this site says agenda 21/smart growth now illegal in TN.
http://www.treehugger.com/ urban-design/ sustainable-development-smart-growth-and-agenda-21-now-illegal-tennes see.html

Can someone please verify. Has this actually become a true law that agenda21 is now illegal in TN. I cannot seem to find the actual law.
Did it pass – is this a true law now?

Thanks so much.

Please have a look at this:

http://www.democratsagainstuna.....ut-us.html

I have learned silence from the talkative; tolerance from the intolerant and kindness from the unkind. I should not be ungrateful to those teachers, – Kahlil Gibran

http://www.fbnewsleader.com/ar.....keover.txt

Maybe that should tell you that more people don’t understand what Agenda 21 is than ‘extremists’. I am glad you included a definition of what Agenda 21 is in your article. But you may sell that definition more if you edit the stereotype of it being an extremist’s theory. Granted, the theory may have been born out of an extremist group. I don’t know, just giving you that. But if I knew I would be labeled an extremist for not understanding something, I would be less apt to ask a question or believe the answer from a source calling me an extremist.

You managed to write roughly five hundred words that said ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Your post made not a single lick of sense.

I’m not even going to try and decipher it. I think your just nuts.

In short…they actually believe a Sheriff is a Federal agent & employee, beholden first to the Federal corporation (Fed. Code, Title 28 USC SS 3002 (Definitions), Sections 2, 10, 13 & 15, and under the magically vague “Commerce” clause that the BAR Associates (like Stewart Rhodes) forget to mention as extra-constitutional.

They are UN Agents in the least, mouth-pieces of the coming legal reboot, propagandized in some part, by the SPLC, and ACLU…who I am certain, are NOT full of BAR Associates working within the private corporation courts, and constantly filing attachment levies/processes by creditor corporations, or attempting bottom basement panopticonic game theory, social reconstruction or behaviour modification.

That wouldn’t have anything to do with the Judge Advocate Generals “Law of War Deskbook, 2010″ and the insertion of INTERNATIONAL corporations (NGO’s filled with “appointees”) being now treated legally, as not only “human”, but “persons” and also “individuals”, equal (and in fact above) actual men and women, thanks to the myriad of shyster treaties signed off on by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the United States corporation, District of Columbia with the United Nations corporation.

“Human Rights” have nothing to do with reality, and are complete “fictio” and “confusio” under merger rights of the civil contract/law merchant/equity courts attempting to gain constructive jurisdiction for summary judgments, dependent solely upon the United Nations treaties, and are clearly defined as 3rd rate, punt return legal presumptions, assumptions and complete creatures and constructions of pure imagination in order to have “Agenda 21″ fulfill the ponzi pyramid empire expansion goal of…expansion.

All while being “overlooked as benign”.
But not “benign” enough to NOT sign.
Did they forget to tell you that unilateral offers in the United Nations corporation are ASSUMED and PRESUMED to be assented and consented to?

Oops. Bet they forgot to tell you that part.
But it is so not real…the JAG Office is certainly teaching its’ own “class” exactly that. So it must not be real.

And it, like the United States corporation, the SPLC, the ACLU, the BAR Association(s), and those dependent upon it for a livelihood, are nothing more than misrepresentations, intentional misconstructions, construances, implicated, inferred and fobbed off fictions from fairy-tale land.

So you are correct, SPLC…it’s all a made-up story, in dreamland. John Sergeant Wise, in “Treatise on American Citizenship”, from 1906 (you know, a Supreme Court Justice) must have went temporarily insane…nothing more.

Or the “American BAR Association Journal” of 1920…all those meetings they had…they were just fictional while they pawned off the farce of the fictional and legal corporation of the “League of Nations”.

In fact, none of the above were SO fake and make-believe, they abolished legal common law, and instituted a completely separate court system under the BAR Associations, private company courts, under equity/roman civil/what-have-you concurrent jurisprudence, with the ability to write their own law and code of procedure. (“ABA Journal 1920″, Page 115, “Oklahoma”, establishing NISI PRIUS & assize contract courts and “Magistrates” in the political corporate concurrent subdivisions, with the ability to establish legally presumptive code WITHOUT legislation).

But hey…what would little old me know.
I am just a stupid southerner, and none of these things exist, never have, never always did, and never will…because the SPLC told me not to worry about it.

And by now, we should ALL know to trust a BAR Associate contracted to a city, county, or state franchise company court, or the BAR Association as their principal. (“Law of Agency”, Ernie Huffcut, 1901).

Well…anything written under the “Chatham House Rules” of the BAR Associations in meeting…must not be true, and is obviously fake.

At any time, you feel free to dispute your OWN corporate association writings, or any legal theory or constructive model you pander as real law (such as the “English Factors Act of 1889″).

ALL of it was so “tin-foil”…nobody wrote TOMES named “Corpus Juris” over it. Nobody at all.
Good day to you, SPLC.

Thankfully, a forum member went to one of those fact-checking web sites, where the claim was found to be untrue.

The Right innundates the public with faulty news, making understanding and truth a wild goose chase. I fail to find ANYTHING coming from the Right to be honest, these days.

I am thankful to organizations like SPLC, Truthout, and several others for their attention to detail and dependable information.

I didn’t call you names. I simply pointed out that Monckton is a climate-change denier. And that, judging by your proclivity for conspiracy theories, you very likely benfit from metal-foil head coverings.

Also that your ideas are resoundingly stupid.

Childish.

(In my country, the one I’m ashamed to admit produced Helen Clarke, “jokers” is more a generic, descriptive. not really even condescending in this context word to use).

Yes, because I’m going to believe a global-warming denier’s evidence regarding a ‘Coming UN One World Government.’

Might what to get that tinfoil hat adjusted.

I have donated to SPLC, but have never been on their staff.

They forget that modern Americans know the differences between mere wealth and genuine morality.

“U.S. Code
TITLE 10 – ARMED FORCES
Subtitle A – General Military Law
PART I – ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL MILITARY POWERS
CHAPTER 15 – INSURRECTION
Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it (1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.”

Hence the use of the military in the 1950s to prevent black Southerners from being deprived of their civil rights by racist-led state governments. Neo-secessionists and nullifiers might not like it, but that’s just one of the many things they’re wrong about.

A military officer or enlisted man not only has the right but has the obligation to disobey an order if he or she feels it is illegal. They also have the obligation to inform their commanders and comrades if they see something they think is wrong before it gets out of hand. That is professional and correct.

I’ve been there, I’ve refused to do things I felt were illegal or just plain stupid and not in the interest of command or country. You stand up and take the consequences, you also go to the Judge Advocates office for advice.

As a former Intelligence Officer myself I feel that numerous members of the military violated their oaths during the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars when they knowingly tortured, humiliated and otherwise violated the Geneva Conventions saying they were “just obeying orders.” I trained my fellow airmen that this was not an excuse, the Air force trained everyone that this was not an excuse, it was and is never an excuse.

To say that “Soldiers are required to follow orders from their commanding officer WITHOUT QUESTION” is to say that we do not have a professional military capable of answering to a constitutional civilian authority.

The Oath Keepers could care less about this kind of professionalism. But this is just the kind of professionalism we lost during the Bush administration in our Armed Forces.

Didn’t you hear? The burden of proof is on the claimant.