<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religious Right Apoplectic Over Decision on Marriage Equality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/</link>
	<description>Hatewatch is a blog of the Southern Poverty Law Center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2606463</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 10:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2606463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[terri, okay - but if you are making a book recommendation, you only need to recommend it once :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>terri, okay &#8211; but if you are making a book recommendation, you only need to recommend it once :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2599767</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2599767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erika, this is not my book. I have read it quite a few times &amp; think the (true) story is one that needs to be told, that&#039;s all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erika, this is not my book. I have read it quite a few times &amp; think the (true) story is one that needs to be told, that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2599157</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 20:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2599157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terri, you wouldn&#039;t happen to be basically spamming the comments to sell your book would you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terri, you wouldn&#8217;t happen to be basically spamming the comments to sell your book would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2596670</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 02:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2596670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ericka, perhaps you would like to read a true story which captures that which you have referred to in your post. Please feel free to email richmondhistory@yahoo.com for information on how to obtain a copy of &quot;Deliver Us. . .a religious cult versus Richmond, New Hampshire.&quot;  This group has been an SPLC top 1000 hate group in America for some time now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ericka, perhaps you would like to read a true story which captures that which you have referred to in your post. Please feel free to email <a href="mailto:richmondhistory@yahoo.com">richmondhistory@yahoo.com</a> for information on how to obtain a copy of &#8220;Deliver Us. . .a religious cult versus Richmond, New Hampshire.&#8221;  This group has been an SPLC top 1000 hate group in America for some time now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2595804</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 21:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2595804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sam, don&#039;t be riduculous - that is as silly as saying that while feminists object to the Christian Right&#039;s attempts to make it illegal to use birth control, force women to have to wear &quot;modest&quot; dresses (because you know, if a man sees a woman wearing pants it will lead to inpure thoughts in his head), and prevent women from working outside of the home - you know, the same old women should be barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen cooking for her master (oopsie, husband) that feminists instead want to move to Saudi Arabia or Iran (although since women in Saudi Arabia are able to be educated and have jobs outside of hte homes even a strict Islamic state gives women more rights than the Christian fundamentalists want to provide).

The left opposes all religious fundamentalists - and more than anyone else understands that ultimately there is no difference between Christian Fundamentalists and Islamic Fundamentalists and for that matter Jewish Fundamentalists or Secular Fundamentalists - its not the religion which is the problem, it is the &quot;Fundamentalism&quot; - fundamentalists of all stripes want to impose their views into law generally on penalty of death for anyone who disagrees.

don&#039;t be naive Sam, if the Religious Right who comprise a very large percentage o th eRepublican voter base really got their way, homosexuality would be illegal and likely penalized by death - the Christian and Moslem Right both want to have astrict Old Testament style state including even stoning rebellious children to death (and i thought that being spanked and paddled for being a disobedient child was bad! - but speaking of corporal punishment remember that the Christian Righ parenting advice is that children as young as 2 should be spanked or even paddled to take away their &quot;willful disobedience&quot; - if they believe that 2 year olds are being willfully disobedient and should be spanked or even hit with a wooden paddle how old will a child have to be to be considered so willfully disobedient to be executed?  How many times will they attempt to correct the wilful disobedience of a child with a paddling before a child gets killed?  i am pretty sure under that system, i would have been killed before i reached the age of 10 - and quite possible long befoer i reached the age of 10).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, don&#8217;t be riduculous &#8211; that is as silly as saying that while feminists object to the Christian Right&#8217;s attempts to make it illegal to use birth control, force women to have to wear &#8220;modest&#8221; dresses (because you know, if a man sees a woman wearing pants it will lead to inpure thoughts in his head), and prevent women from working outside of the home &#8211; you know, the same old women should be barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen cooking for her master (oopsie, husband) that feminists instead want to move to Saudi Arabia or Iran (although since women in Saudi Arabia are able to be educated and have jobs outside of hte homes even a strict Islamic state gives women more rights than the Christian fundamentalists want to provide).</p>
<p>The left opposes all religious fundamentalists &#8211; and more than anyone else understands that ultimately there is no difference between Christian Fundamentalists and Islamic Fundamentalists and for that matter Jewish Fundamentalists or Secular Fundamentalists &#8211; its not the religion which is the problem, it is the &#8220;Fundamentalism&#8221; &#8211; fundamentalists of all stripes want to impose their views into law generally on penalty of death for anyone who disagrees.</p>
<p>don&#8217;t be naive Sam, if the Religious Right who comprise a very large percentage o th eRepublican voter base really got their way, homosexuality would be illegal and likely penalized by death &#8211; the Christian and Moslem Right both want to have astrict Old Testament style state including even stoning rebellious children to death (and i thought that being spanked and paddled for being a disobedient child was bad! &#8211; but speaking of corporal punishment remember that the Christian Righ parenting advice is that children as young as 2 should be spanked or even paddled to take away their &#8220;willful disobedience&#8221; &#8211; if they believe that 2 year olds are being willfully disobedient and should be spanked or even hit with a wooden paddle how old will a child have to be to be considered so willfully disobedient to be executed?  How many times will they attempt to correct the wilful disobedience of a child with a paddling before a child gets killed?  i am pretty sure under that system, i would have been killed before i reached the age of 10 &#8211; and quite possible long befoer i reached the age of 10).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2595176</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2595176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sam scrawls: &quot;Left wingers are against homophobic fundamentalists, unless they are Muslims&quot;

I&#039;m throwing the bullshit flag on this one, Sam.  Prove it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam scrawls: &#8220;Left wingers are against homophobic fundamentalists, unless they are Muslims&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m throwing the bullshit flag on this one, Sam.  Prove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Molloy</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2595123</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Molloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2595123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen,  so true. Our polarized society has many inconsistencies. Right wingers are unwelcoming to Christian immigrants with a good work ethic. Left wingers are against homophobic fundamentalists, unless they are Muslims. Both the SPLC and the NRA waste my donation money chasing cultural issues that have nothing whatsoever to do with their stated purpose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen,  so true. Our polarized society has many inconsistencies. Right wingers are unwelcoming to Christian immigrants with a good work ethic. Left wingers are against homophobic fundamentalists, unless they are Muslims. Both the SPLC and the NRA waste my donation money chasing cultural issues that have nothing whatsoever to do with their stated purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2595073</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2595073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I don&#039;t care who you marry, unless I get invited to the wedding.  Government should have no role in marriage, other than its equitable dissolution.  As a part of that, there should be no government financial &quot;benefit&quot; to being married that comes at the expense of anyone else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t care who you marry, unless I get invited to the wedding.  Government should have no role in marriage, other than its equitable dissolution.  As a part of that, there should be no government financial &#8220;benefit&#8221; to being married that comes at the expense of anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiwiwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2592775</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiwiwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2592775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The religious right is never happy with anything.

So I am more amused by their fury than annoyed with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The religious right is never happy with anything.</p>
<p>So I am more amused by their fury than annoyed with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concernedcitizen</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2590977</link>
		<dc:creator>concernedcitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 03:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2590977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Won’t be long before they outlaw the Bible as hate speech.”

This is so far from the truth because the stuff that comes out of these extremists mouths usually has very little to do with the Bibles and more to do with their illiterate interpretations of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Won’t be long before they outlaw the Bible as hate speech.”</p>
<p>This is so far from the truth because the stuff that comes out of these extremists mouths usually has very little to do with the Bibles and more to do with their illiterate interpretations of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2588819</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 14:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2588819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Modern Christians fear sharia law, but they want exactly the same except they want to use the bible instead of the koran. Fundamentalists are the same; they don&#039;t want Democracy, they would much prefer a Theocracy by which to govern the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Christians fear sharia law, but they want exactly the same except they want to use the bible instead of the koran. Fundamentalists are the same; they don&#8217;t want Democracy, they would much prefer a Theocracy by which to govern the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2586680</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2586680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Deliver Us. . .a religious cult versus Richmond, New Hampshire.&quot; Available at all 3 Toadstool stores in NH, Keene, Milford, Peterborough. Also available at Hannah Grimes Marketplace in Keene. Also available at Homestead Books in Marlborough, NH. Or by emailing richmondhistory@yahoo.com  The book retails for $14.95 with all proceeds going to the Richmond Historical Society. This is a well researched, well documented book about the Saint Benedict Center in Richmond, NH. The SBC always makes the top 1000 hate groups in America list!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Deliver Us. . .a religious cult versus Richmond, New Hampshire.&#8221; Available at all 3 Toadstool stores in NH, Keene, Milford, Peterborough. Also available at Hannah Grimes Marketplace in Keene. Also available at Homestead Books in Marlborough, NH. Or by emailing <a href="mailto:richmondhistory@yahoo.com">richmondhistory@yahoo.com</a>  The book retails for $14.95 with all proceeds going to the Richmond Historical Society. This is a well researched, well documented book about the Saint Benedict Center in Richmond, NH. The SBC always makes the top 1000 hate groups in America list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch Beales</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2585378</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch Beales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2585378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DSM 5 is out so Susan and others who fear scientific discussion among professionals can breathe a sigh of relief that &quot;pedophilia&quot; has not been removed although the name has been changed to &quot;pedophilic disorder&quot;.  I believe this is important because it recognizes that adult sexual attraction toward persons who have not yet reached puberty may not constitute mental illness.  Sexual advances toward such persons, on the other hand, constitute criminal behavior whether or not the perpetrator suffers from a diagnosable psychiatric disorder.  It seems to me there is a pattern among ALL men , regardless of their sexual orientation, to be attracted to younger partners.  Formalizing a committed relationship is likely to mitigate acting on that attraction among homosexual men just as it does among heterosexual men.  The concept that pedophilia (which is not necessarily a crime) or rape is &quot;a crime of power and domination, not sex&quot; befuddles me.  Access to sexual partners is an almost universal aspect of power and it seems to me the two are inextricably linked making such distinctions meaningless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DSM 5 is out so Susan and others who fear scientific discussion among professionals can breathe a sigh of relief that &#8220;pedophilia&#8221; has not been removed although the name has been changed to &#8220;pedophilic disorder&#8221;.  I believe this is important because it recognizes that adult sexual attraction toward persons who have not yet reached puberty may not constitute mental illness.  Sexual advances toward such persons, on the other hand, constitute criminal behavior whether or not the perpetrator suffers from a diagnosable psychiatric disorder.  It seems to me there is a pattern among ALL men , regardless of their sexual orientation, to be attracted to younger partners.  Formalizing a committed relationship is likely to mitigate acting on that attraction among homosexual men just as it does among heterosexual men.  The concept that pedophilia (which is not necessarily a crime) or rape is &#8220;a crime of power and domination, not sex&#8221; befuddles me.  Access to sexual partners is an almost universal aspect of power and it seems to me the two are inextricably linked making such distinctions meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2584816</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2584816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and of course, pedophilia is having sex with prepubscent children - it is most definitely not an accurate description for an adult no matter how old wanting to have sex with an 18 year old.  While it might be icky for a 45 year old to be chasing after teenagers it isn&#039;t close in extreme ickiness to people chasing after preschoolers.

and from the best evidence available, true pedophiles really do have a desire to have sex with very young children - that is why pedophiles are so dangerous and reviled .   now, it is likely true that some people who rape children are not pedophiles, in the majority of cases it does appear that the primary motivation is a desire to have sex with children.  

To try to say that pedophilia describes anything other than people targeting young children trivializes how horrific pedophilia reall is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and of course, pedophilia is having sex with prepubscent children &#8211; it is most definitely not an accurate description for an adult no matter how old wanting to have sex with an 18 year old.  While it might be icky for a 45 year old to be chasing after teenagers it isn&#8217;t close in extreme ickiness to people chasing after preschoolers.</p>
<p>and from the best evidence available, true pedophiles really do have a desire to have sex with very young children &#8211; that is why pedophiles are so dangerous and reviled .   now, it is likely true that some people who rape children are not pedophiles, in the majority of cases it does appear that the primary motivation is a desire to have sex with children.  </p>
<p>To try to say that pedophilia describes anything other than people targeting young children trivializes how horrific pedophilia reall is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2584786</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2584786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sam, you mean like how straight marriage has stopped straight men from attempting to have sex with many beautiful young women???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sam, you mean like how straight marriage has stopped straight men from attempting to have sex with many beautiful young women???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2584503</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2584503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now THIS is truly a walk back in time for me.. SAME people, they CALLED themselves something else back then, but the SAME group of Humans were telling the nation this SAME thing when the Courts ruled that STATES couldn&#039;t allow them to teach &quot;Equal but Different&quot; in our Schools.  Just to remind some of the younger among you, &quot;Equal but Different&quot; was the MAUFACTURED part of the Bible that justified the right of White American&#039;s to put Blacks in the Back of the Bus among other things.  It was also used to justify the Lynching of Blacks because they didn&#039;t stay in their Place.  The more things change the more some stay the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now THIS is truly a walk back in time for me.. SAME people, they CALLED themselves something else back then, but the SAME group of Humans were telling the nation this SAME thing when the Courts ruled that STATES couldn&#8217;t allow them to teach &#8220;Equal but Different&#8221; in our Schools.  Just to remind some of the younger among you, &#8220;Equal but Different&#8221; was the MAUFACTURED part of the Bible that justified the right of White American&#8217;s to put Blacks in the Back of the Bus among other things.  It was also used to justify the Lynching of Blacks because they didn&#8217;t stay in their Place.  The more things change the more some stay the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2584431</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2584431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, the funniest part of the freak out is that even if these Religious Right types were somehow being forced by the government to engage in a gay marriage it would be much worse for the unfortunate person assigned to be their gay spouse :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, the funniest part of the freak out is that even if these Religious Right types were somehow being forced by the government to engage in a gay marriage it would be much worse for the unfortunate person assigned to be their gay spouse :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Molloy</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2583381</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Molloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 04:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2583381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for that clarification, Rey. I know Pedophelia is a crime of power and domination, not sex. There is a pattern among gay men to be overly enfatuated with younger, legal, attractive guys. Hopefully  the normalization of gay marriage will make such unhealthy and self destructive wild goose chases a thing to laugh at instead of cry over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that clarification, Rey. I know Pedophelia is a crime of power and domination, not sex. There is a pattern among gay men to be overly enfatuated with younger, legal, attractive guys. Hopefully  the normalization of gay marriage will make such unhealthy and self destructive wild goose chases a thing to laugh at instead of cry over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2583126</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 03:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2583126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Nancy Pelosi said when asked about Bachmann&#039;s ridiculous comment on the rulings:  &quot;Who cares?&quot;  Actually, I am kinda happy to see them get their knickers in a twist, foaming at the mouth, showing their true colors to mainstream America.  I don&#039;t know that many folks around here in Kansas City who believe that &quot;God is crying now,&quot; &quot;Watch out for more earthquakes in California,&quot; (to which I can only say, &quot;Duh. . .it&#039;s California, dude!) or that these two decisions, one of which we have no idea how it&#039;s going to play out and the other which grants California the right to continue what they&#039;ve done in the past, are going to bring about the disintegration or destruction of America, much less pedophilia, bestiality, incest or polygamy, all which seem to have more heterosexual practitioners than homosexual ones, BTW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Nancy Pelosi said when asked about Bachmann&#8217;s ridiculous comment on the rulings:  &#8220;Who cares?&#8221;  Actually, I am kinda happy to see them get their knickers in a twist, foaming at the mouth, showing their true colors to mainstream America.  I don&#8217;t know that many folks around here in Kansas City who believe that &#8220;God is crying now,&#8221; &#8220;Watch out for more earthquakes in California,&#8221; (to which I can only say, &#8220;Duh. . .it&#8217;s California, dude!) or that these two decisions, one of which we have no idea how it&#8217;s going to play out and the other which grants California the right to continue what they&#8217;ve done in the past, are going to bring about the disintegration or destruction of America, much less pedophilia, bestiality, incest or polygamy, all which seem to have more heterosexual practitioners than homosexual ones, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2583011</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 02:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2583011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What will your Gaud Almighty do about this ruling? Not a thing. Hee hee.
I am happy for my friends and for those who may become my friends, and I say, &quot;It&#039;s about time&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What will your Gaud Almighty do about this ruling? Not a thing. Hee hee.<br />
I am happy for my friends and for those who may become my friends, and I say, &#8220;It&#8217;s about time&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2582660</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2582660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too wonder, along with Erika, don&#039;t those so-called &quot;god-fearing&quot;  fundamentalists (please don&#039;t call them Christians) that claim to be followers of Jesus, don&#039;t they ever read what Jesus taught that&#039;s found in the four Gospels???  I wonder that everytime I hear one of them say that God is going to send His judgement on this country.  When some of Jesus&#039; disciples wanted Him to call down fire from Heaven and destroy certain people, Jesus told them that they didn&#039;t know what spirit they were of, then He told them the parable of the wheat and the tares, in which He said that the  good and the bad would be allowed to grow together until the end of the world because if they tried to destroy the bad, some of the good could be destroyed along with it.  What could be any plainer than that?  When natural disasters happen, aren&#039;t both good and lousy people hurt or killed?  That proves that they either don&#039;t know the teachings of the one they claim to follow or else they&#039;re just plain liars.  I also keep wondering if the fundamentalist right-wingers are totally nuts, totally evil, or both.  They don&#039;t have a problem with greed and not helping other people, which the Bible is very much against but it when it comes to the &quot;sin&quot; (according to them) of homsexuality, their brains seem to have some kind of a fit.  Why does it bother them so much?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too wonder, along with Erika, don&#8217;t those so-called &#8220;god-fearing&#8221;  fundamentalists (please don&#8217;t call them Christians) that claim to be followers of Jesus, don&#8217;t they ever read what Jesus taught that&#8217;s found in the four Gospels???  I wonder that everytime I hear one of them say that God is going to send His judgement on this country.  When some of Jesus&#8217; disciples wanted Him to call down fire from Heaven and destroy certain people, Jesus told them that they didn&#8217;t know what spirit they were of, then He told them the parable of the wheat and the tares, in which He said that the  good and the bad would be allowed to grow together until the end of the world because if they tried to destroy the bad, some of the good could be destroyed along with it.  What could be any plainer than that?  When natural disasters happen, aren&#8217;t both good and lousy people hurt or killed?  That proves that they either don&#8217;t know the teachings of the one they claim to follow or else they&#8217;re just plain liars.  I also keep wondering if the fundamentalist right-wingers are totally nuts, totally evil, or both.  They don&#8217;t have a problem with greed and not helping other people, which the Bible is very much against but it when it comes to the &#8220;sin&#8221; (according to them) of homsexuality, their brains seem to have some kind of a fit.  Why does it bother them so much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What?</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2582651</link>
		<dc:creator>What?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2582651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is such a disaster!  Maybe the right wing nut jobs will do us all a favor and brake out the poison laced cool aide?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is such a disaster!  Maybe the right wing nut jobs will do us all a favor and brake out the poison laced cool aide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger B.</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2582146</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2582146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bryan Fischer truly is an extremely mentally disturbed man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan Fischer truly is an extremely mentally disturbed man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2582143</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 22:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2582143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please ....... If you object about gay marriage ....... then just don&#039;t have one. Don&#039;t be so arrogant as to feel you can deny others of their choices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please &#8230;&#8230;. If you object about gay marriage &#8230;&#8230;. then just don&#8217;t have one. Don&#8217;t be so arrogant as to feel you can deny others of their choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reynardine</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2582140</link>
		<dc:creator>Reynardine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 22:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2582140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susan, although I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re on about, some forms of criminal behavior have been barred or removed from classification as mental disorders exactly so they couldn&#039;t be used (at least in Durham jurisdictions) as a psychiatric defense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, although I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re on about, some forms of criminal behavior have been barred or removed from classification as mental disorders exactly so they couldn&#8217;t be used (at least in Durham jurisdictions) as a psychiatric defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernadette</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2581507</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernadette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2581507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Erika,
You said &quot;. . .some even claim they want to bring back Old Testament law – and since the Old Testament rules of marriage are basically a male surpremacists fantasy where men are allowed to play around with prostitutes and have multiple wives but women’s sexuality is tightly controlled and is the property of men – and women have no rights and literally could even be killed if they were raped or their husband is not satisfied with them in any way – maybe they actually have read their Bibles after all and they know exactly what Biblical marriage is and what they really want is total male domination :P&quot; 
Of course, they don&#039;t have to bring back Old Testament law to live this way. All they have to do is move to a Middle Eastern country of their choice were this is the law of the land!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Erika,<br />
You said &#8220;. . .some even claim they want to bring back Old Testament law – and since the Old Testament rules of marriage are basically a male surpremacists fantasy where men are allowed to play around with prostitutes and have multiple wives but women’s sexuality is tightly controlled and is the property of men – and women have no rights and literally could even be killed if they were raped or their husband is not satisfied with them in any way – maybe they actually have read their Bibles after all and they know exactly what Biblical marriage is and what they really want is total male domination :P&#8221;<br />
Of course, they don&#8217;t have to bring back Old Testament law to live this way. All they have to do is move to a Middle Eastern country of their choice were this is the law of the land!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2581354</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2581354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[okay, i&#039;ve read the opinion now and as i kind of suspected the dissent fails to give any argument at all that DOMA was in fact a Constitutional law - and seems to have completely ignored that the law was designed to discriminate against certain people (or if one prefers elevate one type of relationship above others).

indeed the dissents seem downright silly by saying that the matter - one which even the dissents admit is traditionally a matter of state law - should be deciced by the people or the legislature -  ignoring that in some states people have decided - and then saying &quot;no, not those people in the state Congress gets to decide&quot;) - even sillier since those same Justices have struck down all sorts of laws (or would strike down all sorts of laws - such as the PPACA - popularly known as Obamacare).  In fact, they say that Congress had authority to pass DOMA without pointing to exactly what enumerated power gives Congress the power to define marriage (ironically within a week after saying that those same justices said that it is required to point to some sort of Congressional power).

In fact, it seems like according to the dissent, that Congress can now pass whatever sort of law they want to (providing that there is no specific Constitutional prohibition against it) and its okay (and indeed courts should defer).   And of course, they don&#039;t believe it - why Scalia and Thomas were just the other day claiming that SORNA was unconstitutional because there was no specific provision in the Constitution to authorize Congress to require sex offender registration.

Strange people these Scalia and Thomas - Congress cannot require peopel convicted in military courts to register as a sex offender - but apparently Congress can tell you who you can marry.  That is what they mean by limited government.

at least the religious right people are honest enouhg to simply admit that they find gay people icky and believe that if gay marriage is allowed, God will cast America into a Lake of Fire like it was a Chick Tract.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay, i&#8217;ve read the opinion now and as i kind of suspected the dissent fails to give any argument at all that DOMA was in fact a Constitutional law &#8211; and seems to have completely ignored that the law was designed to discriminate against certain people (or if one prefers elevate one type of relationship above others).</p>
<p>indeed the dissents seem downright silly by saying that the matter &#8211; one which even the dissents admit is traditionally a matter of state law &#8211; should be deciced by the people or the legislature &#8211;  ignoring that in some states people have decided &#8211; and then saying &#8220;no, not those people in the state Congress gets to decide&#8221;) &#8211; even sillier since those same Justices have struck down all sorts of laws (or would strike down all sorts of laws &#8211; such as the PPACA &#8211; popularly known as Obamacare).  In fact, they say that Congress had authority to pass DOMA without pointing to exactly what enumerated power gives Congress the power to define marriage (ironically within a week after saying that those same justices said that it is required to point to some sort of Congressional power).</p>
<p>In fact, it seems like according to the dissent, that Congress can now pass whatever sort of law they want to (providing that there is no specific Constitutional prohibition against it) and its okay (and indeed courts should defer).   And of course, they don&#8217;t believe it &#8211; why Scalia and Thomas were just the other day claiming that SORNA was unconstitutional because there was no specific provision in the Constitution to authorize Congress to require sex offender registration.</p>
<p>Strange people these Scalia and Thomas &#8211; Congress cannot require peopel convicted in military courts to register as a sex offender &#8211; but apparently Congress can tell you who you can marry.  That is what they mean by limited government.</p>
<p>at least the religious right people are honest enouhg to simply admit that they find gay people icky and believe that if gay marriage is allowed, God will cast America into a Lake of Fire like it was a Chick Tract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2581336</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2581336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from http://www.b4uact.org/science/symp/2011/refs.htm#crit

&quot;Each speaker at the symposium has selected a paper to be suggested for background reading related to his or her presentation. Please see the Symposium Program for those references. This page provides a selection of additional references that may be helpful to people who want to delve deeper into the issues and controversies of pedophilia, minor-attracted persons, and the DSM. This is only a small selection. For yet deeper research, see the bibliographies listed below.
Contents

    Official Publications of the APA and the WHO
    Publications of DSM-5 Paraphilias Subworkgroup Members
    Independent Support for DSM-5 Proposed Revision
    Criticism of DSM-5 Proposed Revision
    From B4U-ACT
    Popular Press on the DSM-5
    Bibliographies]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from <a href="http://www.b4uact.org/science/symp/2011/refs.htm#crit" rel="nofollow">http://www.b4uact.org/science/.....s.htm#crit</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Each speaker at the symposium has selected a paper to be suggested for background reading related to his or her presentation. Please see the Symposium Program for those references. This page provides a selection of additional references that may be helpful to people who want to delve deeper into the issues and controversies of pedophilia, minor-attracted persons, and the DSM. This is only a small selection. For yet deeper research, see the bibliographies listed below.<br />
Contents</p>
<p>    Official Publications of the APA and the WHO<br />
    Publications of DSM-5 Paraphilias Subworkgroup Members<br />
    Independent Support for DSM-5 Proposed Revision<br />
    Criticism of DSM-5 Proposed Revision<br />
    From B4U-ACT<br />
    Popular Press on the DSM-5<br />
    Bibliographies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2581322</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2581322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[removing pedophilia from the APA Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has been in the works for at least a decade.  So check out this site for http://www.b4uact.org/news/20110817.htm. - the actual website dedicated to promoting  &#039;B4U-ACT&#039; in getting pedophilia removed from the list.  Or just google it, and check out the conventions that have been held since 2003 in which the APA was invited and some reps have attended.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>removing pedophilia from the APA Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has been in the works for at least a decade.  So check out this site for <a href="http://www.b4uact.org/news/20110817.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.b4uact.org/news/20110817.htm</a>. &#8211; the actual website dedicated to promoting  &#8216;B4U-ACT&#8217; in getting pedophilia removed from the list.  Or just google it, and check out the conventions that have been held since 2003 in which the APA was invited and some reps have attended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Charles Ferrari</title>
		<link>http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/06/26/religious-right-apoplectic-over-scotus-decision-on-marriage-equality/comment-page-1/#comment-2581236</link>
		<dc:creator>J Charles Ferrari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?p=11103#comment-2581236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Jesus wept” with joy because justice narrowly prevailed and there is a little less hate in the world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Jesus wept” with joy because justice narrowly prevailed and there is a little less hate in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>