People that carry that philosophy really don’t have a clue about love, it’s just pure hate.

If you are white marry white and so and so on then live your life as you will, but to promote hate and to degrade other groups in that process is a self defeating act.

Hate begets more hate.

Racists need to put more time into their own progression and evolution as human beings, then perhaps they too would find that they really don’t have all this time they spend towards learning teaching and spreading the cancer of their hate agenda in the U.S.

Another thing, overweight people are not well fed. Well fed means eating healthy, not junk food that is high in refined sugars and carbohydrates. Watching TV and going to a supermarket are not examples of scientific research. And as Ruslan pointed out, Africa has modern cities with running water and electricity.

http://goafrica.about.com/od/a.....tal-ci.htm

You can always Google them.

You then go on to say things like “blacks use welfare and food stamps.” Well, so do white folks, more so than blacks. You also said a bunch of other crap, but Ruslan pretty much destroyed your arguments.

By the way, if you’re so anti-black, why are you looking their asses?

Quite simply, Kiwiwriter, the above is the reason why the SPLC is constantly ridiculed in principled quarters. Maybe it started by declaring an all-out legal war against the most thuggish organizations most everyday Americans between Berkeley and the Beltway would agree to be hate groups, but nowadays, ha!

At some point in time, the SPLC appointed itself the enlightened panel of judges of what it is acceptable to believe and say about any and every subject. Get that? Nobody in America in an official capacity, such as an election to some kind of public office, asked them what is acceptable mainstream thought and what isn’t. They just set up shop in Montgomery and appointed themselves. They consider adherents to Austrian School economics and believers in anti-fiat currency/Federal Reserve/IMF/WTO/Bilderberg Group/CFR/Trilateral Commission conspiracy theories to be dangerous radicals worthy of surveillance right alongside Klansmen. That says it all. They are just apologists for the current American imperial big-government political establishment.

Wealthy Leftists are insulated from the policies they advocate. Consider Bill & Hillary Clinton. For years while in the White House they advocated ‘diversity’. Yet where did they buy a home after the Clinton left the presidency? Chappaqua, N.Y. is about 90% white. If they really believed that blacks are so wonderful, and the races are equivalent and interchangeable, why didn’t they move to a majority black neighborhood? It’s true, Clinton had an office in Harlem. He went there 2-4 times per year escorted by armed body guards in a limousine. His office has now moved. Hillary Clinton has a net worth of ~ 40 million dollars. Next consider Michael Moore. He claims he grew up in Flint, MI. Not true. He grew up in Davison, MI, which is over 90% white. He has a home in Traverse City, MI. Again, > 90% white. Moore is a very wealthy man. The list goes on of such examples. The Kennedy family, Al Gore, Chris Matthews. They’re all rich. They all live in white areas. Al Gore has an enormous mansion on a big estate. Chris Matthews doesn’t live in Washington DC. He lives in Chevy Chase, MD. It’s a very white area.

Their salaries, net worths, and lifestyles are worth pointing out because it validates and confirms what all critics of the “limousine lefty” crowd – no matter their political stripe – have been saying about them for their entire existence. They are the rich, pampered, and privileged elite class, whose wealth makes them conveniently exempt from the effects that the policies they advocate have on the common people, the everyday middle-class American.”

Well, Brock, please tell us who “disrespects” the SPLC. Let’s see, Aryan Nations, the Ku Klux Klan, Louis Beam, Billy Riccio, Glenn Miller, and Tom Metzger. That’s quite a crew. A bunch of sadists, psychotics, greedheads, and racist thugs.

And you say they are “exempt” from the “policies they advocate?” Care to explain that?

Do use the red crayon.

You guys have got to realize the SPLC is a scam. Morris Dees makes a huge salary and lives in a mansion. That whole organization is a money generating operation for the people at the top. Do you know how much Morris Dees makes? Do you know how much Mark Potok makes? I do. Check it out. Research it on your own. Tell me what number you come up with. Then I’ll tell you. This is the big question: What are the salaries of these guys running the SPLC?”

Sorry, Eugene/Ezra/Jason/Annie, the “big questions” are the ones I’ve asked you, and I’m not looking up yours until you answer mine.

And when ARE you going to make that web page with the profiles of us?

Besides, why should I post the number? You said you never read what we write…

Please show me the error of my ways. Please tell me who holds Dees and Potok in such low esteem. I get the feeling you will be listing folks of David Duke’s ilk.

In short, you’re wrong.

I have three degrees from real universities, own my own house free and clear, am not rich, and am quite old enough not to have to prove anything.

Morris and Mark are more highly disrespected than respected. I hope you realize this.

Their salaries, net worths, and lifestyles are worth pointing out because it validates and confirms what all critics of the “limousine lefty” crowd – no matter their political stripe – have been saying about them for their entire existence. They are the rich, pampered, and privileged elite class, whose wealth makes them conveniently exempt from the effects that the policies they advocate have on the common people, the everyday middle-class American.

Pathetic.

Who cares how much they make? Dees is the senior partner of a law firm known as the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Potok is a highly respected journalist.

I would say their salaries are justified.

Now how much do you make as a ‘college professor?’

You guys have got to realize the SPLC is a scam. Morris Dees makes a huge salary and lives in a mansion. That whole organization is a money generating operation for the people at the top. Do you know how much Morris Dees makes? Do you know how much Mark Potok makes? I do. Check it out. Research it on your own. Tell me what number you come up with. Then I’ll tell you. This is the big question: What are the salaries of these guys running the SPLC?

So here’s a little test for you. Please use a No. 2 pencil, and answer all questions.

1. If you’re here to “debate leftists,” why are you ignoring their responses?
2. If you don’t read “their posts anymore,” why are you here?
3. How can you have their posts on “permanent ignore,” when they’re put on a weblog, not sent in a stand-alone e-mail to you?
4. When you have had a “real job and a wife and family, and a nice home and car he worked for?”
5. Why should Ruslan Amirkhanov “go away?” Are you the webmaster of this site?
6. How do you propose to enforce that demand?
7. Do you seriously expect anybody to obey your demands at this point? You have already stated that we are “crazy,” so why are you issuing them?
8. If Ruslan is a “crazy person” and you “don’t read him,” why should it matter if he is here or not?
9. On that line, why should it matter what he writes? Is he ruining your life?
10. You have repeatedly stated that what appears on this web page “does not matter” and is “not important.” Why, then, are you so concerned with it?
11. Do you believe that freedom of speech only applies to you?
12. What legal or racial theory is that based on?
13. How are you such an expert on the lifestyles of leftists?
14. According to you leftists “all probably live in a college town in a crummy basement apartment, doing drugs, with no job, never even had a girlfriend. They’re probably all gay, unattractive, effeminate, overweight slobs. Basically deviants. So they get mad when the see a normal healthy man who has a job, looks good, is clean cut, and has a real job and a wife and family, and has a nice home and car he worked for. So these losers are all jealous.” If “leftists” are “deviants” in the first place, why would they be “jealous” of others?
15. Leftists include Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, and John F. Kennedy. Were any of them “gay, unattractive, effeminate, overweight slobs?”
16. Leftist war heroes include Theodore Roosevelt (Spanish-American War), Harry S. Truman (World War I and dropper of two atomic bombs), John F. Kennedy (World War II), George McGovern (World War II), Al Gore (Vietnam), and John Kerry (Vietnam). Were they “gay, unattractive, effeminate, overweight slobs?”
17. Does the term “projection” mean anything to you?
18. In one of your many incarnations, you have urged your opponents to do the following: “I urge both of you to focus your lives on real world issues that will improve your lives, such as getting a better paying job, joining the military, getting married, saving up to buy a home, or doing anything that will make a real man out of you.” Have you done any of the above?
19. If you have joined the military, please list your service branch, medals, and campaigns.
20. You have also stated, “The posters on here are all a bunch of anti-white bigots and haters. They speak nothing but lies.” Why are you therefore continuing to engage “liars” in dialogue?
21. Why are you so obsessed with the sexuality of leftists and whether or not they have girlfriends?
22. You indicate that leftists are “gay.” Why would a gay person be “jealous” of someone with a “wife” of the opposite sex?
23. Where did you gain you expertise in gay lifestyles?
24. Why have you changed your sex in your names?
25. You say that all leftists “live in college towns in crummy basement apartments, doing drugs, with no job.” By that logic, how do they pay the rent?
26. You claim to have a Ph.D. and be a tenured professor. Where is that college and what do you teach, and what have you written for your dissertation?
27. What do your colleagues and students think about your statement denouncing your “college town?”
28. Does watching black women perform on music videos make someone an expert on black culture, or on the culture created by black musicians and white music promoters?
29. Why, if you think that American blacks are not “your people,” are you so fascinated with black music videos?
30. How does the behavior of black performers in music videos compare with the behavior of white performers in professional wrestling?
31. Have you done any peer-reviewed or accredited term papers on the connection between music videos and the behavior of ordinary black and white people? If so, please provide the link.
32. You are apparently well-informed on the sexual practices and movements of black women. What research have you undertaken in this field, and where can your reports be found?
33. Did that research include sexual encounters with black women? If so, please list all of them, the types of encounters, positions used, the personal information about the involved persons, and whether or not these encounters were provided willingly or for hire.
34. Did you practice “safe sex” during this research?
35. How do you square these acts of miscegenation with Nazi racial laws that forbid such behavior?
36. Have any of these encounters resulted in children? If so, are you supporting them?
37. Does watching documentaries about remote African tribes make one an expert on African-American life?
38. Are loud and pushy women in supermarkets a threat to America’s survival?
39. Are loud and pushy black women in supermarkets a threat to America’s future?
40. Are you being forced to marry or reproduce with loud and pushy black women?
41. Why are you so obsessed with loud and pushy black women in supermarkets?
42. Are these loud and pushy black women preventing you from shopping?
43. Have you written a peer-reviewed academic paper on loud and pushy black women in supermarkets? If so, please provide the link.
44. Does watching music videos featuring loud black women and seeing loud and pushy black women make you an expert on famine in the Ukraine in the 1930s?
45. In what field did you earn your Ph.D. and where can we find your dissertation?
46. You claim that you answer all arguments with data. Please provide links to this data, and show that it has met academic standards. (As a Ph.D. with tenure at a university, you must know what those are)
47. Tell us how the Russian people greeted their Nazi invaders with flowers, with proofs and citations.
48. Tell us how Stalin intended to mate captured German civilians with monkeys to create a super-race, with proofs and citations. Your statement: “In the closing days of WWII the Soviet army was an entire army of rapists. Stalin had a secret agreement with Churchill and Roosevelt to take 4 million German civilians as slaves to Siberia to work in the Gulags — German women, old people teenagers, children. German babies were even taken for medical experiments. Stalin has a nightmarish dream of breeding humans with gorillas to create a super race of human/ape hybrids, which of course, failed. Read yourself in the Yalta agreement. It says the Soviets can take civilians as ‘labor in kind’ — meaning SLAVES!” Can you prove this with documentary evidence, such as examples of this “super race of human/ape hybrids?”
49. Why would “human/ape hybrids” be a “super race?” Would they be superior to, say, the Aryan race?
50. Please give your academic credentials in biology and anthropology in support of this statement.
51. Tell us how Norman Rockwell sided with Hitler, with proofs and citations.
52. Please give your academic credentials in art in support of this statement.
53. Show us your proof that the white man is superior to the black man, with academic citations.
54. You have also told us that you do not associate with neo-Nazis like Hal Turner, and so forth. Yet you have also said, on May 3rd, 2012 at 11:20 pm: “What’s wrong with being a neo-Nazi?” You have also said, “America is an evil country. While our brave young men were fighting in the East to stop the Asiatic hoards [sic], America bombed our civilians. There were no German soldiers left in the cities near the end of WWII. There were only babies, old people, young children, women. Yet the Americans bombed these civilians. During all this time our brave young men were fighting against Communism. America is an evil country. America fought on the side of evil during WWII. And evil won that war.” How can you rectify this hypocrisy?
55. What do your colleagues and superiors at your university think about you being a neo-Nazi adherent?
56. As an educator, how do you treat Jews and blacks in your classes?
57. Have you received any complaints from them for your racism or anti-Semitism?
58. In an earlier post, you said you would prove your theories to us, only if we pay you vast sums of money. Does that mean you are only involved in neo-Nazism for personal gain? Statement: “FYI: I do not read any of your responses. I never click on your links. I am not going to do any work for you or answer your questions for free. I don’t do that.”
59. Isn’t demanding money for personal financial gain in exchange for proving your cause a tactic of the Jews and blacks that you despise?
60. Why are you using tactics of the very people you detest?
61. Doesn’t behaving like a Jew or a black make you a Jew or a black?
62. When are you going to provide us with that e-mail address for our 10-year resumes?
63. You have said, “Someday you’ll be on a talk show, flogging one of your novels, and you’ll complain, ‘I once debated this guy named Ezra on the Internet and he ignored all my posts, even though they were so clever’. Then you will burst out into tears on live TV.” Care to explain this in 1,000 words or less?
64. Isn’t a statement like the above an example of using the evil leftist debate terms of “epithets, slurs, invective,” and therefore not becoming a white nationalist and neo-Nazi?
65. You have repeatedly said that you can create a website with your own worldview. Why have you not done so?
66. If we are all crazy people, why are you wasting valuable time here instead of making your own web page?

You will be tested on this material. Please fill in all the information. If you fail to do so, the questions will be repeated until you have completed the assigned test. If you do not complete the assignment, you must withdraw from the class. See the bursar’s office.

The only ethnic group that, under conditions of normal nutrition, consistently exhibits steatopygy is the San, and in their case, their usual state of nutrition is not what we’d consider normal. Much of the year they live in desert conditions; during the “good” parts of the year, they eat enough to store reserves, and storing those behind, rather than ventrally, as we do, poses less of an impediment to motion. This is neither primitive nor advanced; it is adaptive. You could not adapt to their environment. If you tried, there would soon be aizoaceous plants using your skull for a flower pot.

Maybe the problem you have is with your own buttocks.

You need to read a book called, “The Origin of Races” (1962), by Carlton S. Coon. He was a professor of anthropology at Harvard university.

The Wikipedia article I provided a link to does indeed state that the condition of Steatopygia occurs commonly in Bantu females. African Americans are indeed Bantus. The next time you’re in the supermarket or the shopping mall, I encourage you to begin observing these Bantus objectively. Many of the females do indeed suffer from the condition of Steatopygia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steatopygia

Oh, great point, a rare condition exists amongst a fraction of people in a fraction of the tribes in Africa (designated by you as “primative”-sic), THEREFORE some black women you goggle at in supermarkets in the U.S. also have this same condition THEREFORE black women are also “primative”. Brilliant reasoning.

But wait, you’re an idiot.

“Primitive” is a bias-laden word which doesn’t really mean anything here. Define it better. Spell it correctly.

The women in all those supermarkets (why especially supermarkets? why especially the Twinkies aisle?) you haunt probably are not even indirectly descended from those few tribes in Africa where this rare condition occurs. (not to talk down to you, but “Africa” is not “a big black neighborhood”–it’s a continent).

Big buttocks seem quite often to be a symptom of obesity, a condition that especially troubles impoverished people of all colors and is mostly caused by bad diet of cheap, high-fat food.

Even if all the nodes of your reasoning by a miracle held water, the plausibility that particular attribute somehow related with some level of “primitiveness” is about zero. Makes no sense.

It’s hard to refocus when your social life is limited to those you encounter in the junk food and beer aisles of supermarkets, but there are actually plenty of black women who DON’T have big buttocks. Like Michelle Obama.

Save the drinking until after you post.

…And sixth… Did I mention you’re an idiot and trying way too hard? Because you are!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steatopygia

Next time you go to the supermarket observe the typical black females there and see how big their buttox are. They have the condition of Steatopygia.

Too funny – the white nationalist who is obsessed with white women having sex with black men and pretends to be obsessed with the extinction of the white race (whatever that means) has admitted that he loves to stare at black women’s buttocks. See, a normal person would realize “you know, i find these black women attractive” but not Eugenics Eugene. No, instead like the slave masters in the South before him he believes “oh no! if i find black women attractive, that must mean that white women will find black men attractive – can’t have that, must become a white nationalist because those white women are ours.”

Yes, the fear of interracial dating and sex has always been primarily nothing but treating women as property – of course, Eugenics Eugene no doubt wonders why he can’t get a date from any woman (viewing women as property is a good start).

What does it also say about Eugenics Eugene that he believes that black people are stupid yet he admits to being attracted to black women’s sizable derrieres? Apparently he is really scared of the idea of a woman being equal to him which also explains why he can’t find a date.

Naturally this explains why Eugenics Eugene has turned towards white nationalism – because he is just an angry impotent little man who just can’t understand why he can’t find his perfect little slavegirl to take care of him. Therefore in my theory, his primary ideology isn’t white nationalism or white supremacism or even racism.

It is mysogny and male supremacy. Eugenics Eugene is a white nationalist due to him being a male supremacist – white nationalism to him is simply a way to keep the white women he views as his personal property in line. Its probably also his way to hide the fact that he secretly wishes that he was black because he believes then he’d have a bigger penis (and of course, white women would then flock to him because he’s so attracted to black women so in his little mind he believes that white women must feel the same way).

For Eugenics Eugene, white nationalism is nothing but the highest expression of performance and size insecurity :P

The genotype of one individual does not change. The genotype of a lineage or population indeed changes over time. Your Afghan hound is an example.

A year or so back, there was a newsclip about a soldier who managed to bring home a dog from the battlefield in Afghanistan. The dog was described as a “part-bred Afghan hound”. She was, in fact, a pretty representative example of a tazi- the ancestral gaze hound from whom our show Afghans were derived. Those dogs, used in hunting, were far shorter-coated and more ruggedly built than their show rin descendants. Less than a century of selection made them unrecognizable to casual observers as the same breed, and this was without outcrossing. With human beings, we are looking at millenia of migration and interbreeding. Tasmanians, said to be a pure “race”, were exterminated by invading colonists, who slaughtered the men and buried the babies up to their necks in order to knock off their heads with polo mallets; any remaining “Tasmanians” today descend from the bereaved women and their rapists. I promise you that any other relict pure “race” that survived into the last couple of centuries was some small group of islanders who suffered a similar fate. The remainder of humanity commingled, peaceably or violently, for tens of millenia before that. The very American phenotype has gotten both taller and more dark-eyed than the recruits measured for the Civil War.

You can, of course, continue to describe human beings “racially” according to any parameter you choose, but that will not stop this process. And one day, an Afghan hound may throw a hairless pup.

Wow. What does “being oppressed” mean to you? Being forcibly starved? The conventional manifestations of oppression (job and housing discrimination, social ostracization, etc.) aren’t good enough for you?

You also, in your unique interpretation of the scientific method, look at your “big butt data” and speculate that its related to something you call “primitive evolution”. What on Earth is “primitive evolution”?

Seriously, I feel sorry for you.