The Hatewatch blog is managed by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center, an Alabama-based civil rights organization.

Major White Nationalist Conference Opens in Tennessee Tonight

By Hatewatch Staff on April 5, 2013 - 1:19 pm, Posted in Anti-Black, White Nationalism

Jared Taylor, the man behind the racist American Renaissance journal that is at the heart of the white nationalist movement, kicks off his latest annual conference tonight at Montgomery Bell State Park, just outside Nashville, Tenn. This is the second year the event has been held at the park, after several attempts to hold the event at hotels were thwarted by protesters and the occasional bomb threat.

The theme of this year’s conference, which ends on Sunday, is “A Recommitment to Our People.” The lineup of speakers encompasses a wide range of college professors, a European white nationalist, a Holocaust-denying attorney, and various other white nationalist columnists and bloggers.

Returning presenters include Roger McGrath, a professor at Cal State Northridge and Pepperdine University, and Sam Dickson, a Holocaust denier and former Klan attorney who has closed every meeting since the conferences began. New presenters include John Derbyshire, who was fired from the National Review for his racist rants; RamZPaul, who produces videos on YouTube that rail against blacks, Muslims, and gays; and Fabrice Robert, president of the Bloc Identitaire, a French nationalist movement.

One of the more unusual presenters, RamZPaul describes himself as “a sometimes sober guy with a camera who creates videos on YouTube.“ His Internet program has been described as “Pop Culture Meets Nationalism.” In recent blog posts on his site, he has addressed issues like feminism, homosexuality, gay marriage, transgendered people, and anti-white racism. RamZPaul’s topic at the American Renaissance conference will be “Sex and Nationalism.”

Though few in number, Jewish academic racists have been active in American Renaissance right from the start, welcomed by that group’s leader, Jared Taylor, who even once arranged for kosher meals. But Taylor has also welcomed as speakers outspoken anti-Semites, including Holocaust denier Sam Dickson and neo-Nazi activist Steven Barry, making for a potentially volatile situation. In 2006, at one of the most memorable American Renaissance conferences ever, that volatile situation exploded with the arrival of former Klan chieftain David Duke.

At that event, Duke made a scene when he attacked Jews publicly. “There is the power in the world that dominates our media, influences our government and that has led to the internal destruction of our will and spirit,” he said, enraging Jewish attendees. One Jewish astrophysicist, Michael Hart, yelled back, “You fucking Nazi, you’ve disgraced this meeting!” and stormed out. As many as 50 people then began to jeer and point at the rapidly disappearing Hart. The following year, Hart held his own white nationalist conference in Baltimore.

In a statement on his website this year, Duke said he wouldn’t be coming this time. “A number of people have written me and asked me if I am attending the Amren [sic] conference this year,” he wrote. “I won’t be attending. Jared has requested over the last few years that I don’t attend because I am deemed too controversial for the conference. So please know that if I could attend I would, but I certainly respect the wishes Jared Taylor and the others who work hard to put on the conference.”

Another previous attendee has been Don Black, who runs the white nationalist website, Stormfront. Black has attended the conference in the past, but hasn’t been seen lately, apparently due to health problems.

Also on the schedule is a tribute to Arthur Jensen and Phillipe Rushton, described as “two great scientists who died during 2012.” Jensen has long focused on alleged differences in intelligence among the races, and Rushton once described African blacks as “borderline retarded.”

  • Erika

    Sam, hypocritical self serving claims from Fox News (which is in fact the absolute worse offender when it comes to making local stories about pretty white girls and women into national stories with round the clock ad nausium coverage) do not constitute facts.

    The fact that you fail to see that the Zimmerman case got lots of coverage precisely because raised important social and political issues connected with the so called “Stand at Ground” (or “Kill at Will” if you prefer) laws. All those missing white women stories or stories of pretty white women or girls being raped and murdered are no doubt tragic for the victims and their families and friends. But so is every other case where a person is kidnapped or murdered. Those cases do not receive wall to wall national coverage unless the victim is a pretty white girl or a pretty white woman. And if the victim is an adult, there has to be sexual overtones (especially of the “black brute” or the new boogeyman of “registered sex offender” variety) and some available pictures of the victim wearing a bikini.

  • Erika

    Sam, only because there were no missing white women to receive round the clock coverage at the time. A case which raises some real serious issues regarding the influence of shadowy right wing groups on laws at the state level possibly giving people a free pass to commit murder didn’t receive nearly as much coverage as say Natalie Holloway (which didn’t even take place in the U.S.) to cite only one example. What serious issues were involved there?

  • Sam Molloy

    Clever alliteration and writing profuse diatribes do not erase facts.

  • aadila

    “1. Correlation does not equal causation. ”

    Thanks, Ruslan. It can never be said enough. Because without this frame of reference it would be certainly difficult to address the fact that white males are the most common predators against children in the U.S. So John, what should we ASSume about you?

  • John

    Ruslan, I never said I get my info from AM Talk radio, movies or tv..I don’t even watch tv save for that episode on Gandhi that I saw, which was at a friend’s house…Remember what happens when you ASSume…and based off your silly assumptions, whatever logic you try to use to refute others will now be suspect…and you were doing so well there……..

  • John

    Ruslan, you continue to cite paper statistics and I’ll stay in the real world..deal?

  • Reynardine

    Sam, if you don’t quit swallowing all the confetti from right-wing paper shredders and ralphing it up undigested on this blog, you are going to develop serious gastrointestinal damage

  • Sam Molloy

    Erika, the Zimmerman case was reported hourly ad nauseum for weeks until it was discovered he was Hispanic, then it faded from the stage. Nobody here can tell me who D’Marquise Elkin is because he recieved the bare minimum of coverage for shooting a baby in the face. Both were isolated incidents, with Police of every color working to solve them. The media is transparently guilty of spin, tilt, and choosing coverage that reinforces their preconcieved agendas.

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    “Ruslan, I had put up a post detailing black on white crime for all of you in the peanut gallery to see but apparently Mr. Potok thought it was too harsh..truth hurts I guess..”

    I’ve seen all these specially tailored “statistics” on black crime such as The Color of Crime and I’ve also seen the evidence which easily debunks them.

    90-95% of crime is INTRA-racial, i.e. white on white, black on black, etc. In fact most victims of violent crime know the perpetrators. Factor in the obvious point that whites far outnumber blacks in the US and this explains a lot. More importantly, it shows several other points:

    1. The overwhelming majority of black Americans, including any you meet, are highly unlikely to be criminals of any kind, much less violent criminals.

    2. Trying to avoid becoming a victim by surrounding yourself with white people is a strategy for failure.

    “Also, I never said Obama was to blame, clearly you don’t read my posts thoroughly..As far as why would anyone get that idea? Oh man, you’re not that much of a simpleton, are you?..”

    You implied that the election of Obama might be taken as a signal to some black people that it’s okay to attack whites, for some bizarre reason. Just because you don’t blame him for being behind this doesn’t mean your idea was any less idiotic.

    “Let’s say you belong to a class of people, some of whom have been told all evil springs from the white man-and don’t tell me they don’t have people like that…”

    Some of whom? How many of them are there? And when you say don’t tell me they don’t have people like that it’s interesting that you hold this belief yet you can’t readily name a few of those people.

    “Naturally all that anger and rage over a perceived and an imaginary injustice builds up in an individual..Especially the “thug hoodrats”…

    Yes I’m sure the “thug hoodrats” spend a lot of time listening to lectures on history and politics. The very fact that you write something this profoundly ignorant tells me you really have absolutely no idea what is going on in “the hood.” The people there who really are gangbangers couldn’t care less about injustice; they care about product, and surviving, that’s all.

    Also you keep talking about “perceived injustice”, as though there was no injustice at all for black Americans. Is that what you’re claiming? Because if so it basically flies in the face of all kinds of historical and recent sociological research.

    “Now, you see one of your own elected( trust me, they look past him being “mixed”) so of course you’re gonna feel more bold in your actions..”

    But you look past him being mixed too. You call him one of THEIR own. Moreover, if a man who looked exactly like Barack Obama were to mug you on the street, I highly doubt you would be telling the police how he looked “half-white.”

    “not to mention learning a bit about the “hate crime” laws which rarely favor white victims..”

    Hate crime laws increase penalties when the motive of the crime is determined to be hatred towards the victim’s perceived(not necessarily actual) race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, etc. They don’t favor anyone.

    “If no one can see that this is a very probable train of thought for a number of black people, then all of you on here, with a few exceptions are either being deliberately obtuse or it just comes natural”

    Alright, now that your little thought experiment is done, I’m going to drop some serious knowledge on you here.

    I’m judging you to be a middle-class person, anywhere from late 20s to middle-aged, and probably relatively “successful” by American standards. You probably live in the suburbs and while you’ll rant and rave to the contrary, you have extremely limited first-hand knowledge about black communities. Don’t deny it; you’ve already told me that by what you wrote. The ideas which you have expressed come direct from AM talk radio, movies, and TV.

    You are probably college educated and I suspect you have some white collar job, possibly a homeowner. You are truly a picture of middle class “success” in the USA.

    Yet despite all of this, the little scenario you asked us to imagine is nothing but a wreck between two trains loaded with ignorance and stupidity. Your explanation betrays a total lack of basic critical thinking and reasoning skills. What that means is despite your house, your nice car, and your college degree, you are still left with the reasoning skills of a teenager, at best. Doesn’t it burn to know that you can’t buy critical thinking skills, that you can’t just get them like you do everything else in life? Your theory is so shot full of logical fallacies it leaves nowhere to begin. In fact your scenario could be labeled as “not even wrong,” meaning that it would need considerable improvement just to achieve the status of “incorrect.”

    Now I know you’re going to stamp your feet and scream, “WAT ABOUT MUH STATISTICS!” Look, we already know what you’re going to post, or I should say what you meant to post. There are several problems with trying to make a statistical argument here.

    1. Correlation does not equal causation. No scientific studies shows how any crime actually committed by a black individual was actually caused by the possession of the same genetic features which make him appear “black.”

    2. Typically, when controlling for income and population density in US crime statistics, rates tend to equalize.

    3. Eastern Europe was a very homogeneous “white” region of the world which was virtually crime free for about 40 years. Suddenly their economic systems were destroyed and guess what happened- an explosion of crime of every sort. This would suggest that skin color and ethnicity isn’t the determining factor here.

    The sad thing is that you have obviously bought into the idea of the American meritocracy, so appealing to types like you. In this time of economic crisis, you might one day find the screws tightening on you, if you haven’t already. What will you do when that happens? Remember what they told you all your life- Those people on welfare in the ghetto were lazy; they didn’t follow the rules and they got what they deserved. But you, you follow the rules. You do what you’re told and you work hard. What will you say if everything in your life goes belly up?

    I suggest instead of pointing a finger at black people you take a serious inventory of your life, John.

  • John

    ..and furthermore, I don’t frequent “racist” sites…If I’m gonna frequent a website, it’s gonna be one w/ scantily clad females..

  • John

    Erika, I know very well how the media works, thank you

  • John

    CM, I had posted a rebuttal to you but apparently it was removed for fear of hurting your feelings..

  • John

    Ruslan, I had put up a post detailing black on white crime for all of you in the peanut gallery to see but apparently Mr. Potok thought it was too harsh..truth hurts I guess..

    Also, I never said Obama was to blame, clearly you don’t read my posts thoroughly..As far as why would anyone get that idea? Oh man, you’re not that much of a simpleton, are you?..

    Let’s say you belong to a class of people, some of whom have been told all evil springs from the white man-and don’t tell me they don’t have people like that…Naturally all that anger and rage over a perceived and an imaginary injustice builds up in an individual..Especially the “thug hoodrats”…

    Now, you see one of your own elected( trust me, they look past him being “mixed”) so of course you’re gonna feel more bold in your actions..not to mention learning a bit about the “hate crime” laws which rarely favor white victims..

    If no one can see that this is a very probable train of thought for a number of black people, then all of you on here, with a few exceptions are either being deliberately obtuse or it just comes natural

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    “there’s no denying said attacks on whites are deliberate….”

    Attacks tend to be deliberate(unless we’re speaking in military terms where that has a specific meaning).

    “.However, is it lost on people that there are a percentage of blacks who feel they can get away w/such attacks on whites w/ impunity b/c they feel emboldened by Obama? ”

    Yeah this IS lost on me because I don’t remember hearing anything about Obama announcing an “attack whites and get away with it bill.” Why would anyone get that idea, seeing Obama elected president? Black youth in bad neighborhoods are used to getting hassled by the cops for literally no reason many times, so why would the same people suddenly think that it’s time to assault white people with impunity?

  • Erika

    John, you really believe that black on white crimes get very little attention? You obviously must not watch the news at all.

    In fact, the crimes which get the most attention are crimes where the victim is a pretty white youn woman or a pretty white girl – especially crimes involving rape. if i would get raped and murdered (especially by a black man) it would be all over the news because i am young, pretty, and white. you are incredibly naive and ignorant of the American media if you think that would not happen. Crimes of black men victimizing white women sexually are disportionately reported even by the so called liberal mainstream media.

  • CM

    “… while it might not be a ‘deliberate plan of ethnic cleansing’ as Edouard puts it, there’s no denying said attacks on whites are deliberate….As far as who is behind it, well no one is..”

    What “attacks on whites” are you referring to, specifically? Note: The legends posted on Stormfront and VNN don’t count as evidence. And since these “attacks” are basically imaginary, there’s no point in denying that they’re deliberate, and yes, “no one” is behind them, because they aren’t real.

    But I know I’m wasting my time pointing this out to you, because you and Edward/Edouard are in fact Zero, or Lon Chaney as Kiwiwriter likes to call you, or JasonAnnieEzraEugene et al. as we’ve come to know you. And you’ve continued your unbroken record of having never said one true thing here.

  • John

    CM, while it might not be a “deliberate plan of ethnic cleansing” as Edouard puts it, there’s no denying said attacks on whites are deliberate….As far as who is behind it, well no one is..However, is it lost on people that there are a percentage of blacks who feel they can get away w/such attacks on whites w/ impunity b/c they feel emboldened by Obama? and before you get your panties twisted, in no way am i saying Obama is responsible..

    Couple that w/ the fact that black on white crimes get very little media attention and if you think black on white crimes are a farce, do some research on a non-nationalist or non-political site and you and the others on here might learn something

  • Kiwiwriter

    Well, Edward: I have your test for you:

    Here’s your test, Lon Chaney!
    We’ll start with a reading comprehension section, followed by questions that require answers!

    “#3 Comment By Edward On April 4, 2013 @ 7:21 pm
    The answer is very simple. In our movement we have changed the very definitions of Logic itself. Anything that supports the revolution is logical. Anything opposed, by definition, is illogical. After the revolution we will hire thousands of new Historians to write new History books. In these new books we will be portrayed as good, moral, and ethical. Our enemies will be portrayed as immoral, unethical, and evil. And that will fix the problem. One thousand years from now, in the history books, white patriots will be portrayed as heroes. Our enemies, portrayed as devils. Thus, the problem will be fixed.”
    1. How will you build a new society that is based on lies and deceit, and expect it to gain support?
    2. How can your movement “change the very definitions of logic?”
    3. “Anything that supports the revolution is logical.” But does that mean that anything that supports the revolution is true?
    4. Does that include statements in support of the revolution that are demonstrably and proven to be false?
    5. “Anything opposed, by definition is illogical.” Does that include statements opposed to the revolution that are absolutely true?
    6. How will you build a new society that is based on lies and deceit, and expect it to gain support?
    7. Are you thus admitting that your cause is entirely based on lies and deceits?
    8. How will your society, based on lies and deceit, deal with situations in which physical laws and harsh realities do not “support the revolution?”
    9. How will you re-adjust facts in those situations to “support the revolution?”
    10. “After the revolution we will hire thousands of new Historians to write new History books.” Where will you find these historians?
    11. What will you do with the old historians?
    12. What will you do with the old history books?
    13. “In these new books we will be portrayed as good, moral, and ethical.” But will they be true?
    14. How will you re-adjust documented facts and truth to be utter falsehoods to support these “new books?”
    15. What will you do when these new books are shown to be lies and fiction?
    16. “Our enemies will be portrayed as immoral, unethical, and evil.” What will you do about the fact that they are neither?
    17. “One thousand years from now, white patriots will be portrayed as heroes. Our enemies, portrayed as devils.” And what will you do about the fact that your version is history is an utter lie?
    18. “Thus, the problem will be fixed.” What, precisely, is the problem with the truth?
    19. Are you admitting that you have absolutely no regard whatsoever for the truth, only for your hatred of blacks and Jews?
    20. If you’re here to “debate leftists,” why are you ignoring their responses?
    21. If you don’t read “their posts anymore,” why are you here?
    22. How can you have their posts on “permanent ignore,” when they’re put on a weblog, not sent in a stand-alone e-mail to you?
    23. When you have had a “real job and a wife and family, and a nice home and car he worked for?”
    24. Why should Ruslan Amirkhanov “go away?” Are you the webmaster of this site?
    25. How do you propose to enforce that demand?
    26. Do you seriously expect anybody to obey your demands at this point? You have already stated that we are “crazy,” so why are you issuing them?
    27. If Ruslan is a “crazy person” and you “don’t read him,” why should it matter if he is here or not?
    28. On that line, why should it matter what he writes? Is he ruining your life?
    29. You have repeatedly stated that what appears on this web page “does not matter” and is “not important.” Why, then, are you so concerned with it?
    30. Do you believe that freedom of speech only applies to you?
    31. What legal or racial theory is that based on?
    32. How are you such an expert on the lifestyles of leftists?
    33. According to you leftists “all probably live in a college town in a crummy basement apartment, doing drugs, with no job, never even had a girlfriend. They’re probably all gay, unattractive, effeminate, overweight slobs. Basically deviants. So they get mad when they see a normal healthy man who has a job, looks good, is clean cut, and has a real job and a wife and family, and has a nice home and car he worked for. So these losers are all jealous.” If “leftists” are “deviants” in the first place, why would they be “jealous” of others?
    34. Leftists include Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, and John F. Kennedy. Were any of them “gay, unattractive, effeminate, overweight slobs?”
    35. Leftist war heroes include Theodore Roosevelt (Spanish-American War), Harry S. Truman (World War I and dropper of two atomic bombs), John F. Kennedy (World War II), George McGovern (World War II), Al Gore (Vietnam), and John Kerry (Vietnam). Were they “gay, unattractive, effeminate, overweight slobs?”
    36. What is the definition of a “normal, healthy man?”
    37. Why is having a “car he worked for” so critical to normality?
    38. What if you live in a major city where parking is a nightmare?
    39. As a Ph.D. and a university professor, you must work with colleagues who do not “look good,” or are necessarily “clean cut,” nor can afford a “car he worked for.” How do you get along with them?
    40. Does the term “projection” mean anything to you?
    41. You indicate intense anger at and obsession with leftists who have made a great deal of money and live well through their own energy and hard work. Is this because you still live in your parents’ basement and have never earned a penny in your entire life?
    42. You claim that I and the other regular posters here are deviants who live in “crummy basement apartments in college towns” who have never had jobs, wives, or girlfriends. Please give your research, sources, footnotes, and interviews that have enabled you to come up with such a detailed description of our lives, and explain to us who we are and what we are doing.
    43. You have asked us for our “10-year-resumes,” which I presume is part of that research. Since you are now defining us, please present those “resumes” for review.
    44. In one of your many incarnations, you have urged your opponents to do the following: “I urge both of you to focus your lives on real world issues that will improve your lives, such as getting a better paying job, joining the military, getting married, saving up to buy a home, or doing anything that will make a real man out of you.” Have you done any of the above?
    45. If you have joined the military, please list your service branch, medals, and campaigns.
    46. We notice that nowhere in your prescription for life to you include the concept of “community service.” Can you explain this?
    47. Please define “Community service.”
    48. Have you engaged in any acts of community service, e.g., serving in government, supporting charities, mentoring youth, participating in fundraisers for charities or awareness campaigns to address diseases, or even given blood?
    49. If so, please list all such incidents.
    50. You have also stated, “The posters on here are all a bunch of anti-white bigots and haters. They speak nothing but lies.” Why are you therefore continuing to engage “liars” in dialogue?
    51. Why are you so obsessed with the sexuality of leftists and whether or not they have girlfriends?
    52. You indicate that leftists are “gay.” Why would a gay person be “jealous” of someone with a “wife” of the opposite sex?
    53. Where did you gain you expertise in gay lifestyles?
    54. Why have you changed your sex in your names?
    55. You say that all leftists “live in college towns in crummy basement apartments, doing drugs, with no job.” By that logic, how do they pay the rent?
    56. You claim to have a Ph.D. and be a tenured professor. Where is that college and what do you teach, and what have you written for your dissertation?
    57. What do your colleagues and students think about your statement denouncing your “college town?”
    58. Does watching black women perform on music videos make someone an expert on black culture, or on the culture created by black musicians and white music promoters?
    59. Why, if you think that American blacks are not “your people,” are you so fascinated with black music videos?
    60. How does the behavior of black performers in music videos compare with the behavior of white performers in professional wrestling?
    61. Have you done any peer-reviewed or accredited term papers on the connection between music videos and the behavior of ordinary black and white people? If so, please provide the link.
    62. You are apparently well-informed on the sexual practices and movements of black women. What research have you undertaken in this field, and where can your reports be found?
    63. Did that research include sexual encounters with black women? If so, please list all of them, the types of encounters, positions used, the personal information about the involved persons, and whether or not these encounters were provided willingly or for hire.
    64. Did you practice “safe sex” during this research?
    65. How do you square these acts of miscegenation with Nazi racial laws that forbid such behavior?
    66. Have any of these encounters resulted in children? If so, are you supporting them?
    67. Does watching documentaries about remote African tribes make one an expert on African-American life?
    68. Are loud and pushy women in supermarkets a threat to America’s survival?
    69. Are loud and pushy black women in supermarkets a threat to America’s future?
    70. Are you being forced to marry or reproduce with loud and pushy black women?
    71. Why are you so obsessed with loud and pushy black women in supermarkets?
    72. Are these loud and pushy black women preventing you from shopping?
    73. Have you written a peer-reviewed academic paper on loud and pushy black women in supermarkets? If so, please provide the link.
    74. Does watching music videos featuring loud black women and seeing loud and pushy black women make you an expert on famine in the Ukraine in the 1930s?
    75. Are you sexually obsessed with loud and pushy black women?
    76. You indicate a fascination with loud and pushy black women. Do you find quiet and polite black women sexually attractive?
    77. Please list any and all black women that you find sexually attractive.
    78. In what field did you earn your Ph.D. and where can we find your dissertation?
    79. You claim that you answer all arguments with data. Please provide links to this data, and show that it has met academic standards. (As a Ph.D. with tenure at a university, you must know what those are)
    80. Tell us how the Russian people greeted their Nazi invaders with flowers, with proofs and citations.
    81. Tell us how Stalin intended to mate captured German civilians with monkeys to create a super-race, with proofs and citations. Your statement: “In the closing days of WWII the Soviet army was an entire army of rapists. Stalin had a secret agreement with Churchill and Roosevelt to take 4 million German civilians as slaves to Siberia to work in the Gulags — German women, old people teenagers, children. German babies were even taken for medical experiments. Stalin has a nightmarish dream of breeding humans with gorillas to create a super race of human/ape hybrids, which of course, failed. Read yourself in the Yalta agreement. It says the Soviets can take civilians as ‘labor in kind’ — meaning SLAVES!” Can you prove this with documentary evidence, such as examples of this “super race of human/ape hybrids?”
    82. Why would “human/ape hybrids” be a “super race?” Would they be superior to, say, the Aryan race?
    83. Please give your academic credentials in biology and anthropology in support of this statement.
    84. Tell us how Norman Rockwell sided with Hitler, with proofs and citations.
    85. Please give your academic credentials in art in support of this statement.
    86. Show us your proof that the white man is superior to the black man, with academic citations.
    87. You have also told us that you do not associate with neo-Nazis like Hal Turner, and so forth. Yet you have also said, on May 3rd, 2012 at 11:20 pm: “What’s wrong with being a neo-Nazi?” You have also said, “America is an evil country. While our brave young men were fighting in the East to stop the Asiatic hoards [sic], America bombed our civilians. There were no German soldiers left in the cities near the end of WWII. There were only babies, old people, young children, women. Yet the Americans bombed these civilians. During all this time our brave young men were fighting against Communism. America is an evil country. America fought on the side of evil during WWII. And evil won that war.” How can you rectify this hypocrisy?
    88. Is “our country” Germany or the United States?
    89. To which country do you swear allegiance?
    90. What do your colleagues and superiors at your university think about you being a neo-Nazi adherent?
    91. As an educator, how do you treat Jews and blacks in your classes?
    92. Have you received any complaints from them for your racism or anti-Semitism?
    93. In this post, you said the following: “#47 Comment By Jason Smith On May 7, 2012 @ 12:17 pm A.D.M., Ruslan, Erica, Reynadine, Aron, etc … You will have to start doing your own work. Read some books. If you want to hire me as a consultant , I might do it, for a consulting fee of say $500 dollars per hour. I might be willing to give a speech at one of your events but I would charge a fee. Minimum $10K plus travel expenses. But no, I’m not going to do anything for you for free. FYI: I do not read any of your responses. I never click on your links. I am not going to do any work for you or answer your questions for free. I don’t do that.” Does that mean you are only involved in neo-Nazism for personal gain?
    94. If you will not provide information, except for vast fees, how do you propose to gain adherents among the poor and disenfranchised?
    95. Isn’t demanding money for personal financial gain in exchange for proving your cause a tactic of the Jews and blacks that you despise?
    96. Why are you using tactics of the very people you detest?
    97. Doesn’t behaving like a Jew or a black make you a Jew or a black?
    98. When are you going to provide us with that e-mail address for our 10-year resumes?
    99. You have said, “Someday you’ll be on a talk show, flogging one of your novels, and you’ll complain, ‘I once debated this guy named Ezra on the Internet and he ignored all my posts, even though they were so clever’. Then you will burst out into tears on live TV.” Care to explain this in 1,000 words or less?
    100. Isn’t a statement like the above an example of using the evil leftist debate terms of “epithets, slurs, invective,” and therefore not becoming a white nationalist and neo-Nazi?
    101. You gave the following statement on the death of JT Ready: “#5 Comment By Jason Smith On May 3, 2012 @ 6:20 pm I do not believe this story. I believe it’s a setup! Note, the press release calls him the “apparent” shooter, and “The evidence to this point, which will still be verified …” So it’s not yet proven what happened. It may be a setup. It could be another hoax. It is far more likely this crime was committed by a gang of Communists and JT Ready was set up! Communist gangs operate all along the southern boarder smuggling drugs and illegal aliens. That’s a fact!” Can you provide proof that JT Ready was murdered by a Communist gang?
    102. You indicate that Communist gangs are smuggling drugs and illegal aliens. Since such activities are done for profit motives, in connection with powerful capitalist drug cartels, how do you reconcile this discrepancy?
    103. Do the profits from the drug trade finance Communist activities?
    104. If so, can you provide documented evidence on how the Communist Party of the United States and similar organizations benefit from drug trade?
    105. At the same time, numerous members of the Aryan Brotherhood are heavily involved in the production and distribution of methamphetamine, an illegal substance, to the public and in prison systems. Are such activities in keeping with Nazi traditions of purity?
    106. How do you reconcile their activities as being different from those of Communist drug gangs?
    107. You have made the following statement: “#2 Comment By Annie On August 20, 2012 @ 1:15 pm There’s nothing wrong with being a racist. A racist is merely a person who recognizes the existence of other races, yet prefers the company of his own people. Just as gays began coming out of the closet, I say it’s time for white racists to do the same. I feel more comfortable around other white people. When I go to a restaurant, or shopping, the community where I chose to buy a home, etc … My racist views shape all my decisions, and I think that’s good. I encourage all white to become racists. When more of us come out of the closet can we find acceptance for people like us. The people who hate white racists will be forced to accept us and our beliefs. That will occur when millions of us come out of the closet. There are so many of us they won’t be able to stop us or do anything. Only when white racists are united and come out in groups will we be able to force complete acceptance of racism.” How do you reconcile this statement with the violent and often genocidal acts of fellow racists?
    108. There have already been examples of racist societies: the Confederacy, Nazi Germany, and the Aryan Nations compound in Idaho. They have all failed. If they are based on racial superiority to their enemies, why and how did they fail?
    109. You repeatedly ask us to defend or deny various statements and positions. However, you have also stated that you refuse to read anything we say. Why are you asking us questions about our positions if you do not read our answers?
    110. You have also stated that we are “Communist liars.” If we are liars, why are you asking us where we stand on any issue, since all we state are lies.
    111. You have repeatedly said that you can create a website with your own worldview. Why have you not done so?
    112. You have repeatedly given differing topics as being the “important question.” Can you indicate a set of principles, aka a “political platform,” to consistently give your positions?
    113. Since your positions, names, identities, and views are constantly changing, how can you say you have any core integrity?
    114. If we are all crazy people, why are you wasting valuable time here instead of making your own web page?

    You will be tested on this material. Please fill in all the information. If you fail to do so, the questions will be repeated until you have completed the assigned test. If you do not complete the assignment, you must withdraw from the class. See the bursar’s office.

  • Sam Molloy

    Edward, there is racism from Blacks, from asking every White they see for money to nasty comments to shoving us off the sidewalk to downright physical assaults. The media consistently downplays these incidents, if they are reported at all. However, the overwhelmingly vast majority of Blacks and Whites in Louisville and especially Lexington go out of their way to be polite and friendly to each other. Always support the right side and do that. Any idiot can escalate an argument.

  • CM

    Edouard said,
    on April 6th, 2013 at 3:07 pm

    “Racism is wrong. Racism is immoral. Racism is unethical. I am not a racist. I am an anti-racist. This is the very reason why I have become a pro-white advocate and white civil rights activist in the first place.”

    Well, your first three sentences are true, but the rest of your diatribe is not. You’re just selling the “racism lite” of your “Génération Identitaire,” which is all about trying to hide the inhumanity underlying all racism. The idea of “oppression and racism directed against white people” is the same kind of fantasy the Nazis whipped out to inflame people against the Jews. You’re dressing it up in the same kind of pseudo-reasonable language they used, and for the same purpose: to recruit polite bourgeois people who wouldn’t go near you if you wore a brown shirt or a robe with a pointed hood.

    “Inter-racial crime statistics reveal just an inkling of the massive oppression of whites. Did you know that 40,000 white women are raped by blacks every year in America?”

    No, I didn’t know it – because it isn’t true. You’re simply parroting, like a gazillion posters on Stormfront, a fake number put out a few years ago by the slimy David Duke, who claimed that U.S Bureau of Justice Statistics showed in 2005 that 37,467 white women were raped by black men in America. However, the real BOJS numbers indicate that the *total* number of forcible rapes per year of women *of all races* is in the 37,000-38,000 range. Moreover, according to the bureau, “Victims of rape were about evenly divided between whites and blacks; in about 88% of forcible rapes, the victim and offender were of the same race.” So your number (Duke’s number, that is) is a gross exaggeration, or as we say where I come from, a big fat lie.

    “Thousands of whites are being attacked by blacks everyday in America. This is part of a deliberate plan of ethnic cleansing and intimidation designed to drive whites out of our cities, that has been going on for decades.”

    And precisely who is behind this “deliberate plan”? Might it be the Elders of Zion? The Illuminati? The Reptilians? Don’t stop now, tell us everything.

  • Ruslan Amirkhanov

    “There are tons of examples of racism directed against white people. University admission quotas and minority business set-asides are just a few. Inter-racial crime statistics reveal just an inkling of the massive oppression of whites. ”

    If this were repression against white people, the majority of college students wouldn’t be white. There are number of set asides and special considerations(like legacy) which favor white candidates as well.

    “Did you know that 40,000 white women are raped by blacks every year in America? That means since 1965, 2 million white women have been raped by blacks in America. Do you know how many black women are raped by white men every year? The number is so low, it is statistically zero.”

    Did you know that the overwhelming majority of white women are raped by white men, and that women are most likely to be raped by someone they know, usually an intimate partner? Kind of throw a monkey wrench in your statistics there.

    “Thousands of whites are being attacked by blacks everyday in America. This is part of a deliberate plan of ethnic cleansing and intimidation designed to drive whites out of our cities, that has been going on for decades.”

    Most crime, up to 95%, is intraracial. Like with rape, most murder victims know their attacker. That means that hanging out with white folks isn’t going to help you. The fact that you call this kind of crime “ethnic cleansing” proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that you don’t know what that term means. Maybe you should go to “white” BiH and talk to the locals. And while you’re at it, explain to all three groups about how they’re all just “white.” Promote some “white” brotherhood. Just make sure you get your affairs in order first.

  • Reynardine

    Bailey, won’t you please go home and learn how to read. I won’t even ask you to study the meaning of “truth”.

  • Bailey

    “There is the power in the world that dominates our media, influences our government and that has led to the internal destruction of our will and spirit,”.

    In this statement he mentions nothing about Jews.
    How do we know he is talking about Jews? Could it be the people running this article wants us to think that these people are bad but in reality have done nothing wrong and are only speaking the truth?

  • http://avengingredhand.wordpress.com The Avenging Red Hand

    You guys are hysterical.

    White nationalism: The biggest threat to the Cathedral since the ‘biggest Klan rally in history’ turned out less than 100 people.

    What’s so amusing is how you leftards promote the fiction that you haven’t completely won.

  • Sam Molloy

    Scott, this organization does a great sevice in pointing out groups like this. The mainstream media tends to ignore them, possibly to keep from giving them voice. The SPLC respects free speech enough to allow posts here of any point of view.

  • concernedcitizen

    Well Scott in order to understand why people follow groups that promote hate and violate the civil rights of others you would need to better understand the collection of intelligence. In this way we can help to identify, stop and hopefully interrupt actions of homegrown terrorists. And this group does not hinder freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is one thing but turning into acts of terrorism are another, and using a persons position of power to promote hatred is harmful especially in educational arenas.

    Hate is not merely freedom of speech.

  • concernedcitizen

    There is deep psychological damage that has taken place in this country against many minorities and it was always a shame when I knew of Jewish people who changed their names so they would be recognized as white in their professions. I understand why they did it, but it’s a shame that anyone should feel the need to deny their heritage because we have a group of people who oppress and promote such hate that it grows into self hate amongst people of many different ethnicity’s.

  • Edward

    Racism is wrong. Racism is immoral. Racism is unethical. I am not a racist. I am an anti-racist. This is the very reason why I have become a pro-white advocate and white civil rights activist in the first place.

    It is my belief there is massive racism against white people in America today. Whites are being oppressed and victimized, not only in America, but worldwide. I want to end this oppression and racism directed against white people.

    There are tons of examples of racism directed against white people. University admission quotas and minority business set-asides are just a few. Inter-racial crime statistics reveal just an inkling of the massive oppression of whites. Did you know that 40,000 white women are raped by blacks every year in America? That means since 1965, 2 million white women have been raped by blacks in America. Do you know how many black women are raped by white men every year? The number is so low, it is statistically zero.

    Thousands of whites are being attacked by blacks everyday in America. This is part of a deliberate plan of ethnic cleansing and intimidation designed to drive whites out of our cities, that has been going on for decades.

  • Aron

    Concerned:

    Hart is hardly better than Duke. The man is a white nationalist through and through. He just can’t reconcile the fact that the other WNs do not consider we Jews to be ‘white.’

  • concernedcitizen

    One Jewish astrophysicist, Michael Hart, yelled back, “You fucking Nazi, you’ve disgraced this meeting!” and stormed out. As many as 50 people then began to jeer and point at the rapidly disappearing Hart. The following year, Hart held his own white nationalist conference in Baltimore.

    Boy do I agree with this man!

    Good for him standing up.

  • concernedcitizen

    These people are sick and twisted and I agree no self-respecting Jew would ever be involved in something like this.

    But the powers in this world only defeat will when people give them power to do so. They haven’t defeated all will that is why there are still wars.

    As Americans we need to take a stand and put a stop to this hate and divide that Monsters like this would have run rampant through the minds of our community members. So it’s important to support the work of the SPLC and any organization that fights this sort of hate and collects intelligence to inform those who care to be educated on these issues.

    It’s also important for us to contact State Governors and University Presidents and pertinent personnel who may not even have a clue of the sort of monsters they have right under their noses and in their employ.

  • Scott S

    Why is this organization so against freedom of speech? I find it rather creepy how they essentially follow various “groups” that they see as a problem. Sounds extremely biased and un-American.

  • CM

    “There is the power in the world that dominates our media, influences our government and that has led to the internal destruction of our will and spirit.”

    Are you sure he wasn’t talking about Rupert Murdoch?

  • http://www.slowlyboiledfrog.com David Cary Hart

    First of all, I am not related to the Michael Hart cited in this piece – at least I hope not. As a Jew I could vomit. How on earth could any self-respecting Jew be among this crowd of avowed antisemites? It makes no more sense than, as a gay man, my attending the Values Voters Summit.

    Have any of you watched a RamZPaul video? Paul is a professional white victim. Let me put it this way; He makes Bachmann seem erudite by comparison.