The Hatewatch blog is managed by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center, an Alabama-based civil rights organization.

Member of Mississippi Gang that Hunted Black People is Sentenced

By Bill Morlin on January 4, 2013 - 1:51 pm, Posted in Anti-Black, Hate Crime

A sixth man has pleaded guilty to federal hate crime charges related to the June 2011 racially motivated killing in Jackson, Miss., of a black man assaulted and run over with a pickup truck by a gang of white youths. That brutal murder was captured on surveillance video and broadcast nationally.

Joseph Paul Dominick, 21, of Brandon, Miss., faces a maximum of five years in prison after pleading guilty yesterday to conspiracy to commit federal hate crimes. He pleaded guilty to a criminal information, waiving grand jury indictment and striking a plea deal with federal prosecutors, just a month after The Clarion-Ledger in Jackson published an editorial blasting the Justice Department for a  “thick cloud of secrecy” surrounding the protracted investigation.

Dominick was part of a gang of white youths, federal authorities now say, who armed themselves with assorted dangerous weapons — beer bottles, slingshots and handguns — and, essentially, made a sport of looking for disabled, homeless or intoxicated African Americans to verbally harass and physically assault. This week’s plea was related to Dominick’s participation in a variety of assaults; he was not involved in the murder that brought the gang national attention.

The case is highly reminiscent of the racially charged 2008 killing of Marcelo Lucero, an Ecuadorian immigrant slain by a gang of seven Long Island teenagers, most of them white, in Patchogue, N.Y. The youths, who were eventually sentenced to terms of five to 25 years in prison, had been regularly beating Latino immigrants as part of a blood sport they dubbed “beaner-hopping.”

In the Mississippi case, members of the gang of young white men and women for about a year before the murder “would drive around Jackson during the night and early morning hours looking for African American persons to verbally harass and physically assault,” a charging document says. Dominick frequently joined these human hunting expeditions.

On the night of June 25, 2011, however, Dominick stayed behind at a bonfire birthday party for him in Puckett, Miss., while fellow gang members Deryl Paul Dedmon, John Aaron Rice, William Kirk Montgomery, Dylan Wade Butler and three others not publicly identified by investigators drove to Jackson looking for black victims, the document says.

While in Jackson, several of Dominick’s friends, including Rice and Butler, “hurled glass beer bottles at African American pedestrians before they identified as J.A. as a vulnerable target for assault,” the document says. That victim, spotted shortly before dawn in a motel parking lot, was publicly identified as James Craig Anderson, a 49-year-old auto plant worker.

Yelling racial slurs and “white power,” the attackers brutally beat Anderson, and left him lying in the parking lot as one group of the young adults left in an SUV. A second group got into a Ford pickup driven by Dedmon, who ran over Anderson. Prosecutors said that later, in a cell phone call, Dedmon laughed and said, “I ran that nigger over.” Deryl Dedmon’s uncle, Ray Dedmon, later described his slight, blond nephew to The New York Times as “a good boy” from a “happy-go-lucky” family.

CNN obtained and repeatedly broadcast motel surveillance video that showed the truck driving over James Anderson, once again drawing national attention to the problem of serious hate crimes in the Deep South and elsewhere.

Ironically, although the local district attorney clearly described the killing as a hate crime, Mississippi authorities apparently never listed it that way. In the FBI’s recently released hate crime report for 2011, Mississippi is said to have reported no racially motivated hate crimes at all, a virtual impossibility, given the 200,000 or so hate crimes that are estimated to occur nationally every year.

Last month, Jonathan Kyle Gaskamp, 20, of Brandon; and Montgomery, 23, pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Jackson to one count of conspiracy to commit a hate crime and one count of committing a hate crime. Their pleas came nine months after Dedmon, Butler and Rice pleaded guilty to federal hate crime charges.

While Dominick and Gaskamp weren’t part of the group that came to Jackson the day Anderson was killed, they had been on previous trips to harass African Americans and continued making such forays following Anderson’s death, the Jackson newspaper reported in Thursday’s edition.

The case has sparked some local criticism of officials. In an editorial published on Dec. 6, The Clarion-Ledger said at least two of those involved in the attack on Anderson were believed to be young women but were still not identified. “[T]his is a long time for Anderson’s family and loved ones to wait for justice, especially when you consider that the first suspect, Deryl Dedmon, was arrested just hours after the incident occurred. A second suspect, John Rice, was arrested three days later. The FBI has said that law enforcement has conducted more than 200 interviews regarding this case,” the editorial said.

“What is most confounding is the thick cloud of secrecy behind which this entire investigation and prosecution has taken place,” it added. “We understand the need for sensitive investigations to remain under wraps, but this is one of the oddest we have ever seen. Too, it seems the family is being kept in the dark as well, as every time we talk to them they express their dissatisfaction with the amount of information they are being given,” the editorial said.

It is not clear if other defendants will be charged in federal or state courts.

Sentencing dates are expected later this year for Dominick and the five other defendants. The charge of conspiracy to commit a hate crime carries a maximum penalty of five years. The commission of a hate crime carries a maximum of 10 years unless a death occurred, when the maximum can be life in prison.

  • http://yahoo james hardin

    Facing five years is not enough for what those white Confederate Talibans did to this African-American man. A terrorist is a terrorist even if they are a good old boy or girl. Confederate Talibans should be prosecuted just as the Islam Extremist we are killing overseas and that include the female they need to be put to sleep.

  • mr. x

    Eugene, white people not only raped black women and little girls they raped men and boys. and oh black women look better then white women everyday of the year facials looks and body, thats why white women trying to have ass now and take facials shots to enhance their cheek bone to imitate the black African queen. Anyway i think you mad your not black.

  • Mitch Beales

    But if it was “legitimate rape”…

  • A.D.M.

    It’s funny how Eugene says he doesn’t like black women yet he said he stares at their backsides in supermarkets not too long ago. And yes, white slaveowners did rape black female slaves. That’s a fact that can be proven. Can you backup your little thesis, Eugene? I doubt it.

  • A.D.M.

    I actually have seen white males with black females. And there’s a reason why black American have some European ancestry. Yes, it had to do with white slaveowners raping black female slaves.

  • CM

    For the record, Eugene = John. And in response to his thoroughly despicable comments here, two names:

    Halle Berry
    Strom Thurmond

    All racism is irrational, so any arguments in favor of racism must be based on misrepresentations of fact and/or misprisions of logic. Eugene/Jason/John/Annie/Ezra, ad infinitam nauseam, serve only to remind us of this fact.

    On topic, the actions of this gang of vicious nitwits exhibit the dehumanization that necessarily accompanies racism, in that they were treating their victims like a subhuman species, hunting them like animals. The man they killed is described as a 49-year-old auto plant worker – thus, probably, more of a contributor to society than any of the overgrown juveniles responsible for his death could ever hope to be.

  • aadila

    Sam I question your sensibility on this matter though I understand your point of view.

    I am not sure about poor neighborhoods and crime, but there was a very interesting study from some major universities that showed crime rates were actually lower in predominately immigrant neighborhoods — despite these neighborhoods looking run down and chaotic and having lower per capita income.

    I’m not trying to gainsay you, I’m just pointing out that often what we take as an a priori truth is not so when we question our own assumptions. If “everybody” knows something about any given demographic or region, I think that’s a good reason to test whether or not those assumptions are actually true.

    I remind you how many people argue that “everybody knows” homosexual people are sexual predators…which of course is simply untrue.

  • Mitch Beales

    I am not suggesting that Eugene be banned. What I am suggesting is that comments which are essentially hate speech and/or make racist claims without even a pretense of legitimate documentation be “moderated” into oblivion.

  • Sam Molloy

    Back on topic, I can’t imagine any punishments that might be excessive in this case.

  • Sam Molloy

    Eugene, I for one went to the ” colorofcrime” site that you linked. You may notice it has no footnotes, references or quotable experts to back up their claim. Anybody with any sense knows that poor neighborhoods are higher crime areas, and also have more non white residents. My advice is to stay away from them if possible. My personal experience is that I have known many fine people of color, and only an idiot would reject a potential friend because of their color or culture. As for Black women, I have met some absolutely gorgeous Black women. I too am not attracted to them. Unless they are Drag Queens.

  • Erika

    Banning Eugenics Eugene is foolish because he’ll just show up under a new name and a new email as he always has done – plus, when the SPLC devotes a large effort to education by showing white nationalists own words, Eugenic Eugene pretty much serves as exhibit one for why they are correct.

    Plus, Eugenics Eugene attempting to pretend that he does not lust after black women is one of the funniest things i’ve seen. Seriously, how long until Eugenics Eugene gets busted by a black female undercover cop in a prostitution sting?

  • adamhill


    Actually, I think that seeing Eugene’s comments here motivate more people to donate money to SPLC than to withhold donations. So he should be allowed to comment. Thanks, Eugene, for helping the SPLC.

  • CoralSea

    One of the elements of stories such as these that I find singularly depressing is the fact that family members and friends/acquaintances of bullies such as these kids tend either not to see the problems they have (being racist bullies, probably drinking to excess) or see it and dismiss it, either because they think it is “harmless” because they privately agree with such activities or because they figure it can’t be “that bad.”

    Teens and young adults, especially when they are in groups (or worse, “packs”), often talk about committing various anti-social acts and sometimes commit minor acts that don’t kill people, but would still make most reasonable adults cringe. Fortunately, a lot of them grow out of carrying out actual, impulsive actions. However, a certain percentage of them do not — and such “youthful hijinks” merely provide practice for badder and worse things.

    But even when such anti-social behavior doesn’t involve bodily injury, and “simply” yelling racial, religious, or sexist slurs from a car, these actions can cause significant trauma to those at whom the slurs are directed and help create a climate of fear and oppression that NO ONE should have to endure. Thus, even these “hijinks” are serious–and those who hear of them or known that their kids, friends, relatives, neighbors, are engaging in them should speak out.

    Teens and young adults can be notoriously self-centered. Do they realize how shouting slurs at a stranger can affect that person? The shouters may think it’s a joke, but what about the person on the receiving end? Does he or she know that? Or is he or she going to have nightmares about feeling threatened? How would the shouters feel if they were intimidated (or someone they loved was intimidated) in such a way?

    Parents SHOULD pay attention to what their kids are doing and put a stop to anti-social behaviors. Unfortunately, though, a lot of parents aren’t much better than their kids (e.g., Mean people breed little Mean people).

    While there isn’t much that anyone can do regarding the true sociopath or psychopath, other young people can be influenced away from anti-social behavior if others in their community are willing to speak out and tell them that some of the behaviors they are engaging in is wrong. If a handful of people are willing to stand up and tell them that what they are doing is wrong, is hurtful to others, and is a waste of the doer’s potential, it can sway at least some of the kids away from this type of thing and isolate the nutcases.

    Silence and apparent (or real) acquiesance allows behaviors like this to continue and escalate. At some point, people must consider what sort of community they want to live in, and begin to speak out — both to save those who are being harassed, injured or killed, and the kids who, if properly influenced, could be doing something much more meaningful and productive with their lives.

  • aadila

    I am torn between allowing Eugene to continue to publicly make a fool of him/her/itself and the desire to maintain a public space free from people crapping in the pool, so to speak.

    There is truly a fine line between moderation and censorship and I applaud the SPLC for erring on the side of free expression. By engagement we are able to better disintegrate the moral and philosophical basis upon which hate speech stands.

    But after months of the same cut and paste doo doo which isn’t even an ideological expression but merely an open attempt to get ones jollies by saying offensive things, I must say that I am going to have to cast my chit along with Rey and Mitch Beales. This isn’t an ordinary troll or disgruntled joker with an axe to grind.

    This is a unique case…I defend anyone’s right to have and express an opinion — even when offensive to my own values — but Eugene is not expressing opinions. There’s no tit for tat, no responding to what people say, no relevance to topic, no constructive ideas or well thought out challenges, just seemingly endless repetition of the same empty words.

    In this case, maybe it’s best to cut off the mike. It’s not like we’ll run out of trolls or anything.

  • Reynardine

    I am going to join with Mr. Beales and ask that, because he can offer nothing but time-wasting irrelevancies designed to derail whatever thread he is on, the many-splendored Eugene be barred.

  • Erika

    Eugenics Eugene, you sound suspiciously like one of those homophobes who goes out of his way to deny any sort of attraction towards members of the same sex but then gets caught soliticing an undercover male cop for sex in a public restroom.

  • Reynardine

    Eugene: Clearly you find black women so unattractive that you ogle, and perhaps attempt to fondle, their buttocks in grocery stores, causing them to respond in a manner you characterize as aggressive.

  • Eugene


    Well, do you think the average white man today finds the average black woman attractive? It is very rare to see an inter-racial couple that consists of a white man dating a black woman. Obviously they are not attracted to them. So … do you think during the 19th century white slave holders were attracted to their black female slaves? I doubt it. Most black women are repellent. Their faces are not pretty. Did white men somehow change their preferences? When did they change?

    I almost never see a white man dating a black female. It is rare. A man wants a woman who is pretty. Black women are not pretty. Putting it bluntly, they are ugly. Since they are so ugly I doubt any white slave owner would have ever raped one of them. That would have been a disgusting experience.

  • Mitch Beales

    I am about ready to cease my financial support for SPLC since Hatewatch continues to provide a forum for folks like Eugene to post unverifiable, nonsensical hate speech.

  • Reynardine

    For anyone who hasn’t figured it out: people in the South, regardless of origins, are always darker than people of similar stock in the North. Even that poor, red-haired son of a white supremacist has turned pinker than a shrimp cocktail. Notwithstanding that fact, I saw, mid-Twentieth Century, black people (“Negro” or “colored”) who were blonds and redheads, and, as they were men, not from dye (which men outside of show business never used then). My mother saw such men when she was a kid in the Florida Redlands in the Twenties, and the brothels of New Orleans have traditionally been stuffed with quadroon and octoroon women, some of whom were, in plantation days, specially bred to be sold to such establishments. A good many apparently white Southern families descend from such women who were light enough to “pass”. On the evidence, there was quite a lot of miscegenation in the South. Elvis Presley’s peculiar vocal quality may have owed something to it.

  • Reynardine

    Eugene, the only thing you have a doctorate in is pathological lying.

  • Eugene


    You are so funny. White slave owners did not rape black women and girls during slavery. It is very rare to see inter-racial couples that are white male/black female today. Most white men find black women unattractive. How often do you see an interracial couple that is white male/black female today? Not very often.

    Now, did white men somehow change? Did white men find black women attractive in the 19th century? No. They always found black women unattractive. The average white slave owner found the black woman repellant.

    Notice today if you go to the Deep South most black people are very dark. Whereas, lighter skinned blacks are more common in big cities up north.

    After the civil war blacks began moving north to big cities like New York and there were many single white male immigrants (Jews, Irishmen). Black women started prostituting themselves to these single men.

    The racially mixed blacks are not descendent of southern white slave owners. It came about from black prostitutes in the 19th century living selling themselves in the big northern cities where there were a lot of recent immigrants, having sex with Jews, Irishmen, and other 19th century Elis islander types.

  • Erika

    Eugenics Eugene, post original source evidence rather than a summary from a known hate group and then we will talk. You are as bad as the men’s rights mysognists who thought that posting links male supremacist sites rather than actual crime statistics was convincing.

    Also when you are looking at actual evidence, research how many black women get raped by black booty obsessed white nationalists. In fact, based upon your comments about the buttocks of black women, i kind of suspect that you are a white supremacist solely because you dream of bringing back the days of slavery where white men could whip and rape black women and girls without fear of punishment. And that makes you a disgusting icky perv rapist possible pedophile. Of course, sweetie, it was only the rich white men who could do that – poor white men like you couldn’t afford to own slaves. So you white supremacists have always been fighting someone else’s fight.

    The real funny part is that during the Civil War, many of the poor Southern whites knew that and refused to fight for the Confederacy – many even fought for the Union. That is why the Confederacy had to draft soldiers and essentially force people to fight for them. Yet today it is almost always the poor people who are still flying the Confederate flag and talking about how noble the Confederacy was.

  • Erika

    Rey, “love crimes” sounds like what an abuser would describe acts of domestic violence.

  • Pam

    Those evil little southern racists deserve the maximum penalty for murdering that poor man. They also deserve extra sentencing for all the other crimes they committed against other innocent African-Americans. It does not surprise me that the authorities in Mississippi are being ‘secretive’ about the investigation, because I’d be willing to bet that those criminals are related to people in law enforcement. This seems typical of white southerners to me. Just look at all the utterly heinous things they have done in their history, such as mobs of them lynching black people and acting as if their foul crime was some kind of party. Just despicable and evil, and they need to be dealt with.

  • Reynardine

    John, putting yourself in line for another Toilet Seat to plunk your ASSume on, I see. As for you, Eugene, I see you broke off from ogling black women’s buttocks in the grocery store long enough to make up some statistics.

  • Kiwiwriter

    And to get back on topic, since Ezra/Eugene/Jason/Annie’s twin purposes are to shill for American Renaissance and derail the discussion:

    These idiots in Mississippi disgust me…in their “noble cause” of preserving the “white race,” they are picking upon black targets that cannot defend themselves…drunks and homeless people. They would be a little less tough, I’m sure, facing off against a bunch of black steelworkers, or members of a softball team, or any person capable of remotely defending himself.

    They hurled racial slurs (of course), and thought they were doing a good thing. They then showed their great commitment to their cause by meekly pleading guilty, probably ratting each other out in the hope of a lighter sentence, and not having to face tougher foes in prison.

    They are just bullies…I would like to know what kind of work they did and education they had. I suspect they did no work nor got much education.

    I have very little use for bullies, and even less for racist ones. Time for them to discover the concepts of “personal responsibility,” “civilized behavior,” and “accountability.”

    Enjoy life as felons, fellas. You are now officially members of an inferior group.

  • Kiwiwriter

    Well, Eugene/Ezra/Annie/Jason, you’re just quoting the same line of drivel from “American Renaissance,” which makes it just some of the same more rubbish that you have spouted earlier.

    Nothing new. But I’m surprised you even bothered to give this information and add a link…after all, you yourself said, “I’m not going to do any of your work for you.”

    Did you write that letter to Mark Potok yet to get Heidi Beirich more money?

    Still proud of being a neo-Nazi?

    What happened with that project with our 10-year resumes?

    Your statistics are as bogus as your identity.

    By the way, the latest issue of “Intelligence Report,” referred to earlier on this blogsite, has a terrific article from a guy who left “American Renaissance” when he realized that its theories were full of garbage and Jared Taylor was hanging out with anti-Semites like Kevin McDonald and David Duke.

    How are Kevin and David doing, by the way?

    As for black-on-white crime…read the papers. It gets covered. If they do it just to get cash, it’s not a hate crime. If they do it because the target is white and they hate whites, it’s a hate crime. Show me the anecdotal evidence, not phonied-up numbers.

    Yes, this is so funny…I love laughing at you. Anyway, in the interests of consistency, here’s your test again:

    1. If you’re here to “debate leftists,” why are you ignoring their responses?
    2. If you don’t read “their posts anymore,” why are you here?
    3. How can you have their posts on “permanent ignore,” when they’re put on a weblog, not sent in a stand-alone e-mail to you?
    4. When you have had a “real job and a wife and family, and a nice home and car he worked for?”
    5. Why should Ruslan Amirkhanov “go away?” Are you the webmaster of this site?
    6. How do you propose to enforce that demand?
    7. Do you seriously expect anybody to obey your demands at this point? You have already stated that we are “crazy,” so why are you issuing them?
    8. If Ruslan is a “crazy person” and you “don’t read him,” why should it matter if he is here or not?
    9. On that line, why should it matter what he writes? Is he ruining your life?
    10. You have repeatedly stated that what appears on this web page “does not matter” and is “not important.” Why, then, are you so concerned with it?
    11. Do you believe that freedom of speech only applies to you?
    12. What legal or racial theory is that based on?
    13. How are you such an expert on the lifestyles of leftists?
    14. According to you leftists “all probably live in a college town in a crummy basement apartment, doing drugs, with no job, never even had a girlfriend. They’re probably all gay, unattractive, effeminate, overweight slobs. Basically deviants. So they get mad when the see a normal healthy man who has a job, looks good, is clean cut, and has a real job and a wife and family, and has a nice home and car he worked for. So these losers are all jealous.” If “leftists” are “deviants” in the first place, why would they be “jealous” of others?
    15. Leftists include Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, and John F. Kennedy. Were any of them “gay, unattractive, effeminate, overweight slobs?”
    16. Leftist war heroes include Theodore Roosevelt (Spanish-American War), Harry S. Truman (World War I and dropper of two atomic bombs), John F. Kennedy (World War II), George McGovern (World War II), Al Gore (Vietnam), and John Kerry (Vietnam). Were they “gay, unattractive, effeminate, overweight slobs?”
    17. What is the definition of a “normal, healthy man?”
    18. Why is having a “car he worked for” so critical to normality? What if you live in a major city where parking is a nightmare?
    19. As a Ph.D. and a university professor, you must work with colleagues who do not “look good,” or are necessarily “clean cut,” nor can afford a “car he worked for.” How do you get along with them?
    20. Does the term “projection” mean anything to you?
    21. You indicate intense anger at and obsession with leftists who have made a great deal of money and live well through their own energy and hard work. Is this because you still live in your parents’ basement and have never earned a penny in your entire life?
    22. You claim that I and the other regular posters here are deviants who live in “crummy basement apartments in college towns” who have never had jobs, wives, or girlfriends. Please give your research, sources, footnotes, and interviews that have enabled you to come up with such a detailed description of our lives, and explain to us who we are and what we are doing.
    23. You have asked us for our “10-year-resumes,” which I presume is part of that research. Since you are now defining us, please present those “resumes” for review.
    24. In one of your many incarnations, you have urged your opponents to do the following: “I urge both of you to focus your lives on real world issues that will improve your lives, such as getting a better paying job, joining the military, getting married, saving up to buy a home, or doing anything that will make a real man out of you.” Have you done any of the above?
    25. If you have joined the military, please list your service branch, medals, and campaigns.
    26. We notice that nowhere in your prescription for life to you include the concept of “community service.” Can you explain this?
    27. Please define “Community service.”
    28. Have you engaged in any acts of community service, e.g., serving in government, supporting charities, mentoring youth, participating in fundraisers for charities or awareness campaigns to address diseases, or even given blood?
    29. If so, please list all such incidents.
    30. You have also stated, “The posters on here are all a bunch of anti-white bigots and haters. They speak nothing but lies.” Why are you therefore continuing to engage “liars” in dialogue?
    31. Why are you so obsessed with the sexuality of leftists and whether or not they have girlfriends?
    32. You indicate that leftists are “gay.” Why would a gay person be “jealous” of someone with a “wife” of the opposite sex?
    33. Where did you gain you expertise in gay lifestyles?
    34. Why have you changed your sex in your names?
    35. You say that all leftists “live in college towns in crummy basement apartments, doing drugs, with no job.” By that logic, how do they pay the rent?
    36. You claim to have a Ph.D. and be a tenured professor. Where is that college and what do you teach, and what have you written for your dissertation?
    37. What do your colleagues and students think about your statement denouncing your “college town?”
    38. Does watching black women perform on music videos make someone an expert on black culture, or on the culture created by black musicians and white music promoters?
    39. Why, if you think that American blacks are not “your people,” are you so fascinated with black music videos?
    40. How does the behavior of black performers in music videos compare with the behavior of white performers in professional wrestling?
    41. Have you done any peer-reviewed or accredited term papers on the connection between music videos and the behavior of ordinary black and white people? If so, please provide the link.
    42. You are apparently well-informed on the sexual practices and movements of black women. What research have you undertaken in this field, and where can your reports be found?
    43. Did that research include sexual encounters with black women? If so, please list all of them, the types of encounters, positions used, the personal information about the involved persons, and whether or not these encounters were provided willingly or for hire.
    44. Did you practice “safe sex” during this research?
    45. How do you square these acts of miscegenation with Nazi racial laws that forbid such behavior?
    46. Have any of these encounters resulted in children? If so, are you supporting them?
    47. Does watching documentaries about remote African tribes make one an expert on African-American life?
    48. Are loud and pushy women in supermarkets a threat to America’s survival?
    49. Are loud and pushy black women in supermarkets a threat to America’s future?
    50. Are you being forced to marry or reproduce with loud and pushy black women?
    51. Why are you so obsessed with loud and pushy black women in supermarkets?
    52. Are these loud and pushy black women preventing you from shopping?
    53. Have you written a peer-reviewed academic paper on loud and pushy black women in supermarkets? If so, please provide the link.
    54. Does watching music videos featuring loud black women and seeing loud and pushy black women make you an expert on famine in the Ukraine in the 1930s?
    55. Are you sexually obsessed with loud and pushy black women?
    56. You indicate a fascination with loud and pushy black women. Do you find quiet and polite black women sexually attractive?
    57. Please list any and all black women that you find sexually attractive.
    58. In what field did you earn your Ph.D. and where can we find your dissertation?
    59. You claim that you answer all arguments with data. Please provide links to this data, and show that it has met academic standards. (As a Ph.D. with tenure at a university, you must know what those are)
    60. Tell us how the Russian people greeted their Nazi invaders with flowers, with proofs and citations.
    61. Tell us how Stalin intended to mate captured German civilians with monkeys to create a super-race, with proofs and citations. Your statement: “In the closing days of WWII the Soviet army was an entire army of rapists. Stalin had a secret agreement with Churchill and Roosevelt to take 4 million German civilians as slaves to Siberia to work in the Gulags — German women, old people teenagers, children. German babies were even taken for medical experiments. Stalin has a nightmarish dream of breeding humans with gorillas to create a super race of human/ape hybrids, which of course, failed. Read yourself in the Yalta agreement. It says the Soviets can take civilians as ‘labor in kind’ — meaning SLAVES!” Can you prove this with documentary evidence, such as examples of this “super race of human/ape hybrids?”
    62. Why would “human/ape hybrids” be a “super race?” Would they be superior to, say, the Aryan race?
    63. Please give your academic credentials in biology and anthropology in support of this statement.
    64. Tell us how Norman Rockwell sided with Hitler, with proofs and citations.
    65. Please give your academic credentials in art in support of this statement.
    66. Show us your proof that the white man is superior to the black man, with academic citations.
    67. You have also told us that you do not associate with neo-Nazis like Hal Turner, and so forth. Yet you have also said, on May 3rd, 2012 at 11:20 pm: “What’s wrong with being a neo-Nazi?” You have also said, “America is an evil country. While our brave young men were fighting in the East to stop the Asiatic hoards [sic], America bombed our civilians. There were no German soldiers left in the cities near the end of WWII. There were only babies, old people, young children, women. Yet the Americans bombed these civilians. During all this time our brave young men were fighting against Communism. America is an evil country. America fought on the side of evil during WWII. And evil won that war.” How can you rectify this hypocrisy?
    68. What do your colleagues and superiors at your university think about you being a neo-Nazi adherent?
    69. As an educator, how do you treat Jews and blacks in your classes?
    70. Have you received any complaints from them for your racism or anti-Semitism?
    71. In this post, you said the following: “#47 Comment By Jason Smith On May 7, 2012 @ 12:17 pm A.D.M., Ruslan, Erica, Reynadine, Aron, etc … You will have to start doing your own work. Read some books. If you want to hire me as a consultant , I might do it, for a consulting fee of say $500 dollars per hour. I might be willing to give a speech at one of your events but I would charge a fee. Minimum $10K plus travel expenses. But no, I’m not going to do anything for you for free. FYI: I do not read any of your responses. I never click on your links. I am not going to do any work for you or answer your questions for free. I don’t do that.” Does that mean you are only involved in neo-Nazism for personal gain?
    72. If you will not provide information, except for vast fees, how do you propose to gain adherents among the poor and disenfranchised?
    73. Isn’t demanding money for personal financial gain in exchange for proving your cause a tactic of the Jews and blacks that you despise?
    74. Why are you using tactics of the very people you detest?
    75. Doesn’t behaving like a Jew or a black make you a Jew or a black?
    76. When are you going to provide us with that e-mail address for our 10-year resumes?
    77. You have said, “Someday you’ll be on a talk show, flogging one of your novels, and you’ll complain, ‘I once debated this guy named Ezra on the Internet and he ignored all my posts, even though they were so clever’. Then you will burst out into tears on live TV.” Care to explain this in 1,000 words or less?
    78. Isn’t a statement like the above an example of using the evil leftist debate terms of “epithets, slurs, invective,” and therefore not becoming a white nationalist and neo-Nazi?
    79. You gave the following statement on the death of JT Ready: “#5 Comment By Jason Smith On May 3, 2012 @ 6:20 pm I do not believe this story. I believe it’s a setup! Note, the press release calls him the “apparent” shooter, and “The evidence to this point, which will still be verified …” So it’s not yet proven what happened. It may be a setup. It could be another hoax. It is far more likely this crime was committed by a gang of Communists and JT Ready was set up! Communist gangs operate all along the southern boarder smuggling drugs and illegal aliens. That’s a fact!” Can you provide proof that JT Ready was murdered by a Communist gang?
    80. You indicate that Communist gangs are smuggling drugs and illegal aliens. Since such activities are done for profit motives, in connection with powerful capitalist drug cartels, how do you reconcile this discrepancy?
    81. Do the profits from the drug trade finance Communist activities?
    82. At the same time, numerous members of the Aryan Brotherhood are heavily involved in the production and distribution of methamphetamine, an illegal substance, to the public and in prison systems. Are such activities in keeping with Nazi traditions of purity?
    83. How do you reconcile their activities as being different from those of Communist drug gangs?
    84. You have made the following statement: “#2 Comment By Annie On August 20, 2012 @ 1:15 pm There’s nothing wrong with being a racist. A racist is merely a person who recognizes the existence of other races, yet prefers the company of his own people. Just as gays began coming out of the closet, I say it’s time for white racists to do the same. I feel more comfortable around other white people. When I go to a restaurant, or shopping, the community where I chose to buy a home, etc … My racist views shape all my decisions, and I think that’s good. I encourage all white to become racists. When more of us come out of the closet can we find acceptance for people like us. The people who hate white racists will be forced to accept us and our beliefs. That will occur when millions of us come out of the closet. There are so many of us they won’t be able to stop us or do anything. Only when white racists are united and come out in groups will we be able to force complete acceptance of racism.” How do you reconcile this statement with the violent and often genocidal acts of fellow racists?
    85. There have already been examples of racist societies: the Confederacy, Nazi Germany, and the Aryan Nations compound in Idaho. They have all failed. If they are based on racial superiority to their enemies, why and how did they fail?
    86. You repeatedly ask us to defend or deny various statements and positions. However, you have also stated that you refuse to read anything we say. Why are you asking us questions about our positions if you do not read our answers?
    87. You have also stated that we are “Communist liars.” If we are liars, why are you asking us where we stand on any issue, since all we state are lies.
    88. You have repeatedly said that you can create a website with your own worldview. Why have you not done so?
    89. You have repeatedly given differing topics as being the “important question.” Can you indicate a set of principles, aka a “political platform,” to consistently give your positions?
    90. Since your positions, names, identities, and views are constantly changing, how can you say you have any core integrity?
    91. If we are all crazy people, why are you wasting valuable time here instead of making your own web page?

    You will be tested on this material. Please fill in all the information. If you fail to do so, the questions will be repeated until you have completed the assigned test. If you do not complete the assignment, you must withdraw from the class. See the bursar’s office.

    As you see, I do find you pretty hilarious.

    Still wondering why you’re here, if all we spout are “Communist lies” and you don’t read our stuff…when ARE you going to set up that web page with our resumes?

    I guess you don’t get out of that “crummy apartment in a small college town” much.

  • Kiwiwriter

    We must introduce James Waller to Bungalow Bud…see if the immovable object can defeat the irresistible force.

  • John

    Cella, bet you own a copy too :)

  • Eugene

    This is hilarious. You people actually think that whites are attacking blacks in the South —- and this is the norm. It’s not the opposite? This is so funny!

    The truth is that blacks are attacking whites on a daily basis. Many hundreds (sometimes thousands) of whites are attacked by blacks everyday. These stories just never get published.

    Read, “The Color of Crime Report.” This report takes data from the department of justice, which publishes crime statistics. It summarizes the following facts for inter-racial crime:

    1.) Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.

    2.) Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.

    3.) Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.

    4.) Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

  • adamhill


    Willfully ignoring basic, easily accessible facts about something as important as hate crimes makes you look ignorant. Expressing opinions in a public forum based on that ignorance makes you look ridiculous.

    “The SPLC is known for being one-sided”

    Really? Who “knows” this? And why?

    “There’s a lot more POC on White crime than the other way around”

    It’s not worth addressing whether this comment is true, because it is irrelevant. First, this site is not concerned with “crime”, but with “crime motivated by ethnic or racial bias”. Second, the proportion of which group is committing hate crimes against which group is not important to the overall issue of hate crimes, at least not in the “they hurt us more than we hurt them” crybaby sense you’re asserting.

  • John

    Also Kim, do you deny those stories on the site, if you did look at it that is? If so, tell us why..Denial? White Guilt?
    Or did you just ASSume these were all made up..
    White guilt ridden lefties are always good for a chuckle..

  • John

    Kim, did you even look at the site? Probably not…he has a point though, those crimes that are mentioned on that site wouldn’t be mentioned here..doesn’t have to be every incident but w/ the way the SPLC reports you’d think the country was full of angry whiteys wanting to kill or discriminate against every non white they see.

  • Claudia Garcia-McIntosh

    Maximum of only five years is not enough for a crime this heinous.

  • Sam Molloy

    James, who am I to doubt you? Post the next one here before it happens, though.

  • Reynardine

    Love crimes?……..

  • Kim

    Jeronimus, it’s quite obvious that you don’t actually read any of the information that the Southern Poverty Law Center puts out daily, concerning hate crimes. Your opinions and biases do not amount to facts.

  • Erika

    Mr. Waller, wait what???

  • Reynardine

    Jimmy jimmy jimmy take your meds.

  • James Waller

    GOD sent me there, a few months prior to this, to say that He is tired of racism and violence. I stood at the courthouse and Capitol with signs saying that Jesus is black, and that He is tired of racism and violence. Also, that there shall be great trials, tribulations, and devastation – like you have never seen; until I am heard to His satisfaction. Reference the aforesaid, I also told them that great storms were on the way. The night before the great tsunami hit Japan, and the subsequent tornado rampage in the United States, GOD had me post on facebook: Am I seeing great trials, tribulations, and devastation, like I prophesied. Subsequently, GOD sent me to Brandon, MS., the home of the perpetrators of this crime, to stand with the aforesaid sign. Recently, He had me prophesy, just prior to Sandy, that He was going to trouble the water. Subsequently, prior to the massacre in Connecticut, He had me tell Gov. Chris Christie that a great tragedy was about to occur, and weather phenomena was next. Him that hath an ear, let him hear.

  • Cella

    I can bet ya Glen beck owns me.

  • Jeronimus

    I wish the SPLC was as enthusiastic about the Love Crimes committed by people of color. There is forum of crime reporters reporting and discussing people of color on white crimes here:;f=211

    The SPLC is known for being one sided. Here’s a chance to report both sides. And the fact is, there is a lot more POC on White crime than the other way around. See