to argue with, ie putting words in my mouth, I’ve proved my point and clearly won the argument, as crude and unpleasant as it sounds to your sensitive ears. Believe you me, I take no pleasure in pointing these things out. I was a fairly conventional leftie until a few months ago.

You forgot to finish your little blurb with ‘Anti-Racist is a codeword for Anti-White.’

I hope this helps.

(Oh, and you might want to pick up some Preparation H for all of that butthurt…)

Interesting. You’ve no agenda? Ulterior motive?

Stupid aggressive people will almost always end up broke and in jail.

That’s why black neighborhoods are avoided like the plague
by sensible house buyers. By people looking for a school. The dishonest hypocracy of liberal whites, knows no bounds.

Institutional racism? Race is not a social construct. It’s actually real.

Thankfully for us, Jason is a stopped twenty-four hour clock. So he’s only right ONCE a day.

So he’s right twice a day.

So the Nazis didn’t kill an “white, heterosexual, normal people?” All those corpses at Buchenwald and Belsen and neat rows of crosses at St. Laurent sur Mer and Bayeux Commonwealth War Cemetery are not “white, heterosexual, normal people?” Or they didn’t happen?

Jason’s starting to sound like the Westboro Baptist Church.

The sad part is, Jason probably really believes it, too.

I hate to admit it, but Jason’s descriptions regarding the gas chambers in California are correct. But the gas chambers in Birkenau were FAR different from those used in prisons. Not the smallest part was the use of crystallized potassium-cyanide as the toxin versus the hydrogen-cyanide used in California and elsewhere.

He’s still massively wrong, but he got at least one thing right…

THEY SEE ME TROLL-INNN’….
(White Nationalists—wrong about everything since Prez Thomas J. committed statutory rape on one of his darkies…)

You accuse Stalin of killing and enslaving millions of “white heterosexual normal people” or whatever the hell that’s supposed to mean, yet you support Holocaust denial. The principle claim of Holocaust deniers is that those Jews who did die in the camps died mostly of starvation(yet the guards and the local population around the camps weren’t starving) and typhus(no significant outbreaks of typhus reported by the Germans). In other words, you’re claiming that the Jews weren’t exterminated, but they died due to extreme conditions.

Now, those who claim that Stalin killed 20, 40, or 60 million people aren’t saying these people were executed(maybe a few idiots are); they’re claiming that these people died in the GULAG due to extreme conditions, starvation, disease(this actually IS recorded in the early USSR), and so on. This is the only way you can get such high numbers because we know almost exactly how many people were executed in the period of 1923-53.

So this creates a problem for you: You want to claim that famines, deportations, GULAG conditions in the USSR equate to extermination and genocide, no doubt of “whites” which is ridiculous for so many reasons. Yet at the same time, you think the Holocaust is less of a genocide or crime because you deny that there were gas chambers.

Contradiction. You have one.

Assuming your entire story isn’t BS, which seems to be the case like everything else you say, I’m not surprised that one of the doors got a crack in it after being blown off its hinges when the krema was dynamited.

I’ve heard a lot of Holocaust denial in my day but that has got to be the stupidest claim I’ve ever heard.

Another Holocaust denier trundles up!

Ape/human hybrid supermen? Wow. In a lifetime spent studying every aspect of the Second World War, this is a new one to me.

Maybe you need to cut down on your LSD intake, hmmm?

If you deny that economics and other factors are responsible for this, you’re going to have a hard time explaining why lily white Eastern European countries went from virtually crime-free to crime-ridden in a short amount of time since the late 80’s.

If they put that passion into positive works — and there are plenty to do, left, right, and center — their energy could do some good in the world.

Instead they waste their lives, and drag other lives down with them. It’s a sadness and a shame.

http://www.mshp.dps.missouri.g.....meInMO.pdf

You need to do your homework better, dude. Of course, it also showed all those crimes are decreasing. But I’m not like you. I don’t make conclusions of an entire group of people due to the actions of a few.

Take the crime stats of St Louis: A city with a population that is about 50-50 white-black.

The black population is responsible for approx 78% of sexual assault and rape. 92% of homicide, 93% of robbery, 87% of assault, 82% of burglary.

http://www.mshp.dps.missouri.g.....0grid.html

http://www.mshp.dps.missouri.g.....20City.pdf

I can begin to detail the lethal cases if you like. The self delusion of liberal opinion is itself dangerous. It’s also willfully blind to the obvious.

So who is doing the drilling? Watch the movie “Waiting for Superman” and you may get some insight into this.