Forced assimilation is “The Warburg-Kalergi Plan” named after Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, the godfather of the European Union. Go to Wikipedia and look him up. Scroll down to the section of his “Views on Race and Religion.” The West is slated to become a global plantation worked by Egyptian colored consumer slaves all watched over by Jews of loving grace.

horrible!

As a lot of you know, we’ve developed a problem with the antagonistic nature of the comment threads on Hatewatch. As a result, and after talking to some of you, we’ve decided to try and restore some civility and sense of community.

From now on, we’re just not going to publish comments that include name-calling of any kind, no matter whose side of a particular issue you’re on. We’re not going to publish guttural expressions of racism, anti-Semitism, gay-bashing, misogyny and so on. We will publish white nationalist arguments, but only if they’re presented civilly and calmly, like the fellow from Stormfront who recently made an effort to politely argue with other commenters here. We will not publish bogus claims about certain groups’ alleged inferiority, and we won’t publish links to racist sites or sites that contain misleading or false statistics. Finally, we plan to stop publishing comments from a few posters who have become a real problem on our threads.

This is not an attempt to censor people’s thinking, but it is an effort to make Hatewatch more of a community of people discussing important issues. We don’t want it to degenerate yet another Internet shouting match.

Thanks for your understanding. We appreciate your contributions to the blog very much.

Mark Potok

rey is right, you are like totally a weasel.who won’t give a straight answer to anything.

Who ever said that women work outside the home just so they can support a lazy husband? Because it certainly wasn’t any of us!

Erika, you don’t believe me because your silly beliefs that you cling to blind you to the real world outside of your own ideological framework.

A woman being allowed to work in order SUPPORT HER HUSBAND’S LAZY ASS . . . haha, umm, Erika, you are deranged and your eyes are obviously blind to the world of working- and middle-class families. Take a Midol, a few other meds, and try to type a comment that isn’t a juvenile diatribe.

Small wonder why no women are interested.

And a word of advice brockie baby, considering that even intelligent English majors are basically unemployable you had better let your mail order bride work outside of the house because otherwise you will starve to death

brock, the fact that you term it as the man “allowing” the woman to work speaks volumes. i’m sure that the man will also allow the woman to do all of the cooking and housework and then force his wife to have sex when she is too tired after working all day to support his lazy ass and still having to do the housework.

Hmmm, you know what I just figured out? It IS possible for a household to be run by a father and husband who IS entrusted with all authority over the family, and also DOES allow the wife and mother to have a job outside the home.

Ron Paul doesn’t call himself a libertarian anymore, so far as I know.

The “wrongheaded” criticism does have an actual point to it, so I’ll check it out, but as for the next two . . . oh yeah, they DON’T. They simply restate my own opinions, and that of Gutzman, and emptily imply that said opinions are those of the Devil himself. Now let me guess, before I click on that link, who a person like you trusts as a reasonable and acceptable “conservative” – David Frum? David Brooks? Rush Limbaugh?

“I am FOR the traditional Christian family structure, featuring nearly-absolute male authority, sex for procreation only, many children”

If you somehow think that your above stated view allows for women working outside of the home you are even more foolish than i had thought.

Now if you want to argue that he is not really a libertarian (and there would be strong evidence including his opposition to the incorporation of the Bill of Rights to apply to the states and general opposition to individual liberty – real libertarians since they are strongly in favor of individual liberties are in favor of incorporation of the Bill of Rights since it favors individual liberty) you can. i’d even agree with you, because a real libertarian supports personal liberty and your guy doesn’t. But since he calls himself a libertarian i’ll let him.

As far as whether he is a source you should take seriously, check out this harsh review of one of his books from a conservative group:

http://www.claremont.org/publi.....detail.asp

or just look at the key points (and remember this is coming from a right winger reviewing the book for a right wing group):

“But alas, the first two-thirds of this book [covering the Constitutional convention through the Civil War] are wrongheaded, tendentious, and bizarre”

“Readers can be excused for suspecting that he does not actually like the Constitution very much.”

and the conclusion: “Gutzman is a neo-Confederate who resents the course our history has taken since the first day of the Philadelphia Convention.”

So yes honey, your views are completely outside of the mainstream based upon a guy who even conservatives consider “wrongheaded,” “bizarre,” and a “neo-Confederate” as your sole source for everything about U.S. history and law.

Tut tut, Brockie. Some you’re not an English major: you’re a Pidgen English major.

Erika, this guy is too scattered to be even a malignant narcissist. A grandiose paranoid schiz is nothing that can be dealt with in a forum like this one. I am asking the Hays Office to put a stop to this charade now. I’m serious.

That’s it? That constitutes your rebuttal?

Well, why not? In the imaginary nation of Brockistan these people wield considerable influence. In the Real World that the rest of us live in, not so much.

I don’t think Gutzman is a libertarian. And while I don’t know everything about libertarianism since I am not one, I don’t think they’re against all government to begin with. Sounds more like anarchism, which he definitely does not subscribe to. Anti-Federalist or Republican in the mold of Patrick Henry or Thomas Jefferson is a better description of Gutzman. I can see that you are desperate to create a strawman version of him to beat, and really wish to marginalize him because you feel threatened by his views.

And I was answering Gregory’s question about women who simply agree with my views, not women who are tenured professors, Aron and Erika. Last but not least, Erika, please tell me where and when I said that women should always stay at home and never have jobs.