The Hatewatch blog is managed by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center, an Alabama-based civil rights organization.

UN’s Agenda 21 is Seen as Trojan Horse for ‘New World Order’

By Ryan Lenz on February 6, 2012 - 11:44 am, Posted in Antigovernment

In the last several years, an obscure United Nations accord called Agenda 21 has emerged as something of a unified field theory for the antigovernment movement. On its face, Agenda 21 does nothing but provide countries and communities with a set of principles to grow smartly –– a plan, in short, to fight overpopulation, pollution, poverty and resource depletion.

But for a far-flung network of antigovernment extremists who have risen up to attack it, the nonbinding document that was approved 20 years ago at the UN’s Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro is not really about preserving the planet at all. Between the lines, they argue, lies a blueprint for the “New World Order.”

In his final days on Fox News, Glenn Beck passionately argued that by agreeing to follow Agenda 21, the U.S. government had colluded with internationalists to undermine its own sovereignty and turn the nation into an environmental refuge where nature would take precedence over people.

“Those pushing … government control on a global level have mastered the art of hiding it in plain sight, and then just dismissing it as a joke,” Beck told his viewers, holding up the 294-page document. He cautioned: “Once [internationalists] put their fangs into our communities and suck all the blood out of it, we will not be able to survive.”

The irony is that Agenda 21 is all about survival. It was intended to offer a strategic plan to scale down the use of natural resources to levels that meet “the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations.” (The 21 stands for the 21st century.) One hundred and seventy-eight world leaders, including President George H.W. Bush, signed on to the agreement in 1992.

While there is some opposition to Agenda 21 from the left –– from groups like Democrats Against Agenda 21 –– it’s on the radical right that the UN plan has become a touchstone of a larger theme that equates environmentalism with totalitarianism and the loss of individual freedom. For a growing cast of far-right hardliners, Agenda 21 is a sort of Trojan horse, a totalitarian scheme with a green environmental mask, lying in wait to destroy America as we know it.

How such an arcane UN document that defines the concept of “smart growth” and environmental sustainability became so controversial, even though it gives the UN no enforcement powers, has a lot to do with the work of a tight cadre of antigovernment “Patriot” activists whose fears are rooted in right-wing lore about a New World Order, a kind of authoritarian one-world government. Figures such as Tom DeWeese, head of the American Policy Center, Phyllis Schlafly, founder of the anti-feminist Eagle Forum, and John Bush, with Texans for Accountable Government, have in recent years crisscrossed the country to put on seminars and conferences that strike terror into those inclined to believe conspiracy theories about powerful global elites plotting to install a socialistic global government. The John Birch Society, an archconservative group formed during the Red Scare of the 1950s, regularly assails Agenda 21 with the fervor it once reserved for communists.

Under Agenda 21, these activists argue, the expansive American way of life, in which everyone can aspire to the dream of owning a house with a big yard and two cars in the driveway, will be replaced by one in which increasing numbers are crammed into urbanized “pack ’em and stack ’em” apartment complexes, and forced to use mass transportation and live according to a collectivist ethos. Once the UN’s radical utopia is achieved, gun ownership will be forbidden and the UN will raise an army intent on terrorizing the populace in the name of social order and equality, sustainability and smart growth –– all words that anti-Agenda 21 activists believe signal the true intent of the UN’s plan.

Armed with suspicions and “research,” activists have disrupted meetings from Oklahoma to Ohio, where a Facebook group called Ohio Agenda 21 Watch keeps tabs on “the many socialist groups working in Ohio whose aim is take away our sovereignty and incorporate Ohio into UN control.” In Maine, the Tea Party-backed governor canceled plans to ease congestion along a busy road in response to anti-Agenda 21 protests, The New York Times reported.

In Edmond, Okla., protestors shut down a community workshop held to gather public input on environmental sustainability. After 20 minutes, police were called to disrupt the melee, and the backlash to the city’s decision to follow Agenda 21 ultimately prompted officials to stop coordinating with the UN. Shannon Entz, a community development manager in Edmond who helped organize the workshop in December 2010, told the Intelligence Report that a group called Govern Edmond Locally had enraged the audience with fliers vilifying the UN.

“I can understand how people, in some cases, may be fearful of government,” Entz said. “[But] where it loses steam is they give cities and government a little too much credit. … We certainly don’t have the money or the political will to hurt, or harm, or take private property [to protect the environment].”

In Colorado, Patriots have fiercely resisted environmental initiatives proposed by the U.S. Forest Service. Some are convinced the UN is cutting off access to national forests to leverage natural treasures against foreign debt, or worse, to build prison camps for U.S. citizens. The Tenth Amendment Center and the Oath Keepers have launched propaganda campaigns to curb the supposed UN advance. Even the League of the South (LOS), a neo-Confederate group that advocates a second Southern succession, has gotten involved. Those attending the grand opening in January of the LOS compound in Wetumpka, Ala., had to wipe their shoes on a UN flag before entering the building.

During a speech in late 2010 to the City Council in Austin, Texas, where he lives, John Bush of Texans for Accountable Government summarized the global plot that these activists believed they have unmasked. He had come to challenge a local resolution designed to make the city more energy efficient.

“Before carbon was thought of as the most evil thing in the world,” Bush said, “there were … internationalists hashing out a plan to further their scheme for world government through the means of excessive environmentalism.”

Experts who study conspiracy theories attribute the rise of Agenda 21 fears to distrust of the UN that existed long before the document was drafted and approved at the Earth Summit. “Any time you get some sort of UN program that suggests any kind of change in the way people live, even if it seems outwardly benign and even voluntary, it’s going to be taken up by people of a conspiracist bent,” Michael Barkun, a political science professor at Syracuse University, told the Report.

The fact is that Americans on the extreme right have harbored wild fears about global control, and the loss of national and local power, for at least a century, going back to the League of Nations and even before. Much more recently, in 1991, President George H.W. Bush deepened suspicions about the designs of global elites when he used the term “new world order” during a speech to Congress following the Gulf War — an utterance that, in retrospect, has been interpreted as a revealing slip of the tongue. The signing of Agenda 21 came the next year.

Now, with the resurgence of the Patriot movement since President Obama’s election, Agenda 21 has moved to the top echelon of radical-right fears and has become a mainstream issue as well. The Republican Party this January adopted a resolution opposing Agenda 21, characterizing it as “destructive and insidious.”

Just as it did with communism, the John Birch Society has done as much or more than any other group on the radical right to drum up panic and outrage. It has held more than a dozen conferences across of the nation in the last six months to sound the alarm. “It boils down to control,” spokesman Bill Hahn told The Missoulian after a protest in Missoula, Mont. “Do we allow an international organization to implement its extreme environmental agenda through innocuous names of sustainability, smart growth, etc., or do we retain the sovereignty that allows us to govern ourselves and decide locally what is best?”

There seems to be an even better question: Is there something real to fear in Agenda 21 — or is it just another bogeyman of the politically paranoid?

Arthur Goldwag contributed to this report.

  • Gregory

    Garbage in, garbage out.

  • This is Garbage

    What a garbage dump of disinformation and censored opinions. How many comments do you censor a day? Probably 50:1 and your organization either writes the comments that agrees with your analysis or you pay someone else to do it. This site is such a joke and I can never make it through a whole “article” if you can even call it that. SPLC is the definition of the Ministry of Truth. Tell me censor.. are you happy since you decided to sell out? Is it fun to lie and distort in order to influence the mostly ignorant yet innocent minds of the public? Does it make you feel powerful? If it were me I would be sick to my stomach with guilt.

  • legalhound

    The JBS is carping about all of this because the Koch brothers are involved. They’re terrified of any country that they might be doing business in protecting the environment because it hurts their bottom line. I propose we call the “Patriots” who are involved in all this conspiracy theory crap what they really are. We should use terms like “tool”, “corporate shill” or “right wing bozo” because they are not Patriots. Patriots love their country, and at least respect their government because they know that the only rational way to change it is through elections. These people believe in armed insurrection and seccesion both of which are illegal so they are not Patriots. It’s time we got the word out of right wing hands and brought it back to its true definition.

  • Reynardine

    Well, Sweet William, too bad that people can’t rape the wetlands as much as they want, when fish, lobsters, oysters, and shrimp are so bad for us and sea-bathing in raw sewage is so good for us.

  • TC

    Wow – even Jason Smith isn’t trolling on this one – it must REALLY be outrageous! lol

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    “Ask people whose land is being made off limits to them because it’s been declared a wetland. Ask people who are losing control over their own property.”

    Ok William, tell us their names and we’ll ask them! But would you be so kind as to explain to us what that has to do with the UN?

  • Erika

    Give the John Birch Society credit for successfully warning America that Eisenhower was a Communist.

    Don’t believe me – well, look at modern media standards as applied by Glenn Beck, Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, et. al. and then look at the top marginal tax rates under Ike. Add in the National Defense Highway Act and tepid support for Civil Rights and he definitely was as red as they come.

  • William

    Ask people whose land is being made off limits to them because it’s been declared a wetland. Ask people who are losing control over their own property.

  • Walterius



    People the UN would screw up a two car funeral. What would make any sane, rational being to imagine for one moment these clowns could run the world?

    Sounds like the making of a bad James Bond movie.

  • Reynardine

    Almost sixty years back, Joe McCarthy tried to have the Girl Scouts of America labelled subversive, because their handbook chapter on government included a section on the United Nations. As for the Bushes, they do believe in a New World Order…theirs, the gobal private corporatocracy.

  • CM

    Those wild-eyed socialist liberals William F. Buckley Jr. and J. Edgar Hoover both thought the Birchers were bonkers. Buckley once called founder Robert Welch “paranoid and idiotic” and worked like a Trojan to purge the Republican Party of their influence after the Goldwater debacle. Hoover had his agents keeping an eye on the JBS for years as he considered them potentially subversive. In a 1961 memo, he described the JBS as “an irresponsible organization.”

    This sort of thing helped keep the Birchers marginalized for decades, until Rupert Murdoch gave them Fox News as a pulpit to preach their madness to people with no knowledge of history.

  • A.D.M.

    You can laugh all you want, but the New World Order is real. Very real.

  • DrMJG

    David H,

    Thank you for bringing a smile and even a chuckle to my day!

  • Kiwiwriter

    Actually, if the New World Order was going to take over, why didn’t it do so right after World War I, with the League of Nations?

    David Hart: Very funny!

  • Ithink

    The only awful, near-unforgivable missteps the United Nations has made in modern times is not stopping the U.S.’s War on Civil Lib–err, Terrorism dead in its tracks and not making us uphold that otherwise brilliant Kyoto Protocol against global warming in the first place like every other major industrialized country on the planet…

    “Ignorance: it is not bliss but a merely a way for the madly stupid to be maddeningly relevant…”

  • Ithink

    The John Birch Society has been a (thankfully) contained gangreene patch on the body politic since the moment it sprung forth as a brain child of Robert Welch, Jr. I’m all for ‘freethinking’ and the pursuit of happiness as far as those statements go, but a rabidly anti-communist (an oxymoron in this day), fundamentalist Christian, Constitutional Republic dipstick cult crusading as a ‘legitimate and patriotic’ political advocacy group is what the hell is wrong with the entirety of the New Right nowadays. Fox News can claim being ‘Fair & Balanced’ until George Orwell flips in his grave and their dittoheads can screech about the ever-elusive, likely imaginary liberal media bias until Judgement Day, IT’S NOT GOING TO CHANGE THE ‘FACT’ that the TRUTH has a LIBERAL bias, and that reason has become anathema for them.

    These wingnut trolls have been crying wolf, wolf, wolf! about these marginal and fringe Commies since the end of WWII, and we’ve passed through the Civil Rights, feminist, counterculture movements and the endlessly overrated Cold War with no ‘real’ elimination of that ideology to speak of, as if it was ever going to work past being a (rather ideal) political theory in the first place. The only real fight American conservatives have left to make is against gay marriage, supply side economics (beyond non-thinking people) and Voting fraud, and eventually God willing, the walls of logic will come crashing down to resolve once and for all the former two, since the latter is merely child’s play ploying for election season….

  • David Hart

    OK, SPLC getting ahead of how this works. First the black helicopters descend all over the United States. Shock troops then confiscate all of those guns that the NRA warned us we shouldn’t register.

    Meanwhile, we gays are working hard at bringing about the downfall of civilization. Moreover, the repeal of DADT was designed to compromise the US military. It will be easier for UN forces to take over.

    THEN we proceed with Agenda 21.

    What?You don’t believe me? I am sure that there is someone associated with the Paul campaign who can explain it all to you.

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    Still waiting for that UN take over that’s been “just around the corner” for 30-40 years huh?

  • Aron

    I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. The JBS has only done ONE good thing in its entire history: cost Barry Goldwater the 1964 election.

    Other than that, it has been a blight on society. And after having listened to my friends in the Society drone on and on about the UN, I can only conclude they’re all fools.