(I can’t believe I’m doing this) but in YellowSnow’s defense, he did state that he is of Sub-Continental lineage some months ago. This isn’t a new development.

But a Mohandas K Gandhi, he ain’t.

I wasn’t complaining that you DIDN’T LIST ME. I was complaining that you DIDN’T LIST ME FIRST. Afterall, I’m usually the first one you bring up as a ‘defender of The Evil Gays.’

And I second Supersonic’s comment. Have you ever, ONCE met a homosexual at any point in your life? Because your opinions are so ridiculous as to suggest you haven’t.

And since you seem to enjoy StormFronter company so much, why don’t you head back and STAY THERE.

Better yet, stay here. You provide some much needed comic relief on the site. Keep up that brilliant rhetoric!

1st those situations are unpredictable. If the gay is committing a crime such as harassing a man in the bathroom or assault&battery, the gay may have other violent intent such as commit a more violent act if he does not get his way or even homosexual rape. What if the gay is high on drugs when he does what is described? What if the gay has a past history of committing violence in bathrooms or committing violence on others? I’ve heard people say that if a gay proposes to a man in the bathroom, that the man should just say ‘no thanks’ but as the gay is committing a crime indecency by proposing in a restroom, there’s no need for the man to say no, just as there’s no need for a shopkeeper to put up a sign which says don’t steal-no need to say no to a crime.

Bashing or killing a gay who is harassing a man in the public restroom or killing a gay after he has grabbed a man’s butt or groin against will is a jury topic. Yes, the more violent the reaction, the harder it is to justify, but it’s possible to say that a man who kills a gay after the gay has been harassing him in the bathroom self-defended if he can prove the gay had a more violent intent such as homosexual rape, esp. if the gay was high or has a history of committing violence in bathrooms. These cases are not so easy.

Anyhow (perhaps some of you have read it under this same ID), I commented on this reporter’s blog mentioning what MW Shepard did 2 months before his death where a drunk MW Shepard 1st proposed to a bartender in Cody for a walk around lake where the bartender told him no. But rather than end it, MW Shepard continued proposing, grabbed the bartender’s arm & jacket (misdemeanor assault&battery) & made the statement of ‘you’re afraid of what I can do to you’ after which the bartender decked MW Shepard temporaily KO him. MW Shepard was then taken back to hotel where he was staying with his family. The next day MW Shepard went to Cody cops & made up a story of being homosexually gang raped by 3. The medical tests only found a fat lip & disproved the rape story as no sex happened. Cops interviewed bartender, a waitress who saw what happened & concluded the bartender self-defended.

As I wrote on her blog, MW Shepard should’ve been arrested for assault&battery + falsely reporting crime. When I 1st wrote about this on the reporter’s blog, she became hostile & called me disgusting, not because I said anything she disputed, but rather she got mad that I raised thes facts. She later toned down. The fact is that the journalist who had her own bias in favor of homsexuality allowed my comments about MW Shepard such as what he did to the Cody bartender, MW Shepard’s drunkardism & Ecstasy use, because it was factual.

With gay bashings, it’s hard to get neutral media coverage, because if a reporter were to bring up alleged criminal act the gay did before the man reacted by bashing or killing the gay, gay/lesbian groups can complain to a newspaper or TV stations advertisers & that can be bad business. Case would be the media coverage in Manhattan Beach Calif. where 18 homosexuals were arrested for indeceny in beach bathrooms-gay/lesbian groups complained after the media gave out the names & photos of the 18 arrested. The bathroom is the place to use the toilet & wash up. Those 18 committed a crime, yet the gay/lesbian groups complained after the media announces this.

In 2007, TV host Tucker Carlson talked of how during the 1980s as a teenager, he had beaten up a homosexual who was harassing him in a mall restroom & then he & his friend tied up the gay for the cops to arrest. Gay groups protested him-they saw nothing wrong with the homosexual harassing Tucker Carlson in the bathroom. The gay committed a crime & he got bashed by Tucker Carlson.

Gay groups call it ‘gay panic’ but I call it reacting to gay abuse. Harassing some1 by repeatedly proposing after no has been said is harassment. Unless you’re self-defending, grabbing some1’s butt or groin against will is assault&battery if the intent is not sexual to something more serious such as sex abuse or even attempted homosexual rape if intent is. If a homosexual grab’s a man’s butt or groin against will after which the man reacts by bashing or even killing the gay, then the man reacted to a crime the gay did. Whether the man reacted justly or excessively is a jury topic & if it’s excessive, jury decides what degree it is such as Manslaughter rather than 2d Degree.

I know what I’m writing here is mostly repeat but I support the right of defense lawyers in gay bashing cases to bring up crime such as harassment, indecency or assault&battery the gay did before the man reacted by bashing or killing him. If a gay is going to expose himself, then it’s a crime. Anyhow, I don’t trust media accounts when it comes to covering gay bashings because the topic is ideological that it’s hard to know the reporter’s bias. With the Internet, if a gay bashing case is not honestly discussed in the press (which it often isn’t), then we’ll use the Internet to bring out facts that the media gave little coverage or distorted & then we’ll make our own conclusions as to what we believe the right verdict is whether it’s acquittal or conviction even if the media & gay groups dislike it.

I’m so insulted you didn’t list me first among your list of ‘usual suspects.’ And congratulations on your being approved by Paul Cameron. I’m sure your imaginary friends are SO proud of you!

If that is your belief, then don’t complain about me not mourning Matthew Shepard. I see something wrong with what MW Shepard did to the Cody bartender 2 months before his death. I also see something wrong with MW Shepard continuing to be promiscuous even after he feared he had AIDS-incidentally there are even gays who have said that MW Shepard was a despicable person for doing this so it’s not just homophobes like me (I’m glad I’m a homophobe) who say this about MW Shepard. I also see something wrong with MW Shepard taking Ecstasy & alcohol which worsened his PTSD & depression-he also took depression Meds. His killing in Oct. 1998 is a minor topic & no he should not have been killed, but his killing in Oct. 1998 does not change the fact that MW Shepard was a reckless person who worsened his PTSD & depression in the ways written.

As to Matthew Shepard, his mom Judy Shepard doesn’t deny that her son made up a story of being homosexually gang raped by 3 in Aug. 1998, 2 months before his death against a Cody bartender. The excuse Judy Shepard makes is that her son was drunk , had PTSD & once the medical tests disproved his story, he ‘dropped’ the charge, when it’s the Cody authorities who did so. Maybe MW Shepard believed his story-only he knows his intent. But MW Shepard chose to be reckless in the last year of his life by getting drunk, using drugs such as Ecstasy & he continued to be promiscuous even after he feared he had AIDS. Do you see something wrong with this? If a man were to keep having sex with women after he believes he has a Venereal Disease (I like old word VD), many would say what a dirty pig the straight man is. MW Shepard was a reckless person who chose to worsen himself.

Finally, yes I’m predictable on the homosexual topic. I’ve talked to Dr. Paul Drummond Cameron-called him on March 23, April 3 & 4 2012 to inform him of how I defend him here on the SPLC message board where he thanked me. But the SPLC is predictable & the views given by Erika, Sam Molloy, Aron, Richard L, Karen a old tired lesbian & Ruslan, etc. are also predictable because it’s not like SPLC offers much which is new on this.

You are absolutely right. But I do get a minor power trip smashing Funi into powder. You’d ve gotta get your jollies where you can, right?

His shtick has become so repetitive and predictable that it barely merits ridicule. At least “Jason Smith”, or the committee posting under that moniker, introduces new elements of stupidity with each comment. As a classic attention whore, he has taken Wilde’s comments to heart, that the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.

Anyway, I will understand if the moderator chooses not to publish my little rant, because it has fuck all to do with the topic.

But your wife MUST become celibate! Funinsnow is the Supreme World Arbiter for Sexual Morals, and His word is Law. Defy Him at your peril!

On another note, I sure hope my wife doesn’t decide to become celibate when she hits menopause!

….The very fact that you did not bother to spell out “one” invalidates any argument you made, homophobic and ignorant drivel that it is. You fail at spelling, you fail at grammar, you fail at arguments, you fail period.

You will find that SnowForBrains feels that post-menopausal women SHOULD NOT have sexual relations. For what legitimate reason, I don’t know. Not that he has any legitimate reasons for any of his other opinions…

You know what dead carp means: time to make the gefilte fish!

So are heterosexual activities after a woman reaches menopause, if you are talking strictly about reproduction. Should couples over 50 remain celibate as well?

But what if someone realizes genuine happiness through a gay/lesbian relationship? My friend that I mentioned above certainly seems to have, and that is good enough for me. Happiness and loving companionship have their uses.

Again, it’s irrelevant to me why some1 takes part in gay/lesbian activities. Gay/lesbian activities are useless & it’s best for gays/lesbians to be celibate. Sorry for repeating but if SPLC is going to keep writing about gay/lesbian topics, they’re going to get the same answers by me because this topic is a rerun.