Apparently they condone transphobia and even lend a platform to it

I would just like the same standard applied to all. If A Voice For Men is a hate site, then so are the angry feminist sites. If it is not, I’d like the SPLC to unequivocally say as much.

But this post needs to be taken down or edited: Cathy Brennan, owner of RadFem Hub, is a well known hatemonger herself.

Brennan’s campaign against the transgender community is too lengthy (and vile) to detail in this post. However, given SPLC’s commitment to human rights, I would think that Brennan’s submission to the UN of a paper arguing *against* gender-identity as a legal protection, would kill her credibility with the SPLC.

What’s next? Jared Taylor’s ideas on crime prevention?

I’m not some reactionary, I came from a matriarchal family, I’ve seen and known men who have been victimized by a legal, media, and social structure with a distinctly misandric tilt.

Figures such as Judith Grossman are now reaping what they sow as their own sons get mowed under by the legal structures they erected.

The SPLC’s hypocritical actions regarding MRM groups vs Radical Feminist organizations has convinced this life-long hyper-liberal to discount its credibility.

A woman writes a manifesto about murdering men, then attempts to murder four men.

If Solanis had merely written the manifesto, I could believe it was satire. Instead, she lived it out.

I don’t have an interesting opinion on the rest of the article, but I do want people to stop making excuses for Solanis. She was a criminal. The only reason she’s not a murderer was dumb luck and her own ineptness. Her manifesto is hate speech. That is ALL it is. Anyone who says different is provably wrong.

Men’s Rights is a stupid concept. Men are in charge. Men can lie about this all they want. It will not change the fact that women haven’t done this to you. You and your bros did this to you.

If you are for men’s rights, then why don’t you fight against male genital mutilation? Oh, sometimes you do, but only after insisting that MGM is worse than FGM. lol. Hardly. And hardly the point. Anyway, Christian men want to keep hacking away at their sons’ penises because god forbid their sons be left intact as father wishes he were. If dad doesn’t get his foreskin, no one do!

Solanas was a badass. So was Wuornos. Cry about it.

Here I should add: biology is transphobic. I’ve got this menstruation and ability-to-get-pregnant thing. TOTALLY TRANZPHOBIC. Having a Y chromosome makes you…human! Not male! Wait..

Anyway, glad this misogynist killed himself. Ironic that he used fire, too. Can’t wait to see more patriarch suicides. Suicide for a better world!

1. MRM stands for Mens Rights Movement, its clearly as indicated by the name a “movement” Feminist can be called Womens Rights Movement, since feminism doesnt care about men its obvious society need MRM.

2. MRA stands for Mens Rights Advocates, its clearly as indicated members of the aforementioned movement. The female opposite would be called WRA

3. A movement is not an organisation. Thus claiming MRA as a hate group is just ridicolous. We dont even need to debate whether the opinions is criticism or hate cause IT IS NOT A GROUP! Its lots of different groups with lots of different opinions.

4. Solanas may have been a disturbed woman however the people reading her workds does not have that excuse. The issue is not about whether Solanas was disturbed, its about the masses of feminists who read and treat her works as important thought. Are they also disturbed or whats their excuse?

5. Thomas Ball commited suicide the same way monks often protest against state oppression. Solanas however tried to murder three persons by shooting them with a gun. I am not sure in which universe SPLC would think suicide and murder are equal

6. Thomas Balls message was rebellion against the state. Valerie Solanas message was to murder half the population on earth (Kill all men). In which galaxy are these messages equal of anything?

7. Not only is it really stupid to throw the name “Breivik around” to make opponents seem bad in various issues (Swedish Psychiatrist D. Eberhard think its so ridicolous the Godwin law applies, with Breivik instead of a certain austrian….)

8. Its also concluded in the largest even Police Investigation in Norwegian history he acted completely alone. Also his manifesto (by large copy-pasted and interpreted through his crazy filter) make it absolutely clear the killings were 99,99% caused by his view of himself as a crusader knight against islam.

10. Conclusion:

a) Neither MRA nor MRM can be called a hate group cause they are not groups at all. Should anyone wanna call actual groups as AVFM a hate group they must first show the difference between criticism and hate.

Otherwise you are saying people can only criticize in one direction. Thats a pro-discrimination opinion.

b) Being sympathetic about Solanas who wanted to kill half of the worlds population cant be compared to being sympathetic to Ball, a man trying to avoid his family being destroyed. Thats not even close by a mile.

c) Breivik has nothing to do with the subject whatsoever. The subject of his killings were being a crusader against islam – also his manifesto was not written by him. It was a copy-paste project.

So pardon me, you write Solanas off as “undeniably distrubed woman” yet when it comes to Breivik he is a symptom of the MRA movement?

Why do I get the feeling that you are measuring differently here?

As for Radfemhub and your explaination why radical feminism isn’t really the same as radical MRAs: Same. What happens here is that there is a form of asymetrical warfare going on. The main concerns MRAs are voicing are institutional. Or do “borrow” from the feminist vocabulary: The Matriarchy.

A bit of a better balanced approach to this would have helped the SPLC come off as a neutral force instead of one that seems to have swallowed a certain dogma (that of women as victims). What a shame for this missed opportunity.

The rest of us – including the Judge who will explain what that entire First Amendment freedom of speech thing means – will just be laughing at you.

I feel the Southern Poverty Law Center owes MRA a apology and if it is bent on declaring certain groups or association as hate groups it should be sued to the government recognizes what the Southern Poverty LAw Center is doing is illegal and must be held accountable by the courts for its actions.

Not only is ‘Come Hell or High Watermelon’ potentially tasty, it’s kinetically tasty, too! And I believe Sixpoint Brewery hails from your homestate, so I definitely recommend giving them a try :D

My can is probably the LAST thing anyone here wishes to think about. Unless you’re referring to my 21st Amendment Breweries’ ‘Hell or High Watermelon’ beer can. Which is a very nice can.

One need only glance through the window at a La Perla boutique (not that I would have ever done such a prurient thing!) to see how badly women are being hosed for their ‘frilly things.’

Dey sure am sexy, though.

Yes, you(r) can!

Of course, if you’ve ever shopped for women’s underwear you know they pull the same scam with panties.