These people are absolutely a threat. Buzz off.

Once again we are dealing with those who abhor the separation of church and state:

We will not register ourselves or our arms. Registration is the prerequisite to confiscation, which is the prerequisite to dictatorship and extermination. We will NOT be photographed, finger-printed, tracked, and subjected to psych-evaluations like convicted sex-offenders just for owning semi-automatic rifles. Doing so is itself an act of surrender and submission, taking the mark of the slave (it is akin to taking the mark of the Beast).

Are these people a threat? If so, to who or what? My experience suggests the threat is to the status quo. The typical modern/progressive American citizen doesn’t want to be held accountable for much.

Look at mega-corporations, or law enforcement agencies. Even when faced with criminal charges, it’s exceedingly rare that anyone is convicted and serves prison time.

While there are no doubt nutjobs, I think the actual threat is that typical American bozo is worried they’ll be called out on their complacency.

I think this illustrates a common occurrence. OaKies and Paulistas demand that we read the Constitution, when it is often quite obvious that they have not actually bothered to do the same.

“Our new Government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition.”

They haven’t stopped this, they haven’t even tried to “move forward” (which is what they chant whenever caught with their obvious racist harassment and criminal behavior to an offended party), and they want to bring it all back.
“Take America Back!”

We, the people of the Confederate States, each State acting in its sovereign and independent character, in order to form a permanent federal government, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God do ordain and establish this Constitution for the Confederate States of America.

It talks about “Peace, Order, and Good Government.”

So are the Canadians part of the Communist conspiracy? Just because their flag is red, they use metric, and have socialized medicine?

Hey, it’s possible: they defeated the US in four wars…

Great, big, brass clangers actually.
Rey, glad you’re still running.

Yeah, you are right, Sam, nothing about the masses in that danged ol’ Cawn-stee-to-shun. Just me, mine and I. Yep, no We the People, or more perfect Union, or common defence or general Welfare or ours or ourselves.

Sorry, you’re just taking a pickaxe to a straw man.

I’m also tired of hearing about how Communism is on the march and about to take us over. The only places left in the world that still support Communism are Cuba, North Korea, and City College of New York’s History Department.

People like you make me glad I live on the other side of the world, watching on as a detached observer as a nation with so much potential and hope gets destroyed be people who take such extreme views without any basis in fact.

This guy is a prime example of the “Molon Labe” thing being espoused by the “Oath Keepers” currently in vogue in some Law Enforcement and some of the Military.

“Libtards” and “Democrat” now being used as an insult aimed at anyone who believes in the rights of everyone to free/affordable health care, the rights of women, the rights guaranteed everyone by the constitution (note: Everyone), the right to worship, etc… and this guy’s response to it: auto weapons fire.

Using paper targets as surrogates, this is not so much a “political” statement, or “free speech”, as an obvious threat to those in his community who might have dissimilar views on such things like, oh… racial equality, or women’s rights.

Show me the reference in the Constitution that says our inalienable rights came from God. Or that anything came from God. I suspect that you will dodge this request as you often do when you are clearly wrong.

Since it is clear that you know little about the US Constitution, you opinion of the UN Charter or any other country’s constitution is probably a bit suspect.

This is one of those times.

Again, really, Sam?

Easily proven as demonstrably false. A simple word search reveals this to be a steaming pile of Bircher nonsense.

Here you go, Sam. The Charter of the United Nations
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Charter

There were three Constitutions of the Soviet Union, adopted in 1924, 1936, and 1977. Presumably one of those documents

Do you understand the legal and historical differences between the Declaration of Independence and the Constituion?