Now lets look at what happend in Colorado, 1 gunman shoot and killed a bunch of people, now let me ask you this. What would you think would have happened if atlease two people in that theater had guns of their own? Logic tells us that the shooter would have to either continue his rampage at the risk of his own life or run for cover. And we all know by know that he wasnt trying to get killed because if that was the case he would have been in a shootout with the police and that did not happened therefore it is logical at this point to asume that had someone else fired back he would have run for cover therefore lives would have been saved, but no you people want a world where the individual is dependent upon the government to protect them because the police have such a great track record at showing up just in time to save us. Somehow the police can teleport just in time to save you because when your life is in danger trafic somehow desapears and they show up just in time right? disarm the people and what you are left with are victims.

The news never reports on the lives that have been saved due to good people having guns. No, they only tell you about the bad people that have guns. Hitler himself said the best way to control a population is to disarm them. For the person incharge of censorship on this page have some guts and let this comment get by untuched.

Do they publicly speak out against the majority of their membership having racist or discriminatory tendancies? No they do not.

If I took a picture of the faces of the gun shop owners or employees, who look at me when I walk into a new gun shop to browse, that would tell quite a story. It’s a common story, you’ve all heard it, a story of liberties and freedoms, that belong to everyone, except you.

I like to frequent shops who have ex-military employees or owners, they usually don’t care. Others…not so much. I see the same thing at gun shows, and other places.

“Don’t tread on me…but I’ll more than happily tread on you.”

I just changed my paypal. I can’t tolerate any of this. Nor can I tell my son it’s okay to be apart of an organization that caters to these senseless individuals.

I’m no longer an oath keeper.

I honestly doubt the KBs would ever attempt anything serious against the government. Since they already essentially own the American Right Wing, they have no need to mount any militaristic action.

Though Chamberlain said something very similar in 1938…

I feel bad for people who think they can go man to man against any fed-backed organization. Not that I think it will come down to that, but the thought of it itself. Anything less than an insurgency would be brutal. But an insurgency – that’s another issue.

These Koch brothers really remind me of people who are trying to come into their own form of power. If only they can get enough fools to follow them.

When you own a large part ofthe country (as the Kochs do), you have many, MANY places to store your army.

Don’t cry, Sam, there is surely some jurisdiction that will allow you to wheel a cannon loaded with grapeshot down the street. After all, the Koch brothers have already paraded their very own private tanks down the street of a small Colorado town (not Aurora)

For the NRA other conservative causes always take precedent even over guns. That is why they embrace silly conspiracy theories (see their fearmongering that “yes Obama hasn’t done anything to take guns yet, but no question he will at sometime in the future” fear).

And, believe me, we CRINGE when outrages like the Colorado bat-massacre occur.

Please pardon the capitalization, but I think I cannot make the comment program write italics from my machine.

Bob, if the NRA is too moderate for you, you can always join the military of the Republican of Teabagistan – I strongly recommend against joining their Air Force.:P

Bob, what the Fox are you talking about?

The runaway sale and use of private arms out there has had untoward effects. This last July 4, if memory serves me, the denizens of a small town in Colorado discovered the tanks and other artillery parading through the town didn’t belong to the U.S. Navy or the Colorado National Guard. They were the personal artillery of one of the Koch Brothers. Since then, I have been informed that quite a few richbies have been fielding these things in private war games, but this is the first time such an outfit has been paraded before the general public. Meanwhile, any number of “liberals” (often simply centrists) have been told by former “friends”, “We’re coming for you, and we have the better guns”. Since a number of those who were threatened have been hunters, soldiers, or police, they have started arming themselves also, and quite a few formerly peaceable liberals have begun to learn. Thus, the trade in arms grows brisker, and the atmosphere more explosive.

It has been true for at least a decade that you cannot slip a sheet of paper between the Democrat and Republican policies on gun control.

How can both gun owners and gun-control activists not see this?

But of course the subtext is that US arms companies do not want any international agreements that might limit proliferation of weapons, even to our enemies. The lobbyists can push the buttons of paranoiac Republican voters enough to scare the Senate.