It is just sad.

1. In 2006, Pam Spaulding took side Duke woman who falsely accused several straight White Christian men of rape. The Duke woman who made the false accusation was a crack junky with a DUI conviction before Duke case & who since then was convicted of child abuse in 2011 & currently awaiting murder trial. Unsure what Pam Spaulding thinks now, but what I know is that Pam Spaulding took the side of a woman who is a crack junky child abuser because she accused Christian White men of rape which was proven a lie.

2. Pam Spaulding in 2007 (mentioned this before) condemned former MSNBC host Tucker Carlson after Tucker Carlson talked of how he once beat up a gay who was harassing him in the bathroom when Tucker Carlson was a teenager during the Larry Craig scandal. The cops arrested the gay for harassment. Pam Spaulding wrote that Tucker Carlson had ‘masculinity issues’ because Tucker Carlson self-defended. Bathroom is the place to use the toilet & wash up, but Pam Spaulding saw nothing wrong with gays having sex in bathrooms in that she thinks Tucker Carlson should’ve just taken the abuse.

3. Harvey Bernard Milk is some1 who Pam Spaulding idolises. Pam Spaulding sees nothing wrong with Harvey B. Milk committing homosexual statutory rape on 16 year old boy in 1964. Harvey B. Milk was worse than MW Shepard-of course Harvey B. Milk was killed @ 48 thus had more years for his anti-social conduct. If a straight man were having sex with a 16 year old girl, Pam Spaulding would’ve decried him as a statutory rapist as he should be, but the problem is Pam Spaulding thinks statutory rape is OK when it’s homoseuxal.

Pam Spaulding should be honest & just say that she hates straight men, especially if the straight man is White & Christian.

Do everybody a favour and slit your own throat you malicious, revolting fascist shit.

Gregory, while only you know what is in your mind I think you know what I said was the ugly truth. The journalist @ Big Island Chronicle did not delete my posts on Shepard when I discussed who MW Shepard was before October 1998 & she again didn’t dispute what I wrote-she got offended that readers tell the ugly truths. It’s hard to get neutral journalism when gay bashings are written about in the press. If a newspaper were to tell the ugly truths about a gay bashing victim as I did with MW Shepard, that newspaper’s advertisers can get boycotts from gay/lesbian groups & if a newspaper loses sponsors, then they lose money. Well with the Internet, we can and will tell the ugly truths about ‘gay bashing’ victims be it MW Shepard & Harvey B. Milk if we find this & there’s nothing the mainstream media can do to stop us. I know I’ve gotten away from the topic but I’ll end this post with a rerun of Ted W. Lieu. If Ted W. Lieu is going to write laws to forbid repair therapy for minors who do gay/lesbian conduct, then he may as well write laws which forbid repair therapy for minors who are drug junkies. You know my view that gay/lesbian sexual behaviors are comparable to drug junkyism.

Also, the fact that you were banned elsewhere hardly makes you a martyr for the truth. It just means that the moderators here are exercising more patience than most. With that, I have wasted more time on you than you warrant and will leave it to Reynardine to find the appropriate Latin sobriquet for your persistent jackassery.

Also Reynardine, we don’t have to use our real names when we post here. It’s cowardly for you to make ad hominems behind a computer screen & you like most people who post here are anonymous. Point is that neither you, Gregory, Aron or any1 else who got hostile to me when I told the truth about who MW Shepard was before October 1998 day tried to rebut my findings but got mad that I said it. The smart thing for you to do would be to investigate what I wrote including the link I provided & then see if I was right or wrong. But you didn’t do that-you just went into personal attacks when I said things that you didn’t like.

I am “coward” for hiding behind a computer screen? I note you never use your right name. Publish that and your address as well, and then we’ll talk.

Rey is correct. You’ve strayed from garden variety idiocy into more malicious territory. I am done with you. Have a nice life, as you seem to be a very unhappy and confused individual.

“03-15-2002, 06:43 PM W. Panic Snopes Guest Join Date: Mar 2002 Let me first register my stats: I’m a 35-year-old agnostic openly gay male teacher in some order and I feel justified in saying that I don’t have self-loathing baggage, religious or otherwise. That declared, I have to admit that, maddening as the martyrdom of Matthew Shepard by ignorant bar trash was, his martyrdom by the gay community is just as sickening.

BIG DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT IN ANY WAY CONDONE THE KILLING OF MATTHEW SHEPARD OR IN ANY WAY STATE THAT HE DESERVED TO DIE

Matthew Shepard was, by all accounts, a miserable human being in all senses of the term. In addition to suffering from chronic depression he was described by many, including friends, as moody, arrogant, obnoxious, and self-centered. When a straight bartender he liked spurned his advances and cursed him, Matthew responded by charging him with attempted rape (not a rumor, but public record; in his “defense”, he later dropped the charges). He chose the University of Wyoming out of all schools he could get into yet is said to have continually denigrated both town and gown (you all know the type), and his past seems to have leant towards the promiscuous………Matthew Shepard is the totem pole for everything from pro-hate crime legislation factions to all manner of tolerance organizations, the kid that few liked becoming overnight just short of “a god in Colchester”. ”

As you see, the person who wrote that about MW Shepard was a gay teacher, it’s not just us straights like who tell the ugly truths about MW Shepard’s anti-social conduct. The reporter @ Big Island Chronicle got mad when I raised these facts. She banned me & Ok, it’s her site & she can decide who she wants commenting. But as a reporter, the news she covers including MW SHepard is open to critique by the readers. IMO she is held to higher standard because she is a reporter & she has no right to complain when posters come up with truths she hates because she either leaves them out or gives minor talk to. I hope SPLC allows this post & if people including Gregory or Sam Molloy wish to comment, please do so but think seriously about what you’ll say rather than just being hostile.

I do not believe this person is a Poe, but rather someone with a mental illness. Most sane people would not e-mail a reporter personally attacking a murder victim and then act surprised when the reporter get upset.

People should keep that in mind in any dealings with him/her.

I’ve grown tired of his antics.