As to the question of education – how do you propose to improve education for them? More money is, at best, only a partial answer: the quality of education is not solely a function of the amount of money spent but how it’s spent.

“They know that the more non-whites they can get into country the easier we will be able to control.”

Yes, because we know how those undocumented laborers wield so much power in US society! I’m still in a rage about that time when they got rich selling those CDOs and credit default swaps, and then got a massive taxpayer-funded bailout when the bubble collapsed and they had portfolios full of worthless assets.

Also the 2nd link in my first post, provided several charts showing the percentage of the population that was Black.

Not sure what you are talking about. I’m happy to use more recent stats if I can find them.

2009 is here: It looks pretty similar.

http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius20.....le_06.html

BTW, I’m not WN. As I mentioned before, I think that environmental influences account for the difference (eg. poverty rates, upbringing, likelihood of being convicted, likelihood of being a suspect, poorer job prospects, likelihood of being consistently mistreated by society etc.) So these stats do not prove that anyone is inferior or superior.

I’m just saying that the facts are the facts, and it doesn’t make sense to attack eh’s facts when they are largely correct. It just makes you look uninformed. Instead, attack eh’s conclusion.

I tend to disinclude sources because I tend to refrain from making ridiculous claims that are almost immediately disproved. You and your WN Gang of Idiots aren’t quite so good at that.

http://www.totalcriminaldefens.....y-in-2011/

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg.....7-53-0.stm

http://www.theatlantic.com/nat.....rs/239366/

Same thing with you, Jason. Why 2007? In your little quest to prove the so-called “inferiority” of anyone that doesn’t look like you, you are making yourselves look like fools.

I don’t see how sending the SPLC money changes historical economic conditions.

Also, did you remember to control for income and population density when reading these statistics?

Or did you notice this: Although slightly less true now than before, most murders are intraracial

From 1976 to 2005 –

* 86% of white victims were killed by whites
* 94% of black victims were killed by blacks

Actually historical white supremacy has a LOT to do with criminality in black communities.

I’m sure the SPLC wants you to believe that…so you’ll keep sending them money.

The rest of the replies were either ad hominem, or non-sequiturs — i.e. not worth a response.

You never cite any statistics or sources. Eh is basically correct. Blacks (mostly young and male) commit about 50% of the murders in this country. I cite the Department of Justice, http://www.hhscenter.org/bonbstat.html .

Blacks are only about 14% of the population. Let’s assume half are male, and males commit more murders than females. That cuts our 14% figure down to 7%. Furthermore, let’s assume old men and young children are not committing these murders for the most part. We can easily reduce the 7% number down by 1/2 to 2/3. Thus, I say Eh is conservative. It’s more like 2-3% of the population (young black males) are committing about 50% of the murders in this country!

Your explanation is not original. It’s the thesis of the 1967 Kerner report. The Kerner commission was set up by Lyndon Johnson to investigate urban race riots in America during the late 1960’s. The conclusion of that report was that black crime was a result of ‘racism’. I am well aware of this theory. I simply believe it’s not true. This thesis goes back even further to the 1944 Myrdal report. Jared Taylor gives an excellent review of the Myrdal report in his book, “A Race Against Time”, pp. 151-160.

But his facts seem largely correct.

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/conte.....acetab.cfm

Scroll down to the bottom. Blacks are consistently convicted of over 1/2 of USA’s homicides.

Blacks account for 12.6% of the United States population though. 13.6% if you include mixed race. The proportion seems to be trending higher – it was just 12.3% in 2000.

http://www.census.gov/prod/cen.....0br-02.pdf

Care to back up that rather ridiculous claim with statistics? And make sure you cite your sources!

And just so you know, there is hate from all sides including white hate such as yourself. It’s not imaginary, it’s real. SPLC puts a spotlight on it as they do with this blog.

“The problem of disproportionate black criminality in America is far, far greater than white ‘hate’ — often imaginary, as here.”

Actually historical white supremacy has a LOT to do with criminality in black communities. But of course your brilliant explanation is they do it because their black.

Uhh, no it’s not. Obviously.

But did you know that black males are about 5% of the population, but commit over half of all murders?

That’s fact, and that’s America.

The problem of disproportionate black criminality in America is far, far greater than white ‘hate’ — often imaginary, as here.

But don’t expect to see info about that on this site.

Again, thanks for the follow-up and publication of the results!

(Not African American)

Unfortunately, this will no doubt fuel the wildest, tax-free wet dreams of the radical Republicans and Tea Baggers who insist every charge of ‘racist’ on their wrong doing is an elite, socialist, one world order Cultural Marxist conspiracy to smear the entire American Right of politics, and their ‘Freedom of Speech’ (which of course, doesn’t quite cover the excision of personal responsibility and criticism they seem to hold so dear to their hearts). Just another flash of regression in our so-called ‘post-racial’ America…