President Trump’s executive orders aren’t just policy — they’re attacks on our rights, our communities, and our democracy. Here’s how they’re causing harm — and what we must do to fight back. Here are explanations of how:
Dismantling White Supremacy
Additional Measures to Combat Antisemitism
Executive Order 14188
This executive order directs federal agencies to use “all available and appropriate legal tools, to prosecute, remove or otherwise hold to account the perpetrators of unlawful antisemitic harassment and violence.” Agencies are required to conduct an inventory of all pending administrative complaints and court cases alleging civil rights violations arising from college campus protests related to the post-Oct. 7, 2023, Israel-Gaza conflict. The order calls on the secretaries of state, education and homeland security to monitor and report activities of noncitizen students and faculty related to protests, threatening deportation as a possible consequence.
Impact on Black and Brown Communities:
While it is important to address the harms that arise from antisemitism, this order weaponizes antisemitism to advance the president’s political agenda. The administration has used it to cancel or suspend billions in government grants and contracts to universities; censor and restrict First Amendment-protected political speech on college campuses; justify attacks on diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility programs; and arrest, detain and deport legal permanent residents and foreign students. The order’s accompanying fact sheet indicates that combating antisemitism is just a pretext for advancing the administration’s true political goal — silencing Black and Brown people and other marginalized groups who exercise their First Amendment right to peacefully protest the policies of Israel’s government.
SPLC’s Stance
- The Southern Poverty Law Center opposes the provision within this executive order that flies in the face of First Amendment free speech and freedom of assembly rights which are guaranteed by the Constitution for all people in the United States. The SPLC is:
- Closely monitoring the implementation of this order and its impact on campus free speech, funding cuts at universities and the deportations or visa cancellations of foreign students.
- Representing Leqaa Kordia, a New Jersey resident of Palestinian origin in the United States on a student visa who was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement for exercising her freedom of speech.
Calls to Action
- Support local and national organizations advocating for an inclusive approach to preventing hate violence and dismantling antisemitism.
- Push for the passage of legislation that addresses the root causes of hate and bias-motivated acts.
- Stay informed and speak out against policies that infringe upon First Amendment rights.
Dismantling White Supremacy
Improving Education Outcomes by Empowering Parents, States and Communities
Executive Order 14242
This executive order announces President Trump’s intention to shut down the U.S. Department of Education. At the same time, it maintains the secretary of education’s power to withhold federal funding for certain educational activities as a mechanism to weaken civil rights laws and eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in public schools. The order would jeopardize the unique functions of the department, including overseeing funding for public schools, administering student loans, providing essential supports for low-income students and students with disabilities, and ensuring that every child in America has equitable access to a high-quality education in a safe, inclusive environment free from discrimination.
Impact on Black and Brown Communities:
EO 14242, coupled with the administration’s other actions to undermine public education, threaten to resegregate public schools and limit access to quality education for Black and Brown students, low-income students and students with disabilities. The closing of the department and the defunding of core programs could lead to states in the Deep South experiencing a significant shortfall in education funding, exacerbating existing educational inequities and leaving under-resourced schools with even less. This order would increase class sizes, cut job training programs, make higher education more expensive and less accessible, take away special education services for students with disabilities and roll back protections of students’ civil rights.
SPLC’s Stance
The president of the United States does not have the authority to unilaterally shut down the Department of Education. The Southern Poverty Law Center strongly opposes EO 14242 and is committed to fighting any efforts to weaken and defund public education systems, harm students of color and deny equal opportunities in education.
Calls to Action
- Stay informed and speak out against policies that would siphon resources and funding from the public education system.
- Urge your members of Congress to reject efforts to abolish the Department of Education.
- Support local, state and national organizations advocating for equitable access to inclusive education.
Ending Unjust Imprisonment
Protecting the American People Against Invasion
Executive Order 14159
This executive order advances a mass immigration crackdown, enabling widespread arrests, detentions and deportations while eliminating the right to claim asylum at U.S. borders. It also revokes prior protections against immigration enforcement at sensitive locations such as schools, houses of worship, hospitals and emergency shelters.
Impact on Black and Brown Communities:
EO 14159 disproportionately affects Black and Brown immigrant communities by increasing the risk of racial profiling, detention and deportation. By eliminating safeguards against enforcement actions in sensitive locations, the order creates fear and instability among immigrant families, preventing them from accessing essential services like health care, education and emergency shelter. The executive order also amplifies white supremacist rhetoric by framing immigration as an “invasion,” reinforcing harmful narratives that incite violence and discrimination.
SPLC’s Stance
- The Southern Poverty Law Center strongly opposes EO 14159 and is committed to fighting its implementation. The SPLC has:
- Joined over 80 civil and human rights organizations in urging Congress to reject legislation and funding for policies rooted in the false “invasion” conspiracy theory.
- Filed legal challenges alongside advocacy groups and affected communities to protect immigrant rights.
Calls to Action
- Urge Congress to oppose funding for EO 14159 and reject legislation based on racist and xenophobic narratives.
- Support local and national organizations advocating for immigrant rights.
- Call on your representatives to support passage of the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act, which will ensure clear legal protections for immigrant communities.
- Stay informed and speak out against policies that criminalize and dehumanize immigrants.
Ending Unjust Imprisonment
‘Tough on Crime’ Policies
Memorandum on the Department Charging and Sentencing Policy
General Policy Regarding Charging, Plea Negotiations and Sentencing
The memos adjust sentencing policy for the Department of Justice, requiring prosecutors to charge individuals alleged to have committed a crime with the most serious offense available under the law. This includes death penalty-eligible cases and charges that trigger mandatory minimums. This move returns the federal government to regressive “tough on crime” policies.
Impact on Black and Brown Communities:
The new sentencing policy for the Department of Justice will further fuel mass incarceration, especially for Black and Brown people. Mandatory minimum shift the power of sentencing from judges to prosecutors. Because prosecutors choose which charges to bring, they are effectively selecting the sentence the person will receive if convicted. Mandatory minimums also prevent judges from considering the totality of the circumstances when determining an appropriate sentence after a person has been found guilty of a crime. Federal prosecutors are twice as likely to charge a Black person with an offense that carries a mandatory minimum sentence as compared to a similarly situated white person. As a result, even when controlling for arrest offenses, criminal history and other factors, Black men receive sentences that are, on average, 13% longer than those for white men. Mandatory minimums have largely driven the racial disparities present in the federal criminal legal system.
SPLC’s Stance
- Imposing the death penalty and mandatory minimum sentences do not deter crime; instead, they harm public safety. The Southern Poverty Law Center is committed to fighting against these unequal, harsh and unjust sentencing laws that disproportionately impact Black and Brown people. The SPLC is:
- Urging Congress to put an end to discriminatory sentencing laws by repealing mandatory minimum sentences.
- Advocating for passage of the Eliminating a Quantifiably Unjust Application of the Law (EQUAL) Act, which would end the federal sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
Calls to Action
- Urge your members of Congress to support the EQUAL Act and other legislation that will address racial disparities in the justice system.
- Support local and national organizations working to end mass incarceration.
- Stay informed and speak out against policies that unfairly target and punish communities of color.
Strengthening Democracy & Voting Rights
Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections
Executive Order 14248
This executive order makes it harder for millions of eligible American voters to cast their ballots by requiring voters to prove they are citizens, in person, at an election office each time they want to register to vote or update their registration. Americans would have to produce a birth certificate, passport or naturalization papers just to register. It also withholds congressionally directed federal funding from states whose election laws are not aligned with the president’s preferences.
Impact on Black and Brown Communities:
EO 14248 would erode the voting rights of millions of eligible Americans, including many Black and Brown voters. The documentary proof of citizenship requirement would make registering to vote harder for people who don’t have ready access to those types of documents — with the biggest burden experienced by people with low incomes, people who live in rural areas, people with disabilities, elderly people and more. The order’s attempt to undermine states’ election laws could also endanger voters’ ability to cast a ballot that counts, if, for example, the president chooses to withhold funding from states that accept legitimate ballots that are postmarked by but arrive after Election Day.
SPLC’s Stance
- The Southern Poverty Law Center strongly opposes EO 14248 and is committed to fighting its implementation. The SPLC has:
- Cautioned the Elections Assistance Commission (EAC) against taking actions in response to the directive within this order, which would violate federal law and the U.S. Constitution. The EAC’s mission, as a bipartisan independent agency, is to help Americans participate in the voting process. The agency is not subject to the president’s direction.
Calls to Action
- Urge your members of Congress and the EAC to reject any attempts by the president to undermine federal and state election laws.
- Support local, state and national organizations advocating for voting rights.
- Stay informed and speak out against policies that seek to disenfranchise voters and add unnecessary burdens to the voter registration process.
Strengthening Democracy & Voting Rights
Initial Recessions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions
Executive Order 14148
This executive order rescinded dozens of Biden-era executive orders, including one that attempted to ensure the accuracy and lawfulness of the constitutionally mandated decennial census — the once-per-decade count of all people living in the United States. It follows efforts in President Trump’s first term to add a question about citizenship status to the decennial census and to exclude noncitizens from census counts.
Impact on Black and Brown Communities:
The once-per-decade count of all people in the United States is used to allocate congressional representation and federal funding to states. TheConstitution calls for political maps and funding outlays to be based on the full population, not just the citizen population. Collecting data related to citizenship statuswould prevent some individuals from participating in the census out of fear of being targeted by immigration enforcement, leading to an undercount of communities with noncitizen populations. If some people — or worse, entire communities — are missed in the census count, those communities and the states where they live will suffer by having less representation in Congress and by getting fewer resources for health, education, infrastructure, housing and more.
SPLC’s Stance
- The Southern Poverty Law Center is committed to fighting any attempts by the administration to subvert the census requirements that could lead to an undercount of the total U.S. population, which, according to Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, includes noncitizens.
Calls to Action
- Lodge any concerns during the public comment period if changes to the census form are proposed for the 2030 census.
- Raise your voice in opposition to any attempts to undercount communities through op-eds, letters to the editor or other public forums.
- Contact your members of Congress and urge them to push back against the addition of citizenship questions to the census form.
Strengthening Democracy & Voting Rights
Funding Freeze
Executive Orders on Federal Funding
President Trump issued multiple executive orders of the first day of his presidency that blocked, rescinded and terminated federal funding related to undocumented immigrants; diversity, equity and inclusion; green energy projects; foreign aid; and support for gender-affirming care and abortion. These orders directed agencies to pause existing contracts; review and terminate contracts deemed to be considered fraud, waste or abuse; and initiate clawback or recoupment procedures. Memo M-25-13 (“Federal Funding Freeze Memo”) implemented the federal funding executive orders and placed a government-wide temporary pause on distributing grants, loans and other financial assistance on the related subjects. Trump’s order implementing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) also gave DOGE authority to examine, cut or modify federal spending across agencies and required agencies to review all contracting policies, procedures and personnel; prepare guidance on efficiency; and stop new awards.
Impact on Black and Brown Communities:
States, localities and nonprofits rely on federal funds to pay for critical services and programs. In the Deep South, federal funds account for significant percentages of states’ budgets. For example, the state of Alabama received more than $14.5 billion last year to pay for Medicaid, Head Start, school meals, Pell grants and housing vouchers. Nonprofits that provide direct services to individuals in need also rely heavily on federal funding. Almost 40% of funding for Meals on Wheels, which provides food and social connection to 2.2 million vulnerable older people, comes from the federal government. While the Federal Freeze memo was rescinded, funding has not been restored. Instead, direct service organizations and individuals have reported that previously promised funds and grants are no longer available. Furthermore, various federal funding opportunities and offices have abruptly closed because of the confusing and far-reaching implications of these executive orders and staffing cuts inside the federal agencies themselves.
SPLC’s Stance
- The Trump administration is likely in violation of the constitutional separation of powers. The Constitution clearly gives the legislative branch the “power of the purse” and the sole authority to decide what federal funds can be spent on and how much the executive branch can spend. The president cannot unilaterally stop distributing congressionally allocated funding because most federal spending statutes require executive agencies to spend all the funds Congress has appropriated for a specific activity. The SPLC is fighting to ensure that vital programs are fully funded and will push Congress to reject proposals that cut health care, education and food programs for people with the lowest incomes.
Calls to Action
- Urge Congress to fully fund critical services and programs that support communities in need.
- Support organizations mounting legal challenges to these executive actions terminating federal funding.
- Stay informed and speak out against policies that cut essential support to states, localities and nonprofits.
Learn more, at Together We Fight.